簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 蔡凱淞
Tsai, Kai-Song
論文名稱: 「那並非英雄的生涯」:艾倫‧霍林赫斯特《美的線條》中的酷兒情感政治
“That’s not a Hero’s Life”: Politics of Queer Affect in Alan Hollinghurst’s The Line of Beauty
指導教授: 賴俊雄
Lai, Chung-Hsiung
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 文學院 - 外國語文學系
Department of Foreign Languages and Literature
論文出版年: 2017
畢業學年度: 106
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 85
中文關鍵詞: 艾倫‧霍林赫斯特《美的線條》酷兒理論情感政治愛滋
外文關鍵詞: Alan Hollinghurst, Line of Beauty, queer theory, politics of affect, AIDS
相關次數: 點閱:168下載:10
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 艾倫‧霍林赫斯特在《美的線條》當中,精雕細琢卻又帶著一絲諷刺地描繪了1980年代英國中產階級政治家的偽善態度。其精細的筆觸與描寫,更為他奪下了2004年的曼布克獎。然而,儘管《美的線條》為霍林赫斯特的寫作生涯帶來的莫大的成功,許多學者卻認為霍林赫斯特應該提供小說中的同性戀角色們(尤其是主角尼克‧蓋斯特)一個更美好的結局,而非以負面的觀點呈現同性戀間的情愛關係。簡言之,他們擔心霍林赫斯特的作法會加深人們對當代同性戀者們的負面印象。相對於這些學者的批評,海瑟‧愛則觀察到,當代的同性戀者們不斷地嘗試將「酷兒」的黑暗面拋諸腦後,以便將同性之愛去汙名化。因此,當代的同性戀者似乎必須強迫並規範自己以滿溢的「正面能量」談論自身的性取向。莎拉‧艾哈邁德也指出,在當前的社會中,「不快樂」被視為是群體利益的威脅。因此,為了鞏固全體人民的利益,「快樂」已成為了弱勢群體的責任。但她同時也認為,酷兒群體的(不)快樂能夠質疑並妨礙異性戀主義及其恐同邏輯在社會中的運作。以海瑟‧愛與莎拉‧艾哈邁德的理論著作為出發點,本論文將尼克的政治冷感詮釋為1980年代英國同志對自身所處之曖昧政治地位的回應與抵抗:一方面,柴契爾主義的盛行,使「個人自由」的地位大幅提升;另一方面,在愛滋病爆發與日趨嚴重的恐同思想影響之下,同志不得不隱藏自身的同性之愛。易言之,本論文試圖探討艾倫‧霍林赫斯特《美的線條》中同性戀角色的情感經驗、構想一能容納酷兒負面性的情感政治,並藉此打破當前酷兒論述所面臨的政治僵局。

    Mainly using Heather Love’s and Sara Ahmed’s works on “queer affects,” this thesis aims to explore the affective lives of the gay characters and argues for an alternative form of politics for queer affects in Alan Hollinghurst’s The Line of Beauty. Hollinghurst’s Man Booker Prize winning novel, The Line of Beauty, is praised for its sophisticate yet ironic presentation of the hypocrisy of the bourgeoisie politicians in the United Kingdom during the 1980s. Despite its success, some critics worry that The Line of Beauty may reinforce the negative image of queer people because it fails to offer a positive ending for the gay characters, especially for the protagonist, Nick Guest. However, as Heather Love notes, contemporary homosexuals have tried to forget the dark side of queer life to destigmatize same-sex love. Therefore, it seems now compulsory for the queer to “feel positive” about their sexuality. Similarly, Sara Ahmed also points out that “happiness” has now become a duty for the marginalized, but she adds that queer (un)happiness is interruptive to the compulsory happiness in a heteronormative society. Taking Love’s and Ahmed’s arguments as the departure, this thesis attempts to conceive an alternative form of politics that incorporates the “sad” queer to break the impasse of contemporary queer politics during the era of Neoliberalism. With this form of politics, I try to read Nick’s political indifference not only as a passive response but also an affirmative form of deconstructive resistance against the paradoxical situation where individual freedom conflicts with one’s right to express same-sex desires under Thatcherism.

    Table of Contents Introduction 1 Chapter One: The Right Way to Feel: Optimistic or Pessimistic? Gay Aestheticism as Political Detachment? 6 Is Feeling “Good” and “Positive” a Gay Right? 10 Heteronormative Futurism and Queer Disturbance 14 Reexamination of Negative Affects and Queer Pessimism 19 Chapter Two: Queer Affects and the Impossibility of Gay Love in The Line of Beauty Introduction 25 Can We Call Gay Relations “Love”? 27 Should Love Come Out of the Closet? 31 Homosexuals as House Guests in Britain during the 1980s 39 Impossibility of Gay Love 44 Chapter Three: Queer Affects and the Politics of Refusal in The Line of Beauty Introduction 52 Neoliberalism as the Political Cornerstone of Compulsory Happiness 55 The Alternative Line of Happiness for the Queer 60 AIDS, Nostalgia and the Politics of Refusal 67 Conclusion 78 Works Cited 82

    Ahmed, Sara. Cultural Politics of Emotion. New York: Routledge, 2004. Print.
    ---. Promise of Happiness. Durham: Duke UP, 2010. Print.
    ---. Queer Phenomenology: Orientations, Objects, Others. Durham: Duke UP, 2006. Print.
    Alderson, David. “Attachment and Possession: The Romance of Family, Politics and Things in The Line of Beauty.” Sex and Sensibility in the Novels of Alan Hollinghurst. Ed. Mark Mathuray. London: Springer Nature, 2017. 129-50. Print.
    André Aciman, Call Me by Your Name. New York: Picador, 2007. Print.
    Benjamin, Walter. “Theses on the Philosophy of History.” Illuminations. Trans. Harry Zohn. New York: Schocken Books, 1969. 253-64. Print.
    Berlant, Lauren. Cruel Optimism. Durham: Duke UP, 2011. Print.
    Binkley, Sam. “Happiness, Positive Psychology and the Program of Neoliberal Governmentality.” Subjectivity 4.4 (2011): 371-94. Web. 14 Feb. 2018
    Butler, Judith. Psychic Life of Power: Theories in Subjection. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1997. Print.
    Cook, Matt, et al. A Gay History of Britain: Love and Sex Between Men Since the Middle Ages. Oxford: Greenwood World Pub, 2007. Print.
    De Villiers, Nicholas. Opacity and the Closet: Queer Tactics in Foucault, Barthes, and Warhol. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2012. Print.
    Derrida, Jacques. Negotiations: Interventions and Interviews, 1971-2001. Ed. and Trans. Elizabeth Rottenberg. Stanford: Stanford UP, 2002. Print.
    Eastham, Andrew. “Inoperative Ironies: Jamesian Aestheticism and Post-modern Culture in Alan Hollinghurst’s The Line of Beauty.” Textual Practice 20.3 (2006): 509–27. Web. 26 July 2017.
    Edelman, Lee. No Future: Queer Theory and the Death Drive. Durham: Duke UP, 2004. Print.
    Edwards, Jason. “‘Anxious Flirtations’: Homoeroticism, Art and Aestheticism in Late-Victorian Britain.” Visual Culture in Britain 8.1 (2007): 1-14. Web. 22 Sep. 2017.
    Engels, Frederick. Principles of Communism. Trans. Max Bedacht. Chicago: Daily Workers, 1925. Print.
    Foucault, Michel, and James O’Higgins. “Sexual Choice, Sexual Act: An Interview with Michel Foucault.” Salmagundi 58/59 (1982): 10-24. Print.
    Foucault, Michel. “The Political Technology of Individuals.” Technology of the Self: A Seminar with Michel Foucualt. Eds. Luther H. Martin, Huck Gutman, and Patrick H. Hutton. London: Tavistock, 1988. 145-62. Print.
    ---. History of Sexuality. Trans. Robert Hurley. New York: Random House, 1990. Print.
    Freeman, Elizabeth. Time Binds: Queer Temporalities, Queer Histories. Durham: Duke UP, 2010. Print.
    Gregg, Melissa, and Gregory J. Seigworth, eds. Affect Theory Reader. Durham: Duke UP, 2010. Print.
    Hannah, Daniel. “The Private Life, the Public Stage: Henry James in Recent Fiction.” Journal of Modern Literature 30.3 (2007): 70-94. Web. 16 Aug. 2017
    Hogarth, William. Analysis of Beauty. Ed. Ronald Paulson. New Haven: Yale UP, 1997. Print.
    Hollinghurst, Alan. Line of Beauty. London: Picador, 2015. Print.
    James, David. “Integrity After Metafiction.” Twentieth Century Literature 57.3-4 (2011): 492-515. Web. 13 Aug. 2017.
    Johnson, Allan. “Spitting Images: Image, Text, and the Popular Press in The Line of Beauty.” Alan Hollinghurst and the Vitality of Influence. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. 113-32. Print.
    Kaufman, Moisés. Gross Indecency: The Three Trials of Oscar Wilde. New York: Dramatists Play Service, 1999. Print.
    Love, Heather. “Compulsory Happiness and Queer Existence.” New Formation 64.1 (2007): 52–64. Web. 13 Aug. 2017.
    ---. Feeling Backward: Loss and the Politics of Queer History. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 2007. Print.
    Marx, Karl. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Vol. 1. Trans. Ben Fowkes. New York: Penguin Books, 1982. Print.
    Mathuray, Mark. “Introduction.” Sex and Sensibility in the Novels of Alan Hollinghurst. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017. Print.
    “Optimism.” Def.1. OxfordDictionaries.com. Oxford Dictionaries, n.d. Web. 26 Feb. 2018.
    Rivkin, Julie. “Writing the Gay ’80s with Henry James: David Leavitt’s A Place I’ve Never Been and Alan Hollinghurst’s The Line of Beauty.” Henry James Review 26 (2005): 282-92. Web. 13 Aug. 2017.
    Roberts, Adam. “Ogee: The Line of Beauty.” Sex and Sensibility in the Novels of Alan Hollinghurst. Ed. Mark Mathuray. London: Springer Nature, 2017. 111-28. Print.
    Salih, Sara. Judith Butler. London: Routledge, 2002. Print.
    Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. Epistemology of the Closet. Berkeley: U of California P, 2008. Print.
    Shiller, Dana. “‘Bleak Hilarity’ in Alan Hollinghurst’s The Line of Beauty.” Neo-Victorian Humour: Comic Subversions and Unlaughter in Contemporary Historical Re-Visions. Eds. Marie-Luise Kohlke, and Christian Gutleben. Boston: Brill, 2017. Print.
    Smith, Anna Marie. New Right Discourse on Race and Sexuality: Britain, 1968-1990. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1994. Print.
    Springer, Simon, Kean Birch, and Julie MacLeavy, eds. The Handbook of Neoliberalism. New York: Routledge, 2016. Print.
    Summerskill, Ben, ed. The Way We Are Now: Gay and Lesbian Lives in the 21st Century. London: Continuum, 2006. Print.
    Williams, Raymond. “Structure of Feeling.” Marxism and Literature. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1977. 128-35. Print.
    Wood, James. “The Ogee Curve.” New Republic 13 Dec. 2004: 47-9. Print.
    Woods, Gregory. “Queer London in Literature.” Changing English 14.3 (2007): 257-70.
    Yebra, José M. “A Terrible Beauty: Ethics, Aesthetics and the Trauma of Gayness in Alan Hollinghurst’s The Line of Beauty.” Ethics and Trauma in Contemporary British Fiction. Eds. Susana Onega, and Jean-Michel Ganteau. New York: Rodopi, 2011. 175-208. Print.

    下載圖示 校內:立即公開
    校外:立即公開
    QR CODE