本文係以創造流動環境的觀點，思考都會區土地使用之空間設計。發達的交通與科技的技術，是現代人生活上的一個重要依賴，透過交通工具與科技的媒介進行社會互動，隱喻著一種流動的社會關係，隨速度的改變而影響、調整空間的使用。本文試圖從都市空間發展型態的變革中，觀察流動現象的影響因素，歸納分析創造環境產生流動現象的空間作法，以都市設計手法來解決龐大混亂的空間秩序。研究設計之重點有二，一如何強化人與物的活動，以降低自用客車之使用、活動旅次的最小化；二是如何創造環境的最大可及性，以減少自由流動的失序狀況。在實質作法上，係借以 The Transect 之空間模組規範概念，具體發展設計條件之基準。都市的流動環境是一種臨時性交流場所，係可以順應不同尺度、多樣化的網絡關係而生；故使用制度與規範、轉換活動系統的設計，及如何結合到空間使用以形成有效實質配置成為本文探討的重點。

This article seeks to apply the concept of “mobility environment” to the urban design for the metropolitan nodes. The lives of people and the workings of organizations are increasingly independent of urban physical and administrative boundaries. Throughout the history of urban forms, the concept of major urban design, to draw a conclusion to collect the factors which make places where mobility flows interconnect. In this paper it attempts to focus on the new urban dimension of transportation nodes, the spatial the movement of people and of goods, rather than the movement of vehicles and maximizing accessibility ( the ability to undertake a range of daily activities with a minimum of travel ), rather than mobility ( the ability to move freely). The essential manner is a planning approach that seek to organize the elements of urbanism. The ways in which the transect might be able to formulate the normal components of planning urban environment.

一、中文專書
1. 王健、單燕華譯,1999,《Building the 21st century home, the sustainable urban neighbourhood, 營造二十一世紀的家園,可持續的城市鄰里社區》,Rudlin & Falk 著。
中國北京：中國建築工業出版社。
2. 宋俊嶺、倪文彥譯, 1994,《 The city in histories：its origins, its transformations, and its prospects, 歷史中的城市：起源、演變與展望》, Mumford 著。台北市：建築與文化。
3. 金衡山譯,2006,《 The Death and Life of Great American Cities,美國城市的死與生》,Jacobs 著。中國南京：譯林。
4. 吳越譯,2001,《The city after the automobile,后汽車時代的城市》, Safdie 著。中國北京：人民文學出版社。
5. 俞孔堅譯,1998,《People place : design guidelines for urban open Space,人性場所 : 城市開放空間設計導則》, Marcus and Francis 著。中國北京：中國建築工業出版社。
6. 施植明譯, 1996,《雅典憲章》, Le Corbusier 著。台北市：田園城市文化。
7. 張京祥編著, 2005,《 西方城市規劃思想史綱》。中國南京：東南大學出版社。
8. 舒達恩譯, 1978,《開放的都市設計程序》, Barnett 著。台北市：尚林出版社。
9. 歐陽景根譯, 2002,《 Liquid Modernity, 流動的現代性》, Bauman 著。中國上海：上海三聯學術文庫。
10. 崔征國譯,1997,《建築設計資料集成》,日本建築學會編。台北市：詹氏書局。
11. 蔡燕寶譯,1998,《Stadtebau Band 1 : Stadtebauliches Entwerfen ,圖解都市計畫》, Prinz著。台北市：詹氏書局。
12. 劉依婷譯, 1999,《 The next American meptropolis：ecology, community ,and the American dream, 跨世紀都會藍圖：生態、社區、願景》, Pter Calthorpe 著。台北市：地景。
13. 謝慶達、莊建德譯, 1993,《都市設計概論》, Barnett 著。 台北市：創新出版社。
14. 國立成功大建築系研究所譯作, 1973,《都市設計專集》。台南市：成功大學建築系學會。
二、西文專書
1. American Planning Association,2006,Planning and urban design standards ,Hoboken : NJ :John Wiley & Sons.
2. Barton, Grant and Guise, 2003,Shaping Neighbourhoods：a guide for health, sustainability and vitality, London : Spon.
3. Bertolini & Spit, 1998,Cities on rails :the redevelopment of railway station areas , London : E
& FN Spon.
4. Burns and Kahn, 2005,Site Matters － Design Concepts , Histories, and Strategies, New
York : Routledge.
5. Duany et al., 2005, SmartCode & Manual , American : New Urban Publications Inc.
6. Final report of the Urban Task Force,1999,Towards an urban Renaissance ,London : Spon.
7. Institute of Transportation Engineers,2006,Context sensitive solitions in designing major
urban thoroughfares for walkable communities ,Washington, DC : Institute of
Richards,1990 ,Transport in cities, London : Architecture Design and Technology Press.
8. Stuart Meck, FAICP; Marya Morris, AICP; Kirk Bishop; and Eric Damian Kelly,
FAICP,2006,Model Smart Growth Land Development Regulations , Chicago : the Research
Department of the American Planning Association.
9. Transportation Engineers
10. ULI, 2003,Property development Europe :case studies in innovation , Washington,
D.C. :Urban Land Institute.
11. ULI, 2005,Residential development handbook , Washington, D.C. :Urban Land Institute.
三、西文期刊
1. Bertolini & Dijst, 2003, ”Mobility Environments and Network Cities”, Journal of Urban
Design, Vol.8, No.1 : PP.27-43
2. Brower, 2002,“ The Sectors of the Transect”, Journal of Urban Design, Vol. 7, No. 3,
PP.313-320
3. Dieleman, Dijst and Spit,1999,“Planning the compact city: the Randstad Holland
experience”,European planning Studies,Vol. 7, No. 5,PP.605-620
4. Duany, 2002,“ Introduction to the Special Issue: The Transect”, Journal of Urban Design, Vol. 7, No. 3 : PP.251-260
5. Graham and Healey,1999,“Relational concepts of Space and Place :Issues for planning theory and practices”, European planning studies, Vol.7, No.5 : PP.623-643
6. Healey, 1999,“ Sites, Jobs and Portfolios ： Economic Development Discourses in Planning Systerm” ,Urban Studies, Vol.36, No.1, : PP.27-42
7. Hoppenbrouwer & Erik Louw, 2005,“Mixed-use Development: Theory and Practice in Amsterdam's Eastern Docklands”,European Planning Studies Vol. 13, No. 7 : PP.967-983
8. Page, Phillips, and Siembab,2003,“The Millennium City: Making Sprawl Smart through Network-Oriented Development”,Journal of Urban Technology, Vol 10, No.3 : PP.63-84
9. Richarfson and Jensen,2000,“Discourses of Mobility and Polycentric Development: A Contested View of European Spatial Planning”,European Planning Studies,Vol.8,No.4 :
PP.503-519
10. Sheller, 2004, “Mobile Pubics: beyond the network perspective”, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, Vol. 22 : PP.39-52
11. Talen, 2002,“Help for Urban Planning: The Transect Strategy”, Journal of Urban Design, Vol. 7, No. 3 : PP. 293-312
12. Urry, 2000,“ Mobile sociology”, British Journal of Sociology Vol. 51 Issue 1 : PP.185-203