| 研究生: |
宋怡璇 Sung, Yi-Hsuan |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
直覺式操作兒童數位畫筆之視覺回饋設計 Intuitive Operation Digital Brush for Children on Visual Interface Feedback Design |
| 指導教授: |
吳豐光
Wu, Fong‐Gong |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
規劃與設計學院 - 工業設計學系 Department of Industrial Design |
| 論文出版年: | 2013 |
| 畢業學年度: | 101 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 83 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 電腦繪圖 、直覺式數位畫筆 、回饋 、可用性評估 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | digital drawing, intuitive operation digital pen, feedback, usability evaluation |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:228 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
隨著科技與電腦設備的提升,兒童繪圖素材日趨豐富;直覺式數位畫筆利用筆勢的操作取代圖像式使用者介面(GUI)點選,於前人研究已確定有較佳的績效。本研究以10~12歲的國小高年級學童為目標族群,設計屬於直覺式數位畫筆的視覺回饋,讓兒童於操作過程中,能依其回饋發展出合適的心智模型,使整體繪圖作業有更佳的流暢性。
研究第一階段依前人研究與文獻,定義畫筆功能與操作動作後,利用兒童與專家所組成的多層次焦點團體法,發散思考各操作動作可能的視覺回饋。第二階段以模擬與操作任務的方式,由兒童進行概念評估,依問卷量表與訪談內容所得各設計方案的優缺點和排序再進行細節調整,確立最終視覺回饋介面。研究最後階段則經模型製作與系統實作,驗證視覺回饋之可行性。
由執行連續任務的結果來看,經實驗流程所求得之視覺回饋介面能幫助使用者有更流暢的表現;於主觀量表也可確定相較於對照組,實驗組有較佳的效用性、滿意度與移動相容性;在自由繪圖階段,實驗組因介面的設計安排保留給使用者較大的繪圖空間,致使實驗組於粗細功能的切換次數明顯高於對照組。從上述系統驗證結果可確定,本研究經發散至收斂的設計過程,能求出適合直覺式數位畫筆的回饋介面,並提供給使用者更好的繪圖經驗。
With the advancement of technology and computer equipment, drawing tools for child become more diversified. The study of intuitive operation digital brush which used a pen as an input device to replace graphic user interface has been confirmed with better performance in previous studies. This study bases on visual feedback of intuitive operation for 10-12 years old child. Consider an appropriate interface with operation to create accurate mental models for users, in order to improve processing fluency and efficiency.
In the first stage, defined functions over literatures and experiment results before. After that, through focus group explore the possibilities of interface design on each function. And in the second stage, this study involved child as subjects to evaluate concepts. Use child’s evaluations and judgments to redesign the detail of concept. Finally, through modeling and coding to establish a drawing system for performance test and subjective evaluation.
Three finding are described in the last experiment of experimental group: (1) it shows a better performance in processing fluency. (2) higher subjective evaluation in effectiveness, satisfaction and conceptual compatibility. (3) larger drawing spaces make plentiful strokes. The above results show the design process in this research can provide an appropriate interface and drawing experience for users.
英文文獻
Apitz, G., & Guimbretière, F. (2004),“CrossY: a crossing-based drawing application”, 17th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, October, pp.3~12.
Bae, S. H., Balakrishnan, R., & Singh, K. (2008).“ILoveSketch: as-natural-as-possible sketching system for creating 3d curve models”, 21st annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, October pp.151~160.
Bi, X., Moscovich, T., Ramos, G., Balakrishnan, R., & Hinckley, K. (2008).“An exploration of pen rolling for pen-based interaction ”,21st annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, October, pp.191~200.
Block, F., Gutwin, C., Haller, M., Gellersen, H., & Billinghurst, M. (2008).“Pen and paper techniques for physical customisation of tabletop interfaces”, 3rd IEEE International Workshop, pp.17~24.
Block, F., Haller, M., Gellersen, H., Gutwin, C., & Billinghurst, M. (2008). “VoodooSketch: extending interactive surfaces with adaptable interface palettes”, the 2nd international conference on Tangible and embedded interaction, February, pp.55~58.
Brandl, P., Forlines, C., Wigdor, D., Haller, M., & Shen, C. (2008). “Combining and measuring the benefits of bimanual pen and direct-touch interaction on horizontal interfaces”, AVI '08 Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces, pp.154~161.
Burt, C. (1967). “The psychological aspects of aesthetic education”, Art Education, 20(3) pp.26~28.
Bust, P. D., Gibb, A. G. F., & Haslam, R. (2005). “Manual handling of highway kerbs—focus group findings”, Appl Ergon, 36(4) pp.417~425.
Chan, K. W. L., & Chan, A. H. S. (2005). “Spatial SR compatibility of visual and auditory signals: implications for human-machine interface design”, Displays, 26(3) pp109~119.
Christensen, P. M., & James, A. (2008). Research with children: Perspectives and practices, New York: Taylor & Francis.
Dixon, D., Prasad, M., & Hammond, T. (2010). “iCanDraw: using sketch recognition and corrective feedback to assist a user in drawing human faces”, ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, April, pp.897~906.
Druin, A., & Solomon, C. (1996). Designing Multimedia Environments for Children: Computers, Creativity, and Kids, New York: Wiley Computer Publishing, John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
Fitts, P. M. (1954). “The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement”, Journal of experimental psychology, 47(6) pp.381.
Foley, J. D., & Wallace, V. L. (1974). “The art of natural graphic man-machine conversation”, Proceedings of the IEEE, 62(4) pp.462~471.
Freeman, M., & Mathison, S. (2009). Researching children's experiences, New York: The Guilford Press.
Ghozlan, A. (1997). “Simon's experiments and stimulus-response compatibility: hypothesis of two automatic responses”, Perceptual and motor skills, 84(1) pp.35~45.
Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Gould, J. D., & Lewis, C. (1985). “Designing for usability: key principles and what designers think”, Communications of the ACM, 28(3) pp.300~311.
Guimbretière, F., Stone, M., & Winograd, T. (2001). “Fluid interaction with high-resolution wall-size displays”, 14th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, pp.21~30.
Haller, M., Brandl, P., Leithinger, D., Leitner, J., Seifried, T., & Billinghurst, M. (2006). “Shared Design Space: Sketching ideas using digital pens and a large augmented tabletop setup”, Advances in Artificial Reality and Tele-Existence, pp.185~196.
ISO9241-11. (1998). 9241-11. Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs). The international organization for standardization.
Kotani, K., & Horii, K. (2003). “An analysis of muscular load and performance in using a pen-tablet system”, Journal of physiological anthropology and applied human science, 22(2) pp.89~95.
Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2009). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research, California: Sage.
Löwenfeld, V. (1952). The nature of creative activity: experimental and comparative studies of visual and non-visual sources of drawing, painting, and sculpture by means of the artistic products of weak sighted and blind subjects and of the art of different epochs and cultures: Taylor & Francis.
Lambert, J., & Bard, C. (2005). “Acquisition of visuomanual skills and improvement of information processing capacities in 6-to 10-year-old children performing a 2D pointing task”, Neurosci Lett, 377(1) pp.1~6.
Lee, J., & Ishii, H. (2010). “Beyond: collapsible tools and gestures for computational design”, CHI EA '10: Proceedings of the 28th of the international conference extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, pp.3931~3936.
Levie, W. H., & Dickie, K. E. (1973). The analysis and application of media. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Lim, C., Song, H. D., & Lee, Y. (2012). “Improving the usability of the user interface for a digital textbook platform for elementary-school students”, Educational Technology Research and Development, pp.1~15.
Matthews, J., & Seow, P. (2007). “Electronic Paint: Understanding Children's Representation through their Interactions with Digital Paint”, International Journal of Art & Design Education, 26(3) pp.251~263.
Morgan, D. (1993). “Using qualitative methods in the development of surveys”, Social Psychology Newsletter 19.
Nielsen, J. (1994). “Enhancing the explanatory power of usability heuristics”, CHI '94 Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: celebrating interdependence, pp.152~158.
Nijboer, M., Gerl, M., & Isenberg, T. (2010). “Exploring frame gestures for fluid freehand sketching”, SBIM'10 Proceedings of the Seventh Sketch-Based Interfaces and Modeling Symposium, pp.57~62.
Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.
Piaget, J. (1964). “Part I: Cognitive development in children: Piaget development and learning”, Journal of research in science teaching, 2(3) pp.176~186.
Po, B. A., Fisher, B. D., & Booth, K. S. (2005). “Comparing cursor orientations for mouse, pointer, and pen interaction”, CHI '05 Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pp.291~300.
Ramos, G., Boulos, M., & Balakrishnan, R. (2004). “Pressure widgets”, CHI '04 Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pp.487~494.
Sanders, M. S., & McCormick, E. J. (1987). Human factors in engineering and design: McGRAW-HILL book company.
Sanders, M. S., & McCormick, E. J. (1993). Human factors in engineering and design (7th ed.), New York: McGraw-Hill.
Schmidt, R. A., & Wrisberg, C. A. (2008). Motor learning and performance : a situation-based learning approach (4th ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Shackel, B. (1991). “Usability-context, framework, definition, design and evaluation”, Human factors for informatics usability, pp.21~37.
Sharp, H., Rogers, Y., & Preece, J. (2007). Interaction design : beyond human-computer interaction (2nd ed.), Chichester ; Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Shesh, A., & Chen, B. (2004). Smartpaper: An interactive and user friendly sketching system, Computer Graphics Forum, 23(3) pp.301~310.
Shneiderman, B., & Plaisant, C. (1998). Designing the user interface: strategies for effective human-computer interaction, Boston: Addison-Wesley Longman.
Simon, C. W., College, A., Laboratory, A. M., & Center, W. A. D. (1954). The Presence of a Dual Perceptual Set for Certain Perceptual-motor Tasks.
Sorgatz, H. (2004). Ergonomics at Work in Front of the Computer, Wacom Europe, GmbH, pp.149~158.
Spindler, M., Hauschild, M., & Dachselt, R. (2010). “Towards making graphical user interface palettes tangible”, ITS '10 ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces, pp.291~292.
Straker, L. M., Coleman, J., Skoss, R., Maslen, B. A., Burgess-Limerick, R., & Pollock, C. M. (2008). “A comparison of posture and muscle activity during tablet computer, desktop computer and paper use by young children”, Ergonomics, 51(4), pp.540~555.
Sun, Q., Fu, C. W., & He, Y. (2011). “An interactive multi-touch sketching interface for diffusion curves”, CHI '11 Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference on Human factors in computing systems, pp.1611~1614.
Suzuki, Y., Misue, K., & Tanaka, J. (2008). “Pen-based interface using hand motions in the air”, IEICE-Transactions on Information and Systems archive, November, E91-D(11) ,pp.2647~2654.
Thorndike, E. L. (1931). Human learning.
Tian, F., Ao, X., Wang, H., Setlur, V., & Dai, G. (2007). “The tilt cursor: enhancing stimulus-response compatibility by providing 3d orientation cue of pen”, CHI '07 Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, Apri, pp.303~306.
Tian, F., Xu, L., Wang, H., Zhang, X., Liu, Y., Setlur, V., & Dai, G. (2008). “Tilt menu: using the 3D orientation information of pen devices to extend the selection capability of pen-based user interfaces”, CHI '08 Proceedings of the twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, April, pp.1371~1380.
Waddell, C. W. (1918). An introduction to child psychology: Houghton-Mifflin Company.
Wolpert, D. M., Ghahramani, Z., & Jordan, M. I. (1995). “An internal model for sensorimotor integration”, Science, 269(5232), pp.1880.
Xin, Y., Bi, X., & Ren, X. (2011). “Acquiring and pointing: an empirical study of pen-tilt-based interaction”, CHI '11 Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference on Human factors in computing systems, May, pp. 849~858.
中文文獻
方裕民(2003),人與物的對話-互動介面設計理論與實務,台北:田園城市。
王家誠(1978),了解兒童畫:兒童繪畫心理分析,台北市:藝術家。
李莉珍(2008),「圖像教學對兒童創造力與語文能力影響之研究」,國立高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文。
胡寶林(1994),繪畫與視覺想像力,遠流。
張亮(2009),細節決定互動設計的成敗,電腦人文化。
教育部(2003),國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要: 教育部。
許勝雄, 彭游, &吳水丕(1996),人因工程第二版,台中:滄海。
陳慧慈(2010),「直覺式操作之兒童實體數位畫筆設計」,國立成功大學工業設計學系碩士論文。
葉謹睿(2010),互動設計概論:後數位時代的網站、介面、產品及軟體設計的原則,台北市:藝術家。
趙雲(1997),兒童繪畫與心智發展,台北市:藝術家。
蔡佳蓉(2011),「兒童直覺式操作數位畫筆之認知與人因設計」,國立成功大學工業設計學系碩士論文。
賴麗如(2009),「輔以視覺回饋介面之實體數位畫筆設計與評估」,國立成功大學工業設計學系碩士論文。
校內:2018-09-10公開