| 研究生: |
張亞凡 Chang, Ya-Fan |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
以五大人格理論探討嗅覺感性經驗 The Experience of Olfactory Kansei based on Five-Factor Model |
| 指導教授: |
馬敏元
Ma, Min-Yuan |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
規劃與設計學院 - 工業設計學系 Department of Industrial Design |
| 論文出版年: | 2013 |
| 畢業學年度: | 101 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 104 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 五大人格理論 、嗅覺 、感性設計 、PAD 情緒模型 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Five-Factor Model, Olfactory, Kaisei Design, PAD Emotional State Model |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:133 下載:21 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
隨著時代變遷,從Louis Sullivan (1856-1924) 提出著名設計理論「形隨機能」 (Form Follows Function) 認為形態是隨著機能的需求而設計或改變,到「形隨趣味」 (Form Follows Fun) 與「形隨情感」 (Form Follows Emotion) ,產品演變上伴隨情緒傳達以為顯學。五感 (視覺、聽覺、嗅覺、味覺、觸覺) 的魅力主導了人們對於產品的選擇:對商品的評價,除了單純的「好、壞」外,更增添「喜歡、不喜歡」這樣感官的情緒。由於五感經驗的重要,而嗅覺又為記憶感知最為強烈之感官,因此本研究欲探討嗅覺經驗影響情緒的程度,以及是否因人格特質不同而有所關聯。
本研究探討五大人格特質在嗅覺經驗上情緒構面之變化,以及是否因人格特質不同而有所關聯。規劃流程如下:挑選適合本研究之五大人格特質評測工具、篩選嗅覺經驗類目與製作PAD情緒量表,分析探討各人格特質其嗅覺經驗的情緒構面變化與關聯,期望未來能提供設計單位設計產品或制訂感性行銷策略時參考,並拓展國內感官經驗之研究範圍與應用。
嗅覺經驗之情緒變化以PAD情緒量表評測,並透過複迴歸分析方法 (Multiple Regression Analysis) 進行分析,研究結果顯示五大人格特質對於嗅覺經驗之情緒構面變化皆存在高度相關。研究結果如下:
(1) 五大人格特質之嗅覺類目的情緒構面複迴歸分析函數式15項。
(2) 嗅覺經驗與五大人格特質之關係,在情緒愉悅度 (Pleasure) 方面,影響由大至小依序為神經質 (R=0.922) >開放性 (R=0.854) >外向 (R=0.837) >謹慎 (R=0.837) >親和力 (R=0.78) ;情緒激發度 (Arousal) 方面,影響由大至小依序為謹慎性 (R=0.895) >神經質 (R=0.856) >開放性 (R=0.841) >外向性 (R=0.708) >親和力 (R=0.674) ;在情緒支配度 (Dominance) 方面,影響由大至小依序為開放性 (R=0.860) 謹慎性> (R=0.798) >神經質 (R=0.766) 外向性 (R=0.736) > >親和力 (R=0.670) 。
(3) 謹慎性 (Conscientiousness) 人格特質對嗅覺類目的激發度情緒 (Arousal) ,比其他人格特質關聯性高。開放性 (Openness/ Openness to Experience/ Intellect) 人格特質,在嗅覺類目的支配度情緒構面上 (Dominance) ,呈現高關聯性。其他人格特質 - 親和力 (Agreeableness) 、外向性 (Extraversion) 與神經質 (Neuroticism/ Emotional Stability) 則呈現與愉悅度 (Pleasure) 情緒構面高度相關 (R值皆大於0.8) 。推斷嗅覺經驗之感性需求,最重要者為愉悅度 (Pleasure) 情緒構面。
From the statement of Louis Sullivan (1856-1924), “Form Follows Function” (The shape of a building or object should be primarily based upon its intended function or purpose.) to the “Form Follows Fun” and the “Form Follows Emotion” over the past few years, designing for emotion become the major trend of design. The attractive elements of products from the five Senses (Vision, Olfactory, Gustatory, Tactile, and Auditory) become the major factor in consumers’ choice. Besides “good” or “bad”, there is more judgment of “like ” or “dislike”. Among the five sensual experiences in design, olfactory plays the most significant role for perceptual memory. Therefore, this study aims on exploring the extent to which olfactory experiences affect the emotion and the correlation among emotion and personality traits.
The procedures are as follow:(1) To select appropriate evaluation tool for personality traits. (2) To select olfactory experience category. (3) Build PAD Emotion Scales for analyzing the relatioship among emotion and olfactory experiences and personality traits. The expectation of study is to support kansei marketing strategy and expand relevant research of sensual emotion in the future.
The Emotional state of subjects was measured and analyzed by Multiple Regression Analysis. The results indicate that:(1) There are 15mathematical formulas that describe the correlation between olfactory experiences and personality traits by PAD emotion scale. (2) Based on R score from “Pleasure Scale”, the ranking of personality traits from high to low are:Neuroticism (R=0.922) > Openness (R=0.854) > Extraversion (R=0.837) > Conscientiousness (R=0.837) > Agreeableness (R=0.78). Based on R score from ” Arousal Scale”, the ranking of personality traits from high to low are:Conscientiousness (R=0.895) > Neuroticism (R=0.856) > Openness (R=0.841) > Extraversion (R=0.708) > Agreeableness (R=0.674). Based on R score from ” Dominance Scale”, the ranking of personality traits from high to low are:Openness (R=0.860) Conscientiousness> (R=0.798) > Neuroticism (R=0.766) Extraversion (R=0.736) > > Agreeableness (R=0.670) 。(3) Comparing the score of PAD scale by five personality traits, its shows high correlation between “Conscientiousness” and ” Arousal” ; “Openness” and ” Dominance Scale”. Besides, “Agreeableness, Extraversion, and Neuroticism” shows high correlation (R>0.8) to “Pleasure Scale”. The study infers that the emotion“Pleasure” plays the most significant role in olfactory experience of Kansei needs.
英文文獻
[1] Ackerman. (1990) . A Natural History of the Senses. . New York: Random House.
[2] Barrio, Aluja, & Garcia. (2004) . Relationship between empathy and Big-Five personality traits in a sample of Spanish adolescences. Social Behavior and Personality, 32 (8) , 677-682.
[2] Black. (2010) . The Scent of Design Retrieved April 29th, 2010, from http://seedmagazine.com/slideshow/the_scent_of_design/
[3] Bone, & Scholder. (1999) . Scents in The Marketplace: Explaining a Fraction of Olfaction. Journal of Retailing, 75 (2) , 243.
[4] Buck, & Axel. (1991) . Cell 65, 175-187.
[5] Busato, Prins, Elshout, & Hamaker. (1999) . The relation between learning styles, the Big Five personality traits and achievement motivation in higher education. Personality and Individual Differences, 26 (129–140) .
[6] Cacioppo, Gardner, & Berntson. (1999) . The affect system has parallel and integrative processing components: Form follows function. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76,, 839-855.
[7] Chebat, & Michon. (2003) . Impact of ambient odors on mall shoppers' emotions, cognition, and spending A test of competitive causal theories. Journal of Business Research, 56, 529– 539.
[8] Costa, & McCrae. (1989) . The NEO Personality Inventory Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
[9] Costa, & McCrae. (1992) . Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4, 5-13.
[10] Cronbach. (1946) . Response sets and test validity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 6, 475-494.
[11] Desmet. (2003) . Measuring Emotion: Development and Application of an Instrument to Measures Emotional Responses to Products, In Funology: From Usability to Enjoyment, Blythe MA, Monk AF, Overbeeke K, Wright PC (Eds.) , . New York: Kluwer Academic.
[12] Dillehay, & Jernigan. (1970) . The biased questionnaire as an instrument of opinion change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 15, 144-150.
[13] Doty, Appelbaum, Zusho, & Settle. (1985) . Sex differences in odor identification ability: A cross-cultural analysis. Neuropsychologia, 23 (5) , 667-672.
[14] Ehrler, Gary, & Mcghee. (1999) . Extending Big-Five theory into childhood: A preliminary investigation into the relationship between Big-Five personality traits and behavior problems in children. Psychology in the Schools, 36 (6) , 451-458.
[15] Ehrlichman, & Halpern. (1988) . Affect and memory: Effects of pleasant and unpleasant odors on retrieval of happy and unhappy memories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55 (5) , 769-779.
[16] Ewen. (1998) . Personality: A topical approach. Mahwah, N.J: Erlbaum
[17] Fiore, Jin, & Kim. (2005) . For fun and profit: Hedonic value from image interactivity and responses toward an online store. Psychology & Marketing, 22 (8) , 669–694.
[18] Gardner. (1985) . Mood states and consumer behavior: A critical review. Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 281-300.
[19 ]Gobe. (2001) . Emotional branding: The New Paradigm for Connecting Brands to People. New York: Allworth Press.
[20] Goldberg. (1981) . Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. In L. Wheeler (ed) (Vol. 2) . Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
[21] Goldberg. (1992) . The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26-42.
[22] Hayashi. (1950) . On the Quantification of Qualitative Data from the Mathematico-Statistical Point of view. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 2.
[23] Hirsch. (1991) . Nostalgia: A Neuropsychiatric Understanding. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Consumer Research Conference, Chicago, Illinois.
[24] Hirsch. (1995) . Effects of ambient odors on slot-machine usage in a Las Vegas Casino. Psychology & Marketing, 12 No.7, 585-594.
[25] Holbrook, & Hirschman. (1982) . The experiential aspects of
[26] consumption: Consumer fantasies, feelings, and fun. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 132-140.
[27] Holbrook, & Hirschman. (1982) . The Experiential Aspects of Consumption: Consumer Fantasies, Feelings, and Fun. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 132-140.
[28] John. (1990) . The 'Big Five' factor taxonomy: dimension of personality in the natural language and in questionnaires. In L.A. Pervin (ed.) , Handbook of Personality Theory and Research. . New York: Guilford.
[29] Judge, Higgins, Thoresen, & Barrick. (2002) . The Big-Five personality traits, general mental ability, and career success across the lifespan. Personal Psychology, 52, 621-652.
[30] Kawakami, Aoki, & Ohkubo. (1999) . A study of fragrance on working environment characteristics in VDT work activities. International Journal of Production Economics, 60-61, 575-581.
[31] Kelly. (1955) . The psychology of personal construct: A theory of personality. New York: Norton.
[32] Kelly. (2004) . The "Ocean" and the Night-Sky: Relations between the Five-Factor Model of personality and noctcaelador. College Student Journal, 38 (3) , 406-408.
[33] Lounsbury, & Loveland. (2003) . An investigation of psychological sense of community in relation of Big Five personality traits. Journal of Community Psychology, 31 (5) , 531–541.
[34] MacDonald. (1998) . Evolution, culture, and the Five-Factor Model. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 119–149.
[35] Milotic. (2003) . The impact of fragrance on consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 3 No.2, 179-191.
[36] Mitchell, Kahn, & Knasko. (1995) . There’s something in the air: Effects of congruent or incongruent ambient odor on consumer decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 22 (2) , 229-238.
[37] Norman. (1963) . Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 574-583.
[38] Norman. (2005) . Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things. New York: Perseus Books Group.
[39] Russell. (1980) . A Circumplex Model of Affect. Journal of personality and social psychology, 39 (6) , 1161-1178.
[40] Russell, & Mehrabian. (1976) . Environmental Variables in Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 3, 62-63.
[41] Russell, & Pratt. (1980) . A Description of The Affective Quality Attributed to Environments. Journal of Personality and Psychology, 38 (2) , 311-322.
[42] Schifferstein, & Tanudjaja. (2004) . Visualising fragrances through colours: The mediating role of emotions. Perception, 33 (10) , 1249-1266.
[43] Schmidt, & Beauchamp. (1988) . Adult-like odor preferences and aversions in three-year-old children. Child Development, 59, 1136-1143.
[44] Schmitt. (1999) . Experiential Marketing. Journal of Marketing Management, 15, 53-67.
[45] Schmitt. (2011) . Experiential Marketing: How to Get Customers to SENSE, FEEL, THINK, ACT, and RELATE to Your Company and Brands. New York: Simon & Schuster.
[46] Shadel, & Niaura. (2002) . Does the Five Factor Model of personality apply to smokers? A preliminary investigation. Journal of Applied Biobehavioral Research, 5 (2) , 114-120.
[47] Solomon, & Stonem. (2002) . On“Positive”and“Negative”Emotions. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 32 (4) , 417-435.
[48] Sugiyama, & Nouel. (1996) . The basic for Survey and Analysis by Excel:A Collection of Tool for Planning and Design. Tokyo: Kaibundo publishing.
[49] Thompson, Brossart, Carlozzi, & Miville. (2002) . The Five Factor Model (Big Five) personality traits and universal-diverse orientation in counselor trainees. The Journal of Psychology, 136 (5) , 561-572.
[50] Valdez, & Mehrabia. (1994) . Effects of color on emotions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 123 (4) , 394-409.
[51] Wiggins. (1973) . Personality and prediction: Principles of personality assessment. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
[52] Willander, & Larsson. (2007) . Olfaction and emotion: The case of autobiographical memory,. Memory & Cognition, 35 (7) , 1659.
[53] Zhang. (2002) . Thinking styles and the Big-Five personality traits Educational Psychology, 22 (1) , 17-31.
中文文獻
[1] 王育英編譯. (2000) . 體驗行銷 台北: 經典傳訊文化股份有限公司.
[2] 白明奇. (2005) . 逐嗅雙傑─ 2004 年諾貝爾生理醫學獎 (Richard Axel, 1946- and Linda A. Buck, 1947-, 嗅受器與嗅覺系統的組織整合) . 科學發展, 391, 44-49.
[3] 吳冬友, & 楊玉坤. (2002) . 統計學. 台北: 五南圖書.
[4] 林建全. (2006) . 消費性電子產品的誘目特徵之研究. 工業設計學系碩博士班 碩士, 國立成功大學.
[5] 原研哉. (2007) . DESIGN OF DESIGN (黃雅文, Trans. 14 ed.) . 台北: 龍溪國際圖書有限公司.
[6] 馬敏元. (2010) . 淺談日本新產品開發之感「心」技術. 工業材料雜誌, 280, 160-172.
[7] 経済産業省編集. (2007) . 感性価値創造イニシアティブ― 第四の価値軸の提案感性-21報告書. 日本: 経済産業調查會.
[8] 陳耀茂. (1999) . 多變量解析方法與應用. 台北: 五南圖書.
[9] 曾國雄. (1982) . 多變量解析與其應用. 台北: 華泰文化.
[10] 游恆山編譯. (2010) . 心理學. 台北: 五南圖書出版股份有限公司.
[11] 薛秀宜, 陳利銘, & 洪佩圓. (2006) . 人格理論新紀元:人格五因素模式之測驗工具與其研究應用. 教育人力與專業發展, 23 (1) , 109-118.
[12] 讃井純一郎, & 乾正雄. (1986) . レバートリーグリッド発展手法による住環境評価構造の抽出―認知心理学に基づく住環境評価に関する研究 (1) . 日本建築学会計画系論文報告集, 367.