| 研究生: |
楊曉芸 Yang, Siao-Yun |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
老甕新酒:透過企業遺址中的數位互動設計喚起顧客品牌意識 “New wine in old urn”:Evoking Customer Awareness through Digital Interaction Design in the Brand Heritage |
| 指導教授: |
林蕙玟
Lin, Hui-Wen |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
規劃與設計學院 - 創意產業設計研究所 Institute of Creative Industries Design |
| 論文出版年: | 2017 |
| 畢業學年度: | 105 |
| 語文別: | 英文 |
| 論文頁數: | 95 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 互動設計 、顧客品牌意識 、遺址空間 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Interaction Design, Customer Awareness, Heritage Space |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:148 下載:11 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
隨著體驗經濟時代的來臨,純粹的交易已無法滿足市場上的需求。因此「設計」逐漸受到重視,用以為產品做市場區隔。而這個趨勢影響了企業經營方式。這篇論文以台灣塑膠產業遺址公園為例探討溝通互動設計,這個遺址公園為台灣塑膠工業股份有限公司(台塑)發跡廠所轉型,是個十分具有歷史價值的工業遺址。本研究分析影響顧客感知的因素,特別的是我們研究的「空間」這個元素是品牌遺址,而這也是本研究在台塑實際專案下進行的優勢。
至於分析框架,本研究運用兩個成功傳達品牌價值先例研究增強假設的概念框架,取得設計建議,並且進一步在評估階段討論品牌遺址的角色。
本研究發現當互動設計扮演的角色是助於在品牌遺址空間中推廣品牌歷史價值,設計過程中有三個超越初始的互動設計元素之上的關鍵組件必須被考慮,物件、內容以及空間。因此,我們將討論這三者間的關係,以及揭示互動體驗與品牌價值傳播的重要連結。
互動設計能夠考量到用戶目標、公司需求以及科技上的限制,藉此我們可以提供台塑設計解決方案來喚起他們想要傳達給客戶的品牌意識。為此,此篇論文將建立用於設計過程的互動設計架構來確保我們的設計能夠增進顧客與企業的溝通。
With the advent of the experience economy, “Design” has been valued to help a business to differentiate their products from their competitors. And this trend influenced the business management as well. This thesis explores communicative interaction design approaches by the case of Taiwan Plastics Industry Heritage Park. The heritage was transformed from a plastics factory in Taiwan. This factory is a significant industrial heritage from Formosa Plastics Corporation (台灣塑膠工業股份有限公司[FPC]) in Taiwan. The study analyzes the factors of interaction design influencing customer perception especially considers the space component which is contributed by the real field, brand heritage site.
For its analysis framework, the study applies two precedents for the purpose of enhancing the hypothetical conceptual framework to get the design suggestion of brand value conveying and discuss the role of brand heritage in the evaluation stage. The study finds that there are three key components need to be considered beyond the initial interaction design elements, which are object, content, and space in the interaction design process for promoting the brand history value in brand heritage space. Thus, we aim to illustrate the connection of the three components and reveal the significant linkage in interactive experience and brand value diffusion.
Interaction Design (IxD) which considered the goal of users, the need of business, and the constraint of technology can serve as a tool for us to offer the design solutions to provide customer experience for evoking customer awareness of FPC. For a better result, the IxD framework using in the design process will be established to ensure our design enhancing the communication between customer and corporation.
Aaker, D. a. (2004). Leveraging the Corporate Brand. California Management Review, 46(3), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166218
Abraham, J. (2015). The Role of Curiosity in Making Up Digital Content Promoting Cultural Heritage. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 184(August 2014), 259–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.05.089
Amato, F., Chianese, A., Mazzeo, A., Moscato, V., Picariello, A., &Piccialli, F. (2013). The talking museum project. Procedia Computer Science, 21, 114–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.09.017
Amato, F., Chianese, A., Moscato, V., Picariello, A., &Sperli, G. (2012). SNOPS: A smart environment for cultural heritage applications. International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Proceedings, 49–56. https://doi.org/10.1145/2389936.2389947
Bollnow, O. F. (1963). Mensch und raum. W. Kohlhammer Stuttgart.
Casey, E. (2013). The fate of place: A philosophical history. Univ of California Press.
Cooper, A., Reinmann, R., &Cronin, D. (2007). About Face 3.0: The essentials of interaction design. Information Visualization (Vol. 3). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ivs.9500066
Crang, M., &Thrift, N. J. (2000). Thinking space (Vol. 9). Psychology Press.
Fang, C., &Mohnen, P. (2003). Working Paper Series, (31), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.1980.tb00220.x
Felipe, P., Arruda, A., &Araujo, K. (2015). ScienceDirect Experience Design as a tool to promote interaction among users in the beverage market : proposal for a new emotional approach in usability. Procedia Manufacturing, 0(Ahfe), 138–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.720
Forlizzi, J., Zimmerman, J., &Evenson, S. (2008). Crafting a Place for Interaction Design Research in HCI. Design Issues, 24(3), 19–29.
Garrett, J. J. (2002). A visual vocabulary for describing information architecture and interaction design. Retrieved July, 11.
Gaston Bachelard. (1958). The Poetics of Space.
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual; essays on face-to-face behavior. Doubleday.
Hector Pottie. (2017). Brand is experience, experience is brand. Retrieved July11, 2017, from https://medium.com/method-perspectives/brand-is-experience-experience-is-brand-b5b757d63628
interactions Volume 12 Issue 4. (2005). ACM.
Jes Koepfler & Kieran Evans. (2016). Getting (Dis)Connected: Shallow Interaction Design For Deeper Human Experiences – Smashing Magazine. Retrieved May31, 2017, from https://www.smashingmagazine.com/2016/03/getting-disconnected-shallow-interaction-design-deeper-human-experiences/
Kate Kaplan. (2017). Experience Design: Bridging Brand Intention and Brand Interpretation. Retrieved July11, 2017, from https://www.nngroup.com/articles/brand-intention-interpretation/
Kim, H. B., Gon Kim, W., &An, J. A. (2003). The effect of consumerbased brand equity on firms’ financial performance. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 20(4), 335–351. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760310483694
Martino, V. (n.d.). Dalle storie alla storia d’impresa. Memoria, comunicazione, heritage - Valentina Martino - Libro - Bonanno - Comunicazione Media Tecnologie | IBS. Retrieved December29, 2016, from https://www.ibs.it/dalle-storie-alla-storia-d-libro-valentina-martino/e/9788896950722
Martino, V., &Lovari, A. (2015). When the past makes news: Cultivating media relations through brand heritage. Public Relations Review, 42(4), 539–547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2016.03.009
Merleau-Ponty. (1945). Phenomenology of perception.
Misiura, S. (2006). Heritage marketing. Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.
Montemaggi, M., &Severino, F. (2007). Heritage marketing : la storia dell’impresa italiana come vantaggio competitivo. Angeli.
Mossberg, L. (2007). A Marketing Approach to the Tourist Experience. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 7(1), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/15022250701231915
Nathan Shedroff. (2001). Experience Design.
Neumeier, M. (2003). The Brand Gap: A Visual Presentation by Marty Neumeier. Retrieved April, 30, 2007.
Newbery, P., &Farnham, K. (2013). Experience design : a framework for integrating brand, experience, and value.
Nielsen, J., &Molich, R. (1990). Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems Empowering people - CHI ’90 (pp. 249–256). New York, New York, USA: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/97243.97281
Pethes, N., Ruchatz, J., &Borsari, A. (2002). Dizionario della memoria e del ricordo. Bruno Mondadori.
Rogers, Y., Sharp, H., &Preece, J. (2011). Interaction design: beyond human-computer interaction. Retrieved from https://www.mysciencework.com/publication/show/fbabc4fca2d1da90150213ad37561404
Rogers ., Y. (2009). Interaction design. Wiley-Blackwell.
Saffer, D. (2006). designing for interaction.
Schmitt, B. (1999). Experiential marketing. Journal of Marketing Management.
Tuan, Y.-F. (1997). Space and place : the perspective of experience. Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press, [1977] ©1977.
Urde, M., Greyser, S., &Balmer, J. (2007). Corporate brands with a heritage. Journal of Brand Management. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/palgrave.bm.2550106
Vaz, R. I. F., Fernandes, P. O., &Veiga, A. C. R. (2016). Proposal of a Tangible User Interface to Enhance Accessibility in Geological Exhibitions and the Experience of Museum Visitors. Procedia Computer Science, 100, 832–839. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.232