簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 吳文心
Ngo, Van-Tam
論文名稱: 網路機器人系統於網宇實體控制系統之合作與人機互動
Cooperation and Human-Robot Interaction for Networked Robotic Systems in Cyber-Physical Control Systems
指導教授: 劉彥辰
Liu, Yen-Chen
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 工學院 - 機械工程學系
Department of Mechanical Engineering
論文出版年: 2021
畢業學年度: 109
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 152
中文關鍵詞:
外文關鍵詞: Networked robotic system, Euler-Lagrange system, cooperative control, teleoperation control, leader-follower control, event-based control, resilient control, DoS attacks, fault tolerance, time delay, switching topology, neural network, cyber-physical system
相關次數: 點閱:109下載:10
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • With the boom of technology, Internet, and Artificial Intelligent the demands on the variety of products increase with a shorter life-cycle resulting from smart and autonomous factories. The objective of Industry 4.0 is to upgrade the industrial production process nowadays leading to the next stage with better machine utilization and faster throughput times.

    In order to enhance and accomplish the development of flexible and scalable manufacturing for the foreseeable future of Industry 4.0 with advanced technology and configurations, the ultimate goal of this dissertation is to develop and design advanced control frameworks and algorithms for a network of multiple robots under cyber-physical systems. The control problems, e.g. cooperative, human-in-the-loop, leader-follower, and resilient controls are studied for networked robotic systems to achieve various missions in industry.

    The first topic addressed in this dissertation is cooperative control that is utilized for networked robotic systems to achieve predefined tasks in manufacturing such as object transporting or assembling. In addition, a novel task-space synchronization control is studied with a triggering condition for the network under time-varying communication delays, to improve cooperative quality while reducing network burden. Lyapunov technique is utilized to prove that the proposed control algorithm is stable and guarantees the finite-time convergence of tracking errors to adjustable compact sets with the avoidance of Zeno behavior. Then, to exploit the advantage of complementary capabilities of humans and networked robots, the second research topic is devoted to studying human-robot interaction control algorithms. Two control frameworks have been proposed in this dissertation for a human operator to remotely interact with multiple robots under undirected and directed graphs. The proposed control algorithms utilize the efficiency of teleoperation systems, thereby enhance the performance of the networked systems in case of incomplete information about the environment.

    Several crucial and unavoidable problems of networked systems, e.g., limited bandwidth, communication delay, and switching connection, are further studied in the third research topic, leader-follower control. The study provides alternative solutions for the cooperation and human-robot interaction control algorithms in unreliable connection networks.
    Although networks of multi-robot systems have compelling advantages for the future industry, they are vulnerable to faults and prone to cyber attacks, which can interrupt or damage the systems. Therefore, the last not least research topic, resilient control, several control schemes have been studied for guaranteeing acceptable performance of a networked system under denial-of-service attacks, faulty robots, and faulty actuators.

    This dissertation takes the advantage of cyber-physical systems and networks of multiple robots to accomplish requirements and visions of the robotic systems in flexibility, scalability, interactivity, expansibility, and also security for the future of manufacturing in Industry 4.0.

    List of Figures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xv List of Tables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xviii 0.1 Nomenclature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xix 0.2 Definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xx Chapter 1: Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.1 Research Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.1.1 Networked Robotic Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.1.2 Cooperative Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 1.1.3 Human-Robot Interaction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 1.1.4 Leader-Follower Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 1.1.5 Resilient Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 1.2 Literature Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 1.2.1 Cooperation Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 1.2.2 Human-Robot Interaction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 1.2.3 Leader-Follower Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 1.2.4 Resilient Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 1.3 Dissertation Contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 1.4 Dissertation Outlines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 Chapter 2: Preliminaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 2.1 Model of Networked Robotic Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 2.1.1 Dynamic Model of Robots . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 2.1.2 Dynamic Model of Robots with External Force . . . . . . . . 19 2.2 Graph Theory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 2.3 Wavelet Neural Networks (WNNs) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 Chapter 3: Cooperative Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 3.1 Problem Formulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 3.2 Adaptive Wavelet Neural Network Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 3.3 Event-Triggered Synchronization Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 3.4 Cooperative Controller Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 3.5 Validation Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 3.5.1 Numerical Verification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 3.5.2 Experimental Verification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 3.5.3 Comparison Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 3.6 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 Chapter 4: Human-Robot Interaction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 4.1 Problem Formulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 4.2 Leaderless Slave Robots with Relative Velocity . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 4.3 Leader-Follower Slave Robots without Relative Velocity . . . . . . . 54 4.4 Validation Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 4.4.1 Results with Relative Velocity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 4.4.2 Results without Relative Velocity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 4.5 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 Chapter 5: Leader-Follower Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 5.1 Task-Space Consensus with Event-Based Algorithms . . . . . . . . 68 5.1.1 Problem Formulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 5.1.2 Event-Based Communication Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 5.1.3 Event-Based Controller Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 5.1.4 Validation Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 5.2 Synchronization under Nonuniform Time-Varying Delays . . . . . . 87 5.2.1 Problem Formulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87 5.2.2 Controller Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87 5.2.3 Validation Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93 5.3 Synchronization with Switching Topology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94 5.3.1 Problem Formulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94 5.3.2 Controller Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95 5.3.3 Validation Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102 5.4 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 Chapter 6: Resilient Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 6.1 Consensus under DoS Attacks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 6.1.1 Problem Formulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 6.1.2 Controller Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 6.1.3 Validation Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111 6.2 Fault Detection for Multi-Agent Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113 6.2.1 Problem Formulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113 6.2.2 Controller Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113 6.2.3 Validation Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115 6.3 Partial-loss-of-Effectiveness Tolerance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117 6.3.1 Problem Formulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117 6.3.2 Controller Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117 6.3.3 Validation Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119 6.4 Tolerance with Unknown Actuator Saturation . . . . . . . . . . . . 120 6.4.1 Problem Formulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120 6.4.2 Controller Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121 6.4.3 Validation Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123 6.5 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125 Chapter 7: Conclusions and Future Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126 7.1 Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126 7.2 Future Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128 Appendices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130 Appendix A: Lemmas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131 Appendix B: Experimental Devices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135 B.1 DYNAMIXEL Motor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135 B.2 Touch Haptic Device . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137 B.3 Raspberry Pi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138 Reference . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139

    [1] Industrial workplace-present and future," https://www.japanindustrynews.
    com/2016/01/safety-measures-industrial-workplace-present-future/, accessed: 2021-06-03.
    [2] Z. Li and C. Su, "Neural-adaptive control of single-master-multiple-slaves
    teleoperation for coordinated multiple mobile manipulators with time-varying communication delays and input uncertainties," IEEE Transactions
    on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 1400-1413,
    2013.
    [3] O. Khatib, K. Yokoi, K.-S. Chang, C. Ruspini, R. Holmberg, and A. Casal,
    "Coordination and decentralized cooperation of multiple mobile manipulators," Journal of Robotic Systems, vol. 13, pp. 546-553, 1996.
    [4] Y. Huang, J. Chen, L. Huang, and Q. Zhu, "Dynamic games for secure and
    resilient control system design," arXiv:1910.07510, 2019.
    [5] "Dynmaixel motors," http://mirror.umd.edu/roswiki/robotis.html?distro=
    fuerte, accessed: 2021-06-03.
    [6] "3D touch haptic device," https://www.3dsystems.com/sites/default/files/
    2017-12/3DSystems-Touch-UserGuide.pdf, accessed: 2021-06-03.
    [7] "Raspberry pi," https://www.raspberrypi.org/products/, accessed: 2021-
    06-03.
    [8] F. Yang and S. Gu, Industry 4.0, a revolution that requires technology and
    national strategies," Complex & Intelligent Systems, vol. 7, pp. 1311-1325,
    2021.
    [9] (2020) Industry 4.0 market size growth will reach usd 210 billion by 2026:
    Facts and factors. [Online]. Available: https://www.globenewswire.com
    [10] C.-W. Lin, M.-H. Khong, and Y.-C. Liu, Experiments on human-in-the-loop
    coordination for multirobot system with task abstraction," IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 981-989,
    2015.
    [11] C.-H. Lin, K.-T. Song, and G. Anderson, "Agent-based robot control design
    for multi-robot cooperation," in IEEE International Conference on Systems,
    Man and Cybernetics, vol. 1, 2005, pp. 542-547.
    [12] A. Marino, "Distributed adaptive control of networked cooperative mobile
    manipulators," IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 26,
    no. 5, pp. 1646{1660, 2018.
    [13] G. Niemeyer, C. Preusche, S. Stramigioli, and D. Lee, Telerobotics. Springer,
    2016, pp. 1085-1108.
    [14] A. D. Greer, P. M. Newhook, and G. R. Sutherland, "Human{machine interface for robotic surgery and stereotaxy," IEEE/ASME Transactions on
    Mechatronics, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 355-361, 2008.
    [15] J.-H. Jean and L.-C. Fu, "An adaptive control scheme for coordinated multimanipulator systems," IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation,
    vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 226-231, 1993.
    [16] M. Zribi, S. Ahmad, and S. Luo, "Adaptive control of redundant multiple
    robots in cooperative motion," Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems,
    vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 169-194, 1996.
    [17] O. Khatib, "Mobile manipulation: The robotic assistant," Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 175-183, 1999.
    [18] Z. Li, S.-S. Ge, and W. Z., "Robust adaptive control of coordinated multiple
    mobile manipulators," Mechatronics, vol. 18, no. 5-6, pp. 239-250, 2008.
    [19] G.-B. Dai and Y.-C. Liu, "Distributed coordination and cooperation control for networked mobile manipulators," IEEE Transactions on Industrial
    Electronics, vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 5065-5074, 2017.
    [20] A. Marino, "Distributed adaptive control of networked cooperative mobile
    manipulators," IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 26,
    no. 5, pp. 1646-1660, 2018.
    [21] A. Marino and F. Pierri, "A two stage approach for distributed cooperative
    manipulation of an unknown object without explicit communication and
    unknown number of robots," Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 103,
    pp. 122-133, 2018.
    [22] C. K. Verginis, M. Mastellaro, and D. V. Dimarogonas, "Robust cooperative manipulation without force/torque measurements: Control design and
    experiments," IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 28,
    no. 3, pp. 713-729, 2020.
    [23] Y.-H. Liu and S. Arimoto, "Decentralized adaptive and nonadaptive position/force controllers for redundant manipulators in cooperations," The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 232-247, 1998.
    [24] G. Peng, C. Yang, W. He, and C. L. P. Chen, "Force sensorless admittance
    control with neural learning for robots with actuator saturation," IEEE
    Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 3138-3148, 2020.
    [25] V.-T. Ngo and Y.-C. Liu, "Object transportation using networked mobile manipulators without force/torque sensors," in International Automatic
    Control Conference, 2018, pp. 1-6.
    [26] L. Kong, W. He, C. Yang, Z. Li, and C. Sun, "Adaptive fuzzy control for coordinated multiple robots with constraint using impedance learning," IEEE
    Transactions on Cybernetics, vol. 49, no. 8, pp. 3052-3063, 2019.
    [27] F. L. Lewis, K. Liu, and A. Yesildirek, "Neural net robot controller with
    guaranteed tracking performance," IEEE Transactions on Nueral Networks,
    vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 703-715, 1995.
    [28] F. L. Lewis, A. Yesildirek, and K. Liu, "Multilayer neural-net robot controller with guaranteed tracking performance," IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 388-399, 1996.
    [29] S. Lin and A. A. Goldenberg, "Neural-network control of mobile manipulators," IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 338-399, 2001.
    [30] D. Xu, D. Zhao, J. Yi, and X. Tan, "Trajectory tracking control of omnidirectional wheeled mobile manipulators: Robust neural network-based sliding
    mode approach," IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and CyberneticsPart B: Cybernetics, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 788-799, 2009.
    [31] C.-C. Tsai, H.-C. Huang, and S.-C. Lin, "Adaptive neural network control
    of a self-balancing two-wheeled scooter," IEEE Transactions on Industrial
    Electronics, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 1420-1428, 2010.
    [32] M. Cannon and J.-J. E. Slotine, "Space-frequency localized basis function
    networks for nonlinear system estimation and control," Neurocomputing, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 293-342, 1995.
    [33] C. de Sousa, E. M. Hemerly, and R. K. H. Galvao, "Adaptive control for
    mobile robot using wavelet networks," IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man,
    and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 493-504, 2002.
    [34] N. Sureshbabu and J. A. Farrell, "Wavelet-based system identification for
    nonlinear control," IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 412-417, 1999.
    [35] C. Hsu, C. Lin, and T. Lee, "Wavelet adaptive backstepping control for a
    class of nonlinear systems," IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 1175-1183, 2006.
    [36] Y. Ren, S. Sosnowski, and S. Hirche, "Fully distributed cooperation for
    networked uncertain mobile manipulators," IEEE Transactions on Robotics,
    vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 984-1003, 2020.
    [37] Y.-C. Liu and N. Chopra, "Controlled synchronization of heterogeneous
    robotic manipulators in the task space," IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 268-275, 2012.
    [38] Y. Fan, L. Liu, G. Feng, and Y. Wang, "Self-triggered consensus for multiagent systems with zeno-free triggers," IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 60, no. 10, pp. 2779-2784, 2015.
    [39] X. Liu, C. Du, P. Lu, and D. Yang, "Decentralised consensus for multiple Lagrangian systems based on event-triggered strategy," International Journal
    of Control, vol. 89, no. 6, pp. 1111-1124, 2016.
    [40] Q. Liu, M. Ye, J. Qin, and C. Yu, "Event-triggered algorithms for leader-follower consensus of networked Euler-Lagrange agents," IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 1435-1447, 2019.
    [41] Y.-C. Liu and S.-C. Hu, "Nonlinear bilateral teleoperators under event-driven communication with constant time delays," International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 3547-3569, 2019.
    [42] P. B. g. Dohmann and S. Hirche, "Distributed control for cooperative
    manipulation with event-triggered communication," IEEE Transactions on
    Robotics, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 1038-1052, 2020.
    [43] S. Hu and Y.-C. Liu, "Event-triggered control for adaptive bilateral teleoperators with communication delays," IET Control Theory Applications,
    vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 427-437, 2020.
    [44] C. Peng and F. Li, "A survey on recent advances in event-triggered communication and control," Information Sciences, vol. 457-458, pp. 113-125,
    2018.
    [45] N. Chopra, M. W. Spong, and R. Lozano, "Synchronization of bilateral
    teleoperators with time delay," Automatica, vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 2142-2148, 2008.
    [46] E. Nuno, R. Ortega, and L. Basanez, "An adaptive controller for nonlinear
    teleoperators," Automatica, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 155-159, 2010.
    [47] E. Nuno, L. Basanez, and R. Ortega, "Passivity-based control for bilateral
    teleoperation: A tutorial," Automatica, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 485-495, 2011.
    [48] D. Sun, F. Naghdy, and H. Du, "Wave-variable-based passivity control of
    four-channel nonlinear bilateral teleoperation system under time delays,"
    IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 238-253, 2016.
    [49] Z. Chen, F. Huang, W. Sun, J. Gu, and B. Yao, "Rbf-neural-network-based
    adaptive robust control for nonlinear bilateral teleoperation manipulators
    with uncertainty and time delay," IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 906-918, 2020.
    [50] Y.-C. Liu, P. N. Dao, and K.-Y. Zhao, "On robust control of nonlinear teleoperators under dynamic uncertainties with variable time delays and without relative velocity," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 1272-1280, 2020.
    [51] Y.-C. Liu and N. Chopra, "Control of semi-autonomous teleoperation system
    with time delays," Automatica, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 1553-1565, 2013.
    [52] D. Zhai and Y. Xia, "Adaptive control of semi-autonomous teleoperation
    system with asymmetric time-varying delays and input uncertainties," IEEE
    Transactions on Cybernetics, vol. 47, no. 11, pp. 3621-3633, 2017.
    [53] N. Nath, E. Tatlicioglu, and D. M. Dawson, "Teleoperation with kinematically redundant robot manipulators with sub-task objectives," Robotica,
    vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 1027-1038, 2009.
    [54] P. F. Hokayem and M. W. Spong, "Bilateral teleoperation: An historical
    survey," Automatica, vol. 42, no. 12, pp. 2035-2057, 2006.
    [55] R. J. Anderson and M. W. Spong, "Bilateral control of teleoperators with
    time delay," IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 494-501, 1989.
    [56] G. Niemeyer and J.-J. E. Slotine, "Stable adaptive teleoperation," IEEE
    Journal of Oceanic Engineering, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 152-162, 1991.
    [57] D. Zhang, L. Liu, and G. Feng, "Consensus of heterogeneous linear multi-agent systems subject to aperiodic sampled-data and DoS attack," IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 1501-1511, 2019.
    [58] H. Wang, "Passivity based synchronization for networked robotic systems
    with uncertain kinematics and dynamics," Automatica, vol. 49, no. 3, pp.
    755-761, 2013.
    [59] Y.-C. Liu and M.-H. Khong, "Adaptive control for nonlinear teleoperators
    with uncertain kinematics and dynamics," IEEE/ASME Transactions on
    Mechatronics, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 2550-2562, 2015.
    [60] E. Nu~no, C. I. Aldana, and L. Basa~nez, "Task space consensus in networks
    of heterogeneous and uncertain robotic systems with variable time-delays,"
    International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 917-937, 2017.
    [61] W. He, C. Xu, Q. Han, F. Qian, and Z. Lang, "Finite-time L2 leader{follower
    consensus of networked Euler-Lagrange systems with external disturbances,"
    IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, vol. 48, no. 11, pp. 1920-1928, 2018.
    [62] Y. Ren, S. Sosnowski, and S. Hirche, "Fully distributed cooperation for
    networked uncertain mobile manipulators," IEEE Transactions on Robotics,
    vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 984-1003, 2020.
    [63] G.-B. Dai and Y.-C. Liu, "Distributed coordination and cooperation control for networked mobile manipulators," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 5065-5074, 2017.
    [64] J. Mei, W. Ren, J. Chen, and G. Ma, "Distributed adaptive coordination
    for multiple Lagrangian systems under a directed graph without using neighbors’ velocity information," Automatica, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 1723-1731, 2013.
    [65] E. Nu~no and R. Ortega, "Achieving consensus of Euler-Lagrange agents with
    interconnecting delays and without velocity measurements via passivity based control," IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 222-232, 2018.
    [66] O. Khatib, "Mobile manipulation: The robotic assistant," Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 175-183, 1999.
    [67] Y. Tan and Z. yang Zheng, "Research advance in swarm robotics," Defence
    Technology, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 18-39, 2013.
    [68] C. I. Aldana, R. Mungu´ıa, E. Cruz-Zavala, and E. Nuno, "Pose consensus of
    multiple robots with time-delays using neural networks," Robotica, vol. 37,
    no. 5, pp. 883-905, 2019.
    [69] H. Wang, "Consensus of networked mechanical systems with communication
    delays: A unified framework," IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control,
    vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 1571-1576, 2014.
    [70] V.-T. Ngo and Y.-C. Liu, "Event-based communication and control for task-space consensus of networked Euler-Lagrange systems," IEEE Transactions
    on Control of Network Systems, pp. 1-11, 2021, in press.
    [71] Y.-C. Liu, "Leaderless consensus for multiple Euler-Lagrange systems with
    event-triggered communication," in IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), Miyazaki, Japan, 2018, pp. 2657-2662.
    [72] H. Yu and P. J. Antsaklis, "Output synchronization of networked passive systems with event-driven communication," IEEE Transactions on Automatic
    Control, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 750-756, 2014.
    [73] V.-T. Ngo and Y.-C. Liu, "Object transportation with force-sensorless control and event-triggered synchronization for networked uncertain manipulators," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 902-912, 2021.
    [74] P.-B.-G. Dohmann and S. Hirche, "Distributed control for cooperative manipulation with event-triggered communication," IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 1038-1052, 2020.
    [75] Q. Liu, M. Ye, J. Qin, and C. Yu, "Event-triggered algorithms for leader-follower consensus of networked Euler-Lagrange agents," IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 1435-1447, 2019.
    [76] T. Xu, Z. Duan, and Z. Sun, "Event-based distributed robust synchronization control for multiple Euler-Lagrange systems without relative velocity
    measurements," International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 3684-3700, 2019.
    [77] T. Xu, Y. Hao, and Z. Duan, "Fully distributed containment control for multiple Euler-Lagrange systems over directed graphs: An event-triggered approach," IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 2078-2090, 2020.
    [78] E. F. Dimos V. Dimarogonas and K. H. Johans, "Distributed event-triggered
    control for multi-agent systems," IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control,
    vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 1291-1297, 2012.
    [79] N. Mu, X. Liao, and T. Huang, "Event-based consensus control for a linear
    directed multiagent system with time delay," IEEE Transactions on Circuits
    and Systems II: Express Briefs, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 281-285, 2015.
    [80] X. Ge and Q. Han, "Distributed formation control of networked multi-agent
    systems using a dynamic event-triggered communication mechanism," IEEE
    Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 64, no. 10, pp. 8118-8127, 2017.
    [81] L. Ding, Q.-L. Han, X. Ge, and X.-M. Zhang, "An overview of recent advances in event-triggered consensus of multiagent systems," IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 1110-1123, 2018.
    [82] Y. Wang and H. Ishii, "Resilient consensus through event-based communication," IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems, vol. 7, no. 1,
    pp. 471-482, 2020.
    [83] Y.-C. Liu, "Distributed synchronization for heterogeneous robots with uncertain kinematics and dynamics under switching topologies," Journal of the
    Franklin Institute, vol. 352, no. 9, pp. 3808-3826, 2015.
    [84] H. Wang, "Task-space synchronization of networked robotic systems with
    uncertain kinematics and dynamics," IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 58, no. 12, pp. 3169-3174, 2013.
    [85] L. Wang, B. Meng, and H. Wang, "Adaptive task-space synchronisation of
    networked robotic agents without task-space velocity measurements," International Journal of Control, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 384-392, 2014.
    [86] E. Nu~no, C. Aldana, and L. Basa~nez, "Task space consensus in networks
    of heterogeneous and uncertain robotic systems with variable time-delays,"
    International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing, vol. 31, pp.
    917-937, 2016.
    [87] B. Zhang, Y. Jia, F. Matsuno, and T. Endo, "Task-space synchronization
    of networked mechanical systems with uncertain parameters and communication delays," IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 2288-2298, 2017.
    [88] J. Mei, W. Ren, and G. Ma, "Distributed coordinated tracking with a dynamic leader for multiple Euler-Lagrange systems," IEEE Transactions on
    Automatic Control, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 1415-1421, 2011.
    [89] Z. Meng, D. V. Dimarogonas, and K. H. Johansson, "Leader-follower coordinated tracking of multiple heterogeneous Lagrange systems using continuous control," IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 739-745, 2014.
    [90] A. Abdessameud, A. Tayebi, and I. G. Polushin, "Leader-follower synchronization of Euler-Lagrange systems with time-varying leader trajectory
    and constrained discrete-time communication," IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 2539-2545, 2017.
    [91] W. Ren and R. W. Beard, "Consensus seeking in multiagent systems under
    dynamically changing interaction topologies," IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 655-661, 2005.
    [92] D. Meng and Y. Jia, "Scaled consensus problems on switching networks,"
    IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 1664-1669,
    2016.
    [93] Z. Meng, T. Yang, D. V. Dimarogonas, and K. H. Johansson, "Coordinated
    output regulation of heterogeneous linear systems under switching topologies," Automatica, vol. 53, pp. 362-368, 2015.
    [94] G. Wen and W. X. Zheng, "On constructing multiple Lyapunov functions
    for tracking control of multiple agents with switching topologies," IEEE
    Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 64, no. 9, pp. 3796-3803, 2019.
    [95] H. Wang, "Differential-cascade framework for consensus of networked Lagrangian systems," Automatica, vol. 112, pp. 1-9, 2020.
    [96] V.-T. Ngo and Y.-C. Liu, "Distributed task-space consensus control of networked Euler-Lagrange systems under faulty actuator and switching communication topology," in 59th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control
    (CDC), 2020, pp. 5224-5229.
    [97] H. Cai and J. Huang, The leader-following consensus for multiple uncertain Euler-Lagrange systems with an adaptive distributed observer," IEEE
    Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 61, no. 10, pp. 3152-3157, 2016.
    [98] M. Lu and L. Liu, "Leader-following consensus of multiple uncertain Euler-Lagrange systems subject to communication delays and switching networks," IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 63, no. 8, pp. 2604-2611, 2018.
    [99] -, "Robust synchronization control of switched networked Euler-Lagrange systems," IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, pp. 1-9, 2020, in press.
    [100] C. De Persis and P. Tesi, "Input-to-state stabilizing control under denial-of-service," IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 60, no. 11, pp. 2930-2944, 2015.
    [101] S. Feng and P. Tesi, "Resilient control under denial-of-service: Robust design," Automatica, vol. 79, pp. 42-51, 2017.
    [102] V. S. Dolk, P. Tesi, C. De Persis, and W. P. M. H. Heemels, "Event-triggered
    control systems under denial-of-service attacks," IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 93-105, 2017.
    [103] T. Dong and Y. Gong, "Leader-following secure consensus for second-order
    multi-agent systems with nonlinear dynamics and event-triggered control
    strategy under DoS attack, "Neurocomputing, vol. 416, pp. 95-102, 2020.
    [104] H. Liu, "Event-triggering-based leader-following bounded consensus of
    multi-agent systems under DoS attacks," Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, vol. 89, pp. 1-18, 2020.
    [105] Z. Feng and G. Hu, "Secure cooperative event-triggered control of linear multi-agent systems under dos attacks," IEEE Transactions on Control Systems
    Technology, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 741-752, 2020.
    [106] L. Zhao and G.-H. Yang, "Adaptive fault-tolerant control for nonlinear
    multi-agent systems with DoS attacks," Information Sciences, vol. 526, pp. 39-53, 2020.
    [107] Z. Cheng, D. Yue, S. Hu, H. Ge, and L. Chen, "Distributed event-triggered
    consensus of multi-agent systems under periodic DoS jamming attacks,"
    Neurocomputing, vol. 400, pp. 458-466, 2020.
    [108] I. Shames, A. M. Teixeira, H. Sandberg, and K. H. Johansson, "Distributed fault detection for interconnected second-order systems," Automatica, vol. 47, no. 12, pp. 2757-2764, 2011.
    [109] A. Teixeira, I. Shames, H. Sandberg, and K. H. Johansson, "Distributed
    fault detection and isolation resilient to network model uncertainties," IEEE
    Transactions on Cybernetics, vol. 44, no. 11, pp. 2024-2037, 2014.
    [110] C. Chen, F. L. Lewis, S. Xie, H. Modares, Z. Liu, S. Zuo, and A. Davoudi,
    "Resilient adaptive and H1 controls of multi-agent systems under sensor
    and actuator faults," Automatica, vol. 102, pp. 19-26, 2019.
    [111] H. Modares, B. Kiumarsi, F. L. Lewis, F. Ferrese, and A. Davoudi, "Resilient
    and robust synchronization of multiagent systems under attacks on sensors
    and actuators," IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 1240-
    1250, 2020.
    [112] L. Cao, Q. Zhou, G. Dong, and H. Li, "Observer-based adaptive event-triggered control for nonstrict-feedback nonlinear systems with output constraint and actuator failures," IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 1380-1391, 2021.
    [113] I. Saboori and K. Khorasani, "Actuator fault accommodation strategy for
    a team of multi-agent systems subject to switching topology," Automatica,
    vol. 62, pp. 200-207, 2015.
    [114] M. Khalili, X. Zhang, M. M. Polycarpou, T. Parisini, and Y. Cao, "Distributed adaptive fault-tolerant control of uncertain multi-agent systems," Automatica, vol. 87, pp. 142-151, 2018.
    [115] M. W. Spong, S. Hutchinson, and M. Vidyasagar, "Robot Modeling and Control," New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2006.
    [116] J. H. Jean and L. C. Fu, "An adaptive control scheme for coordinated multimanipulator systems," IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation,
    vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 226-231, 1993.
    [117] Y.-H. Liu and S. Arimoto, "Decentralized adaptive and nonadaptive position/force controllers for redundant manipulators in cooperations," The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 232-247, 1998.
    [118] S. A. M. Dehghan, M. Danesh, F. Sheikholeslam, and M. Zekri, "Adaptive force-environment estimator for manipulators based on adaptive wavelet
    neural network," Appl. Soft Comput., vol. 28, no. C, pp. 527-540, 2015.
    [119] A. D. Z. Antonios K. Alexandridis, "Wavelet Neural Networks: A Practical
    Guide," Published in Neural Networks, 2013.
    [120] C. Ma, J. Lam, and F. L. Lewis, "Trajectory regulating model reference
    adaptive controller for robotic systems," IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 2749-2756, 2019.
    [121] M. M. Polycarpou, "Stable adaptive neural control scheme for nonlinear
    systems," IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 447-451, 1996.
    [122] N. Chopra and M. W. Spong, "Passivity-based control of multi-agent systems," in Advances in Robot Control: From Everyday Physics to Human-Like
    Movements, S. Kawamura and M. Svinin, Eds. Springer Verlag, 2006, pp.
    107-134.
    [123] C. C. de Wit, P. No¨el, A. Aubin, and B. Brogliato, "Adaptive friction compensation in robot manipulators: Low velocities," The International Journal
    of Robotics Research, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 189-199, 1991.
    [124] R. R. Selmic and F. L. Lewis, "Neural-network approximation of piecewise
    continuous functions: application to friction compensation," IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 745-751, 2002.
    [125] Y. Dong, W. He, L. Kong, and X. Hua, "Impedance control for coordinated
    robots by state and output feedback," IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man,
    and Cybernetics: Systems, pp. 1-11, 2019, in press.
    [126] F. L. Lewis, A. Yesildirak, and S. Jagannathan, Neural Network Control of
    Robot Manipulators and Nonlinear Systems. USA: Taylor &Francis, Inc.,
    1998.
    [127] F. L. Lewis, A. Yesildirek, and K. Liu, "Multilayer neural-net robot controller with guaranteed tracking performance," IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 388-399, 1996.
    [128] S. Lin and A. A. Goldenberg, "Neural-network control of mobile manipulators," IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 1121-1133,
    2001.
    [129] F. L. Lewis, K. Liu, and A. Yesildirek, "Neural net robot controller with
    guaranteed tracking performance," IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks,
    vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 703-715, 1995.
    [130] D. Lee and P. Y. Li, "Passive bilateral feedforward control of linear dynamically similar teleoperated manipulators," IEEE Transactions on Robotics
    and Automation, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 443-456, 2003.
    [131] L. Xing, C. Wen, Z. Liu, H. Su, and J. Cai, "Event-triggered adaptive control
    for a class of uncertain nonlinear systems," IEEE Transactions on Automatic
    Control, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 2071-2076, 2017.
    [132] J. Mei, W. Ren, and G. Ma, "Distributed coordination for second-order
    multi-agent systems with nonlinear dynamics using only relative position
    measurements," Automatica, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 1419-1427, 2013.
    [133] H. K. Khalil, Nonlinear Systems. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2002.
    [134] Y.-C. Liu and N. Chopra, "Synchronization of networked mechanical systems
    with communication delays and human input," Journal of Dynamic Systems,
    Measurement, and Control, vol. 135, no. 4, 2013.
    [135] G. D. White, R. M. Bhatt, C. P. Tang, and V. N. Krovi, "Experimental
    evaluation of dynamic redundancy resolution in a nonholonomic wheeled
    mobile manipulator," IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, vol. 14,
    no. 3, pp. 349-357, 2009.
    [136] H. Sadeghian, L. Villani, M. Keshmiri, and B. Siciliano, "Dynamic multipriority control in redundant robotic systems," Robotica, vol. 31, no. 7, p. 1155, 2013.
    [137] P. Hsu, J. Hauser, and S. Sastry, "Dynamic control of redundant manipulators," in American Control Conference, 1988, pp. 2135-2139.
    [138] V.-T. Ngo and Y.-C. Liu, "Task-space consensus of networked Euler-Lagrange systems to a moving leader," in IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), 2020, pp. 2383-2388.
    [139] Y. G. Sun and L. Wang, "Consensus of multi-agent systems in directed
    networks with nonuniform time-varying delays," IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 54, no. 7, pp. 1607-1613, 2009.
    [140] W. Ren and R. W. Beard, Distributed Consensus in Multi-vehicle Cooperative Control: Theory and Applications, 1st ed. Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated, 2007.
    [141] H. Wang, "Towards manipulability of interactive Lagrangian systems," Automatica, vol. 119, pp. 1-9, 2020.
    [142] U. M¨ unz, A. Papachristodoulou, and F. Allg¨ ower, "Consensus in multi-agent systems with coupling delays and switching topology," IEEE Transactions
    on Automatic Control, vol. 56, no. 12, pp. 2976-2982, 2011.
    [143] F. Ficuciello, L. Villani, and B. Siciliano, "Variable impedance control of
    redundant manipulators for intuitive human-robot physical interaction,"
    IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 850-863, 2015.
    [144] G. D. White, R. M. Bhatt, C. P. Tang, and V. N. Krovi, "Experimental
    evaluation of dynamic redundancy resolution in a nonholonomic wheeled
    mobile manipulator," IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, vol. 14,
    no. 3, pp. 349-357, 2009.
    [145] Z.-J. Tang, T.-Z. Huang, J.-L. Shao, and J.-P. Hu, "Consensus of second-order multi-agent systems with nonuniform time-varying delays," Neurocomputing, vol. 97, pp. 410-414, 2012.
    [146] Touch haptic device, 2020 (accessed Dec 29, 2020). [Online]. Available:
    https://www.3dsystems.com/haptics-devices/touch
    [147] Y. Su and J. Huang, "Cooperative output regulation with application to
    multi-agent consensus under switching network," IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics), vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 864-875, 2012.
    [148] J. Hu and Y. Hong, "Leader-following coordination of multi-agent systems
    with coupling time delays," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, vol. 374, no. 2, pp. 853-863, 2007.
    [149] B. Brogliato, B. Maschke, R. Lozano, and O. Egeland, Dissipative Systems
    Analysis and Control. Springer, 2020.
    [150] J. P. Hespanha and A. S. Morse, "Stability of switched systems with average
    dwell-time," in Proceedings of the 38th IEEE Conference on Decision and
    Control (CDC), vol. 3, 1999, pp. 2655-2660.
    [151] A.-Y. Lu and G.-H. Yang, "Distributed consensus control for multi-agent
    systems under denial-of-service," Information Sciences, vol. 439-440, pp.
    95{107, 2018.
    [152] J. Cortes, "Discontinuous dynamical systems: A tutorial on solutions, nonsmooth analysis, and stability," IEEE Control Systems Magazine, vol. 28,
    no. 3, pp. 36-73, 2008.
    [153] S. X. Ding, Model-based Fault Diagnosis Techniques: Design Schemes, Algorithms, and Tools, 1st ed. Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated,
    2008.
    [154] O. E. R. Lozano, B. Brogliato and B. Maschke, Dissipative Systems Analysis
    and Control Theory and Applications. London, U.K: Springer, 2007.
    [155] Y. Su and J. Huang, "Stability of a class of linear switching systems with
    applications to two consensus problems," IEEE Transactions on Automatic
    Control, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 1420-1430, 2012.
    [156] F. Mazenc and M. Malisoff, "Extensions of Razumikhin's theorem and Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional constructions for time-varying systems with delay," Automatica, vol. 78, pp. 1-13, 2017.
    [157] B. Farkas and S.-A. Wegner, "Variations on Barbalat's lemma," The American Mathematical Monthly, vol. 123, no. 8, pp. 825-830, 2016.

    下載圖示 校內:立即公開
    校外:2024-06-01公開
    QR CODE