簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 小堀和彥
Kazuhiko, Kobori
論文名稱: 預算參與對管理績效的影響之研究 ―以角色模糊和組織承諾為干擾變数
The Effect of Budgetary Participation on Performance: Role Ambiguity and Organizational Commitment as an Intervening Variable
指導教授: 劉宗其
Liu, TsungChii
倪豐裕
Ni, Feng ­Yu
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 企業管理學系
Department of Business Administration
論文出版年: 2006
畢業學年度: 94
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 44
中文關鍵詞: 組織承諾割當預算預算參與角色模糊績效
外文關鍵詞: Role Ambiguity, Budgetary Participation, Appropriation Budget, Organizational Commitment, Performance
相關次數: 點閱:117下載:4
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究在探討在台灣日本製造業部門經理人有關預算參與、角色模糊、組織承諾和管理績效間的關係。由於預算參與和管理績效間的關係仍未獲得一致性的結論、本文認為兩者之關係受角色模糊和組織承諾中介的影響。

    實證結果、對預算參與的程度很低、為此、組織承諾也低的結果得了。這個、能得到了Mia(1988)的研究結果同樣的結果。根據Mia(1988)、有了對於組織承諾低的經理人、撥款預算恰當這樣的結果。在台灣日本製造業的預算在被日本總社先撥款預算分配了、這個預算中、如何獲得卓越的成果、是現場公司經理人的課題。

    不管對預算參與很低、更加組織承諾也低、可是、他們為職務角色高度看去了。這個、對日本籍經理人來說、對所說的在海外的特殊的地方的業務、台灣籍經理人來說、所說的在外國企業的職務的特殊的被考慮從環境主要原因是出了的結果。

    為文獻上預算參與和管理績效的影響關係的不一致、本研究以組織承諾和角色模糊、確證分析的結果、除了預算參與和角色模糊、假設全部被拋棄了。

    那個理由、對日本經營手法在外國。就是説這國的經理人限制著對預算參與和經營參加的權限。可是、對他們的職務的意識的高度能得到了。管理績效貢獻著這樣的結果。

    從這個研究結果、在台灣日本製造業、是向預算參與被限制的、由於撥款預算內看高度的角色。一般認為出示完成了對跟對預算參與和管理績效的關係的研究新的確證的根據。

    關鍵詞:撥款預算、預算參與、角色模糊、組織承諾、管理績效。

    Japanese overseas subsidiaries are considered as suppliers for
    headquarters still now. In budgetary process, the total budget is decided by the
    top down from headquarters. Most headquarters recognize the significance that
    managements participate in budgetary process, however, they do not make highly
    use of the process in overseas subsidiaries. This study aims to investigate whether
    budgetary participating process or appropriation budgetary system is suitable for
    overseas subsidiaries.
    The research results show that the relationship between budgetary
    participation and performance is negative. The result is the same as the outcome
    of Sterdry (1960), Bryan and Locke (1967), Blumenfield and Leidly (1969) and
    Cherrington (1973). However, it is different form that of Argyris (1955), Brownell
    (1982), Brownell and Mclnnes (1986), Govindarajan (1986), Dunk (1990), Kren
    (1992). Therefore, the relationship between budgetary participation and
    performance has not reached a consistent conclusion.
    The results also show that managers in Japanese overseas subsidiaries do
    not participate in the budgetary processing positively in Taiwan. It brought them
    low commitment to their organization. The result is correspondent with Mia’s
    findings (1988) in that point. A manager with low commitment has had negative
    results about the relationship between budgetary participation and performance
    with organizational commitment as an intervening variable. It is suitable for the
    managers to appropriation budget (Mia, 1988). In fact, managers in Japanese
    overseas subsidiaries have a task to get the excellent results within appropriation
    budget.
    These managers are lower to participate in budgetary processing. That is
    why most hypotheses are rejected in this research. It means that Japanese
    companies do not think highly of effects of budgetary participation in overseas
    subsidiaries. The results show that headquarters just gave overseas subsidiaries
    an allocation budget.
    However, managers’ intension is higher about their role. They have a
    mission to product specific goods in Taiwan. They are expected to attain a
    distinguish goals by headquarters. It reveals that they have a clear role in their
    organizations.
    It shows that their budgetary participation opportunities are restricted.
    On the other hand, they have an intention to perform their duties and
    organizational goals within appropriation budget. This research presents the
    unknown their intention of role about budgetary processing in Japanese overseas
    subsidiaries.

    CHPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION Pages 1.1 Research Background and Motivation 1 1.2 Research Objectives and Contributions 2 1.2.1 Research Model 3 1.3 Scope of this Research 3 1.4 Research Procedure 4 1.5 The Structure of this Study 5 CHPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW 2.1 Budgetary Participation and Performance 6 2.2 Budgetary Participation and Role Ambiguity 7 2.3 Budgetary Participation and Organizational Commitment 8 2.4 Role Ambiguity and Organizational Commitment 9 2.5 Role Ambiguity and Performance 9 2.6 Organizational Commitment and Performance 10 2.7 Hypotheses to be tested 11 CHPTER THREE: Research Method 3.1 Construct Measurement 3.1.1 Budgetary Participation 12 3.1.2 Role Ambiguity 12 3.1.3 Organizational Commitment 12 3.1.4 Performance 13 3.2 Sampling Plan 13 3.3 Questionnaire Development 13 3.4 Data Analysis Procedure 14 3.4.1 Descriptive Statistic Analysis 3.4.2 Purification and Reliability of the Measurement variables 3.4.3 Hypotheses Testing CHAPTER FOUR: EMPIRICAL ANALYSES AND RESULTS 4.1 Budgetary Participation and Performance 16 4.2 Budgetary Participation and Role Ambiguity 19 4.3 Budgetary Participation and Organizational Commitment 19 4.4 Role Ambiguity and Organizational Commitment 20 4.5 Role Ambiguity and Performance 20 4.6 Organizational Commitment and Performance 20 CHAPTER FIVE: COCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS 5.1 Research Conclusion 22 5.2 Research Limitation 23 5.3 Research Suggestions 23 REFERENCES 24 APPENDIX 31

    中文部分:
    倪豐裕、蘇志泰,2003 年,策略型態和角色模糊對預算制度效能的影響,中山管理評論。
    倪豐裕、祝道松、張瑞當,1998 年,製造技術水準對參與式預算制度與部門績效關係影
    響之研究,中山管理評論。
    蘇銘峰,2001 年,在台日系企業幹部之預算參與對管理績效之影響─以組織承諾為干擾
    變數之研究,中山大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
    蘇志泰,1995 年,組織特徵、預算參與、動機和管理績效之相關研究,中山大學企業管
    理研究所未出版碩士論文。
    蘇志泰、林淑美,2001 年,預算目標接受與預算目標困難度對預算參與和管理績效間關
    係的影響,第十六屆全國技術及職業教育研討會論文。
    日文部分:
    浅田孝幸,1989 年,予算管理システムの日米企業比較について,
    企業会計'89 VOL,41 No.4-No-5。
    岡本清、尾畑裕、広本敏郎、挽文子,2003 年,管理会計,中央経済社。
    大塚裕史,1998 年,参加型予算管理研究,同文館。
    小菅正伸,1992 年,行動的予算管理論,中央経済社。
    柴田典男・熊田靖久,1988 年,わが国企業の予算管理制度,
    企業会計'88Vol,40 No.4。
    東洋経済新報社,2005 年,海外進出企業総覧2005,東洋経済新報社。
    西澤脩,2000 年,英和・和英管理会計辞典,中央経済社。
    日本管理会計学会,2000 年,管理会計学大辞典,中央経済社。
    渡邊章好,2002 年,参加型予算に関する経験的研究の近年の動向,
    一橋論叢,第127 巻、第5 号。
    英文部分:
    Allen, N. J., and J. P. Meyer. 1990. The Measurement and Antecedents of
    Affective, Continuance and Normative Committing to the Organization.
    Journal of Occupational Psychology 63: 1-18.
    Angle, H. L., and J. L. Perry. 1981. An Empirical Assessment of Organizational
    Commitment and Organizational Effectiveness. Administrative Science
    Quarterly 26(1): 1-14.
    Argyris, C. 1952. The Impact of Budgets on People. Ithaca: School of Business and
    Public Administration, Cornell University.
    Argyris, C. 1955. Organizational Leadership and Participative Management. The
    Journal od Business 28: 1-7.
    25
    Baron, R. A., and J. Greenberg. 1990. Behavioral in Organizations:
    Understanding and Managing the Human Side of Work. 160-77 226-29
    268-71.
    Baron, R. M., and D. A. Kenny. 1986. The Moderator - Mediator Variable
    Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and
    Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
    51(6): 1173-82.
    Bass, B. M., and H. J. Leavitt. 1963. Some Experiments in Planning and
    Operating. Management Science: 574-85.
    Becker, H. S. 1960. Notes on the Concept of Commitment. American Journal of
    Sociology 66: 32-42.
    Becker, S., and D. Green, Jr. 1962. Budgeting and Employee Behavior. The
    Journal of Business (October): 392-402.
    Blumenfield, W. S., and T. R. Leidly. 1969. Effectiveness of Goal Setting as a
    Management Device: research Note. Psychological Reports: 752-59.
    Boshoff, C., and G. Mels. 1995. A Causal Model to Evaluate the Relationships
    Among Supervision, Role Stress, Organizational Commitment and
    Internal Service Quality. European Journal of Marketing 29(2): 23-42.
    Brownell, P. 1981. Participation in Budgeting, Locus of Control and
    Organizational Effectiveness. The Accounting Review 56(4): 844-60.
    Brownell, P. 1982a. The Role of Accounting Data in Performance Evaluation,
    Budgetary Participation, and Organizational Effectiveness. Journal of
    Accounting Research 20(1): 12-27.
    Brownell, P. 1982b. A Field Study Examination of Budgetary Participation and
    Locus of Control. The Accounting Review 57(4): 766-77.
    Brownell, P. 1982c. Participation in Budgeting Process: When It Works and When
    It Doesn’t. Journal of Accounting Literature: 124-53.
    Brownell, P. 1985. Budgetary Systems and the Control of Functionally
    Differentiated Organizational Activities. Journal of Accounting Research
    23(2): 502-12.
    Brownell, P., and M. Hirst. 1986. Reliance on Accounting Information, Budgetary
    Participation, and Task Uncertainty: Tests of a Three-Way Interaction.
    Journal of Accounting Research 24(2): 241-49.
    Brownell, P., and M. McInnes. 1986. Budgetary Participation, Motivation, and
    Managerial Performance. The Accounting Review 61(4): 587-600.
    Bryan, J. F., and E. A. Locke. 1967. Goal Setting as a Means of Increasing
    Motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology 51(3): 274-77.
    Buchanan, B. 1974. Government Managers, Business Executives, and
    Organizational Commitment. Public Administration Review
    34(July/August): 339-47.
    26
    Caplan, E. H. 1971. Management Accounting and Behavioral Science. MA:
    Addison-Wesley.
    Carmines, E. G., and R. A. Zeller. 1979. Reliability and Validity Assessment. CA.:
    Sage Publications.
    Chalos, P., and S. Haka. 1989. Participative Budgeting and Managerial
    Performance. Decision Sciences 20: 334-47.
    Cherrington, D. J. 1989. Organizational Behavior. MA: Simon & Schuster.
    Cherrington, D. J., and J. O. Cherrington. 1973. Appropriate Reinforcement
    Contingencies in the Budgeting Process. Journal of Accounting Research
    (Supplement): 225-53.
    Chonko, L. B. 1986. Organizational Commitment in the Sales Force. Journal of
    Personal Selling & Sales Management 6(3): 19-27.
    Collins, F. 1978. The Interaction of Budgeting Characteristics and Personality
    Variables with Budgetary Response Attitudes. The Accounting Review
    53(2): 324-35.
    Collins, F., S. H. Lowensohn, M. H. McCallum, and R. I. Newmark. 1995. The
    Relationship Between Budgetary Management Style and Organizational
    Commitment in a Not-for-Profit Organization. Behavioral Research in
    Accounting 7: 65-79.
    Cronbach, L. J. 1951. Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of
    Tests. Psychometrika 16: 291-334.
    DeCotiis, T. A., and T. P. Summers. 1987. A Path Analysis of a Model of the
    Antecedents and Consequences of Organizational Commitment. Human
    Relations 40(7): 445-70.
    Dunk, A. S. 1989. Budget Emphasis, Budgetary Participation and Managerial
    Performance: A Note. Accounting, Organizations and Society 14(4): 321-24.
    Dunk, A. S. 1990. Budgetary Participation, Agreement on Evaluation Criteria and
    Managerial Performance: A Research Note. Accounting, Organizations
    and Society 15(3): 171-78.
    Dunk, A. S. 1993a. The Effect of Budget Emphasis and Information Asymmetry
    on the Relation Between Budgetary Participation and Slack. The
    Accounting Review 68(2): 400-10.
    Dunk, A. S. 1993b. The Effects of Job-Related Tension on Managerial Performance
    in Participative Budgetary Setting. Accounting, Organizations and Society
    18(7/8): 575-85.
    Frucot, V., and W. T. Shearon. 1991. Budgetary Participation, Locus of Control,
    and Mexican Managerial Performance and Job Satisfaction. The
    Accounting Review 66(1): 80-99.
    Govindarajan, V. 1986. Impact of Participation in the Budgetary Process on
    Managerial Attitudes and Performance: Universalistic and Contingency
    27
    Perspectives. Decision Sciences 17(4): 496-516.
    Gregson, T. 1992. An Investigation of the Causal Ordering of Job Satisfaction and
    Organizational Commitment in Turnover Models in Accounting.
    Behavioral Research in Accounting 4: 80-95.
    Gregson, T., J. Wendell. 1994. Role Conflict, Role Ambiguity, Job Satisfaction and
    the Moderating Effect of Job-Related Self-Esteem: A Latent Variable
    Analysis. Journal of Applied Business Research 10(2): 106-13.
    Gregson, T., J. Wendell, and J. Aono. 1994. Role Ambiguity, Role Conflict, and
    Perceived Environmental Uncertainty: Are the Scales Measuring
    Separate Constructs for Accountants? Behavioral Research in Accounting
    6: 144-59.
    Heneman, H. G., Ⅲ. 1974. Comparisons of Self and Superior Ratings of
    Managerial Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 59(5): 638-42.
    Hofstede,G.H.(1967), The Game of Budget Control,N.Y.:Garland(1984)
    Hofstede, G. H. 1983. National Cultures in Four Dimensions. International
    Studies of Management and Organization 13(1/2): 46-74.
    Hopwood, A. G. 1976. Accounting and Human Behaviour. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.:
    Prentice-Hall.
    Hunt III, H. G., and R. L. Hogler. 1990. Agency Theory as Ideology: A Comparative
    Analysis Based on Critical Legal Theory and Radical Accounting.
    Accounting, Organizations and Society 15(5): 437-54.
    Kenis, I. 1979. Effects of Budgetary Goal Characteristics on Managerial Attitudes
    and Performance. The Accounting Review 54(4): 707-21.
    Kren, L. 1992. Budgetary Participation and Managerial Performance: The Impact
    of Information and Environmental Volatility. The Accounting Review
    67(3): 511-26.
    Latham, G. P., and L. M. Saari. 1979. The Effects of Holding Goal Difficulty
    Constant in Assigned and Participatively Set Goals. Academy of
    Management Journal (March): 163-68.
    Latham, G. P., and G. A. Yukl. 1975. A Review of Research on the Application of
    Goal Setting in Organizations. Academy of Management Journal 18(4):
    824-45.
    Lewin, K. 1951. Field Theory in Social Science. N.Y.: Harper & Row.
    Liou, K. T., and R. C. Nyhan. 1995. Dimensions of Organizational Commitment in
    the Public Sector: An Empirical Assessment. Public Administration
    Quarterly 18(1): 99-118.
    Mahoney, T. A. 1967. Managerial Perceptions of Organizational Effectiveness.
    Management Science 14(2): 76-91.
    Mahoney, T. A., T. H. Jerdee, and S. J. Carroll. 1963. Development of Managerial
    Performance: A Research Approach. Cincinnati, OH: Southwestern
    28
    Publishing.
    Mahoney, T. A., T. H. Jerdee, and S. J. Carroll. 1965a. The Job(s) of Management.
    Industrial Relations 3(February): 97-110.
    Mckinsey, J. O. 1922. Budgetary Control. Ronald.
    Merchant, K. A. 1985a. Organizational Controls and Discretionary Program
    Decision Making: A Field Study. Accounting, Organizations and Society
    10(1): 67-85.
    Merchant, K. A. 1985b. Budgeting and the Propensity to Create Budgetary Slack.
    Accounting, Organizations and Society 10(2): 201-10.
    Merchant, K. A. 1985c. Control in Business Organizations. Marshfield. MA:
    Pitman.
    Meyer, J. P., and N. J. Allen. 1984. Testing the “Side-Bet Theory” of
    Organizational Commitment: Some Methodological Considerations.
    Journal of Applied Psychology 69: 372-78.
    Meyer, J. P., S. V. Paunonen, I. R. Gellatly, R. D. Goffin, and D. N. Jackson. 1989.
    Organizational Commitment and Job Performance: It’s the Nature of the
    Commitment That Counts. Journal of Applied Psychology 74(1): 152-56.
    Mia, L. 1987. Participation in Budgetary Decision Making, Task Difficulty, Locus
    of Control, and Employee Behavior: An Empirical Study. Decision Sciences
    18(4): 547-61.
    Mia, L. 1988. Managerial Attitude, Motivation and the Effectiveness of Budget
    Participation. Accounting, Organizations and Society 13(5): 465-75.
    Mia, L. 1989. The Impact of Participation in Budgeting and Job Difficulty on
    Managerial Performance and Work Motivation: A Research Note.
    Accounting, Organizations and Society 14(4): 347-57.
    Milani, K. 1975. The Relationship of Participation in Budget-Setting to Industrial
    Supervisor Performance and Attitudes: A Field Study. The Accounting
    Review 50(2): 274-84.
    Morse, N. C., and E. Reimer. 1956. The Experimental Change of a Major
    Organizational Variable. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology:
    120-29.
    Mowday, R. T., L. W. Porter, and R. M. Steers. 1982. Employee-Organization
    Linkages: The Psychology of Commitment and Absenteeism and Turnover.
    N.Y.: Academic Press.
    Mowday, R. T., R. M. Steers, and L. W. Porter. 1979. The Measurement of
    Organizational Commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior 14(April):
    224-47.
    Murray, D. 1990. The Performance Effects of Participative Budgeting: An
    Integration of Intervening and Moderating Variables. Behavioral
    Research in Accounting 2(2): 104-23.
    29
    Nazalina Jamil. 2006. Tourism Destination Image as Perceived by International
    and Domestic Tourists. National Cheng Kung University International
    Master of Business administration Program, Master Thesis.
    Nelson, D. L., and J. C. Quick. 1994. Organizational Behavior: Foundation,
    Reality, and Change. :116-19 462-69.
    Nouri, H., and R. J. Parker. 1998. The Relationship Between Budget Participation
    and Job Performance: The Roles of Budget Adequacy and Organizational
    Commitment. Accounting, Organizations and Society 23(5/6): 467-83.
    Novick, M., and G. Lewis. 1967. Coefficient Alpha and the Reliability of Composite
    Measure. Psychometrika 32: 1-13.
    Oliver, N. 1990. Rewards, Investments, Alternatives and Organizational
    Commitment: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Development. Journal
    of Occupational Psychology 63(March): 19-31.
    O’Reilly, C, III, and J. Chatman. 1986. Organizational Commitment and
    Psychological Attachment: The Effects of Compliance, Identification and
    Internalization on Prosocial Behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology
    71(August): 492-99.
    Pindyck, R. S., and D. L. Rubinfeld. 1976. Econometric Models and Economic
    Forecasts. N.Y.: McGraw-Hill.
    Porter, L. W., R. M. Steers, R. T. Mowday, and P. V. Boulian. 1974. Organizational
    Commitment, Job Satisfactory, and Turnover Among Psychiatric
    Technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology 59(5): 603-09.
    Reichers, A. E. 1985. A Review and Reconceptualization of Organizational
    Commitment. Academy of Management Review 10(3): 465-76 or 553-63.
    Reichers, A. E. 1986. Conflict and Organizational Commitment. Journal of
    Applied Psychology 71(3): 508-14.
    Rizzo, J. R., R. J. House, and S. I. Lirtzman. 1970. Role Conflict and Ambiguity in
    Complex Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 15: 150-63.
    Salancik, G. S. 1977. Commitment and the Control of Organizational Behavior
    and Belief. in B. M. Staw and G. R. Salancik (eds.). New Direction in
    Organizational Behavior. Chicago: St. Clair Press.
    Searfoss, D. G. 1976. Some Behavioral Aspects of Budgeting for Control: An
    Empirical Study. Accounting, Organizations and Society 1(4): 375-85.
    Sommer, S. M., S. Bae, and F. Luthans. 1996. Organizational Commitment Across
    Cultures: The Impact of Antecedents on Korean Employees. Human
    Relations 49(7): 977-93.
    Staw, B. M. 1976. Knee-Deep in the Big Muddy: A Study of Escalating
    Commitment to a Chosen Course of Action. Organizational Behavior and
    Human Performance 16: 27-44.
    Stedry, A. C. 1960. Budget Control and Cost Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.:
    30
    Prentice-Hall.
    Steers, R. M. 1994. Organizational Behavior. 5th ed. N.Y.: HarperCollins College
    Publishers.
    Umstot, D. D. 1988. Understanding Organizational Behavior. MN: West
    Publishing: 12-21 70-75 300-303 414-19.
    Welsch, G. A. 1976. Budgeting: Profit Planning and Control. 4th ed. N.J.:
    Prentice-Hall.
    Wiener, Y., and Y. Vardi. 1980. Relationships Between Job, Organization, and
    Career Commitment and Work Outcomes: An Integrative Approach.
    Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 26(1): 81-96.
    Zahra, S. A. 1984a. Antecedents and Consequences of Organizational
    Commitment: An Integrative Approach. Akron Business & Economic
    Review 15(3): 26-32.
    Zahra, S. A. 1984b. Understanding Organizational Commitment. Supervisory
    Management 29(3): 16-20.

    下載圖示 校內:2007-08-10公開
    校外:2007-08-10公開
    QR CODE