經濟成長及都市發展似乎並沒有確實地提升生活品質，反倒是因都市成長及擴張而導致生活所需的都市開放空間變得破碎縮小，特別是都市公園，儼然僅被視為都市快速成長後的殘留空間。我們應有更新的注意及更精準地去瞭解都市與開放空間之關係，而都市公園即是都市中最重要的開放空間之一。

針對更精準地瞭解都市公園與都市關係之問題，當前對於公園的檢討規劃仍停留在維持公園足夠「量」的舊式思維，而以法規規定的「每人應有之公園面積」作為公園設施之檢討標準，不夠準確以作為實際檢討之依據，在都市發展一段時間後，對於都市公園的品質量測評量，應有更精確新穎的觀念及方法，以更加重視公園在提供「活動機會」觀念下所提供的服務效用。

為了檢討公園在提供「活動機會」觀念下所提供的服務效用，我們可以運用都市公園可及性量測之觀念以表現都市品質及現象，如同過去的研究一般。（Talen，2002；Kyushik and Yeunwoo，2002）不同以往的是，我們不再將全體都市公園作無差異的均質假設，開始重視都市公園之類型差異，將都市公園有層級地「系統化」，並將都市公園系統化的結果及設施之服務特性做為可及性指標建構操作及解釋之依據，以合理化可及性量測之結果。

本研究將對整體都市公園系統所能提供之服務效用做一新的量測評估系統。在「精確」量測的原則下，針對個體公園方面，將注意其個別屬性及空間環境所帶來之效用差異，而在整體公園系統方面，則將因不同層級公園之服務性質、對象之不同而有著不同的服務範圍設定，綜合以上以確實瞭解都市公園系統其個別公園的獨特性及系統互補性之發揮結果；研究將建構一都市公園系統可及性指標，主要在考量到公園具有之異質性因子影響，如面積、距離、服務範圍及周圍人口密度等，並且由於模糊集方法能更為精確地量測資料，因此對於距離空間阻抗跟面積規模所產生的效用層級性與漸進性將以模糊集方法加以表示，以給與都市公園服務量一正確精準之量測。

研究結果將以量測所得之可及性水準做為都市公園服務量，展現台南市都市計畫公園系統服務量分佈情形以作為實證研究結果，量測各家戶於都市公園系統下，其各自所獲得複數公園個別差異服務量之總和，量測結果將展現在地理資訊系統的介面上，藉以分析探討都市公園服務量於空間上的分佈情況，以做為空間規劃上檢討之依據，以期能增進規劃檢討之效用。

Development in economy and city development seem not to improve the quality of the life positively, though cause the open space of city of living needs to become broken and shrink, especially the urban park, is only considered as the city in the residue space after growing up.

We should have newer attention and understand the city and open the relation of space more perfectly, and the urban park is one of the most important opening space in the city.
We can measure the accessibility of urban park in order to display city quality and phenomenon. Follow different the past, no longer suppose that there is the same nature in the town park , the difference of the specific urban park will influence its service utility. The systematized urban park will enable us to find out about the service situation of the town park more perfectly.

Studying will set up a method of accessibility for the urban park system,consider the key influence factor influencing the park to serve, for instance area ,distance ,service range and density of population of space ,etc.,and combine fuzzy membership function for improving measurement.

At the same time, a case in Tainan City also had been studied. Based on the results, we found the method of accessibility for the urban park system could measure urban life quality more accurate and effective.

參考文獻
一、中文文獻
1. 內政部營建署，1996，全國公園綠地研討會會議資料集
2. 李政道，2002，日治時代臺灣都市設施服務水準之研究，中國文化大學建築及都市計畫
研究所碩士論文
3. 李國正，2000，公共設施區位之合理配置，國立交通大學交通運輸研究所碩士論文
4. 李皎榮，2004，都市計畫區公園用地開發經營策略之研究－以高雄市公園用地為例，
國立成功大學建築所碩士論文
5. 官威政，1977，地方公共財最適水準之探討，政治大學財經所碩士論文
6. 周傑，1986，都市公園遊憩效益之研究─以植物園為例，中興大學都市計畫研究所碩
士論文
7. 林峰田，1997，公共設施檢討空間分析方法，都市與計劃，第24卷，第2期，第171-192
頁
8. 林寶秀，2001，都市公園分佈型態與居民遊憩品質關係之研究，台灣大學園藝學研究
所碩士論文
9. 紀雲曜、李上妤、葉光毅，2004，公共設施最適服務/影響距離之評估模式，建築與規
劃學報，第2卷，第5期，第150-177 頁
10.都市及區域分析方法，2000，馮正民/林楨家，建都文化
11.苗蕙芬，1994，公共圖書館設置區位之研究，台灣大學圖書館學研究所碩士論文
12.陳佐瑲，2000，空間互動模型中可及性變數之敏感性分析，成功大學都市計畫研究所碩
士論文
13.黃日松，2002，科學工業園區公園綠地系統劃設籍檢討之研究，私立中華大學建築及
都市計畫研究所碩士論文
14.黃昭雄，2002，以服務水準及空間結構特性探討台中市鄰里公園網絡系統，逢甲大學
建築與都市計畫所碩士論文
15.曾明遜、謝潮儀，1995，住戶逃避鄰避設施之自我防衛支出：以垃圾 處理場為實證
對象，「都市與計劃」，第2期，第22卷，第57-73頁
16.黃淑姿，1982，都市里鄰公園區位之研究─以台北市大安區為例，中興大學都市計畫
研究所碩士論文
17.黃筱薇，2001，鄰里公園開闢與人口變遷關係之研究—以高雄市為例，逢甲大學建築
及都市計畫碩士班碩士論文
18.蔡春華，2002，都市公園區位條件及內部結構與其使用效能關係之探討，彰化師範大
學地理學系碩士論文
19.廖尉植，2003，台中市鄰里公園可及性與服務水準之研究，逢甲大學建築與都市計畫
所碩士論文

二、英文文獻
1. Altman D. A. ,1994,Fuzzy set theoretic approaches for handling imprecision
in spatial analysis, International Journal of GIS,Vol.8,p271-289.
2. Banai R. ,1993,Fuzziness in geographical information systems: contributions
from the analytic hierarchy process,International Journal of GIS,Vol.7,p315
-329.
3. Braza,M. ,2003,Parks,Community Gardens,and Open Space in Urban
Neighbourhoods.
4. Burrough P. A. , Frank A. U. ,1996,Geographic Objects with Indeterminate
Boundaries,London.
5. Calthorpe,P. ,1993,The Next American Metropolis,Princeton Architectural
Press,New York.
6. Davidson D. A. , Theocharopoulos S. P. , Bloksma R. J. ,1994,A land
evaluation project in Greece using GIS and based on Boolean and fuzzy set
methodologies,International Journal of GIS,Vol.8,p369-384.
7. Erkip,F. ,1997,The distribution of urban public services: the case of parks
and recreational services in Ankara,Cities,Vol.14,No.6,p353-361.
8. Hall G. B. ,Wang F. , Subaryono,1990,Fuzzy information representation and
processing in conventional GIS software: database design and application,
International Journal of GIS,Vol.8,p261-283.
9. Hall G. B.,Wang F. , Subaryono,1992,Comparison of Boolean and fuzzy
classification methods in land suitability analysis by using geographical
information systems, Environment and Planning A,Vol.24,p497-516.
10.Glazer, N. Lilla,M. ,1987,The Public Face of Architecture,Free Press, New
York.
11.Goodmann,W. ,1968,Principles and Practice of Urban Planning,International
City Manager’s Association,Washington.
12.Gregor y.and D. ,1986, Accessibility, in: R.J.Johnston,D. Gregor y. and D.
R. Stoddart (eds ) TheDictionary of Human Geography, second
edition,Oxford, England,Blackwell, p2.
13.Handy S. L. ,Niemeier D. A. ,1997,Measuring accessibility: an exploration
of issues and alternatives,Environment and Planning A,Vol.29,p1175-1194.
14.Harnik,P. ,2003,The Excellence City Park System: What Makes it Great and
How to Get There,The Trust for Public Land Pub,Washington,DC.
15.Helling,A. ,1998,Changing intra-metropolitan accessibility in U.S.:
evidence from Atlanta,Progress in Planning,Vol.49,No.2,p55-107.
16.Kyushik Oh, Yeunwoo, J. ,2002,The usefulness of the GIS－fuzzy set approach
in evaluating the urban residential environment,Environment and Planning B:
Planning and Design,Vol.29,p589-606.
17.Langdon,P. ,1994,A Better Place to Live: Reshaping the American
Suburb,University of Massachusetts Press,Amherst,MA.
18.Lau,J. C. Y. ,Chiu,C. C. H. ,2003,Accessibility of low-income workers in
Hong Kong.Cities,Vol.20,No.3,p197-204. Leung Y.,1987,On the impression of
boundaries,Geographic Analysis,Vol.19,p125- 151.
19.Leung,Y. ,Leung K. S. ,1993a,An intelligent expert system shell for
knowledge-based geographical information systems: 1. The
tools,International Journal of GIS,Vol.7,p189-199.
20.Leung,Y. ,Leung K. S. ,1993a,An intelligent expert system shell for
knowledge-based geographical information systems: 2. Some applications,
International Journal of GIS,Vol.7,p201-213.
21.Levinson,D. M. ,1998,Accessibility and the journey to work,Journal of
Transport Geography,Vol.6,No.1,p11-21.
22.Madanipour,A. ,1992,Design of Urban Space: An Inquiry into a Socio-Spatial
Process,Wiley,West Sussex.
23.More,T. A. ,Stevens,T. ,Allen,P. G.. ,1988,Valuation of urban parks.
Landscape and Urban Planning,Vol.15,p139-152.
24.Pred,A. ,1977,City Systems in Advanced Economies,London, England,
Hutchinson.
25.Nicholls,S. ,2001,Measuring the Accessibility and Equity of Public Parks: A
Case Study Using GIS,Managing Leisure,Vol.6,p201-219.
26.Rogers,W. ,2003,The excellent city park system. In: Harnik,
P.,Editor,2003,What Makes it Great and How to Get There,The Trust for
Public Land Pub,Washington, DC.
27.Shen Q. ,1998,Location characteristics of inner-city neighborhoods and
employment accessibility of low-wage workers,Environment and Planning
B:Planning and Design 1998,p345-365.
28.Sorkin,M. ,1992,Variations on a Theme Park: The New American City and the
End of Public Space, Hill and Wang,New York.
29.Talen,E. ,Anselin,L. ,1998,Assessing spatial equity: An evaluation of
measures of accessibility to public playgrounds,Environment & Planning
A,Vol.30,p595-613.
30.Talen,E. ,2000,Measuring the public realm: a preliminary assessment of the
link between public space and sense of community,Journal of Architectural
and Planning Research,Vol.17,No.4,p344-359.
31.Talen,E. ,2002, Pedestrian Access as a Measure of Urban Quality, Planning
Practice & Research,Vol.17,No.3,p257-278.
32.Talen,E. ,2003,Neighborhoods as service providers: a methodology for
evaluating pedestrian access,Environment and Planning B: Planning and
Design 2003,Vol.30,p181-200.
33.Thriault, M. , Des Rosiers, F. ,2004,Modelling perceived accessibility to
urban amenities using fuzzy logic,transportation GIS and origin-destination
surveys,in Toppen, F, Prastacos, P.(Eds),Proceedings of AGILE 2004 7th
Conference on Geographic Information Science, Crete University Press,
Heraklion, p475-485.
34.Tibbalds,F. ,1992,Making People Friendly Towns: Improving the Public
Environments in Towns and Cities, Longman Press,Harlow,Essex.
35.Vernez Moudon,A. ,1992,A Catholic approach to organizing what urban
designers should know. Journal of Planning Literature,Vol.6,p331-349.
36.Whyte,H. W. ,2000,How to Turn a Place Around,Projects for Public Space Inc.
37.Worpole,K. ,1992,Towns for People: Transforming Urban Life, Buckingham
University Press.