簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 戴佩妮
Rahmaningrum, Dita
論文名稱: 燃煤火力發電廠之汞排放對周界大氣環境之影響
Impact Assessment of Mercury Emission from the Coal-fired Power Plant on the Ambient Air Environment
指導教授: 李文智
Lee, Wen-Jhy
共同指導教授: 吳義林
Wu, Yee-Lin
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 工學院 - 環境工程學系
Department of Environmental Engineering
論文出版年: 2012
畢業學年度: 100
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 147
中文關鍵詞: 汞(水銀)燃煤火力發電廠擴散模式周界大氣濃度煙道氣
外文關鍵詞: Mercury (Hg), coal-fired power plant, dispersion modeling, ambient air concentration, stack flue gas
相關次數: 點閱:106下載:5
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究以工業汙染源複合短期模式3(ISCST3),針對燃煤火力發電廠周界大氣中氣相及固相之汞(水銀)進行調查。ISCST3擴散模式模擬為美國及台灣環保署所認可的擴散模式,該模式亦可探討擴散之汞於環境中之貢獻度。
    本研究於此燃煤火力發電廠之周界中取5個周界大氣採樣點,並對汞濃度進行採樣。煙道排放之汞濃度平均為1549.3ng/Nm3,個別濃度介於614~2672ng/Nm3。此排放濃度相對其他主要汙染物來得低。周界大氣中之汞濃度介於2.48 至 4.13 ng m-3,平均為3.38±0.599 ng m-3。五點周界採樣點中, A點之汞濃度最低,為2.48±1.62 ng m-3, 相較之下,D點之汞濃度較高,為4.13±2.71 ng m-3。A點為於郊區, 而D點位於高地。D點濃度較A點來得高的原因是由於氣相之汞分子於高海拔地區較高。C點距燃煤火力發電廠最近,但汞濃度仍較D點為低。由ISCST3求得之汞濃度介於 0.0226±0.00650 ng m-3 及0.0135-0.0316 ng m-3, 而測得之汞濃度平均為3.24±0.575 ng m-3,介於2.39至 3.98 ng m-3,故模擬求得之汞濃度遠較監測值為低。
    年度周界大氣中之汞濃度,由燃煤火力發電廠貢獻之比例為0.698%±0.164%。該廠對各周界採樣點之個別貢獻度為0.568%,0.783%,0.927%,0.523%和0.687%即便D點之汞濃度高,但火力發電廠僅對周界大氣做出了微小的貢獻。以上之結果顯示火力發電廠對周界大氣之貢獻量皆小於.1%。由於煙囪極高且排放濃度低,火力發電廠排放之汞對周界大氣測站只影響微乎其微。因此,火力發電廠並非周界大氣中汞濃度之主要貢獻者。

    In this study, the annual concentration of gas and particle phase of Mercury (Hg) in the ambient site areas have been researched by using ISCST3 Dispersion Modeling. The ISCST3 dispersion modeling is one of the dispersion models trusted by USEPA and Taiwan EPA, which is able to further explore the dispersed contributed mercury concentration existing in the environment as well.
    There were five typical ambient air sites in the vicinity of the coal-fired Power Plant (CFPP). Each ambient site has been measured for Hg concentrations. Hg concentrations, which is emitted from stack flue gases, were averaged at 1549.3 ng/Nm3 and ranged from 614 to 2672 ng/Nm3. This emission was relatively low, compared with other pollutants. Totally measured Hg concentration in the ambient air sites were ranged between 2.48 to 4.13 ng m-3, averaging 3.38±0.599 ng m-3. Among those 5 ambient sites, site A has a low Hg concentration content about 2.48±1.62 ng m-3, compared with site D which has a high Hg concentration (4.13±2.71 ng m-3). Site A is a suburban area and site D is a plateau area. Therefore, Hg concentration in site A was quite low, compared to that in site D. Because the gas-phase Hg was plenty in the high level atmosphere such as those existing in site D. Even though site C is closest to the power plant; however, it contains a lower Hg concentration than site D. Moreover, the Hg concentration obtained by the ISCST3 dispersion modeling was averaged 0.0226±0.00650 ng m-3, ranging from 0.0135-0.0316 ng m-3, compared to the total gaseous mercury (TGM) concentration at 3.24±0.575 ng m-3, ranging from 2.39 to 3.98 ng m-3, so the modeled Hg concentration was much lower than the measured values.
    For the annual total Hg concentration fraction of ambient air, the partition contributed by the coal-fired power plant was found to be 0.698%± 0.164%, with the concentration fraction for each of ambient air sites A, B, C, D and E being 0.568%, 0.783%, 0.927%, 0.523% and 0.687%, respectively. Though site D contained a high measured concentration, however, the modeled Hg concentration shown that the coal-fired power plant only contributed a small amount of Hg to the ambient air. The above results revealed that all of the emission sources that contributed to the ambient air were lower than 1%. Due to the high stack height and low emission concentration, the Hg impact of the coal-fired power plant was insignificant for the impact assessment on the ambient air sites. Therefore, this indicates that the power plant was obviously not the major contributor of the Hg concentration onto the ambient air environment

    Page of Title i Certificate of Passed Oral Examination iii 摘 要 v ABSTRACT vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ix TABLE OF CONTENTS xii LIST OF FIGURES xvi LIST OF TABLES xviii CHAPTER 1- INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Problem Boundary 5 1.3 Scope 5 1.4 Objectives 6 CHAPTER 2- LITERATURE REVIEW 7 2.1 Heavy Metal 7 2.1.1 Heavy Metal Generally 7 2.1.2 Emission of Heavy Metals 8 2.1.3 Characteristic of Heavy Metals 8 2.1.4 Analysis of Heavy Metal 9 2.2 Heavy Metal of Mercury (Hg) 10 2.2.1 Basic information of Mercury (Hg) 11 2.2.2 Mobility of Heavy Metals Mercury (Hg) in the Atmosphere 14 2.2.3 Emission of Atmospheric Mercury 15 2.3 Sampling and Analysis for Atmospheric Mercury 17 2.3.1 The Sampling Equipment 17 2.3.2 Collection of Vapor Phase Hg Samples 20 2.3.3 Collection of Particle Phase Hg Samples 21 2.3.4 Analysis of Ambient Air Samples 22 2.3.5 Analysis of Vapor Phase Hg Samples 23 2.3.6 Analysis of Hg in Particulate Samples 27 2.4 Thermal Power Plant 29 2.4.1 Basics of the working of a coal fired thermal power plant 29 2.4.2 How Coal Power Plants Produce Electricity 29 2.4.3 Waste Characteristic of Thermal Power Plant 31 2.4.4 Concentration of Mercury in Power Plant onto the Ambient Air 32 2.4.4.1 Impact Assessment of Mercury Emission from the Coal-fired Power Plant 35 2.4.5 Coal-fired Power Plant in the Middle of Taiwan 37 2.5 Atmospheric Deposition 39 2.6 Estimates of Wet and Dry Deposition of Mercury 41 2.7 Atmospheric Modeling 42 2.8 Atmospheric layers 43 2.9 Dispersion Modeling 44 2.9.1 ISCST3 Model Description 45 CHAPTER 3- EXPERIMENTAL SECTION 53 3.1 Research Scheme 53 3.2 Phase of Research 53 3.2.1 Notion of Thesis 53 3.2.2 Theoretical Study 55 3.2.3 Sample Collection 57 3.2.3.1 Sampling of Mercury (Hg) 58 3.2.3.1.1 Sampling of Mercury (Hg) from the Stack Flue Gas 60 3.2.3.1.2 Sampling of Mercury (Hg) from the ambient air 60 3.2.3.2 Analysis of Mercury (Hg) 61 3.2.4 Preliminaries of Materials 62 3.2.5 Preliminaries of Devices 63 3.2.6 ISCST3 Dispersion Modeling and ArcGIS Program 65 3.3 Results and Discussion 66 3.4 Conclusions and Suggestions 66 CHAPTER 4- RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS 67 4.1 Sample Location of Coal-fired Power Plant and the Ambient Air 67 4.2 Existing Information of Coal-fired Power Plant 70 4.2.1 Coal Consumption and Capacity 70 4.2.2 Climate Condition 72 4.3 Characteristic of Mercury (Hg) Samples in the Sampling Location 76 4.3.1 Characteristic of Mercury (Hg) Samples in Stack Flue Gases (SFGs) 76 4.3.2 Characteristic of Mercury (Hg) Samples in the Ambient Air of the Coal-fired Power Plant 79 4.4 Basic Information of Hg Emitting Sites 93 4.5 Gas-phase Fraction of Hg Concentration in Ambient Air Sites 96 4.6 ISCST3 Modeling Result 98 4.6.1 Control Options 99 4.6.2 Point Source 101 4.6.3 Receptor Networks 103 4.6.4 Cartesian Grid 104 4.6.5 Sampling Location (ISCST3 Modeling Result) 105 4.7 Hg Contribution Concentration from Coal-fired Power Plant by using ISCST3 Dispersion Modeling 106 4.7.1 Maximum 12 1-Hour Average Hg concentration for Source Group (all including sources of 10 SFGs) 106 4.7.2 Mean Hg Concentration in Ambient Air Sites 109 4.7.3 TGM Concentration Fraction from the Coal-fired Power Plant on the Ambient Air Environment 111 4.7.4 Mercury Concentration (ng/Nm3) Contributed by Power Plant (ISCST3 Modeling Result) 114 CHAPTER 5- CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS 117 5.1 Conclusions 117 5.2 Suggestions 119 REFERENCES 121 Appendix A: ANOVA TEST PROCEDURE 133 Appendix B: TWD97 Repository 145

    [1] ADEQ Modeling Guidelines. 2004. Air Dispersion Modeling Guidelines for Arizona Air Quality Permits. Arizona Department of Environmental Quality.
    [2] Bakir, R.S.F., Damlugi, L., Amin-Azki, M., Murtadha, M., Khaldi, A., Al-Rawi, A., Tikriti, S., Dhahir, H.I., Clarkson, T.W., Smith, C., Doherty, R.A. 1973. Methylmercury poisoning in Iraq. Science 181, 230-241.
    [3] CARPI, ANTHONY. 1997. Mercury from Combustion Sources: A Review of the Chemical Species Emitted and Their Transport in the Atmosphere. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 98: 241–254, 1997.
    [4] Choi, Anna L., Pal Weihe, Esben Budtz-Jørgensen, Poul J. Jørgensen, Jukka T. Salonen, Tomi-Pekka Tuomainen, Katsuyuki Murata, Hans Petur Nielsen, Maria Skaalum Petersen, Jórun Askham, and Philippe Grandjean. 2009. Methylmercury Exposure and Adverse Cardiovascular Effects in Faroese Whaling Men. Environmental Health Perspectives volume 117(3) : 367-372.
    [5] Dastoor, Ashu P., Yvan Larocque. 2004. Global Circulation of Atmospheric Mercury: A Modelling Study. Atmospheric Environment 38 (2004) 147–161
    [6] de Lacerda, Luiz Drude and Willem Salomons. 1998. Mercury from Gold and Silver Mining: A Chemical Time Bomb?. ISBN 3-540-61724-8 page 35-36, Springer-verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York.
    http://books.google.co.id/books?id=cb0AHTBBE7UC&pg=PA35&lpg=PA35&dq=mercury+in+rural+area&source=bl&ots=B9DYZwwOB5&sig=aDaheNBhWDzEtmiJGnsYolBZTjs&hl=id&ei=qsHlTu_2H-nFmQXl2pnzBA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&sqi=2&ved=0CB4Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=mercury%20in%20rural%20area&f=false
    [7] EMEP (1999). Monitoring and Modeling of Lead, Cadmium and Mercury Transboundary Transport in the Atmopshere of Europe. Joint report of EMEP Centers: MSC-E and CCC. EMEP report 3/99, July 1999.
    [8] ENVIRON Australia Pty Ltd. 2006. Report of Kalgoorlie Consolidated Gold Mines (KCGM) Mercury Modeling Result. ENVIRON Australia Pty Ltd (ACN 095 347 442; ABN 49 095 437 442).
    [9] E.P.A. (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) (1990) Interim Methods for Development of Inhalation Reference Concentrations. Office of Research and Development, Office of Health and Environmental Assessment, Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711. EPA/600/8-90/066a.
    [10] Fang, F., Wang, Q., Li, J., 2001. Atmospheric Particulate Mercury Concentration and its Dry Deposition Flux in Changchun City, China. The Science of the Total Environment 281, 229-236.
    [11] Fang, Guor-Cheng, I-Lin Yang, Chia-Kuan Liu. 2010. Estimation of Atmospheric Particulates and Dry Deposition Particulate-bound Mercury Hg(p) in Sha-Lu, Taiwan. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 10: 403–413, 2010.
    [12] Feeley, Thomas J., James Murphy, Jeffrey Hoffmann and Scott A. Renninger. (2003). A Review of DOE/NETL’s Mercury Control Technology R&D Program for Coal-Fired Power Plants. U.S. Department of Energy, National Energy Technology Laboratory. Science Applications International Corporation. DOE/NETL Hg R&D Program Review, April 2003.
    [13] Fellows, K. and M. N. Bates. 1998. Mercury Concentrations in Ambient Air of the Rotorua, New Zealand, Geothermal Area. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. (1998) 60:885-891.
    [14] Fitzgerald, W.F., Engstrom, D.R., Mason, R.P., Nater, E.A., 1998. The case for Atmospheric Mercury Contamination in Remote Areas. Environmental Science & Technology 32 (1), 1–7.
    [15] Fulkerson, Mark. 2006. Atmospheric Mercury Deposition in an Urban Environment. A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering in the College of Engineering and Computer Science at the University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida.
    [16] Fu, X. W., X. Feng, Z. Q. Dong, R. S. Yin, J. X. Wang, Z. R. Yang, and H. Zhang. 2010. Atmospheric Gaseous Elemental Mercury (GEM) Concentrations and Mercury Depositions at a High-Altitude Mountain Peak in South China. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 2425–2437, 2010.
    [17] Friedlii, Hans. R., Avelino F. Arellano , Jr. , Sergio Cinnirella , and Nicola Pirrone. Mercury Emissions from Global Biomass Burning: Spatial and Temporal Distribution. Chapter 8: 193-220.
    [18] Han, Young-Ji, Thomas M. Holsen, Philip K. Hopke. 2007. Estimation of Source Locations of Total Gaseous Mercury Measured in New York State using Trajectory-Based Models. Atmospheric Environment 41 (2007) 6033–6047.
    [19] Handbook mercury.
    http://www.ifc.org/ifcext/enviro.nsf/AttachmentsByTitle/p_ppah_pguiMercury/$FILE/HandbookMercury.pdf
    [20] Harada, M., 1995. Minamata disease-methylmercury poisoning in Japan caused by environmental pollution. Critical Reviews in Toxicology 25, 1-24.
    [21] Heckel, Pamela Funderburg, Grace K. LeMasters. 2010. The Use of AERMOD Air Pollution Dispersion Models to Estimate Residential Ambient Concentrations of Elemental Mercury. Water Air Soil Pollut (2011) 219:377–388.
    [22] Hladikova, V., Petrik, J., Jursa, S., Ursinyova, M., & Kočan, A. (2001). Atmospheric mercury levels in the Slovak Republic. Chemosphere, 45, 801. doi:10.1016/S0045-6535(01) 00058-3.
    [23] Hsi, Hsing-Cheng, Hsiu-Hsia Lee, Jyh-Feng Hwang, and Wang Chen. 2010. Mercury Speciation and Distribution in a 660-Megawatt Utility Boiler in Taiwan Firing Bituminous Coals. ISSN:1047-3289 J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 60:514–522. Taiwan.
    [24] IPCS/WHO (1991) Environmental Health Criteria 118. Inorganic mercury, World Health Organisation, Geneva, 1991.
    [25] IRIS (1995) Mercury, elemental (US-EPA).
    [26] Järup, Lars. 2003. Hazards of Heavy Metal Contamination. British Medical Bulletin Vol. 68: 167–182, The British Council 2003. Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Imperial College, London, UK.
    [27] Jasinski, S., M. 1995. Mercury
    [28] Keeler, G.J., Glinsorn, G., Pirrone, N., 1995. Particulate mercury in the atmosphere: its significance, transport, transformation and sources. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 80 (1-4), 159-168.
    [29] Kilgroe JD, Sedman CB, Srivastava RK, Ryan JV, Lee CW. Thorneloe SA. 2002. Control of Mercury Emissions from Coal-Fired Electric Utility Boilers: Interim Report. Research Triangle Park (nc): U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. EPA-600/R-01/109.
    [30] Kumar, H.D. and L.C. Rai, J. P. Gaurx. 1981. Phsycology and Heavy-Metal Pollution. Centre of Advanced Study in Botany, Banaras Hindu University. Biol. Rev. (1981),5 6,p p. 99-151 Printed in Great Britain, Cambridge Philosophical Society. India.
    [31] Kumari, Ragini. Report : Emission Estimate of Passport-Free Heavy Metal Mercury from Indian Thermal Power Plants and Non-Ferrous Smelters. Toxic-Links. European Environmental Bureau – Zero Mercury Campaign
    [32] Kuo, T.H., Chang, C.F., Urba, A., Kvietkus, K., 2006. Atmospheric gaseous mercury in northern Taiwan. Science of the Total Environment 368, 10–18.
    [33] Lamborg C. H., Fitzgerald W. F., O'Donnell ., Torgersen T. (2002). A Non-Steady-State Compartmental Model of Global-Scale Mercury Biogeochemistry with Interhemispheric Atmospheric Gradients. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 66:1105-1118
    [34] Lee, D. S., Dollard, G. J., & Pepler, S. (1998). Gas-phase mercury in the atmosphere of the United Kingdom. Atmospheric Environment, 32, 855–864.
    [35] Lee, S.C., Ho, K.F., Chan, L.Y., Zielinska, B., Chow, C.J., 2001. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and carbonyl compounds in urban atmosphere of Hong Kong. Atmospheric Environment, 5949–5960.
    [36] Lin, C.J. and Pehkonen, S.O. (1999). The Chemistry of Atmospheric Mercury: A Review. Atmos. Environ. 33: 2067–2079.
    [37] Lin, C.J. and Pehkonen, S.O. (1999). Two-Phase Model of Mercury Chemistry in the Atmosphere: A Review. Atmos. Environ. 32: 2543-2558.
    [38] Lindqvist, O., Rodlhe, H., 1985. Atmospheric mercury: a review. Tellus B 37, 136-159.
    [39] Liu, Bian, Gerald J. Keeler, J. Timothy Dvonch, James A. Barres, Mary M. Lynam, Frank J. Marsik, Joy Taylor Morgan. Temporal variability of mercury speciation in urban air. Atmospheric Environment 41 (2007) 1911–1923.
    [40] Loredo, Jorge, Jorge Soto & Rodrigo Álvarez & Almudena Ordóñez. 2006. Atmospheric Monitoring at Abandoned Mercury Mine Sites in Asturias (NW Spain). Environ Monit Assess (2007) 130:201–214.
    [41] Loux, N.T., 1998. An Assessment of Mercury-Species-Dependent Binding with Natural Organic Carbon. Chemical Speciation and Bioavailability 10, 127-136.
    [42] Lucotte, M., A. Mijcci, C. Hillaire-Marcel, P. Hchet and A. Grondin. 1995. Anthropogenic Mercury Enrichment in Remote Lakes of Northern QueBec (Canada). Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 80: 467-476, 1995.
    [43] Ma, Hwong-wen, Wayne Wei-Yuan Tu, Douglas Crawford-Brown, Chi-Feng Chen. 2007. A Bayesian Approach for the Reduction of Uncertainty in the Industrial Source Complex-Short Term Model Version 3 (ISCST3). J. Environ. Eng. Manage., 17(6), 385-393 (2007)
    [44] Mason, R.P., Fitzgerald, W.F., Morel, F.M.M., 1994. The biogeochemical cycling of elemental mercury: anthropogenic influences. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 58 (15), 3191–3198.
    [45] Mason, R.P., Lawson, N.M., Sheu, G.R., 2000. Annual and seasonal trends in mercury deposition in Maryland. Atmospheric Environment 34, 1691-1701.
    [46] Morel, F.M.M., Kraepiel, A.M.L., Amyot, M., 1998. The Chemical Cycle and Bioaccumulation of Mercury. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 29, 543-566.
    [47] Munthe J, Wängberg I, Iverfeldt Å, Lindqvist O, Strömberg D, Sommar D, et al. Distribution of atmospheric mercury species in Northern Europe: final results from the MOE Project. Atmos Environ 2003;304:S9–S20.
    [48] Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management (NESCAUM). 2003. Mercury Emissions from Coal-fired Power Plants : The Case for Regulatory Action. Boston, Massachusetts. http://www.nescaum.org
    [49] Nriagu, J.O., 1994. Mechanistic Steps in the Photoreduction of Mercury in Natural Waters. The Science of the Total Environment 154, 1-8.
    [50] Nugroho, Budi. 2001. Microbial Ecology in Heavy Metal Contaminated Soil. Papers Philosophy of Science (PPs 702), Doctorate Program Institute of Agriculture
    [51] Pacyna E G, Pacyna J M, Steenhuisen F, Wilson S, 2006. Global anthropogenic mercury emission inventory for 2000. Atmospheric Environment, 40(22): 4048–4063.
    [52] Pacyna, E.G., Pacyna, J.M., 2002. Global Emission of Mercury from Anthropogenic Sources in 1995. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 137, 149-165.
    [53] Pacyna, J., E. Pacyna, F. Steenhuisen and S. Wilson (2003). Mapping 1995 global anthropogenic emissions of mercury. Atmospheric Environment 37 Supp. No. 1 S-109-S117.
    [54] Pai, P., Niemi, D., Powers, B. 2000. A North Amercian Inventory of Anthropogenic Mercury Emissions. Fuel Processing Technology 65-66, 101-115.
    [55] Palar, H. 1994. Heavy Metals Contamination and Toxicology. Jakarta: Rineka Notices.
    [56] Park JY, Won JH, Lee TG. 2006. Mercury analysis of various types of coal using acid extraction and pyrolysis methods. Energy Fuels, 20, 2413–6.
    [57] Pierrehumbert, Raymond T., Hélène Brogniez, and Rémy Roca. 2007. Chapter 6-On the Relative Humidity of the Atmosphere.
    [58] Pirrone, N. (2001). Mercury research in Europe: Towards the preparation of the EU air quality directive. Atmospheric Environment, 35, 2979–2986.
    [59] Pirrone, N., Keeler, G.J., Nriagu, J.O., 1996. Regional Differences in Worldwide Emissions of Mercury to the Atmosphere. Atmospheric Environment 30, 2981-2987.
    [60] Pirrone, N., Sprovieri, F., Pesenti, E. (2001). MED-OCEANOR Project-Technical Report. Workshop on Data Analysis of the URANIA Oceanographic Mediterranean Campaign-Summer 2000. 26-27 Febbraio 2001, Pisa, Italy.
    [61] Position Paper of Mercury Chapter 3 :
    http://ec.europa.eu/environment/air/pdf/pp_mercury3.pdf
    [62] Position Paper of Mercury Chapter 4 :
    http://ec.europa.eu/environment/air/pdf/pp_mercury4.pdf
    [63] Position Paper of Mercury Chapter 5 :
    http://ec.europa.eu/environment/air/pdf/pp_mercury5.pdf
    [64] Public Service Commission of Wisconsin. Environmental Impacts of Power Plants.page 5-6.
    [65] Pyta, H., C. Rosik-Dulewska, M. Czaplicka. 2008. Speciation of Ambient Mercury in the Upper Silesia Region, Poland. Water Air Soil Pollut (2009) 197:233–240.
    [66] Ryaboshapkoa, Alexey, Russell Bullock, Ralf Ebinghaus, Ilia Ilyin, Kristen Lohman, John Munthe, Gerhard Petersen, Christian Seigneur, Ingvar Wangberg. 2002. Comparison of Mercury Chemistry Models. Atmospheric Environment 36 (2002) 3881–3898.
    [67] Schroeder, W.H. and Munthe, J., 1998. Atmospheric mercury-an overview. Atmospheric Environment 32, 809–822.
    [68] Schwede, Donna B. and James O. Paumier. 1996. Sensitivity of the Industrial Source Complex Model to Input Deposition Parameters. Journal of Applied Meteorology 36: 1096-1106. Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
    [69] Slemr, F. and E. Langer. 1992. Increase in Global Atmospheric Concentration of Mercury Inferred from Measurements over the Atlantic Ocean. 1992 Nature Publishing Group vol 355 pp: 434-437
    [70] Slemr, F., Schuster, G., Seiler, W., 1985. Distribution, Speciation and Budget of Atmospheric Mercury. Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry 3, 407–434.
    [71] Slemr F., R. Ebinghaus, C. A. M. Brenninkmeijer, M. Hermann, H. H. Kock, B. G. Martinsson, T. Schuck, D. Sprung, P. van Velthoven, A. Zahn, and H. Ziereis. 2009. Gaseous Mercury Distribution in the Upper Troposphere and Lower Stratosphere Observed Onboard the CARIBIC Passenger Aircraft. 2009. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 9: 1957–1969, 2009.
    [72] Sullivan, T. M., F.D. Lipfert, S.M. Morris. (2003). The Local Impacts of Mercury Emissions from Coal Fired Power Plants on Human Health Risk. Progress Report for the Period of March 2002 – March 2003. New York
    [73] Sullivan, T.M., J. Adams, M. Bender, C. Bu, N. Piccolo, C. Campbell. 2008. Local Impacts of Mercury Emissions from the Three Pennsylvania Coal Fired Power Plants. Final Report to the Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory Mercury Deposition Near Coal-Fired Power Plants. February, 2008. Environmental Sciences Department/ Environmental Research & Technology Division. Brookhaven National Laboratory. BNL-80047-2008-IR
    [74] Sundseth, Kyrre, Jozef M. Pacyna , Elisabeth G. Pacyna, John Munthe, Mohammed Belhaj, Stefan Astrom. Economic benefits from decreased mercury emissions: Projections for 2020. Journal of Cleaner Production 18 (2010) 386–394
    [75] Taichung Coal-Fired Power Plant, Taiwan. power-technology.com. Net Resources International.
    [76] Taipower (2008) (PDF). 2008 Sustainability Reports – Power Generation And Transmission. p. 3.
    [77] Taiwan Power Company. 2009. Annual Report 2009.
    [78] Taiwan Power Company. 2010. Annual Report 2010. Page 10.
    [79] Temmea, Christian, P. Blanchard, A. Steffen, C. Banic, S. Beauchamp, L. Poissant, R. Tordon, B. Wiens. 2007. Trend, Seasonal and Multivariate Analysis Study of Total Gaseous Mercury Data from the Canadian. Atmospheric Mercury Measurement Network (CAMNet). Atmospheric Environment 41 (2007) 5423–5441.
    [80] Tu, Li-Kai, Yee-Lin Wu, Lin-Chi Wang, Guo-Ping Chang-Chien. 2011. Monitoring and Dispersion Modeling of Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers (PBDEs) in the Ambient Air of Two Municipal Solid Waste Incinerators and a Coal-fired Power Plant. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, x: 1-10, 2011.
    [81] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1999. Compendium of Methods for the Determination of Inorganic Compounds in Ambient Air Chapter IO-5 “SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS FOR ATMOSPHERIC MERCURY”. Center for Environmental Research Information Office of Research and Development, Cincinnati
    [82] US-EPA.1993. Regulatory 40 CFR 50.6(a) inside 40 CFR Part 81. VOL. 58, No. 184 Rules and Regulations. FEDERAL REGISTER.
    [83] USEPA, 1997. Mercury study report to Congress. EPA-452/R-97-004.
    [84] US-EPA. Study of hazardous air pollution emissions from electric utilitysteam generating units—final report to congress. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.: EPA-453/R-98-004; 1998.
    [85] Wan, Qi, Xinbin Feng, Julia Lu, Wei Zheng, Xinjie Song, Shijie Han, Hao Xu. 2009. Atmospheric mercury in Changbai Mountain Area, Northeastern China: I. The Seasonal Distribution Pattern of Total Gaseous Mercury and its potential sources. Environmental Research 109 (2009) 201–206.
    [86] Wang, Juan Wenhua Wang, Wei Xu, Xiaohao Wang, Song Zhao. 2011. Mercury removals by existing pollutants control devices of four coal-fired power plants in China. Journal of Environmental Sciences 2011, 23(11) 1839–1844
    [87] Wang, Qianrui, Daekeun Kim, Dionysios D. Dionysiou, George A. Sorial, Dennis Timberlake. 2004. Sources and Remediation for Mercury Contamination in Aquatic Systems. Environmental Pollution. 131 (2004) 323-336. USA
    [88] Wang, Ya-Fen, How-Ran Chao, Lin-Chi Wang, Guo-Ping Chang-Chien, Tsui-Chun Tsou. 2010. Characteristics of Heavy Metals Emitted from a Heavy Oil-Fueled Power Plant in Northern Taiwan. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 10: 111–118, 2010
    [89] Wang, Yaodong. 2004. Phytoremediation of Mercury By Terrestrial Plants. Doctoral Thesis, Department of Botany, Stockholm University.
    [90] WHO. 2003. Elemental Mercury and Inorganic Mercury Compounds: Human Health Aspects, World Health Organization, Geneva 2003.
    [91] Wiener, J. G.; Krabbenhoft, D. P.; Heinz, G. H.; Scheuhammer, A. M. In Handbook of Ecotoxicology, 2nd ed; Hoffman, D. J., Rattner, B. A., Burton, G. A., Jr., Cairns, J., Jr., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 2003; Chapter 16, pp 409-463.
    [92] Witt, M.L.I., T.P. Fischer, D.M. Pyle, T.F. Yang, G.F. Zellmer. 2008. Fumarole compositions and mercury emissions from the Tatun Volcanic Field, Taiwan: Results from multi-component gas analyser, portable mercury spectrometer and direct sampling techniques. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research 178 (2008) 636–643
    [93] WORLD BANK GROUP. 1998. Thermal Power: Guidelines for New Plants. Pollution Prevention and Abatement Handbook
    [94] Wu, Y.; Wang, S.; Streets, D.G.; Hao, J.; Chan, M.; Jiang, J. 2006. Trends in Anthropogenic Mercury Emissions in China from 1995 to 2003; Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 5312-5318.
    [95] Yudovich, Ya. E. and M.P. Ketris. 2005. Mercury in coal: a review Part 1. Geochemistry. International Journal of Coal Geology 62 (2005) 107– 134.
    [96] Zielonka, U., Hlawiczka, S., Fudala, J., Wängberg, I., & Munthe, J. (2005). Seasonal mercury concentrations measured in rural air in Southern Poland. Contribution from local and regional coal combustion. Atmospheric Environment, 39 (39), 7580.

    下載圖示 校內:立即公開
    校外:立即公開
    QR CODE