| 研究生: |
林彥岑 Lin, Yen-Tsen |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
艦船水下螺槳噪音之氣泡幕降噪技術實驗研究 Experimental Study on the Reduction of Underwater Ship Propeller Noises by Using Bubble Screen Techniques |
| 指導教授: |
黃清哲
Huang, Ching-Jer |
| 共同指導教授: |
許泰文
Hsu, Tai-Wen |
| 學位類別: |
博士 Doctor |
| 系所名稱: |
工學院 - 水利及海洋工程學系 Department of Hydraulic & Ocean Engineering |
| 論文出版年: | 2016 |
| 畢業學年度: | 104 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 138 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 水面船舶 、俥葉 、拖航水槽 、氣泡幕最佳化 、低頻聲波 、減噪 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | optimal bubble screen, propeller, surface vessel, towing tank, bubble emitter belt, attenuated sounds |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:105 下載:2 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究主要目的是經由實驗研究設計出船舶降噪用之氣泡幕,以達到最佳俥葉噪音的降噪效果。降噪用氣泡幕是應用操作簡單的水中聲學技術來降低船舶俥葉所產生之水下噪音。
實驗研究在拖航水槽中進行,主要分成兩個階段進行。第一階段量測俥葉噪音並進而研究氣泡幕對俥葉噪音的降噪效果。第二階段將俥葉安裝於可移動船模來模擬實際情形,量測及比較俥葉轉動造成的艉流區其有無使用氣泡幕之差異。船模及俥葉均是基於相同福祿數運動動力近似所設計之實驗及物理實體模型。氣泡是將空氣壓縮經由長條型氣泡帶產生。藉由改變氣泡帶孔徑、空氣壓力及流速來調整氣泡流體的氣泡大小及體積分率。使用水下麥克風來監測輻射噪音。可量測在不同氣泡大小及體積分率下氣泡幕後方噪音衰減的特性。
在另一個水槽進行率定實驗,來估算氣泡流體的氣泡分佈及體積分率。另外,使用二氧化碳替代氣體產生氣泡幕,比較聲音通過一般空氣氣泡及二氧化碳氣泡幕之差異。
由本研究實驗結果得知,運用氣泡幕原理來減低或改變螺槳噪音是具體可行的。四葉螺槳輻射噪音頻率範圍為600至6000 Hz。多孔隙氣泡石所產生的氣泡可顯著衰減600至1100 Hz的螺槳低頻輻射噪音及空蝕現象所產生700 Hz噪音,符合氣泡其自然共振頻率恰巧等同入射聲波的頻率之理論。
氣泡幕控制參數包含:氣體施放流量、氣體施放壓力及氣幕帶孔徑大小。其影響因子為氣泡體積分率(氣泡包覆率)、氣泡幕寬度(厚度)。氣體流量與氣泡幕的氣體體積分率成正比,體積分率愈大入射聲波越不易穿透;氣泡大小與孔徑大小的關係為放大8至13倍,氣幕帶孔徑直接影響施放氣泡粒徑,直接決定降噪頻率,為最關鍵之參數;可溶性氣體(如CO2)確有助於減少氣泡生命週期,降低氣泡與船艦艉流產生交互作用的時間。
艦船氣泡帶存在最佳巡弋速率,本研究所設計之船模換算派里級實船最佳巡弋速率船速分別為12節及20節。氣泡幕運用不僅在於降噪效果,可依所欲管制的特定頻率,操作氣泡幕氣泡大小及體積分率,以獲得主頻強度增揚或改變頻率特徵之效果。
Experimental Study on the Reduction of Underwater Ship Propeller Noises by Using Bubble Screen Techniques
Yen-Tsen Lin
Ching-Jer Huang
Department of Hydraulic and Ocean Engineering
National Cheng Kung University
SUMMARY
The purpose of this experimental study is to design an optimal bubble screen for reducing the underwater propeller noises of surface vessels.The experiments were carried out in a towing tank. A propeller was installed in a ship model to simulate the noises produced by a surface vessel and hydrophones were used to monitor the radiated sounds. The bubble screen is generated by passing the compressed air through a long bubble emitter belt. By measuring the attenuated sounds behind the bubble screen, the optimal bubble size and air volume fraction for reducing the radiated sounds can be fixed. Furthermore, the calibration experiments of the bubble screen were implemented in a water tank to estimate the bubble populations and gas void fraction while the bubble emitter belt with different orifice sizes was pumped into variable air pressures and flow rates.
KEY WORDS: optimal bubble screen, propeller, surface vessel, towing tank, bubble
emitter belt, attenuated sounds.
INTRODUCTION
The sound speed in the bubbly flow differs significantly from the standard sound velocity in the sea water and the speed is frequency dependent. Propeller noise is produced by a purely hydrodynamic mechanism such as cavitation at the tips of the blades or cavitation on the blades themselves, or by mechanical vibration of the blades. Usually flow noise, propeller noise and mechanical noise will be concealed. Propeller noises are commonly reduced by using the variable pitch, skew, and the appropriate number of propeller blades. The spontaneous noises generated by the ship propeller are the main signal source of reconnaissance.
The noises generated by the propeller are mostly in the low frequency range (less than 500 Hz). Accordingly, the low-frequency sound generated by the propeller becomes an important clue for the underwater vehicle to search for the sea surface vessels. It has been known for a long time that the speed of sound propagating in the water is affected by the presence of the gas bubbles. The propagation of sound through bubbly liquid has been thoroughly investigated both theoretically and experimentally. It was revealed that when the frequency of the incident sound coincides with the resonant frequency of the bubble in the bubbly flow, a small amount of sound will penetrate through the bubbly flow.
Figure 1.3 shows that two air emitter belts were installed to reduce the noise of the ship. FR 253 air emitter belt is fitted to the ship’s propeller, while FR177 belt is fitted to the external hull in the vicinity of the propulsion plant. Air bubbles are employed to mask potential target, or to provide alternate targets.
For the best use of the air emitter belt, the effect of belt control parameters, such as the air pressure, flow rate, and the size of orifice on the bubble size and air-volume fraction of the bubbly flow must be tested. Furthermore, by applying the air bubble screen technique for the reduction of the self-noises of the surface vessels, effect of bubble size and volume fraction on the reduction of noises produced by a propeller installed to a ship under way must also investigated. Based on the above-mentioned experimental studies, this work aims to design an optimal bubble screen for reducing the underwater propeller noises of surface vessels.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
In this study, the experiments are divided into three main parts. In the first part of the experiments, surface ships use air bubbles with a bubble curtain to weaken the main and auxiliary mechanical noise through the hull of radiative transfer to the sound of water, shelter air curtain with the cast bubble screen control mechanism and influence factors include: flow, pressure and gas screen with a pore size such as the three main control parameters. In this study, experiment to experiment according to different control parameters in order to find out the relationship between the bubble screen and associated control parameters in the water tank of Laboratory for fiber-optic sensing and underwater acoustics at the Department of Hydraulic and Ocean Engineering, National Cheng Kung University(NCKU) , Taiwan.
In the second part of the experiments, underwater noises generated by the propellers shown in Fig.3.13 and Fig.4.2 were measured. Effects of the bubble screen on the reduction of sound transmission were then studied by deploying a bubble curtain at the rear side of the propeller. These experiments were carried out in the towing tank of the Department of Systems and Naval Mechatronic Engineering, NCKU.
In the third part of the experiments, the ship model is equipped with two air bubble emitting belts. The underwater noises generated by the installed propeller in a moving ship hull with or without the emission of air bubble will be measured and compared. Effect of the air flow rate and bubble size on the reduction of sound transmission through the bubbly flow will be systematically investigated.
RESULT AND DISCUSSION
The effect of different air flows for high-speed propeller, by the bubble curtain noise reduction. As shown in Figure 4.20. The black line represents the location of underwater ambient noise for the experimental flume(not including the propeller and bubble). The Green line represents the sound spectrum of the propeller in shallow water(0.15 m depth), and high speed(rpm = 488). The main radiation of propeller is approximated to 0.6 ~ 6 KHz. The blue and red lines, represents the sound spectrum of the propeller noise through the bubble curtain by 1.0 and 20.0(L / min)of air flow. In fact, the bubble screen generates a noise reduction effect of roughly 10 dB in the frequency range of 0.6 ~ 1.1 KHz.
CONCLUSION
(1) By the research results, the use of the principle of the bubble screen to reduce or change the propeller noise is concrete and feasible.
(2) The range of radiated noise frequency for four-leaf propeller between 600 to 6000 Hz. Bubble screen generated by Bubble stone can attenuate low-frequency radiation of propeller noise between 600 to 1100 Hz and attenuate cavitation noise about 700 Hz significantly, the result was match its natural resonance theory bubble frequency of the incident sound wave frequency equal happen.
(3) Bubble curtain control parameters include: flow, pressure and gas screen with pore sizes. Its impact factors are the volume fraction of bubbles (bubble cover ratio), the bubble curtain width (thickness).
(4) Gas volume fraction in bubble curtain is proportional to the gas flow. When the greater the volume fraction , the incident sound waves more difficult to penetrate.
(5) The relationship between bubble size and pore size is enlarged 8-13 times.
(6) Pore size is the direct effect factor for the bubble size of bubble screen, it’s the most critical parameter of the reducing noise frequency.
(7) CO2 really helps reduce the life cycle of the bubble, bubble and reduce ship stern flow generating interaction time.
[1] Urick, R.J., Principles of underwater sound, Third ed., Peninsula Publishing, Los Altos., 1993.
[2]林武文,潛艦匿蹤技術,海軍學術月刊,第三十九卷,第一期,頁30,2005。
[3]周蓮香,林子皓,應用水下聲學定點監測中華白海豚型為生態,中華白海豚族群生態與棲地環境噪音監測計畫,頁55-76,2012。
[4]黃清哲,黃致遠,尹孝元,涂季平,水中爆炸氣泡破裂之數值模擬,第25 屆海洋工程研討會論文集,國立台灣海洋大學,臺灣基隆,2003。
[5] 劉家瑞,腸音與氣泡—結合影像與聲學的臨床研究,慈濟大學醫學研究所博士論文,花蓮,2010。
[6] Lohse, D., Schmitz, B., and Versluis, M., Snapping shrimp make flashing bubbles, Nature, Vol. 413, pp. 477-478., 2001.
[7] Leighton, T.G., From seas to surgeries, from babbling brooks to baby scans: The acoustics of gas bubbles in liquids, International Journal of Modern Physics B, Vol. 18(25), pp. 3267-3314., 2004.
[8] Research Analysis Group, Physics of Sound in the Sea., Peninsula Publishing, Los Altos, 1981.
[9] Fessenden, R.A., Method and apparatus for sound insulation:U.S. Patent no.1, 348,828.,1920.
[10] Minnaert, M., On musical air-bubbles and the sounds of running water, Philosophical Magazine Series 7, Vol. 16(104), pp. 235-248., 1933.
[11] Leighton, T.G., Wilkinson M., Walton A.J. and Field J.E., Studies of non-linear bubble oscillations in a simulated acoustic field, European Journal of Physics, Vol. 11, pp. 352-358.,1990.
[12] Medwin, H., and Clay, C.S., Fundamentals of acoustical oceanography, second ed., Academic Press, New York. 1997.
[13] Foldy, L.L., The multiple scattering of waves, Physical Review, Vol. 67, pp. 107-119., 1945.
[14] Carstensen, E.L., and Foldy, L.L., Propagation of sound through a liquid containing bubbles, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. , Vol. 19(3), pp. 481-501., 1947.
[15] Francis E.F., Stanley R.C. and Glenn S.L., Phase Velocity and Absorption Measurements in Water Containing Air Bubbles, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. ,Vol 27, pp.534 ,1955.
[16] Silberman, E., Sound velocity and attenuation in bubbly mixtures measured in standing wave tubes, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. ,Vol. 29(8), pp. 925-933. 1957.
[17]Van Wijngaarden, L., On the equations of motion for mixtures of liquid and gas bubbles, J. Fluid Mech., Vol. 33, pp. 465-474., 1968.
[18] Van Wijngaarden, L., One-dimensional flow of liquids containing small gas bubbles, Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech., Vol. 4, pp. 27-44., 1972.
[19] Domenico, S.N., Acoustic-wave propagation in air-bubble curtains in water .1. History and theory, Geophysics, Vol. 47(3), pp. 345-353., 1982a.
[20] Domenico, S.N., Acoustic-wave propagation in air-bubble curtains in water .2. Field experiment, Geophysics, Vol. 47(3), pp. 354-375., 1982b
[21]王虹斌,張文光,艦艇氣幕降噪系統與設計思想,艦船科學技術,1990。
[22] Leighton, T.G., Ramble D.G., and Phelps A.D., Comparison of the abilities of multiple acoustic techniques for bubble detection, Processing. Proceedings of the Institute of Acoustics, Vol. 17(8), pp. 149-160., 1995.
[23] Medwin, H., and Daniel A.C. , Acoustical measurements of bubble production by spilling breakers, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. , Vol. 88(1), pp. 408-412., 1990.
[24] Leighton, T.G., and Walton A.J. , An experimental study of the sound emitted from gas bubbles in a liquid, European Journal of Physics, Vol. 8(2), pp. 98-104.,1987.
[25] Leighton, T.G., White, P.R., and Schneider, M.F., The detection and dimension of bubble entrainment and comminution, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., Vol. 103, No. 4, pp. 1825-1835., 1998.
[26] Tien, T.M., Huang, C.J., Hsu, T.W., Lee, C.H., and Hsu, S.S., Bubble size distribution for waves propagating over a submerged breakwater, China Ocean Eng., Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 227-240., 2008.
[27] Stokes, M.D. and Deane, G.B., A new optical instrument for the study of bubbles at high void fractions within breaking waves, IEEE J. Oceanic Eng., Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 300-311., 1999.
[28] Jähne, B. and Geißler, P., An image optical technique for bubble measurements, in Sea Surface Sound 94, Buckingham, M.J. and Potter, J.R., Eds. World Scientific, pp. 290-303. (1994)
[29] Cartellier, A. and Achard, J.L., Local phase detection probes in fluid/fluid two phase flows, Rev. Sci. Instrum., Vol. 62, pp. 279–303., 1991.
[30] Barrau, E., Rivière, N., Poupot, Ch., and Cartellier, A., Single and double optical probes in air–water two-phase flows: real-time signal processing and sensor performance, Int. J. Multiphase Flow, Vol. 25, pp. 229–256., 1999.
[31] Blenkinsopp, C.E. and Chaplin, J.R., Bubble size measurements in breaking waves using optical fiber phase detection probes, IEEE Ocean Eng., Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 388-401., 2010.
[32] Huang, C.J., Lin, Y.T., and Tien, T.M., Measurements of local void fraction of bubbly flows generated by breaking waves, the 22nd International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Rhodes, Greece, pp. 1-8., 2012.
[33] Tsuchiya, K., H. Mikasa, et al., Absorption dynamics of CO2 bubbles in a pressurized liquid flowing downward and its simulation in seawater., Chemical Engineering Science,Vol. 52(21-22),pp. 4119-4126., 1997.
[34] Parkinson, L., Sedev, R., Fornasiero, D., and Ralston, J., The terminal rise velocity of 10–100 μm diameter bubbles in water, J. colloid and interface science, Vol. 322(1), pp. 168-172., 2008.
[35] Takemura, F. and Magnaudet, J., The history force on a rapidly shrinking bubble rising at finite Reynolds number, Phys. Fluids, Vol. 16, pp. 3247., 2004.
[36] Maceiras, R., Álvarez, E., and Cancela, M.A., Experimental interfacial area measurements in a bubble column, Chem. Eng. J., Vol. 163(3), pp. 331-336., 2010.
[37] Sun, R.P. and Cubaud, T., Dissolution of carbon dioxide bubbles and microfluidic multiphase flows, Lab on a Chip, Vol. 11(17), pp. 2924-2928., 2011.
[38] Perlin, M.,He,J.and Bernal, L.P., An Experimental Study of Deep Water Plunging Breakers, Physics of Fluids, Vol. 8, pp. 2365–2274., 1996.
[39] Greated, C.A.and Emarat,N., Optical Studies of Wave Kinematics, Advances in Coastal and Ocean Engineering, Vol.6, pp.185–223., 2000.
[40]Hassan, Y.A., Schmidl, W.D. and Ortiz-Villafuerte J., Investigation of Three dimensional Two phase Flow Structure in a Bubbly Pipe, Measurement Science Technology, Vol.9, pp.309–326., 1998.
[41] Doh, D.H., Hwang, T.G. and Saga T., 3-DPTV Measurements of the Wake of a Sphere, Measurement Science Technology, Vol.15, pp.1059~1066., 2004.
[42] Ryu, Y., Chang, K.A., and Lim, H.J., Use of bubble image velocimetry for measurement of plunging wave impinging on structure and associated greenwater, Depart. Civil Eng., Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843-3136, U.S.A. ,2005.
[43] Shintani, A., Funaki, J., and Hirata, K., Measurements of Bubble Jets by 3D PTV and UVP, Dept. Mech .Eng., Doshisha Univ., Kyoto, 610-0321, Japan., 2005.
[44] Yamamoto, F., Uemura, T., Iguchi, M., Ohta, J., Wada, A., Mori, K., 3D PTV based on binary image correlations method and its applications to a mixing flow with a bubbling jet, in: Brebbia, C.A., Carlomagno, G.M. (eds) Computational methods and experimental measurements VI. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, pp. 229–246., 1993.
[45]Ma, B..B., and Nysturen, J.A.,, Passive Acoustic Detection and Measurement of Rainfall at Sea, Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, Vol. 22, pp1225-1248, 2005.
[46] Wenz, G.M., Acoustic ambient noise in the ocean: Spectra and Sources, J.Acoust.Soc Am.,Vol.34, no.12, pp.1936-1956,1962.
[47]Huang, C.J., Hsu, S.S., Shen, J.C., Lee, C.H.,, Study of the Damping Mechanisms of BubbleOscillations, Proceedings of the 27th Ocean Engineering Conference , Taiwan, 2005.
[48] Streeter, V. L., Fluid dynamics, McGraw-Hill, New York., 1948.
[49] Biesheuvel, A., and Wijngaarden, L.V. , Two-phase flow equations for a dilute dispersion of gas bubbles in liquid, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 148, pp. 301-318.,1984.
[50] Gonzalez, R. C., Woods, R. E.,Digital Image Processing Third Edition, Prentice Hall: 954., 2008.
[51] Otsu, N. A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms., Automatica 11: 285-296.,1975.
[52] 黃景暉,應用質點軌跡追蹤法於船殼降噪氣泡量測,國立成功大學系統及船舶機電工程研究所碩士論文,臺灣臺南,2012 。
[53]Huang, C.J.,, Lin, Y.T.,, Chang, H.Y.,, Tien, T.M., Hsu, T. W., Journal of Coastal and Ocean Engineering, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 43-53, 2016.
[54]王昱博,船側減噪氣泡覆蓋行為之研究,國立成功大學系統及船舶機電工程研究所碩士論文,臺灣臺南,2014 。
[55] Lai, W.J., Study on the attenuation of sound propagating through bubbly liquids at arbitrary gas-volume fraction,, Master Thesis, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan. 1999.
[56] Tien, T. M., Sound propagation through a bubble screen at finite gas-volume fraction, Master Thesis, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan,. 2001.
[57] 楊宇宏,解壓對二氧化碳氣泡於過飽和水溶液中之消長現象研究,國立清華大學動力機械工程學系碩士論文,臺灣新竹,2005
[58]黃奇鍊,二氧化碳氣泡粒徑在水中衰減特性之實驗研究,國立成功大學水利及海洋工程研究所碩士論文,臺灣臺南,2012 。
[59] Keller, J. B., and Miksis M., Bubble oscillations of large amplitude, J. Acoust. Soc. Am.,Vol. 68(2), pp. 628-633., 1980.
校內:2021-07-01公開