| 研究生: |
鄭夙娟 Cheng, Su-Chuan |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
董事會組成與股權結構對企業績效影響之研究-以機械產業之家族企業為實證 A Study on the Effect between Board Composition and Ownership Structure on Firm Performance - Family - Based Machinery Industry |
| 指導教授: |
吳宗正
Wu, Chung-Cheng |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 高階管理碩士在職專班(EMBA) Executive Master of Business Administration (EMBA) |
| 論文出版年: | 2006 |
| 畢業學年度: | 94 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 57 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 董事會組成 、股權結構 、企業績效 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | firm performance, ownership structure, board composition |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:106 下載:8 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究以2003~2005年台灣區機器公會會員中上市(櫃)廠商為對象,研究機械產業之家族企業的董事會組成與股權結構對企業績效影響。研究樣本經篩選過後共得42家有效樣本,得出以下實證結果:(1)臺灣機械業廠商之董事會組成與股權結構對與企業績效並無顯著關係。(2)就機械業而言,非家族企業的平均企業績效高於家族企業。(3)就研究樣本之所有機械業廠商而言,董事會組成中的董監事人數與外部董監事比例都不是影響企業績效的重要因素。(4)在股權結構方面,整體機械業的股權集中度為0.15,屬於股權分散型。且就研究之機械業而言,股權結構的內部持股比例以及股權集中度亦不是影響企業績效的重要因素。(5)在董事會組成與股權結構對企業績效的影響來看,針對於所有機械業而言,董事會組成與股權結構對企業績效的影響皆不顯著,但股權結構對企業績效的影響大於董事會組成對企業績效之影響。
The paper is to study the effect between the board composition and ownership structure on firm performance for family - based machinery industry. The sample of the study collected 42 published companies listed in Taiwan Association of Machinery Industry from 2003 to 2005. By conducting regression analysis in the study, we find out that there is no significant effect between board composition and ownership structure on firm performance in the machinery industry. Besides it, the effect from the ownership structure to firm performance is bigger than that from board composition. For the machinery industry, the factors in the board size and outside directors have no significant effect on the board composition. For the machinery industry, the firm performance on non - family - based machinery industry is better than family - based machinery industry.
一、中文部分
吳建頤 (1999),董事會規模對公司價值的影響,國立中正大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。
吳萬益 (1994),中美日在台企業經營目標、組織結構及競爭策略之比較研究,台大管理論叢,第五卷第二期,83-114頁。
侍台誠 (1994),董事會特性中家族因素與經營績效之實證研究-兼論法人董事的影響,台灣大學會研所碩士論文。
范揚富 (1986),家族企業管理承續之研究,工業技術研究院工程技術研究所工業管理組博士論文。
孫秀蘭 (1996),董事會制度與企業經營績效之研究,國立台灣大學財務金融學系論文。
孫啟能 (1997),我國多國籍企業內部網路連結型態與控制機制之研究,大葉工學院事業經營研究所碩士論文。
翁淑育 (2000),台灣上市公司股權結構、核心代理問題及公司價值之研究,輔仁大學金融研究所碩士論文。
高強、黃旭南、末吉俊幸 (2003),管理績效評估:資料包絡分析法,華泰文化事業公司。
許士軍、陳光中 (1989),台家家族企業發展與家族結構關係,行政院國家科學會專題研究報告,1-11頁。
陳玉晏 (2002),台灣的經理者股權、企業集團及其與廠商績效關係之研究,淡江大學產業經濟研究所碩士論文。
陳宏姿 (2001),董監事結構與企業經營績效關聯之研究,國立政治大學會計系碩士論文。
陳柏升 (1988),高科技產業策略群組與績效之研究,國立中興大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
陳佩吟 (1996),企業股權結構與企業經營決策、經營績效之關係,國立台灣大學商學系碩士論文。
陳家樂等著 (2005),2005機械產業年鑑,工研院產經資訊中心。
陳泰和 (2001),台灣家族企業接班人選擇因素之研究-以『交易成本』、『信賴機制』、『網絡關係』之觀點探討,國立台灣大學國際企業學研究所碩士論文。
黃光國 (1984),談家族企業的組織型態,中國論壇,第一十三卷第七期,20-22頁。
黃鈺光 (1993),我國上市公司董事會特性與經營績效之研究,國立台灣大學會計研究所碩士論文。
黃蓉芬 (2005),2005、2006年機械業景氣觀測,工研院產經資訊中心。
黃榮龍 (1993),股權結構與企業經營績效之研究,國立政治大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
張明峰 (1991),股權結構對公司績效影響之研究,國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
張訓華 (1991),股權結構、董事會組成與企業當年財務績效-以77年度會計報酬率為準,東吳大學管理研究所碩士論文。
張峻萍 (1999),公司監理與經營績效之關係,國立台灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
謝淑娟 (1994),以權益代理問題的觀點探討股權結構變動與企業經營績效之關係,國立交通大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
楊俊中 (1998),股權結構與經營績效相關性之研究,台灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
楊慧玲 (2000),董事會結構及其變動對股東財富與經營績效影響之研究,朝陽大學企業管理系碩士論文。
劉平文 (1993),經營分析與企業診斷-企業經營系統觀,華泰書局。
魏早啟 (1997),上市公司董監特性與經營績效之研究,東吳大學會計研究所碩士論文。
二、英文部分
Agrawal, A. and C.R. Knoeber (1996). Firm Performance and Mechanism to Control Agency Problem between Managers and Shareholders, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31(3), 377-397.
Anderson, R.C. and D.M. Reeb (2003). Founding-family Ownership and Firm Performance: Evidence from the S&P 500, The Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1301-1328.
Andres, P., V. Azofra and F. Lopez (2005). Corporate Boards in OECD Countries: Size, Composition, Functioning and Effectiveness, Corporate Governance, 13(2), 197-210.
Balatbat, M.C.A., S.L. Taylor and T.S. Walter (2004). Corporate Governance, Insider Ownership and Operating Performance of Australian Initial Public offerings, Accounting and Finance, 44(3), 299-328.
Benson, B. (1984). The Enigma of The Family-Owned Business, Laventhol and Horwath Perspective. Philadelphia, 10(1), 3-6.
Carpano, C. and A.T. Shao (1994). Strategy, Structure and Resources in Multinational Advertising Agencies, Multinational Business Review, 2(2), 25-32.
Carsrud, A.L. (1994). Meanderings of a Resurrected Psychologist or, Lessons Learned in creating a Family Business Program, Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 19(1), 39-48.
Chaganti, R.S., M. Vijay and S. Subhash (1985). Corporate Board Size, Composition and Corporate Failures in the Retailing Industry, The Journal of Management Studies, 22(4), 400-417.
Chen, C.J.P. and B. Jaggi (2000) Association Between Independent Non-executive Directors, Family Control and Financial Disclosures in Hong Kong, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy ,19, 285-310.
Chen, Z., Y.L. Cheung, A. Stouraitis and A.W.S. Wong (2005). Ownership Concentration, Firm Performance, and Dividend Policy in Hong Kong, Pacific-Basin Finance, 13, 431-449.
Fama, E.F. (1980). Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm, Journal of Political Economy, 88(2), 288-307.
Fremond, O. and M. Capaul (2002). The State of Corporate Governance : Experience from Country Assessments, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2858.
Hermalin, B.E. and M.S. Weisbach (2003). Boards of Directors as an Endogenously Determined Institution: A Survey of the Economic Literature, Economic Policy Review-Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 19(1), 7-26.
Ho, S.S.M. and K.S. Wong (2001). A Study of the Relationship between Corporate Governance Structures and the Extent of Voluntary Disclosures, Journal of International Accounting Auditing and Taxation, 10(2), 139-156.
Jensen, M.C. (1993). The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control System, Journal of Finance, 48(3), 831-880.
Jensen, M.C. and R.S. Ruback (1983). The Market for Corporate Control: The Scientific Evidence, Journal of Financial Economics, 11(1-4), 5-50.
Jensen, M.C. and W.H. Meckling (1976). Theory of the Firms: Managerial Behavior, Agency Cost, and Ownership Structure, Journal of Financial Economics 3, 305-360.
Judge, W.Q., I. Naoumova and N. Koutzevol (2003). Corporate Governance and Firm Performance in Russia: An Empirical Study, Journal of World Business, 38, 385-396.
Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P. (1992). The Balanced Scorecard - Measures That Drive Performance, Harvard Business Review, 70(1),71-79.
Kesner, I. (1987). Directors' Stock Ownership and Organizational Performance: An Investigation of Fortune 500 companies, Journal of Management, 13(3), 499-508.
Klein, P., D. Shapiro and J. Young (2005). Corporate Governance, Family Ownership and Firm Value: the Canadian Evidence, Corporate Governance,13(6), 769-784.
Lee, J. (2004). The Effects of Family Ownership and Management on Firm Performance, S.A.M. Advanced Management Journal, 69(4), 46-53.
McConnell, J. and H. Servaes (1990). Additional Evidence on Equity
Ownership and Corporate Value, Journal of Financial Economics, 27, 595-612.
Morck, R., A. Shleifer and R.W. Vishny (1988). Management Ownership and Market Valuation: An Empirical Analysis, Journal of Financial Economics, 20(1-2), 293-315.
Ng, C.Y.M. (2005). An Empirical Study on the Relationship Between Ownership and Performance in a Family-Based Corporate Environment, Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 20(2),
121-146.
Olson, P.D., V.S. Zuiker, S.M. Danes, K. Stafford, R.K.Z. Heck and K.A. Duncan (2003). The Impact of the Family and the Business On Family Business Sustainability, Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 639-666.
Roth, K. and A.J. Morrison (1990). An Empirical Analysis of the Integration Responsiveness Framework in Global Industries, Journal of International Business Studies, 21(4), 541-564.
Shleifer, A. and R.W. Vishny (1986). Large Shareholders and Corporate, Journal of Political Economy, 94(3), 461-488.
Steiner, T.L. (1996). A Reexamination of the Relationships between Ownership Structure, Firm Diversification, and Tobin’s Q, Journal of Business and Economics, 35(4), 39-48.
Yeh, Kuang S.(1997). Board Network Structural Change Before and After Initial Public Offerings in Taiwan, Sun Yat-Sen Management Review International Issue, 93-104.
Zahra, S.A and J.A. Pearce (1989). Boards of Directors and Corporate Financial Performance:A Review and Integrative Model, Journal of Management,15(2), 291-334.