二十一世紀知識經濟時代，知識成為組織的重要資產，而知識管理由於能有效協助企業進行知識之獲取、組織、儲存、轉換、更新、分享與創造，被視企業知識化之重要策略與方法。另外，由於資訊科技的進步，數位學習成為組織知識推播與擴散的方法，也成為組織知識管理之一環，故導入知識管理與數位學習將有利於成員之學習與知識分享及組織之成長而為必然之趨勢。
由於知識為數位學習之核心，亦為知識管理之元素，故知識管理與數位學習之成效繫於知識內容是否完備及能否滿足功能需求，因此為提升知識管理與數位學習之效益，需要一數位知識內容獲取、儲存、管理、分享之系統化方法及適當的知識儲存區設計，始能提供完善的知識內容並有效支援知識的管理與分享。
本研究提出一「結構化數位知識儲存區建構方法論」，本方法論包括程序、各步驟之目標、產出和有關的方法與技術，且依據此方法論建置一數位知識儲存區之實例，以提供數位知識儲存區建構與知識導入的指導原則與方針。
運用本方法論產出之數位知識儲存區，可為組織與個人帶來以下的效益：一、領域知識之正規化與模式化，二、增加知識的再用性，三、領域知識得以有效分享與擴散。

With the advent of knowledge economy, knowledge becomes the most important assets of organizations. Knowledge management is consequently regarded as one of the promising strategies and methods for advancing an enterprise due to its ability to facilitate knowledge acquisition, organizing, storage, transforming, updating, sharing, and innovation. At the same time, as the rapid development of information technology and the widespread and profoundness of the internet environment, e-learning has become an emerging method to advance communication of organizations knowledge, and is often viewed as a part of knowledge management. Implementation of knowledge management and e-Learning thus become an inevitable trend for knowledge development of individuals and organizations.
Since knowledge is the core of e-learning, it is also an element of KM. Therefore, the success of knowledge management and e-Learning relies heavily on the completeness of knowledge content and its ability to fulfill application requirements. It is necessary to provide a systematic approach for development of knowledge content and design of knowledge content repository to efficiently support knowledge management and e-Learning.
The objective of this research is to develop a structured methodology for digital knowledge repository development, including the development process, and the goal, outputs, and related methods and technology of each step of the process, as well as to design and build a digital content repository using the proposed methodology.
Through the knowledge repository established by means of the proposed methodology, the benefits that can be provided to organizations or individuals are as follows: (1) formalization and modeling of domain knowledge, (2) increasing the reusability of knowledge, and (3) allowing domain knowledge to be more easily sharing and conveying.

英文文獻
1. Alavi, M., and Leidner, D. E. “Research commentary: technology-mediated learning - a call for greater depth and breadth of research.” Information Systems Research, Vol.12, No.1, pp.1-10. 2001.
2. Alun D. P., Alan F., Derek H. S., David C., Nigel M.,and Phil, P. “Better knowledge management through knowledge engineering.” IEEE Intelligent Systems 16(1): 36-43 .2001.
3. Beckman, T. “Implementing the knowledge organization in government.” National Conference on Federal Quality, Paper and Presentation,10th . 1997.
4. Beckman, T. “A methodology for knowledge management.” International Association of Science and Technology for Development's(IASTED)International Conference on AI and Soft Computing﹐Canada：Banff, 1997.
5. Benjamin S. B. Logistics, engineering and management. fifth edition, Prentice Hall Inc. P81. 1998.
6. Beckham, T. J. “The current state of knowledge management.” In Knowledge Management Handbook, ed. Jay Liebowitz. New York: CRC Press, 1-1 pp.1-22.1999.
7. Boudah, D.J., Logan, K.R., and Greenwood, C.R. “The research to practice projects: Lessons learned about changing teacher practice.” Teacher Education and Special Education, 24, pp.290-303. 2001.
8. Buysse, V., and Wesley, P. W. “Models of collaboration for early intervention: Laying the groundwork.” Early intervention services for infants, toddlers, and their families. pp.259-293. Boston, In P. M. Blasco (Ed.), MA: Allyn and Bacon.2001.
9. Barbulescu, M., Balan, G., Boicu, M., and Tecuci, G. “Rapid development of large knowledge bases.” Systems, Man & Cybernetics, IEEE International Conference, 2003.
10. Carayannis, E. “The strategic management of technological learning in project/program management: the role of extranets, intranets, and intelligent agents in knowledge generation, diffusion, and leveraging.” Technovation, Vol. 18 No.11, pp.697-703. 1998.
11. Coombs, R., and Hull, R. “Knowledge management practices and path dependency in innovation.” Research Policy, 27: 237-253. 1998.
12. Chen, K.Y. “A method of hierarchical case representation in case-based reasoning.” Artificial Intelligent Laboratory, E.E. Department of National Chung Cheng University. June, 2000.
13. Chu, H. C., Lu, H. Y., Chen, Y. M., Lin, C. J., Chen, M. Y., and Lin, C. M., “Problem-based e-learning to support mathematics teaching for students with mild disabilities: model and system framework.” In Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2006, Orlando, FL, 2006.
14. Chu, H. C.; Chen, Y. M.; Chen, M. Y.; Lin, C. J., and Cheng, C. Y. “A structured methodology for digital knowledge content development: knowledge of mathematics teaching for students with mild disabilities as an example.” In Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2006 (pp. 935-940). Chesapeake, VA: AACE. 2006.
15. Drucker, P. F., Post -capitalist society. New York, NY:Harperbusiness. 1993.
16. Durkin J. Expert systems - design and development. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1994.
17. Demarest, M. “Understanding knowledge management.” Long Range Planning, Vol. 30, Issue 3, pp. 321-322,374-384.1997.
18. Davenport, T., and Prusak, L., Working knowledge: how organizations manage what they know. Harvard Business School Press, Boston,1998.
19. Fenstermacher, G. D. “The knower and the known: the nature of knowledge in research on teaching.” American Educational Research Association, 3-56. 1994
20. Fenwick, T.J., and Parsons, J. “Boldly solving the world: a critical analysis of problem-based learning as a method of professional education.” Studies in the Education of Adults, 30 (1), pp. 53-66. 1998.
21. Grant R. M. “Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: organizational capability as knowledge integration.” Organization Science, Vol. 20. 1996.
22. Hamilton, D. M. “Knowledge acquisition for multiple site, related domain expert systems: delphi process and application.” Expert Systems with Applications, Vol.11, Issue: 3, pp.377-389. 1996.
23. Hwang, G. J. “A tutoring strategy supporting system for distance learning on computer networks.” IEEE Transactions on Education, Vol. 41, No. 4, pp. 343-343. 1998.
24. Hansen M. T., Nohria N., and Tierney T. “What’s your strategy for managing knowledge?” Harvard Business Review, March-April. 1999.
25. Jain A. K., Dubes R. C. Algorithms for clustering data. NJ: Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs,1988
26. Janet, K. Case-based reasoning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc, ISBN 1-55860-237-2, 1993.
27. Jovanovic A. S., and Wageman G. Knowledge-based system (KBS) for creep crack growth of high temperature components in HIDA project. Materials at High Temperatures, 1998
28. Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., Puntambekar, S., and Ryan, M. “Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: putting learning by design(tm) Into practice.” Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(4), pp.495-547. 2003.
29. Levy, A. Y., and Rousset, M. C. “Verification of knowledge bases based on containment checking.” Artificial Intelligence, Vol.101, Issue: 1-2, pp.227-250. 1998.
30. Merseth, K. K. Cases and case methods in teacher education. Handbook of Research on Teacher Education (2nd), In J. Sikula (Ed.) New York: Macmillan. pp.722-744. 1996.
31. Marco R., and Paramjeet, S. “Knowledge management in an e-learning system.” IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, August 30- September 01, Joensuu, Finland, pp.365-369. 2004.
32. Nonaka, I. “A Dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation.” Organization Science(5:10), pp.14-37.1994.
33. Nonaka, I., and Takeuchi, H., The knowledge creating company:how japanese companies Ccreate the dynamics of innovation. New York:Oxford University Press,1995.
34. Noy, N. F., and McGuinnes, D. L. “Ontology development 101: a guide to creating your first ontology.” Stanford Knowledge Systems Laboratory Technical Report KSL-01-05 and Stanford Medical Informatics Technical Report.2001
35. Olin, J. G., and Greis, N.P. “Knowledge management across multitier enterprises: the promise of intelligent software in the auto industry.”Eropean Management Journa1.l7(4).pp.335-347.1999
36. Presley, A. R., Huff, B.L., and Liles, D.H. “A comprehensive enterprise model for small manufacturers.” In Proceedings of the 2nd Industrial Engineering Research Conference, Institute of Industrial Engineers, Atlanta, Georgia. pp. 430-434. 1993.
37. Petrash, G., “Managing knowledge assets for value.” Knowledge-Based Leadership Conference, Linkage, Inc., Boston.October 1996.
38. Patel, A., and Russell, D.”Cognitive skills acquisition and computer based intelligent tutoring tools.” Interactive Learning Environments, 10 (2), pp.139-155. 2002.
39. Quinn, J.B. “Maximizing innovation using intellectual science and technology.” The Knowledge Advantage: An Anthology, Capstone A/S, Dover, in Ruggles, R. and Holtshouse, D. (Eds), pp.130-2.1999.
40. Quinn, J., Anderson, P., and Finkelstein, S., “Managing professional intellect: making the most of the best.” Harvard Business Review,March-April 1996.
41. Richert, A.E. “ Teaching teachers to reflect: a consideration of programme structure.” Journal of Curriculum Studies, 22 (6), pp.509-527. 1990.
42. Rogoff, B. Apprenticeship in thinking: cognitive development in social context. Oxford University Press. New York.1990.
43. Rosenberg M. J., E-Learning: strategies for delivering knowledge in the digital Age. McGraw-Hill, 2001.
44. Russell, S., and Norvig, P. Artificial intelligence: a modern approach. Prentice Hall, 2nd, (Chap. 18-22) , 2003.
45. Schon, D. Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 1987.
46. Shulman, L. S. “Knowledge and teaching: foundations of the new reform.” Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22. 1987.
47. Solomon, J. “Social influences on the construction of pupil’s understanding of science.” Studies in Science Education, 14, pp.63-82. 1987.
48. Silverman, R., Welty, W.M., and Lyon S. Case studies for teacher problem solving. NY: McGraw-Hill Inc. 1992.
49. Sun, C. T., and Chou, C. “Experiencing CORAL: design and implementation of distance cooperative learning.” IEEE Transactions on Education, Vol. 39, No. 3, pp. 357-366. 1996.
50. Souders, J., and Prescott, C. “A case for contextual learning.” High School Magazine, 7 (3), pp. 38-43. 1999.
51. Simon, S., Christophe, B. J., Racz, W., and Sriram, R. “Design repositories: next-generation engineering design databases.” IEEE Intelligent Systems and Their Applications, 2000.
52. Sanchez, R., Managing knowledge intocompetence: the five learning cycles of the competent organization. Knowledge Management and Organizational Competence, New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.
53. Staab, S., Schnurr H. P., Studer, R., and Sure, Y., “Knowledge process and ontology.” IEEE Intelligent System, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 26-34, 2001.
54. Uschold, M., and Gruninger, M., “Ontologies: principles, methods and applications.” Knowledge Engineering Review, Vol 11, No. 2, pp. 93-55, 1996.
55. Urdan, T., and Weggen, C., “Corporate e-learning: exploring a new frontier.” A Research Paper from WR Hambrecht & Co, available on line athttp://www.wrhambrecht.com/research/coverage/elearning/, 23 July, 2000.
56. VanLehn, K. ”Cognitive skill acquisition.” Annual Review of Psychology, 42, pp.513-539. 1996.
57. Van der Spek, R., and Spijkervet, A. Knowledge management. Dealing intelligently with knowledge. The Hague: Kenniscentrum CIBIT. 1997.
58. Van Driel, J. H., Beijaard, D., and Verloop, N. “Professional development and reform in science education：the role of teachers’practical knowledge.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching.38. pp. 137-158. 2001.
59. Vincent, Annette., and Ross, Dianne. “Personalize training: determine learning styles, personality types and multiple intelligences online.” Learning Organization. 8(1), 36-43.2001.
60. Wiig, K. M. Knowledge Management Foundation. Schema Press,1993.
61. Wang, C. H., “Self-integrating knowledge-based brain tumor diagnostic system.” Expert Systems with Applications, Vol.11, Issue: 3, pp.351-360. 1996.
62. Wiig, K. M., “Knowledge management: where did it come from and where will it go?” Expert Systems with Applications, Pergamon Press/Elsevier (14), Fall 1997.
63. Zack, M. H., “Developing a Knowledge Strategy.” California Management Review, Vol. 41, No. 3, Spring , pp. 125-145.1999.
64. Zhu H.; Chen D., and Zhang X. “Research of knowledge chain in intelligent control.” 2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics, Intelligent Systems and Signal Processing, Volume: 2, vol.2, pp.1027- 1030. 2003.

中文文獻
65. 朱則剛，建構主義知識論的起源與近代哲學知識論的趨勢。教育工學的發展與派典演化，台北：師大書院。頁173-219。民83。
66. 余幸真，數學學習障礙教師之知識內容建構。學士論文，國立台南大學特殊教育學系，民95。
67. 林信成， 軟性計算理論與知識處理技術之研究，教育資料與圖書館學，第三十八卷，第二期，頁148-173，民89。
68. 林東清，知識管理，智勝文化事業有限公司，台灣台北，頁14-16，民93。
69. 許平和，身心障礙兒童鑑定與就學安置法令及個案分析研究。碩士論文，國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所，民92。
70. 郭靜姿與陳秀芬主編 ，特殊教育學生個案輔導實例彙編 。國立臺灣師範大學，民93。
71. 教育部，國民教育階段九年一貫課程總綱綱要。台北：教育部，民87。
72. 教育部，身心障礙與資賦優異學生鑑定標準。台北：教育部。民91。
73. 國際系統工程協會(INCOSE-International Council on Systems Engineering) INCOSE 系統工程手冊, 2a版, 第19-29頁，民93。
74. 樂為良譯，數位神經系統，商業週刊出版股份有限公司，台灣台北，民88。
75. 數位學習國家型科技計劃，http://elnpweb.ncu.edu.tw/index.htm，民91。
76. 鍾邦友，情境式電腦輔助數學學習軟體製作研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究未出版碩士論文，民83。