| 研究生: |
劉巧蓮 Liu, Qiao-Lian |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
大社石化工業區臭味特徵成份分析研究 Characteristics of Odorous Air Pollutants Around the Da-She Industrial Complex |
| 指導教授: |
蔡俊鴻
Tsai, Jium-Horng |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
工學院 - 環境工程學系 Department of Environmental Engineering |
| 論文出版年: | 2004 |
| 畢業學年度: | 92 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 140 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 揮發性有機物 、臭味成份 、周界 、工業區 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | volatile organic compound, odorous composition, ambient, industrial complex |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:122 下載:10 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
石化工業區揮發性有機物及臭味污染問題為附近居民所關注,本研究針對石化工業區臭味特徵成份做研究,特徵成份的選擇以相關研究檢測資料、石化工業區原物料清單及臭味物種閾值等,找出本研究石化工業區之致臭成份進行現場採樣分析,以探討石化工業區臭味特徵成份及污染特性。
本研究於石化工業區周界人口較密集之兩處測點,進行現場採樣分析,兩測點各進行二次連續48小時採樣,分析揮發性有機物成份包括:苯、甲苯、乙苯、間,對-二甲苯及鄰-二甲苯、苯乙烯、丙烯腈、1,3-丁二烯,以及酯類:甲基丙烯酸甲酯,氨、硫化氫等十一種臭味特徵成份(其中VOCs使用GC/MS分析、硫化氫使用GC/PFPD分析、氨使用自動連續監測儀分析),並且配合採樣時間及風向速來解析。
研究結果顯示,甲測點位於工業區北方,風向來源多為石化工業區上風來源及鄰近交通源,測得物種多為苯、甲苯、乙苯、間,對-二甲苯,乙測點位於工業區東方,風向來源多為石化工業區及交通源,測得物種多以工業源物種為主,氨、丙烯腈、1,3-丁二烯、苯乙烯、MMA為主,濃度範圍依序介於:2.2~111 ppb、0.3~42.6 ppb、0.4~14.9 ppb、1.5~6.2 ppb、0.5~0.6 ppb。甲測點BTEX濃度多於乙測點(1.2~1.7倍),且兩測點BTEX比值均接近交通源BTEX比值,顯示石化工業區周界特徵成份苯、甲苯、乙苯、二甲苯受上風側移動源影響十分顯注。氨、丙烯腈、1,3-丁二烯、苯乙烯、MMA此五成分於甲測點濃度特徵比值以MMA為1,依序為14.6:1.2:1.2:6.6:1,乙測點依序為75.3:10.7:7.1:5.3:1,表示乙測點應受工業源影響較大。
本研究發現甲測點氨及硫化氫濃度時間出現相似,潛在上風來源有待進一步追蹤。乙測點日間測得:丙烯腈、1,3-丁二烯、苯乙烯、MMA,於11:00~19:00濃度有同時出現現象,依風向來源判斷可能為石化工業區內廠家所為。此外,乙測點之氨及甲苯濃度出現時間相似情形,可能與區內某二廠家同時運用氨及甲苯之工廠排放有關。乙測點日間風向來源多為西風主要來自石化工業區,夜間風向偏移為西北風及東南風,工業源物種日間濃度約是夜間濃度1.1~12.4倍(日:AM 6:00~PM 6:00;夜:PM 6:00~ AM 6:00)。
臭味強度評析石化工業區周界各物種臭味干擾顯示,氨及甲苯為較常出現較高濃度之物種;氨之臭味閾值較低(43 ppb),故為石化工業區主要致臭特徵成份。其他多種工業源物種雖然閾值甚低,唯其偵測濃度逹限值之次數較少,屬於短時間或瞬間致臭成份,依臭味強度排序為苯乙烯>MMA>1,3-丁二烯>丙烯腈。總臭味強度與總濃度相關性迴歸,於乙測點分別為0.8及0.7,相關性較甲測點好,顯示在乙測點有偵測到特徵致臭成份之濃度值。
以連續自動監測法與壓縮容器法分析VOCs特徵成份,兩者濃度相關係數R2介於0.62~0.96之間,且濃度差異不大。前者為現場採樣後立即分析,低濃度出現率較壓縮容器法高,且在時效性上具有優勢,壓縮容器法採集樣品時間較長,濃度代表性具有優勢。
The air pollution due to the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and the odorous problems in the petrochemical park were concerned by its neighborhood. The characterization of the odorous components, chosen from the consideration of the reference papers, the raw material list of the factories in the Da-She petrochemical industry park and the thresholds value of odorous compounds, was conducted in this study.
Twice of continuous 48 hours air sampling with the interval of two hours per time using the Canister followed the Method To-14, in the populated and sensitive sites of S1 upwind and S2 downwind around the Da-She industry park, was conducted in this study to measure 11 components (using GC/PFPD for hydrogen sulfide, GC/MS for VOCs and ammonium analyzer) including benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylene, styrene, arcrylonitrile, 1,3-butidiene, MMA, ammonium and hydrogen sulfide, and the resolution of the investigation results accompanying with the variation of time and wind direction and velocity.
The major odorous components measured in the S1 site, located at the upwind of the industry park but downwind of the Jern-Shen freeway, included benzene (B), toluene (T), ethylbenzene (E), and m,p-xylene (X). Both of the average ratio of BTEX of 1:2.8:0.8:0.9 in the S1 site being 1.2 ~ 1.7 time of 1:3.4:0.6:0.5 in the site S2 were close to the ratio of 1:2.4:0.5:1.9 from the vehicle emission, which showed that the S1 and S2 sites were apparently effected by the freeway emission. However, in the S2 site the concentration range of the petrochemical components ammonium, acrylonitrile, 1,3-butidiene, styrene and MMA releasing from the factory were 2.2 ~111 ppb, 0.3 ~ 42.6 ppb, 0.4 ~ 14.9 ppb, 1.5 ~ 6.2 ppb and 0.5 ~ 0.6 ppb respectively that corresponded to the ratio of 75.3:10.7:7.1:5.3:1, which being larger than that of 14.6:1.2:1.2:6.6:1 in site S2 showed that the effect due to the petrochemical factories emission was significant in site S2.
The components of ammonium and hydrogen sulfide, measured in site S1 always existing in the same time and not belong to the vehicle emission, indicated that the further investigation of its potential source was needed. On the other aspect, these compounds including acrylonitrile, 1,3-butidiene, styrene and MMA measured in the S2 site appearing at the same duration of a.m. 11:00 ~ p.m.7:00 indicated that was caused from the emission of the factories in the industry park., while the similar occasion of the ammonium and toluene observed simultaneously was correlated to the emission from two factories . The major wind source of the S2 in the daytime (a.m. 6:00 ~ p.m. 6:00) being the western direction, and the western north and eastern south direction in the nighttime (p.m. 6:00 ~ a.m. 6:00) came from the industry park, which resulted in the 1.1 ~ 12.4 time of industry contents in the daytime larger than that in the nighttime.
The odor strength, defined as the ratio of measured concentration to the thresholds concentration, of the ammonium and toluene appearing often with higher concentration were the major odorous components in the petrochemical park, while some components come from industrial emission was measured seldom with lower concentration and odor strength in the order of styrene, MMA, 1,3-butidiene and acrylonitrile. The square of the correlation coefficient between the total concentration and the total odor strength of all odorous components measured twice in the S2 sits of 0.8 and 0.7 were significant for the identification of the odorous components.
The comparisons of measuring the VOCs between the continuous monitoring system in site and the method TO-14 sampling by canister obtained the square of the correlation coefficient of 0.62 ~ 0.96, owing to the lower instant concentration existing in the VOCs monitoring system in site and the higher concentration obtaining in the canister sampling method spending more time.
參考文獻
1.何俊杰(1998)”石化工業臭味問題之探討”,工業污染防治,第68期,pp.38-48
2.行政院環境保護署”惡臭防制技術參考手冊(石化惡臭防制技術)譯”
3.劉巧蓮、江鴻龍、蔡俊鴻(2003)”南部石化工業區異味中VOCs及硫化物成份特性分析”,第十五屆化學工業安全與環保研討會
4.張鳳祥(1992)”石化工業區附近大氣中有害空氣污染物特徵之研究”,成大碩士論文
5.陳東廩(1992)”石化工業區附近大氣中之揮發性有機污染物特性及影響分析”,成大碩士論文
6.蔡政賢(2002)”含硫氣體化合物於高週波電漿中之反應機制”,成大碩士論文
7.張明輝(1997)”林園石化工業區臭味監測系統合理化探討”,台大碩士論文
8.洪文正(2002)”石化業區臭味與VOCs逸散及氣因子對排源污染物落點之探討”,雲科大碩士論文
9.李丁鑽(1994)”大氣中之苯環揮發性有機物排放來源特性與影響研究”,成大碩士論文
10.鄭景智 (1997)”年石化製程設備元件揮發性有機物逸散排放推估方法比較研究”,成大碩士論文
11.陳宏坤(1997)”大社石化工業區致臭物質監測系統合理化之探討”,台大碩士論文
12.張明輝(1997)” 林園石化工業區臭味監測系統合理化探討”,台大碩士論文
13.高雄縣環保局(1998)”八十七年度石化工業區揮發性有機物及臭味物質空氣污染巡查分析管制計畫”, 慧群環境科技股份有限公司期中報告
14.高雄縣環保局 (1999)“八十八年度石化工業區環境VOC監測計畫”, 金煇企業股份有限公司
15.經濟部工業局 (1995~2000)”大社林園工業區安全與環境監測管理系統督導查核”,增誠公司期末報告
16.蔡俊鴻(1993)“大社林園石化專業區附近環境背景空氣品質監測計畫”,經濟部工業局
17.蔡俊鴻(1993)”石化工廠附近大氣中揮發性有機物污染特性及危害分析(I)”,國科會計畫
18.高雄縣環保局(1998)“固定污染源逸散性VOC加強管制計畫(儲槽、製程元件)”,慧群環境科技股份有限公司期末報告
19.工研院(1997)”運用傳立葉紅外光遙測技術執行石化工業區空氣污染成份監測及環境評估專案研究計畫期中報告”,行政院環保署
20.台南縣環保局 (1998)”台南縣臭味污染源調查分析期未報告”,陳賢焜等
21.行政院環保署(2001)”監督查楠梓區揮發性有機物防制成效調查及改善計畫” 期末報告
22.高雄市環保局(1999)”八十八年度固定污染源減量輔導計畫”中技社
23.高雄縣環保局 (1996)”石化工業區空氣品質(含臭味、VOC等)之影響及改善計畫”, 金煇公司
24.Lu-yen Chen, Fu-Tine Jeng(2002), “Rationalization of an Odor Monitoring System:A Case Study of Lin-Yuan Petrochemical Park” ,Environ . Sci. Technol.,vol.34,pp:1166-1173
25.TNRCC 1995 Effects Screening Levels(ESLs)
26.American Industrial Hygiene Association (1989) ,“Odor thresholds for chemicals with established occupational health standards”
27.CMA(1990),“Chemical in the Community:Implementing Regional Air Monitoring Programs”,Chemical Manufacturers Association Washingto
28.S.T.Scherer,H.Rothweiler and CH.Schlatter,”Investigation of an industrial site”,Tocixological and Environmental Chemistry, vol.40,pp.103-109.
29.T.M.Hellman and F.H.Small(1973),“Characterization of Odors from the Peterochemical Industry”,Chemical Engineering Progress,69:75-78
30.T.M.Hellman and F.H.Small(1974),“Characterization of the Odors Peterochemical of 101 Petrochemicals Using Sensory Methods”, Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association,Vol.24:979-982
31.L.K Robin.,1991,“Partnering Between the Public, Regulatory Agencies, and industry for a Successful Ambient Air Monitoring Program”,the 84th Annual Meeting and Exhibition of the Air Waste Management Association,Vancouver, B.C.,Canada.
32.Francesc Venturam Rosa Boleda, Roger Lloret and Jordimatrtin –Alonso (1998),“Strategies for the identification of compounds causing odours inf water:a strdy of creosote spills” Wat. Res. Vol. 32.No. 2. pp.503-509
33.Dan G. Blumberg and A nat Sasson(2001),“Municipal hotlines and automated weather stations as a tool for monitoring bad odour dispersion:the northern Negev case”,Journal of Environmental Management 63, 103-111
34.Bruchet, C.Anselme,C.Jammes and J.Mallevialle(1995),“Development of a taste and odor expert system: present state strengths,limitations and possible future evolution”,Wat. Sci.Tech.Vol.31.No.11.pp.243-250
35.T. Nakamoto, H.Hiramatsu(2002),“Study of odor recorder for dynamical change of odor using QCM sensors and neural network” sensors and actuators B 85,263-269
36.J.Hermia and S.Vigneron(1993),“Odorors metrology and industrial Olfactometry”, Proceeding of the second international symposium on characterixation and contral of odours and VOC in the process industries, Louvain –Ia –Neuve , Belhium,3-5 November,pp.77-89
37.Michanel C. Murphy,Denis L.Margues and James F.L.Knight(1996), “Odours in an industrial-residential area near a large oil rdfinery in east saint john, new brunswicks-assessment and resolution”,89th annual meeting and exhibtion for AWMA