| 研究生: |
楊千慧 Yang, Cian-Hui |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
簡約線構風家用品產品系列辨識初探 A Preliminary Study of The Recognition of Simplicity Wire-Based Household Products Series |
| 指導教授: |
何俊亨
Ho, Chun-Heng |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
規劃與設計學院 - 工業設計學系 Department of Industrial Design |
| 論文出版年: | 2022 |
| 畢業學年度: | 111 |
| 語文別: | 英文 |
| 論文頁數: | 168 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 簡約線構風產品 、產品系列辨識 、家用品 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Wire-based household products series, Product series recognition, Houseware |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:214 下載:35 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
家用品遍佈於生活,產品透過挑選收藏或於室內場域中使用,風格即為一種認知,將內在蘊含的特徵視覺化呈現。本研究以簡約線構風家用產品為例,分析影響產品系列辨識的特徵間的關係,以陳超萃(2016)的建築風格實驗架構為基礎,應用於工業設計產品領域。實驗共分為兩個階段,第一階段為簡約線構風產品共同特徵(Common Feature)定義,採用專家焦點團體訪談法、卡片分類法與階梯法訪談,定義出簡約線構風家用產品12個共同特徵:功能、錯視、比例、角度、端部、中段、底部、接點、顏色、材質、粗細、加工方法,透過線徑粗細改變於簡約線構風產品全部位、端部、中段、底部;第二階段為產品系列辨識,進行線徑粗細視覺特徵的改變,採用李克特量表進行ANOVA與Scheffe事後檢定法分析產品系列辨識的閾值,實驗結果得知產品全部位與中段區域粗細改變影響產品系列感知最為顯著。本研究結果協助設計者進行簡約線構風產品設計時脈絡化思考並掌握影響產品家族系列的特徵元素,符合快速迭代的家用品市場。
Household products are all over our lives. We select, collect, and use them indoors. Style is a kind of cognition, which visualizes the inherent characteristics of household products. This study takes the wire-based household products as an example, analyzes the relationship among the characteristics that affect the product series identification, and applies architectural style experimental framework (Chan, 2016) to industrial design. The experiment is divided into two stages. First, we define the common features of the wire-based household products. By focus groups and expert interviews, card sorting and ladder interviews, 12 common features of wire-based household products are defined: function, optical illusion, proportion, angle, the end, the middle, the bottom, joint, color, material, thickness, and processing method. We change the wire diameters of the whole position, the end, the middle, and the bottom of the product, respectively. Second, we recognize product series by changing the thickness of the wire diameter. Then we use “Likert scale questionnaire” and “ANOVA with Scheffe's post hoc test” to analyze the threshold value of product series. The results show that the change of the thickness of the whole position and the middle area of the product has the most significant impact on the perception of the product series. To sum up, this study helps designers better think in systematic way when designing wire-based household products and grasp the elements that affect the product series.
Alvarez, C. (2017). Lean customer development: Building products your customers will buy: " O'Reilly Media, Inc.".
Arsel, Z., & Bean, J. (2013). Taste regimes and market-mediated practice. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(5), 899-917.
Brassett, J., & O’Reilly, J. (2015). Styling the future. A philosophical approach to design and scenarios. Futures, 74, 37-48.
Chan, C.-S. (1992). Exploring Individual Style in Design. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 19(5), 503-523. doi:10.1068/b190503
Chan, C.-S. (2000). Can style be measured? Design Studies, 21(3), 277-291.
Christensen, C. M., Hall, T., Dillon, K., & Duncan, D. S. (2016). Know your customers’ jobs to be done. Harvard Business Review, 94(9), 54-62.
DiMaggio, P. (1979). On pierre bourdieu. In: University of Chicago Press.
Fiell, C., & Fiell, P. (2019/2021). 改變設計的100個概念:從奢華美學到物聯網,從大量生產到3D列印,百年來引領設計變革的關鍵思考 (林金源, Trans.): 漫遊者文化.
Hanington, B., & Martin, B. (2012). 設計的方法:100個分析難題,跟成功商品取經,讓設計更棒、更好的有效方法 (趙慧芬, 林潔盈, & 吳莉君, Trans.): 原點出版社.
Hsu, C. (2020). 承襲大師風格的簡約線條,印度家具品牌 Phantom Hands 續寫現代主義美學. Retrieved from https://thefemin.com/2020/05/indian-furniture-brand-phantom-hands/
Jose, A., & Tollenaere, M. (2005). Modular and platform methods for product family design: literature analysis. Journal of intelligent Manufacturing, 16(3), 371-390.
KENTON, W. (2021, August 24). Product Family. Retrieved from https://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/product-family.asp
Kippenberger, T. (2000). Remember the USP?(Unique selling proposition). The Antidote.
Kumar, D., Chen, W., & Simpson, T. W. (2009). A market-driven approach to product family design. International Journal of Production Research, 47(1), 71-104. doi:10.1080/00207540701393171
Schilling, M. A., & Shankar, R. (2019). Strategic management of technological innovation: McGraw-Hill Education.
Talbot, J. (2000). Style, Function, Interaction: Do Designers Disregard User-Product Interaction when Proposing Product Design Concepts? Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting.
Thevenot, H. J., & Simpson, T. W. (2006). Commonality indices for product family design: a detailed comparison. Journal of Engineering Design, 17(2), 99-119.
Tonkinwise, C. (2011). A taste for practices: Unrepressing style in design thinking. Design Studies, 32(6), 533-545.
Van der Lelie, C. (2006). The value of storyboards in the product design process. Personal and ubiquitous computing, 10(2), 159-162.
Wang, H.-H., & Chan, J.-H. (2010). An Analysis on Similarity of Product Images. Paper presented at the DS 66-2: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Design Creativity (ICDC 2010).
Zheng, L., Chen, J., & Wu, J. (2009). Research on Designers' Style-Cognition Based on Product Form Construction. Paper presented at the 2009 Fifth International Conference on Natural Computation.
水野學. (2022). 品味,從知識開始:日本設計天王打造百億暢銷品牌的美學思考術【暢銷紀念版】 (葉韋利, Trans. 2 ed.): 時報文化出版企業股份有限公司.
王雅文. (2021). 風格師給你居家空間布置85法則6大經典風格+8大明星級軟件, 教你選對物, 找出規劃關鍵, 搭出對味的家: 原點出版社.
向哲緯. (2017). 簡約風格的設計手法應用於家飾品之設計. (碩士). 實踐大學, 台北市. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/11296/5kc52r
余強. (2018). 造物设计 幾何精神探析: 中國紡織出版社.
姚謙. (2015). 一個人的收藏: 時報文化.
原來. (2012). 風格四論:生活美學與形象競爭力: 新銳文創.
莊明振, & 蕭坤安. (2009). 建構圈椅風格的造形要素及其操作之探討. 設計學報 (Journal of Design), 1(1).
陳昱丞. (2006). 風格描述與型態建構方法應用於視覺造型創作之研究. 應用藝術與設計學報.
陳超萃. (2016). 风格与创造力-设计认知理论: 天津大学出版社.
黄琦, & 孫守遷. (2005). 基于产品风格认知模型的计算机辅助概念设计技术的研究. 杭州: 浙江大学,
黄琦, & 孫守遷. (2006). 产品风格计算研究进展. 计算机辅助设计与图形学学报, 18(11), 1629-1636.
游曉貞, 陳國祥, & 鄧怡莘. (2007). Mackintosh 座椅風格形態建構研究. 設計學報 (Journal of Design), 12(3).
楊千慧. (2021). 線架構家用產品之風格認知探討. (百感交集論文集). 感性設計國際研討會.