本論文探討了Chia Coin引入的Proof of Space-Time（PoST）共識機制，並將其與比特幣採用的Proof of Work（PoW）和以太坊實施的Proof of Stake（PoS）進行了比較。旨在全面分析PoST的獨特特徵和潛在優勢。

研究從介紹區塊鏈共識機制和PoW、PoS開始。然後深入探討PoST的概念，該機制利用存儲空間和時間作為區塊的創建和驗證的主要資源。研究探討了每種機制的資源需求、安全性、能源效率、去中心化和可擴展性等方面的特點。

通過比較分析，論文揭示了PoST的獨特特徵。強調了其解決PoW能源低效問題和PoS可擴展性挑戰的潛力。研究結果為區塊鏈開發者和相關利益相關者在考慮采用PoST時提供了深入洞察和參考。

此外，研究還確定了未來研究的方向，包括可擴展性和性能優化、安全性和抗攻擊性、混合共識機制。通過在這些方向上的深入研究，可以進一步發掘PoST的潛力，並推動其在各個行業的應用。

總之，本論文為PoST作為一種有前景的共識機制及其在塑造未來去中心化系統中的作用提供了深入的了解和展望。

This thesis investigates the Proof of Space-Time (PoST) consensus mechanism introduced by Chia Coin and compares it with the well-known Proof of Work (PoW) used by Bitcoin and Proof of Stake (PoS) implemented in Ethereum. The aim is to provide a comprehensive analysis of PoST, highlighting its distinguishing features and potential benefits.

The research begins with an introduction to blockchain consensus mechanisms and the limitations of PoW and PoS. It then delves into the concept of PoST, which utilizes storage space and time as the primary resources for block creation and validation. The study explores the resource requirements, security, energy efficiency, decentralization, and scalability aspects of each mechanism.

Through a comparative analysis, the thesis reveals the unique characteristics of PoST. It emphasizes its potential to address energy inefficiency issues associated with PoW and scalability challenges faced by PoS. The findings contribute to the existing knowledge of blockchain consensus mechanisms and provide insights for blockchain developers and stakeholders considering the adoption of PoST.

Furthermore, the research identifies areas for future exploration, including scalability potential, long-term security and sustainability, and hybrid consensus mechanisms. Recommendations are provided to guide further research and development in the field.

Overall, this thesis sheds light on the potential of PoST as a promising consensus mechanism and its role in shaping the future of decentralized systems.

achow101. extit{https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin}, 2023.

Husneara Sheikh, Rahima Meer Azmathullah, Faiza Rizwan. Proof of Work Vs. Proof of Stake: A Comparative Analysis and an Approach to Blockchain Consensus Mechanism, 2018.

Dan Boneh, Benedikt Bunz, Ben Fisch. A Survey of Two Verifiable Delay Functions, 2018.

Johannes A. Buckmann. Introduction to Cryptography, 2000.

Vitalik Buterin. Ethereum: A Next-Generation Smart Contract and Decentralized Application Platform, 2014.

Vitalik Buterin, Virgil Griffith. Casper: The Friendly Finality Gadget, 2019.

Vitalik Buterin. Proof of Stake: The Making of Ethereum, and the Philosophy of Blockchains, 2022.

Ping-Lun Wang, Tzu-Wei Chao, Chia-Chien Wu, Hsu-Chun Hsiao. Tool: An Efficient and Flexible Simulator for Byzantine Fault-Tolerant Protocols, 2022.

Chia Network, Chia Proof of Space Construction, 2020.

Chia Network, Chia Consensus, 2020.

Bram Cohen, Krzysztof Pietzak. The Chia Network Blockchain, 2019.

Coperneec group. How to Represent a Blockchain Through a Mathematical Model, 2020.

Whitfield Diffie, and Martin E.Hellman. New Directions in Cryptography, 1976.

Stefan Dziembowski, Sebastian Faust, Vladimir Kolmogorov, and Krzysztof Pietrzak. Proofs of Space, 2013.

Cong T. Nguyen, Dinh Thai Hoang, Diep N. Nguyen, Dusit Niyato, Huynh Tuong Nguyen, Eryk Dutkiewicz. Proof of Stake Consensus Mechanisms for Future Blockchain Networks: Fundamentals, Applications and Opportunities, 2019.

Neal Koblitz. Algebraic Aspects of Cryptography Ver3, 1997.

Satoshi Nakamoto. Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. extit{www.bitcoin.org}, 2008.

Krzysztof Pietzak. Efficient Verifiable Delay Functions, 2018.

RJ Rybarczyk. Understanding The Bitcoin Blockchain Header, 2020.

Benjamin Wesolowski. Simple Verifiable Delay Functions, 2018.

Gavin Wood. Ethereum: A Secure Decentralised Generalized Transaction Ledger, 2022.