近年來永續工程議題在全球發酵，傳統工程需思考如何採取永續作法。我國永續工
程評估系統始於綠建築，於道路，營建署 2020 年建立台灣市區綠道路評估系統，用以
評估市區道路工程內容之永續性。然而不同道路種類，可施行之永續作法會有不同，於
高快速道路之綠道路評估系統則尚未建立。
本研究以市區綠道路評估系統為基礎，從永續評估系統、道路特性、案例分析三面
向，推導如何延伸市區綠道路，建立高快速綠道路評估系統架構與指標。首先，比較各
基礎設施與道路評估系統架構與指標，了解常見的永續議題。接著比較市區與高快速道
路性質差異，分析兩類型道路於施工及營運階段之異同。用市區綠道路評估系統，評估
市區與高速公路 2 個道路工程，了解兩案得分差異，並以 6 個高速公路案例，檢視指標
適用性，提出建議刪除或修改之市區綠道路指標。最後從評估市區與高速公路兩案例中，
彙整指標所需及實際文件，分為既有及補做文件，歸納其重要性，得到高快速綠道路評
估系統需要之文件。
經比較評估系統可得出 13 個常見評估類別，由道路性質分析發現高快速與市區兩
類型道路差異最大在社會面，而由高速公路案例評估結果可知，市區綠道路指標大多可
適用於高快速道路。所建立的高快速綠道路評估系統以整建工程為主要考量，有 6 個類
別：生態、材料與能資源、廢棄物與污染、通路與人文、經濟，及其他創新，共 22 個
指標，其中「通路與人文」為合併類別。
由文件分析結果發現，指標文件有 61%為工程既有，高快速綠道路評估文件有 31
份，能涵蓋所有指標要求。其中以施工單位要提供的最多，設計提供的次之，營運的最
少。文件中以設計圖、規劃設計報告書、設施及過程照片為最重要，評估綠道路需優先
提供。

In 2020, the Construction and Planning Agency established the Urban Green Roadway
Rating System (UGRRS) to evaluate the sustainability of urban road projects. But the green
road rating system for highways and expressways has not been established.
This research aims to extend the UGRRS to establish a rating system for highways and
expressways, from three aspects: the sustainable rating systems, road characteristics, and case
analysis. First, the study compared the categories and indicators of six infrastructure and road
rating systems to understand common sustainability issues. Then it analyzed the differences of
the nature of urban roadways, highways and expressways. Third, it used the UGRRS to
evaluate one urban road and one highway projects to understand the difference in the scores,
and used six highway cases to check the applicability of the indicators. Finally, it analyzed the
required and actual documents for the indicators, divided them into existing and supplementary
documents, summarized their importance, and obtained the documents for the green highways
and expressways rating system.
Through the comparison of rating systems, 13 common evaluation categories were
obtained. From the evaluation results, most of the urban green road indicators could be applied
to highways and expressways. The established greenroad rating system of highways and
expressways has six categories: ecology, materials and energy resources, waste and pollution,
access and culture, economy, and other innovations, with a total of 22 indicators.
From the document analysis results, 61% of the documents are existing in the roadway
construction projects, and there are 31 assessment documents for highways and expressways
that can meet all the requirements for the indicators. Among the document providers, the
contractor needs to prepare the most documents, the designer second, and the owner the least.
Among the documents, design drawings, design reports, facility and construction photos are
important to the evaluated roadway projects and should be provided with priority.

英文文獻
1.Abdel-Raheem, M., Ramsbottom, C. (2016). “Factors affecting social sustainability in
highway projects in Missouri.” Procedia Engineering, Vol.145, No.67, pp.548-555.
2. Adeli, H. (2002). “Sustainable infrastructure systems and environmentally-conscious
design—A view for the next decade.” Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, Vol.16,
No.4, pp.1-4.
3. Anderson, J. L., Muench, S. T. (2013). “Sustainability trends measured by the greenroads
rating system.” Journal of the Transportation Research Board, University of Washington,
Seattle.
4. Cai, J., Xia, C., Wang, J., Zhang, Y., Zhuang, Y., Wang, D. (2019). “Green construction
technology of Sanming section of Puyan expressway in Sanming.” E3S Web of
Conferences, ED. EDP Science, International Academic Exchange Conference on Science
and Technology Innovation, Dec. 20~22, Guangzhou, China.
5. CEEQUAL (2020). CEEQUAL: Technical manual for UK & International projects v6,
CEEQUAL Ltd.
6. Chang, A. S., Tsai, C. Y. (2015). “Difficulty and reasons for sustainable roadway design
– The case from Taiwan.” Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, Vol. 21, No. 4,
pp.395-406.
7. GreenLITES (2010). Project Design Certification Programme, New York State
Department of Transportation.
8. Greenroads (2020). https://www.greenroads.org/4500/draft-v3-checklist.html, accessed
on June 9, 2022.
9. Ibrahim, A. H., Shaker, M. A. (2019). “Sustainability index for highway construction
projects.” Alexandria Engineering Journal, Vol.58, No.4, pp.1399-1411.
10. ISI (2018). ENVISION: A Rating System for Sustainable Infrastructure, Institute for
Sustainable Infrastructure.
11. Bryce, J. M. (2008). “Developing Sustainable Transportation Infrastructure - Exploring
the Development and Implementation of a Green Highway Rating System.” University of
Missouri, 2008 ASTM WISE Intern, US.
102
12. Lew, J. B., Anderson, J. L., Muench, S. T. (2016). “Informing roadway sustainability
practices by using greenroads certified project data.” Journal of the Transportation
Research Board, Vol.1, No.1, pp.1–13.
13. Mattinzioli, T., Sol-Sanchez, M., Martinez, G., Rubio-Gamez, M. (2020). “A critical
review of roadway sustainable rating systems.” Sustainable Cities and Society, Vol.63,
No.2, pp15-28.
14. Muench, S. T., Anderson, J.L., Bevan, T. (2010). “Greenroads: A sustainability rating
system for roadways.” International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, Vol.
3, No.5, pp. 270–279.
15. Nusa, F. N. M., Endut, I., Takim, R. E., Ishak, S. Z. (2015 a). “Challenges of green
highway concept towards implementation of green highway.” Applied Mechanics and
Materials, Vol.747, No.1, pp.3-6.
16. Nusa, F. N. M., Endut, I., Takim, R. E., Ishak, S. Z. (2015 b). “Green highway for
Malaysia: A literature review.” Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Vol.9,
No.1, pp.64-71.
17. Raja, R. R. M. R., Nurizan, A. R., Nazurah, Z. U. B., Muhd Zaimi, M. and Faridah, I.
(2014). “An evaluation of sustainable design and construction criteria for green highway.”
Procedia Environmental Sciences, Vol. 20, No.24, pp. 180-186.
18. Uchehara, I., Moore, D., Jafarifar, N., Omotayo, T. (2022). “Sustainability rating system
for highway design:—A key focus for developing sustainable cities and societies in
Nigeria.” Sustainable Cities and Society, Vol.78, No.2, pp.17-32.
19. UN (2016). The 2016 new climate economy report. The sustainable infrastructure
imperative: Financing for better growth and development, NYC, US,

中文文獻
1. 交通部(1987)，公路路線設計規範，幼獅文化事業公司印行，台北。
2. 佘品蓁(2012)，道路設計因子對行車碳排放影響之研究，國立中央大學營建管理研
究所碩士論文。
3. 行政院環保署(2018)，推動廢輪胎橡膠瀝青混凝土刨除料應用發展暨材料性質評估。
4. 林思翰(2016)，綠道路認證中施工活動項目執行之困難評估與原因分析，國立成功
大學土木工程研究所碩士論文。
5. 林立庭(2017)，建立綠道路評估架構，國立成功大學土木工程研究所碩士論文。
103
6. 陳彥伯(2019)，西濱快速公路周邊效益行銷串聯，行政院第 3674 次院會，2019 年
10 月 31 日，交通部公路總局。
7. 高公局(1999)，道路相關設施景觀設計準則之研究，交通部。
8. 高公局(2014)，國道建設永續發展經營及通行費檢討機制之研究，期末報告，交通
部，台北。
9. 高公局(2016)，國道高速公路路面平整度品質及交通安全廉政研究調查，交通部，
台北。
10. 高公局 (2022) ， 主 題 宣 導 / 永 續 發 展 環 境 復 育 / 生 態 復 育 ，
https://www.freeway.gov.tw/Publish.aspx?cnid=1596&p=8911&fbclid=IwAR1hU_cKU
m8vDjhEzk_0vgWFUuC2s4oyhQ8PgCgzyQ_vZKnoWLJmt8KEbGs，2022 年 2 月 10
日網上資料。
11. 涂謦麟(2018)，納入綠道路指標之設計綱要，國立成功大學土木工程研究所碩士論
文。
12. 張菱芳(2020)，綠道路指標之達成程度與提升方法，國立成功大學土木工程研究所
碩士論文。
13. 顏進儒(2013)，運輸學，第 2 版，五南出版社，台北。
14. 萬鼎工程服務股份有限公司(2004)，高速公路建設應用生態工法設計準則則範例之
研究，交通部，台北。
15. 曾大仁(2011)，國道永續經營策略與展望，國道永續經營環境復育研討會，2011 年
10 月 24 日，交通部臺灣區國道高速公路局。
16. 運研所(2020)，107 年城際運輸消長觀察，交通部，台北。
17. 蔡雅雯(2011)，工程永續設計環境面項目之建立與適用性評估，國立成功大學土木
工程研究所博士論文。
18. 營建署(2020 a)，建立市區道路之綠道路評估系統成果報告書，營建署，台北。
19. 營建署(2020 b)，市區綠道路評估手冊，營建署，台北。