班次延誤在運輸系統是很常見問題，也發表多篇相關研究，大部分都討論關於列車班表最佳化之研究，如何讓班次更加合理以減少延誤或是面對班表延誤時候，列車調度最佳化的方法，較少文獻探討關於旅客對於延誤之旅行行為改變之議題，旅客面對延誤旅行行為改變相關研究議題，相關文獻研究背景大都在都市之研究對於短途的通勤者且是較長期以及習慣性的延誤以及動態交通量指派，研究先進旅行資訊系統，對於都市駕駛人之駕駛行為影響，較少研究城際運輸系統長距離運輸之旅客，本研究從等候心理、高鐵搭乘經驗切入研究，研究範圍與課題與國外大部分文獻都不同。
本研究主要調查台灣高鐵旅客，在面對高鐵列車延誤下，旅客的心理行為、高鐵搭乘乘經驗以及對於改變運具影響行為，利用問卷調查旅客對於不同延誤之對於替代運具選擇，利用多項羅吉斯迴歸分析旅客選擇替代運具行為以及利用順序羅吉斯迴歸分析。
研究結果顯示，依據現況調查台北高雄之間替代運具選擇上，對於選擇轉乘不轉乘影響的心理因素，內心的焦慮是推動旅客選擇替代運具的重要項目，旅客事前規劃替代方案，有助於旅客轉乘，延誤經驗對於選擇有所影響，有延誤經驗旅客在45分鐘大多選擇不轉乘，對於替代運具之間的選擇之間的差異，是來自平日所習慣之運具，是否有自己小汽車，在這樣運輸長度看來是無影響，並不會因為有車開而將替代運具轉換為小汽車，男性較女性不耐等候，對於替代運具選擇較為顯著，搭乘頻率、收入與職業是比較不顯著的影響因素。

Schedule delays often occur on transit systems. Many studies focus on train schedule adjust, about how to adjust transit timetable that makes service in transit systems service on time. Fewer studies focus on passengers/drivers about how to change their travel behavior/route. Most Travel behavior/route studies are focus on Advanced Traveller Information Systems (ATIS), which infor-mation help travellers avoid road congestion. This study focus on passengers travel behaviors change on high speed railway encountering departure delays in Taiwan.
This study presents investigation into the travel behavior change while high speed railway en-countering deapature dealys. To investigate waiting psychology, social economic and experience on high speed railway that affect travel behavior change for passengers, this study use Multinomial lo-gistic regression analysis.
To study whether a longer delay will change passenger`s decision to choose alternative mode ,we use Sequential Logisitic Regression.
The results shows that train departure delays cause passengers` anxiety, anxiety is a strong thrust to find alternative mode. Passengers who can plan alternative mode in pre-trip helps them when de-lays make passegers change to alternative mode. Passenger who has delay experiences on high speed railway, may wait more long time to change mode. Alternative mode choices from passenger most commonly used .Driving by alone is not a significant choice on such long distance (Taipei- Kaohsiung).and men can`t wait longer than women.

中文文獻
王基洲. (2000). 旅行者對捷運行車事故延誤時間可忍受度之研究. 國立交通大學.
周萍芬. (2009). 旅客認知服務品質、轉換成本、價值與忠誠度關係之研究---以台灣高速鐵路公司為例. 國立成功大學, 台南市.
胡守任, and 陳俊名. (2006). 行前交通資訊對城際旅行者運具選擇行為影響之研究. 運輸學刊, 18卷(第1期), pp. 33.
張顥鐘. (2001). 以敘述性偏好法探討迄點屬性對城際旅運者運具選擇行為之影響. 國立成功大學.
陳陸陣. (1999). 台鐵行車延誤補償制度之研究. 國立交通大學.
馮正民, and 郭奕妏. (2007). 路線資訊類型對高速公路小汽車駕駛人. 運輸計劃季刊, 36卷(4期), pp. 32.
蔡侑君. (2008). 探討列車延誤時乘客等候之心理及其改善策略─以台鐵為例. 國立成功大學.

外文文獻
Adenso-Díaz, B., Oliva González, M., & González-Torre, P. (1999). On-line timetable re-scheduling in regional train services. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 33(6), pp. 387-398.
Bhadra, D. (2009). You (expect to) get what you pay for: A system approach to delay, fare, and complaints☆. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 43(9-10), pp. 829-843.
Bhat, C., & Sardesai, R. (2006). The impact of stop-making and travel time reliability on commute mode choice. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 40(9), pp. 709-730.
Blaeji, A. T. d., & Vuuren, D. J. v. (2003). Risk perception of traffic participants. Accident analysis and Prevention 35, pp. 167-175.
Blumstein, A., & Miller, H. D. (1983). Making Do : The effects of a mass transit strike on travel behavior. Transportaion, 11, pp. 361-382.
Bonsall, P. (2004). Traveller Behavior: Decision-Making in an Unpredictable World. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 8(1), pp. 45-60.
Borjesson, M. (2008). Joint RP–SP data in a mixed logit analysis of trip timing decisions. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 44(6), pp. 1025-1038.
Dissanayake, D., & Morikawa, T. (2010). Investigating household vehicle ownership, mode choice and trip sharing decisions using a combined revealed preference/stated preference Nested Logit model: case study in Bangkok Metropolitan Region. Journal of Transport Geography, 18(3), pp. 402-410.
Exel, N. J. A. v., & Rietveld, P. (2001). Public transport strikes and traveller behavior. Transport policy, 8, pp. 237-246.
Fujinami, K., Murakoshi, A., Yamauchi, K., Fukasawa, N., Tsuchiya, R., & Inoue, T. (2008). Design of train operation information display system that informs train loction to passengers. Railway Techinal Research Institute Report 22(7), pp. 43-48.
Heilporn, G., Degiovanni, L., & Labbe, M. (2008). Optimization models for the single de-lay management problem in public transportation☆. European Journal of Operational Research, 189(3), pp. 762-774.
Houston, M. B., Bettencourt, L. A., & Wenger, S. (1998). The relationship between wait-ing in a service queue and evaluations of service quality: A field theory perspective. Psychology and Marketing, 15(8), pp. 735-753.
Kahn, L. M., and Morimune, K. (1979). Unions and Employment Stability: A Sequential Logit Approach. International Economic Review, 20(1), pp. 217-235.
Khattak, A. J., Schofer, J. L., & Koppelman, F. S. (1991). Factors influencing commuters` enroute decision behavior in response to delay Transportation Research Record, 1318, pp. 125-136.
Khattak, A. J., Schofer, J. L., & Koppelman, F. S. (1993). Commuters' enroute diversion and return decisions: Analysis and implications for advanced traveler information sys-tems. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 27(2), pp. 101-111.
Larsen, O. I., & Sunde, Ø. (2008). Waiting time and the role and value of information in scheduled transport. Research in Transportation Economics, 23(1), pp. 41-52.
Lemp, J. D., Kockelman, K. M., & Damien, P. (2010). The continuous cross-nested logit model: Formulation and application for departure time choice. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 44(5), pp. 646-661.
Lijesen, M. (2006). A mixed logit based valuation of frequency in civil aviation from SP-data. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 42(2), pp. 82-94.
Krishnan, L. (1984). Perceived Time: Its Relationship with Locus of Control, Filled versus Unfilled Time Intervals, and Perceiver's Sex. The Journal of General Psychology, 110(2), pp. 275-281.
Mahmassani, H. S., & Liu, Y.-H. (1999). Dynamics of commuting decision behaviour un-der advanced traveller information systems. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 7(2-3), pp. 91-107.
McDonnell, J. (2007). Music, scent and time preferences for waiting lines. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 25(4), pp. 223-236.
Molin, E., & Timmermans, H. (2006). Traveler expectations and willingness-to-pay for Web-enabled public transport information services. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 14(2), pp. 57-67.
Nie, & Winter. (2000). Waiting: integrating social and psychological perspectives in oper-ations management. Omega, 28(6), pp. 611-629.
Nordfjærn, T., & Rundmo, T. (2010). Differences in risk perception, priorities, worry and demand for risk mitigation in transport among Norwegians in 2004 and 2008. Safety Science, 48(3), pp. 357-364.
Polak, J., & Jones, P. (1993). The acquisition of pre-trip information: A stated preference approach. Transportation 20, pp. 179-178.
Rammsayer, Thomas; Lustnauer, Sebastian (1989). Sex differences in time perception Perceptual and Motor Skills, Vol 68(1), pp. 195-198.
Taylor, S. (1994). Waiting for service: the relationship between delays and evaluation of service The Journal of Marketing, 58(2), pp. 56-69.
Thomas, L. J., Rhind, D. J. A., & Robinson, K. J. (2005). Rail passenger perceptions of risk and safety and priorities for improvement. Cognition, Technology & Work, 8(1), pp. 67-75.
Train, K., & .McFadden. (1976). An Application of Diagnostic Tests for the Independence from Irrelevant Alternatives. Transportation Research Record, 637, pp. 39-46.
Toglia, M.P., Schlechter, T.M. and Chevalier, D.S. (1992). Memoryfor directly and indi-rectly experienced events. Applied CognitivePsychology, 6, 293–306.
Tsirimpa, A., Polydoropoulou, A., & Antoniou, C. (2008). Development of a Latent Varia-ble Model to Capture the Impact of Risk Aversion on Travelers’ Switching Behavior. Journal of Choice Modelling, 3(1), pp. 127-148.
Tseng, Y., & Verhoef, E. (2008). Value of time by time of day: A stated-preference study☆. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 42(7-8), pp. 607-618.
週刊東洋経済 (6120), 92-94, 2008-01-12 東洋経済新報社

網路文獻
1. 台北捷運. (2002). 台北捷運2001年年報. Retrieved from http://www.trtc.com.tw/public/Attachment/91019116390.pdf.
2. 台北捷運. (2003). 台北捷運2002年年報. Retrieved from http://www.trtc.com.tw/public/Attachment/910191124284.pdf.
台灣高鐵. (2010). 台灣高鐵營運概況. from http://www.thsrc.com.tw/tc/about/ab_operate_year.asp
3. 監察院調查「99年高雄縣甲仙鄉發生規模6.4級地震，導致高鐵列車於行進中出軌；台灣地震頻繁，號稱先進之高鐵有無完善之地震偵測系統，其防震與應變機制是否充足？攸關人民生命財產安全，認有深入瞭解之必要乙案」調查報告
http://www.cy.gov.tw/AP_HOME/Op_Upload/eDoc/%E8%AA%BF%E6%9F%A5%E5%A0%B1%E5%91%8A/99/0990002640990801383%E7%94%B2%E4%BB%99%E9%AB%98%E9%90%B5(%E8%AA%BF%E6%9F%A5%E6%84%8F%E8%A6%8B).doc