簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 林安娜
Beatriz, Diana
論文名稱: Comparing Operational Efficiency among Mobile Operators in Brazil, Russia, India and China
Comparing Operational Efficiency among Mobile Operators in Brazil, Russia, India and China
指導教授: 廖俊雄
Liao, Chun-Hsiung
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 國際經營管理研究所碩士班
Institute of International Management (IIMBA--Master)
論文出版年: 2008
畢業學年度: 96
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 64
外文關鍵詞: BRICs, Partial Factor Productivity, Mobile Operator, Operational Efficiency, Data Envelopment Analysis
相關次數: 點閱:80下載:1
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • Brazil, Russia, India and China represent the most dynamic, emerging markets in the world. From 1996 to 2006, the combined GDP of the four countries, called the BRIC economies, rose to more than $17.8 trillion from roughly $7.5 trillion. Telecommunications played a crucial role in their economic development. In particular, the mobile telecommunications industry of these four countries is experiencing very fast market growth combined with rapid technological change and fierce competition. Therefore, telecommunications organizations have no alternative but to improve their productivity and efficiency in order to become more competitive and profitable. A wide variety of empirical studies on productivity and efficiency in the telecommunications industry is available, but few studies have measured and compared operational efficiency among mobile operators. To my best knowledge, this study is the first attempt to measure and compare the operational efficiency of the ten dominant mobile operators in BRICs, including Vivo, TIM, Claro and Oi in Brazil, MTS and Beeline in Russia, Bharti Airtel and Vodafone Essar (previously Hutchison Essar) in India, and China Mobile and China Unicom in China. The study period is between 2002 and 2006.
    In this study, partial factor productivity (PFP) is first measured by means of three indicators ─ revenue per employee (RPE), revenue per total asset (RPA) and revenue per capital expenditure (RPC). Next, the overall technical efficiency, pure technical efficiency and scale efficiency of mobile operators are measured by the data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach. The number of employees, total assets and capital expenditures are used in the DEA model as input variables. As for output variables, this paper chooses total revenue. Finally, sensitivity analysis is conducted in order to determine the degree of sensitiveness to data variations in the application of DEA
    This study has some interesting findings; in particular, partial factor productivity demonstrates that three of the four Brazilian mobile operators, Vivo, TIM and Oi showed remarkable productivity ratios and the state-owned operator China Unicom had the highest RPC among BRICs. In contrast, Indian mobile operator’s productivity ratios were generally low compared to other BRICs mobile carriers. Consistent with the findings of PFP, the results of empirically implementing DEA approach indicate that the two dominant Brazilian mobile operators, Vivo and TIM, were fully efficient throughout the entire period of study. The fourth largest Brazilian mobile operator, Oi, and the second dominant Chinese carrier, China Unicom showed remarkable improvement and achieved fully efficiency in the later period of study. Overall, Indian mobile operators were the least efficient among BRICs operators in the period of study. Interestingly, the findings of this study verified that full operational efficiency can be achieved by operators with large revenues, such as China Unicom, as well as by others with medium and small revenues, such as Vivo, TIM and Oi. Finally, the results of sensitivity analysis suggested that the input variable that seemed to affect the efficiency score the most was total assets.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS IV ABSTRACT V TABLE OF CONTENTS VII LIST OF TABLES IX CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Research Background and Motivation. 1 1.2 Research Objectives and Procedures. 4 1.3 Thesis Structure. 5 CHAPTER TWO MOBILE MARKETS IN BRICs 7 2.1 Brazil. 7 2.1.1 Market Structure and Mobile Communication Standards in Brazil 7 2.1.2 Market Development in Brazil 9 2.2 Russia. 12 2.2.1 Market Structure and Mobile Communication Standards in Russia 12 2.2.2 Market Development in Russia 13 2.3 India. 15 2.3.1 Market Structure and Mobile Communication Standards in India 15 2.3.2 Market Development in India 16 2.4 China. 18 2.4.1 Market Sstructure and Mobile Communication Standards in China. 18 2.4.2 Market Development in China. 20 CHAPTER THREE LITERATURE REVIEW AND METHODOLOGY 22 3.1 Literature Review. 22 3.2 Measurement Methodology. 29 3.2.1 Data Envelopment Analysis. 29 3.2.2 Partial Factor Productivity. 32 3.3 Data Collection. 32 3.3.1 Input and Output Variables. 33 CHAPTER FOUR EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS 37 4.1 Partial Factor Productivity. 37 4.1.1 Revenue per Employee 38 4.1.2 Revenue per Asset 39 4.1.3 Revenue per Capital Expenditure 39 4.1.4 Comparison of Partial Factor Productivity 40 4.2 Efficiency Estimates and Discussion. 42 4.2.1 Isotonicity Test 42 4.2.2 DEA Results and Discussion 42 4.2.3 Input Slack Analysis 48 4.2.4 Kruskal-WallisTest Dwass-Steel-Critchlow-Fligner Test… 52 4.3 Sensitivity Analysis. 53 CHAPTER FIVE CONCLUSION 58 REFERENCES 62

    Agencia Nacional de Telecomunicacoes (2006). Relatorio Annual 2006. Retrieved September 2007, from www.anatel.gov.br/
    Banker, R.D., Charnes, A. and Cooper, W.W. (1984), “Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis”, Management Science, 30(9), 1078–1092.
    Beeline. Annual Reports 2002-2006. Retrieved September 2007, from http://www.vimpelcom.com/index.wbp
    Bharti Airtel. Annual Reports 2002-2006. Retrieved September 2007, from http://www.bhartiairtel.in/index.php?id=29
    BSNL. Annual Reports 2002-2006. Retrieved September 2007, from http://www.bsnl.co.in/company/achivement.htm
    Calabrese, A., Campisi, D., & Mancuso, P. (2002). Productivity Change in the telecommunications industries of 13 OECD countries. International Journal of Business and Economics, 1(3), 209-223.
    Chang, J., Fang, X., & Yen, D. C. (2005). China's telecommunication market for international investors: opportunities, challenges, and strategies. Technology in society, 27, 105-121.
    Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W. and Rhodes, E. (1978), “Measuring the efficiency of decision making units”, European Journal of Operations Research, 2(6), 429–446.
    China Mobile. Annual Reports 2002-2006. Retrieved September 2007, from http://www.chinamobileltd.com/?lang=bg5
    China Unicom. Annual Reports 2002-2006. Retrieved September 2007, from http://www.chinaunicom.com.hk/tc/home/default.html
    Claro. Annual Reports 2002-2006. Retrieved September 2007, Retrieved September 2007, from http://www.americamovil.com/
    Critchlow, D. E., & Fligner, M. A. (1991). On distribution-free multiple comparisons in the one-way analysis of variance. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 20 (1), 127-139.
    Dwass, M. (1960). Some k-sample rank-order tests. In: Olkin, I., Ghurye, S. G., Hoeffding, H., Madow, W. G., Mann, H. B., eds. Contributions to Probability and Statistics. Stanford University Press, pp. 198–202.
    Farrel, M. J. (1957). The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 120(No.3), 253-290.
    Giokas, D. I., & Pentzaropoulos, G. C. (2000). Evaluating productive efficiency in telecommunications: evidence from Greece. Telecommunications Policy, 24, 781-794.
    Goldman, S. (2003). Dreaming with BRICs: The Path to 2050. Retrieved September 2007, from http://www.gs.com/insight/research/reports/99.pdf
    Gruber, H. (2005). The Economics of Mobile Telecommunications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    ITU. Main telephone lines, subscribers per 100 people. Retrieved September 2007, from http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/icteye/Indicators/Indicators.aspx#
    Lam, P. L., & Lam, T. (2005). Total factor productivity measures for Hong Kong telephone. Telecommunications Policy, 29, 53-68.
    Lee, Y. Y., Park, Y. T., & Oh, H. S. (2000). The impact of competition on the efficiency of public enterprise: The case of Korean Telecom. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 17, 423-442.
    Macdonald, S., & Madden, G. (Eds.). (1998). Telecommunications and Socio-Economic Development. Amsterdam, B.V.: Elsevier Science.
    Madden, G., & Savage, S.J. (1999). Telecommunications productivity, catch-up and innovation, Telecommunications Policy, 23, 65-81.
    Mattos, C., & Coutinho, P. (2005). The Brazilian model of telecommunications reform. Telecommunications Policy, 29(5-6), 449-466.
    Megafon. Annual Reports 2002-2006. Retrieved September 2007, from http://eng.megafon.ru/
    MIC. (2006). The analysis of mobile communication market in Russia. Market Intelligence Center.
    MTS, Annual Reports 2002-2006. Retrieved September 2007, from http://www1.mtsgsm.com/
    Oi, Annual Reports 2002-2006. Retrieved September 2007, from http://www.telemar.com.br/ri/principal/frame.asp
    Pentzaropoulos, G.C., & Giokas, D.I. (2002). Comparing the operational efficiency of the main European telecommunications organizations: A quantitative analysis. Telecommunications Policy, 26, 595-606.
    Petrazzini, B. A. (1996). Telecommunications policy in India: The political underpinnings of reform. Telecommunications Policy, 20(1), 39-51.
    Rushdi, A. A. (2000). Total factor productivity measures for Telstra. Telecommunications Policy, 24, 143-154.
    Steel, R. G. D. (1960). A Rank Sum Test for Comparing All Pairs of Treatments. Technometrics, 2(2), 197-207.
    Sueyoshi, T. (1998). Privatization of Nippon Telegraph and Telephone: was it a good decision?. European Journal of Operational Research, 107, 45-61.
    TIM, Annual Reports 2002-2006. Retrieved September 2007, from http://www.timpartri.com.br/tim/
    TRAI. (2006). Study paper on financial analysis of telecom industry of China and India. Retrieved September 2007, from
    http://www.trai.gov.in/trai/upload/StudyPapers/7/Study%20Paper%20of%20China%2027%20June%202006_NEW.pdf
    Tsai, H. C., Chen, C. M., & Tzeng, G. H. (2006). The comparative productivity efficiency for global telecoms. International Journal of Production Economics, 103, 509-526.
    Uri, N. D. (2000). Measuring productivity change in telecommunications. Telecommunications Policy, 24, 439-452.
    Uri, N. D. (2001). Measuring the impact of price caps on productive efficiency in telecommunications in the United States. The Engineering Economist, 46(2), 81-115.
    Uri, N. D. (2002). The measurement of the change in productivity in telecommunications. Telecommunications Systems, 20(3), 177-194.
    Vivo. Annual Reports 2002-2006. Retrieved September 2007, from
    http://www.vivo.com.br/ri/index.php?WT.ac=Home.Menu_Superior.Investidores
    Vodafone Essar, Annual Reports 2002-2006, Retrieved September 2007, from http://www.htil.com/eng/ir/home.htm

    下載圖示 校內:2009-08-14公開
    校外:2018-08-14公開
    QR CODE