| 研究生: |
黃鴻揚 Huang, Hong-Yang |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
結合個人規範、自我認同與計畫行為理論探討低碳旅遊行為 Investigating Low-carbon Tourism Behavior by Integrating Personal Norm, Self-identity with the TPB Perspective |
| 指導教授: |
陳勁甫
Chen, Ching-Fu |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 交通管理科學系 Department of Transportation and Communication Management Science |
| 論文出版年: | 2012 |
| 畢業學年度: | 100 |
| 語文別: | 英文 |
| 論文頁數: | 78 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 低碳旅遊 、計畫行為理論 、個人規範 、自我認同 、過去生活碳行為 、結構性障礙 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Low-carbon tourism, Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), Personal Norm, Self-identity, Past carbon-related behavior, Structural constraints. |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:134 下載:24 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
近年來,全球氣候異常,各地災難頻傳,使得人們開始重視環保與節能減碳的議題。根據世界經濟論壇(UNWTO, 2007)的報告指出,旅遊業碳排放佔世界總量的5%到12%,由此可見傳統旅遊業已不再適用於「無煙囪工業」的稱號,因此節能減碳的風潮也引進了旅遊產業。低碳旅遊不只強調在旅遊過程中盡可能的減少碳排放,更著重利用碳抵銷的概念,來中和在旅遊過程中的碳足跡。本研究以計畫行為理論為基礎,整合個人規範、自我認同與個人過去的生活碳行為,建構低碳旅遊行為模式,並加入結構性障礙作為區隔旅客的變數,探討台灣旅客的低碳旅遊行為。
本研究以參加台北、台中、台南或高雄春季旅展的受訪者為主要研究對象,有效問卷461份,資料分析方法採用結構方程模式,研究主要結論如下:一、個人對於低碳旅遊的意願,受到個人道德規範的驅使而不是受到外在壓力團體的影響;二、當旅客自認為自己為環保人士,產生出在旅遊過程中減少碳排放是一種義務,並感受到低碳旅遊為一種美好的旅遊體驗與型態,進而產生低碳旅遊意圖與最終的行為表現;三、低旅遊障礙群組在低碳旅遊的決策行為較傾向於理性,從事低碳旅遊行為的意圖與行為的可能性也較高;而高旅遊障礙群組除了受到理性因子的影響外,亦受到過去生活習慣的慣性因子所影響;四、結構性旅遊障礙為驅使旅客是否從事低碳旅遊最重要的因子,並且對低碳旅遊意圖與行為的關係產生干擾效果,顯示出不論結構性旅遊障礙的高低,其低碳旅遊行為會隨著低碳旅遊意圖提高而增加,此現象尤其在結構性旅遊障礙程度高的群組更加明顯。
Tourism sectors accounted for 5% to 12 % of the total world amount of CO2 (UNWTO, 2007). Therefore they have a responsibility to minimize any adverse impact on the environment. Low-carbon tourism has emerged as a new travel concept that aims at not only minimizing CO2 emission occurring during travel but also emphasizing the use of carbon offsetting to neutralize the carbon footprint involved in travel. We proposed an extended Theory of Planned Behavior model by integrating personal norm, self-identity, past carbon-related behavior and structural constraints to investigate low-carbon tourism behavior.
A questionnaire was distributed to visitors attending travel exhibitions in Taiwan by means of a convenience sampling approach. After analyzing 461 valid samples with Structural Equations Modeling, the following results could be drawn. First, the intention of visitors to reduce CO2 during travel was driven by obligations rather by social pressure. Second, when the public regarded themselves as environmentalists, this thereby produced a set of values and norms associated with low-carbon tourism behavior, and they felt personally obligated to engage in low-carbon tourism, felt it was desirable and with to ultimately perform it. Third, compared to the low structural constraint group, the high constraints group was more likely to perform low-carbon tourism behavior through not only a rational evaluation process but also by habit. Last, it was found that structural constraints affect the intention-behavior consistency of tourists; when the high constraints group had a high tendency toward low-carbon tourism, they overcame the problem of structural constraints and exhibited low-carbon tourism behavior.
1.Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, pp.179~211.
2.Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), pp.411~423.
3.Ballantyne, R., Packer j. & Falk, j. (2011). Visitors’ learning for environmental sustainability: Testing short- and long-term impacts of wildlife tourism experiences using structural equation modeling. Tourism Management, 32, pp.1243~1252.
4.Bamberg, S., Hunecke, M. & Blobaum A. (2007). Social context, personal norms and the use of public transportation: two field studies. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(3), pp.190~203.
5.Becken, S. & Simmons, D. G. (2002). Understanding energy consumption patterns of tourist attractions and activities in New Zealand. Tourism Management, 23, pp.343~354.
6.Becken, S., Frampton, C. & Simmons, D. (2001). Energy consumption patterns in the accommodation sector—the New Zealand case. Ecological Economics, 39, pp. 371~386.
7.Becken, S., Simmons, D. G. & Frampton, C. (2003). Energy use associated with different travel choices. Tourism Management, 24, pp.267~277.
8.Black, J. S., Stern, P. C., & Elworth, J. T. (1985). Personal and contextual influences on household energy adaptations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, pp.3-21.
9.Carbon Footprint: Carbon Footprint Calculator, Revised January 10, 2012, from Web site: http://www.carbonfootprint.com/calculator.aspx
10.Chen, S. S. (2009). Exploration of visitor’s carbon footprint and low-carbon travel behavior intention: A case study on Pinglin township, Feng Chia University, Programe of Landscape and Recreation.
11.Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G. & Aiken, L. S. (2002). Applied multiple regression / correlation analysis for behavioral science (3rded.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12.Collins, C. M. & Chambers, S. M. (2005). Psychological and situational influences on commuter-transport-mode choice. Environment and Behavior, 37(5), pp.640~661.
13.Conner, M. & Armitage, C. J. (1998). Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior: A review and avenues for further research. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(15), pp.1429~1464
14.Cook, A. J., Kerr, G. N. & Moore, K. (2002). Attitudes and intention towards purchasing GM food. Journal of Economic Psychology, 23, pp.557~572.
15.Crawford, D. W., Jackson, E. L., & Godbey, G. (1991). A hierarchical model of leisure constraints. Leisure Sciences, 13, pp.309~320.
16.Department for Transport. (2009). Exploring public attitudes to climate change and travel choices: Deliberative research. Available from: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/scienceresearch/social/climatechange/attitudestoclimatechange.pdf
17.Dono, J., Webb, J. & Richardson, B. (2010). The relationship between environmental activism, pro-environmental behaviour and social identity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, pp.178~186.
18.Ewing, G. & Sarigollu, E. (2000). Assessing consumer preference for clean-fuel vehicle: A discrete choice experiment. Journal of Policy & Marketing, 19(1), pp.106~118.
19.Fielding, K. S., McDonald, R. & Louis, W. R. (2008). Theory of planned behaviour, identity and intention to engage in environmental activism. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28, pp.318~326.
20.Gössling, S., Garrod, B., Aall, C., Hille, J. & Peeters, P. (2010). Food management in tourism: Reducing tourism’s carbon ‘foodprint’. Tourism Management, 32 pp.534~543.
21.Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
22.Han, H., Hsu, L. T. & Sheu, C. (2010). Application of the theory of planned behavior to green hotel choice: Testing the effect of environmental friendly activities. Tourism Management, 31, pp.325~334.
23.Harland, P., Staats, H. & Wilke H. A. M. (1999). Explaining proenvironmental intention and behavior by personal norms and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(12), pp.2505~2528.
24.Hines, J. M., Hungerford, H. R., & Tomera, A. N. (1986). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Education, 18(2), pp.1~8.
25.Huang C. & Deng H. (2011). The model of developing low-carbon tourism in the context of leisure economy. Energy Procedia, 5, pp.1974~1978.
26.Hung, K. & Petrick, F. J. (2010). Developing a measurement scale for constraints to crusing. Annals of Tourism Research, 37(1), pp. 206–228,
27.Kaiser, F. G. & Gutscher, H. (2003). The proposition of a general version of the theory of planned behavior: Predicting ecological behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33(3), pp.586~603.
28.Kaiser, F. G. & Scheuthle, H. (2003). Two challenges to a moral extension of the theory of planned behavior: Moral norms and just world beliefs in conservationism. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, pp.1033~1048.
29.Kaiser, F. G. (2006). A moral extension of the theory of planned behavior: Norms and anticipated feelings of regret in conservationism. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, pp.71~81.
30.Kaiser, F. G., Hubner, G. & Bogner, F. X. (2005). Contrasting the theory of planned behavior with the value-belief-norm model in explaining conservation behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35(10), pp.2150~2170.
31.Kiesling, F. M. & Manning, C. M. (2010). How green is your thumb? Environmental gardening identity and ecological gardening practices. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, pp.315~327.
32.Klöckner, C. A. & Blöbaum, A. (2010). A comprehensive action determination model: Toward a broader understanding of ecological behaviour using the example of travel mode choice. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, pp.574~586.
33.Kollmuss, A. & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?. Environmental Education Research, 8(3), pp.239~260.
34.Koper, M. A. (2009). The influence of environmental issues on ecological concerns and pro-environmental behaviour intention employing the VBN model. National Cheng Kung University, Institute of International Management.
35.Kuo, N. W. & Cheng, C. P. (2010). Tourism and carbon footprint. the proceedings of the first green tourism conference, Taipei, Taiwan.
36.Lane, B. & Potter, S. (2007). The adoption of cleaner vehicles in the UK: Exploring the consumer attitude e action gap. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15, pp.1085~1092.
37.Lin, T. P. (2010). Carbon dioxide emissions from transport in Taiwan’s national parks. Tourism Management, 31, pp.285~290.
38.Lin, W. C. (2005). Research of the relationship between travelers’ attitude、the degree of involvement group affection intention and mode choice behavior-A case study for Taipei Metropolitan Area. National Sun Yat-sen University, Institute of Public Affairs Management.
39.Luo, J. & Zhang, M. (2011). Route choice of low-carbon industry for global climate change: An issue of China tourism reform. Energy Procedia, 5, pp.2283~2288.
40.Mainieri, T., Barnett, E. G., Valdero, T. R., Unipan J. B. & Oskamp, S. (1997). Green buying: The influence of environmental concern on consumer behavior. The Journal of Social Psychology, 137(2), pp.189~204.
41.Manstead, A. S. R. & Parker, D. (1995). Evaluating and extending the theory of planned behaviour. European Review of Social Psychology, 6(1), pp.69~95.
42.Nyaupane, G. P., Morais, D. B., & Graefe, A. R. (2004). Nature tourism constraints: A cross-activity comparison. Annals of Tourism Research, 31(3), pp.540~555
43.Pierro, A., Mannetti, L. & Livi, S. (2003). Self-Identity and the theory of planned behavior in the prediction of health behavior and leisure activity. Self and Identity, 2, pp.47~60.
44.Qiu, T. Y. (2010). Applying the extending theory of planned behavior to study the determinants of ecotourism behavior, National Dong Hwa University, Department of Business Administration.
45.Raymore, L., G. Godbey, D. Crawford, and A. von Eye (1993). Nature and process of leisure constraints: An empirical test. Leisure Sciences, 15, pp.99~113.
46.Regis, D. (1990). Self-concept and conformity in theories of health education. University of Exeter, School of Education.
47.Shi, C. B. & Peng, J. J. (2011). Construction of low-carbon tourist attractions based on low-carbon economy. Energy Procedia, 5, pp.759~762.
48.Sparks, P. and Shepherd, R. (1992). Self-identity and the theory of planned behavior: Assessing the role of identification with green consumerism. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55(4), pp.388~399.
49.Sparks, P., Shepherd, R., & Frewer, L. J. (1995). Assessing and structuring attitudes toward the use of gene technology in food production: The role of ethical obligation. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 16(3), pp.267–285.
50.Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A., & Kalof, L. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: the case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 6, 81~97.
51.Tang, Z., Shi, C. B. & Liu, Z. (2001). Sustainable development of tourism industry in China under the low-carbon economy. Energy Procedia, 5, pp.1303~1307.
52.Teng, C. C., Horng, J. S., Hu, M. L., Chien, L. H., & Shen, Y. C. (2011). Developing energy conservation and carbon reduction indicators for the hotel industry in Taiwan. International Journal of Hospitality Management, in the press.
53.Theodorakis, Y. (1994). Planned behavior, attitude strength, role identity, and the prediction of exercise behavior. The Sport Psychologist, 8, pp.149- 165.
54.Tonglet, M., Phillips, P., & Read, A. D. (2004). Using the theory of planned behaviour to investigate the determinants of recycling behavior: A case study from Brixworth, UK. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 41, pp.191~214.
55.United Nations World Tourism Organization (2003). Tourism highlights 2003 edition. Available from: http://www.hospitalitynet.org/file/152001182.pdf
56.United Nations World Tourism Organization (2007). Tourism highlights 2007 edition. Available from: http://www.unwto.org/facts/eng/pdf/highlights/highlights_07_eng_hr.pdf
57.Whitmarsh, J. & O’Neill, S. (2010). Green identity, green living? The role of pro-environmental self-identity in determining consistency across diverse pro-environmental behaviours. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, pp.305~314.
58.Zhang, Q. & Liu, H. (2011). Study on design and research of tourist souvenirs on the background of low-carbon economy. Energy Procedia, 5, pp.2416~2420.
59.Zheng, L. L. & Lin, X. Q. (2010). On the construction of the model of “low-carbon tourism.” The response of tourism under the condition of global warming. Xiangfan Zhiye Jishu Xueyuan Xuebao, 9(1), pp.40~43.