在科技快速變遷的時代下，駭客攻擊的手段日新月異，使企業面臨著機密外洩的風險。有鑑於此，多數資安企業常透過使用不同技術，來開創各種產品及服務，以幫助企業更敏捷地應對各式挑戰。然而，中小企業經常受制於有限的資源，無力強化自身之資訊安全發展，這導致其無法快速因應威脅及需求變動，甚至造成營運危機。
儘管近年來，多數中小企業已紛紛意識到委外資安服務提供商的重要性，然而這些資安服務提供商往往無法在有限的時間內，為企業導入有效的資安服務，這使得這些中小企業難以應對日益嚴峻的資安威脅。因此，敏捷賦能資安服務被視為當代資訊安全的關鍵之一，它可被視為保護企業免於受到外在攻擊的重要手段。
為了研究此一現象，本研究採用質性個案研究作為研究方法，並且透過分析個案公司如何在市場需求與威脅大幅增加的情況下，透過實現區塊鏈的可供性來達成「敏捷賦能（Agility Enablement）」。在這段過程中，本研究根據個案公司感知機會的時間順序，將其發展過程分為三階段，分別為數據治理階段、數據共享階段及數據賦能階段。此外，也分析在各階段中，不同元組織將如何行動，形成不同樣態之聚集，為資訊工件的潛能提供實現的助力，使資訊工件在每階段的最後，都得以形成不同功能的技術平台，來為更多元組織提供特定行動的動能。
透過此研究，將得以為將來欲發展敏捷賦能能力之企業，提供清晰的路徑依據，協助其透過識別資訊工件的可供性，並藉由元組織間的不同運作型態，為生態系統中所有元組織提供敏捷實現目標的能力。

This study investigates how blockchain technology enables organizational agility through a three-phase model, from data governance, data sharing to data enablement. From BaaS Innovation's case, it demonstrates how strategic partnerships with meta-organizations facilitate the actualization of blockchain's affordances, particularly for its decentralization, immutability, and verifiability features, which create scalable solutions for resource-constrained small and medium-sized enterprises.
Besides, the research reveals how blockchain technology enable enterprises equip with certain capability from each phase, such like decentralized identity verification can effectively mitigate privacy risks, while smart contract can automize the supply chain procedure. On top of that, cross-industry collaborations enable the development of modular platforms that facilitate business goals, from digital member management platform, supply chain finance platform to supply chain carbon management platform, each of them provides strong capability that help firms effectively achieve certain goal in respective domain.
Also, this research makes two key theoretical contributions. First, it extends affordance actualization theory by examining how technology can be leveraged to enhance external organizations' agility. Second, it incorporates social capital theory to explain how meta-organization' network and credibility accelerate platform development. The study identifies a recursive relationship between technological implementation and actions of meta-organization that drives continuous ecosystem improvement.
At last, this research conceptualizes the process of blockchain employment through BaaS Innovation and highlights the role of social capital in acquiring cross-domain resources. It offers practical insights for enterprises seeking to implement technology solutions through collaboration. The findings are particularly relevant for technology firms and small and medium-sized enterprises operating in fast-paced environments.

英文部分
Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy. Journal of management, 43(1), 39-58.
Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2010). Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic management journal, 31(3), 306-333.
Ahrne, G., & Brunsson, N. (2005). Organizations and meta-organizations. Scandinavian journal of Management, 21(4), 429-449.
Ahrne, G., & Brunsson, N. (2008). Meta-organizations. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Akhil, N., Raj, R., Kumar, V., Gangaraju, P. K., & De, T. (2024). An Agility and Performance Assessment Framework for Supply Chains using Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modelling. Supply Chain Analytics, 100093.
Anderson, R., & Moore, T. (2006). The economics of information security. science, 314(5799), 610-613.
Apuke, O. D. (2017). Quantitative research methods a synopsis approach. Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review (Kuwait Chapter), 6(11), 40-47.
Baldwin, C. Y., & Clark, K. B. (2000). Design rules, Volume 1: The power of modularity. MIT press.
Baryannis, G., Dani, S., & Antoniou, G. (2019). Predictive analytics and artificial intelligence in supply chain management: Review and implications for the future. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 137, 106024.
Berkowitz, H., Brunsson, N., Grothe-Hammer, M., Sundberg, M., & Valiorgue, B. (2022). Meta-organizations: A clarification and a way forward. M@ n@ gement, 25(2), 1-9.
Bernhard, E., Recker, J., & Burton-Jones, A. (2013). Understanding the actualization of affordances: A study in the process modeling context. Proceedings of the 34th international conference on information systems (ICIS 2013),
Bettiol, M., Capestro, M., Di Maria, E., & Grandinetti, R. (2023). Leveraging on intra-and inter-organizational collaboration in Industry 4.0 adoption for knowledge creation and innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 26(7), 328-352.
Bodin, L. D., Gordon, L. A., & Loeb, M. P. (2008). Information security and risk management. Communications of the ACM, 51(4), 64-68.
Bourdieu, P. (2011). The forms of capital.(1986). Cultural theory: An anthology, 1(81-93), 949.
Choo, K.-K. R., Dehghantanha, A., & Parizi, R. M. (2020). Blockchain cybersecurity, trust and privacy (Vol. 79). Springer.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American journal of sociology, 94, S95-S120.
Constantinides, P., Henfridsson, O., & Parker, G. G. (2018). Introduction—platforms and infrastructures in the digital age. In (Vol. 29, pp. 381-400): Informs.
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. P. (2007). Mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
Crosby, M., Pattanayak, P., Verma, S., & Kalyanaraman, V. (2016). Blockchain technology: Beyond bitcoin. Applied innovation, 2(6-10), 71.
Dai, F., Shi, Y., Meng, N., Wei, L., & Ye, Z. (2017). From Bitcoin to cybersecurity: A comparative study of blockchain application and security issues. 2017 4th International Conference on Systems and Informatics (ICSAI),
Dash, B., & Sharma, P. (2021). Digital Identity and Authentication in the Blockchain Era. Available at SSRN 4567733.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. sage.
Du, W., Pan, S. L., Leidner, D. E., & Ying, W. (2019). Affordances, experimentation and actualization of FinTech: A blockchain implementation study. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(1), 50-65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2018.10.002
Falch, M., Olesen, H., Skouby, K. E., Tadayoni, R., & Williams, I. (2022). Cybersecurity strategies for SMES in the Nordic Baltic region. Journal of Cyber Security and Mobility, 727-754.
Faraj, S., Pachidi, S., & Sayegh, K. (2018). Working and organizing in the age of the learning algorithm. Information and Organization, 28(1), 62-70.
Flick, U. (2022). An introduction to qualitative research.
Fowler, M., & Highsmith, J. (2001). The agile manifesto. Software development, 9(8), 28-35.
Gallagher, K. P., & Worrell, J. L. (2008). Organizing IT to promote agility. Information technology and management, 9, 71-88.
Gelsomino, L. M., Mangiaracina, R., Perego, A., & Tumino, A. (2016). Supply chain finance: a literature review. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 46(4).
Gibson, J. (1977). The theory of affordances. Perceiving, acting and knowing: Towards an ecological psychology/Erlbaum.
Hammarberg, K., Kirkman, M., & De Lacey, S. (2016). Qualitative research methods: when to use them and how to judge them. Human reproduction, 31(3), 498-501.
Hanifan, L. J. (1916). The rural school community center. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 67(1), 130-138.
Harraf, A., Wanasika, I., Tate, K., & Talbott, K. (2015). Organizational agility. Journal of Applied Business Research, 31(2), 675.
Hartson, R. (2003). Cognitive, physical, sensory, and functional affordances in interaction design. Behaviour & information technology, 22(5), 315-338.
Heinz, D., Benz, C., Hunke, F., & Satzger, G. (2022). An Affordance-Actualization Perspective on Smart Service Systems.
Hovorka, D. S., & Larsen, K. R. (2006). Enabling agile adoption practices through network organizations. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(2), 159-168.
Jónasdóttir, H., & Müller, S. D. (2020). Theorizing Affordance Actualization in Digital Innovation from a Socio-Technical Perspective: The case of the video game industry. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 32(1), 5.
Krancher, O., Luther, P., & Jost, M. (2018). Key affordances of platform-as-a-service: Self-organization and continuous feedback. Journal of Management Information Systems, 35(3), 776-812.
Lamming, R., Johnsen, T., Zheng, J., & Harland, C. (2000). An initial classification of supply networks. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 20(6), 675-691.
Lee, S., & Kim, S. (2021). Blockchain as a cyber defense: opportunities, applications, and challenges. Ieee Access, 10, 2602-2618.
Leonardi, P. M. (2011). When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: Affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. MIS quarterly, 147-167.
Lin, N. (2002). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action (Vol. 19). Cambridge university press.
Marchesi, M., Marchesi, L., & Tonelli, R. (2018). An agile software engineering method to design blockchain applications. Proceedings of the 14th Central and Eastern European Software Engineering Conference Russia,
Markus, M. L., & Silver, M. S. (2008). A foundation for the study of IT effects: A new look at DeSanctis and Poole's concepts of structural features and spirit. Journal of the association for information systems, 9(10), 5.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
Mohanta, B. K., Jena, D., Panda, S. S., & Sobhanayak, S. (2019). Blockchain technology: A survey on applications and security privacy challenges. Internet of Things, 8, 100107.
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of management review, 23(2), 242-266.
Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system.
Nambisan, S. (2017). Digital entrepreneurship: Toward a digital technology perspective of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 41(6), 1029-1055.
Naz, N., Gulab, F., & Aslam, M. (2022). Development of qualitative semi-structured interview guide for case study research. Competitive Social Science Research Journal, 3(2), 42-52.
Norman, D. A. (1988). OF EVERYDAY THINGS. New York City, NY, USA: Doubleday.
Oun, M. A., & Bach, C. (2014). Qualitative research method summary. Qualitative Research, 1(5), 252-258.
Overby, E., Bharadwaj, A., & Sambamurthy, V. (2006). Enterprise agility and the enabling role of information technology. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(2), 120-131.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (Vol. 3). Sage.
Pozzi, G., Pigni, F., & Vitari, C. (2014). Affordance theory in the IS discipline: A review and synthesis of the literature. AMCIS 2014 Proceedings,
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon Schuster.
Reed, E. S. (1982). An outline of a theory of action systems. Journal of motor behavior, 14(2), 98-134.
Shiu, J.-M., Dallas, M., & Huang, H.-H. The Social Capital and Strategic Goals in the Meta-Organization. Available at SSRN 4648826.
Stare, A. (2014). Agile project management in product development projects. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 119, 295-304.
Strong, D. M., Volkoff, O., Johnson, S. A., Pelletier, L. R., Tulu, B., Bar-On, I., Trudel, J., & Garber, L. (2014). A theory of organization-EHR affordance actualization. Journal of the association for information systems, 15(2), 2.
Sunny, F. A., Hajek, P., Munk, M., Abedin, M. Z., Satu, M. S., Efat, M. I. A., & Islam, M. J. (2022). A systematic review of blockchain applications. Ieee Access, 10, 59155-59177.
Susitha, E., Jayarathna, A., & Herath, H. (2024). Supply chain competitiveness through agility and digital technology: A bibliometric analysis. Supply Chain Analytics, 7, 100073.
Tallon, P. P., & Pinsonneault, A. (2011). Competing perspectives on the link between strategic information technology alignment and organizational agility: insights from a mediation model. MIS quarterly, 463-486.
Taylor, P. J., Dargahi, T., Dehghantanha, A., Parizi, R. M., & Choo, K.-K. R. (2020). A systematic literature review of blockchain cyber security. Digital Communications and Networks, 6(2), 147-156.
Tian, F. (2016). An agri-food supply chain traceability system for China based on RFID & blockchain technology. 2016 13th international conference on service systems and service management (ICSSSM),
Vanhaverbeke, W., & Cloodt, M. (2006). Open innovation in value networks. Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm, 13, 258-281.
Wessling, F., Ehmke, C., Meyer, O., & Gruhn, V. (2019). Towards blockchain tactics: Building hybrid decentralized software architectures. 2019 IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture Companion (ICSA-C),
Williams, T., McCall, J., Berner, M., & Brown-Graham, A. (2022). Beyond bridging and bonding: the role of social capital in organizations. Community Development Journal, 57(4), 769-792.
Worley, C. G., & Lawler, E. E. (2010). Agility and organization design: A diagnostic framework. Organizational Dynamics, 39(2), 194-204.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5). sage.
Yli-Huumo, J., Ko, D., Choi, S., Park, S., & Smolander, K. (2016). Where is current research on blockchain technology?—a systematic review. PloS one, 11(10), e0163477.
Zammuto, R. F., Griffith, T. L., Majchrzak, A., Dougherty, D. J., & Faraj, S. (2007). Information technology and the changing fabric of organization. Organization science, 18(5), 749-762.
Zhang, R., Xue, R., & Liu, L. (2019). Security and privacy on blockchain. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 52(3), 1-34.
Zheng, Z., Xie, S., Dai, H., Chen, X., & Wang, H. (2017). An overview of blockchain technology: Architecture, consensus, and future trends. 2017 IEEE international congress on big data (BigData congress),
Балазюк, О., Сисоєва, І., & Пилявець, В. (2020). Control and accounting aspects of introducing agile-methodology for software development projects. Financial and credit activity problems of theory and practice, 3(34), 94-102.

網路部分
博士旺創新股份有限公司官方網站https://zh.i-baas.com/about-iroc/
經濟日報 第八屆《Hit AI & Blockchain》人工智慧暨區塊鏈產業高峰會 盛大舉辦，2025年2月21日（2025年3月12日瀏覽）https://money.udn.com/money/story/5636/8562755
Line today《Hit FinTech》博士旺創新股份有限公司執行長黃啟誠：以資訊安全為出發點，為客戶導入區塊鏈技術 達到數據治理與賦能的目標，2024年5月30日（2025年3月18日瀏覽）https://today.line.me/tw/v2/article/j7GEX1r
PC home網路新聞《台南Web3產業國際博覽會》博士旺創新股份有限公司執行長黃啟誠：區塊鏈有助於數據治理，確保數據是所有者所擁有，2024年10月18日（2025年3月23日瀏覽）https://news.pchome.com.tw/science/knowing/20241018/index-72924440023125229005.html