| 研究生: |
蔡世華 Tasi, Shih-Hua |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
排灣族七佳(Tjuvecekadan)社域外農業地景的民族考古學視野 The Agricultural Landscape of Tjuvecekadan Village: An Ethnoarchaeological Perspective |
| 指導教授: |
鍾國風
Chung, Kuo-Feng |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
文學院 - 考古學研究所 Institute of Archaeology |
| 論文出版年: | 2021 |
| 畢業學年度: | 109 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 198 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 地景考古學 、資源域分析 、民族考古學 、地理資訊系統(GIS) 、七佳部落 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | landscape archaeology, site catchment analysis, ethnoarchaeology, geographic information systems (GIS), tjuvecekadan |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:233 下載:100 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
隨著遺址外考古(off-site archaeology)和分佈式考古 (distributional archaeology)研究興起,考古學者開始將研究範圍擴至道路系統和農業遺留。農業遺留物作為人類與自然環境互動下,所留存之物質文化,考古學者可從農業遺留之空間分布位置,探討農耕行為是如何受環境因素限制,同時也理解人群是如何認識環境並改造環境。
在統計分析、地理資訊系統(GIS)隨著電腦計算快速發展的今日,唯物主義下地景研究更是受到考古學者青睞,透過電腦運算找尋物質文化和環境變量間之規律,此舉往往導致考古學者會以最理想覓食模式,和理性經濟模型去解釋人類是如何理性地開發地景。
然而,僅從理性經濟人假設的地景研究,容易忽略社會文化對於土地使用模式的影響。僅由土地客觀屬性進行討論,會使土地使用模式遭到錯估,因此常與民族誌觀察有所出入,原住民族有其認知與環境利用的分類邏輯,且原住民族對環境資源的使用方式,也並非完全符合理性資源域分析所採用的模型假設。
為反應資源域分析的不足處,筆者欲舉排灣族Tjuvecekadan(老七佳)部落作為研究案例,從地景考古學的觀點出發,由於地景本身是人類與環境之間,相互影響下物質和空間展現之結果。因此筆者希冀藉由地景考古學全觀性(holism)的理論框架,運用資源域分析(site catchment analysis)與民族考古學策略,試圖分析老七佳部落的農耕遺留分布位置與環境資源間之關係,以及農業地景背後所隱含社會秩序和文化邏輯概念,從其相互辯證之結果,用以討論與解釋Tjuvecekadan住民是如何去建構自身的農業地景。
With the rise of off-site archaeology and distributional archaeology, archaeologists began to expand their research to road systems and agricultural heritage. Agricultural artifacts are the material culture that remains under the interaction between humans and the natural environment. Archaeologists can explore how farming behavior is restricted by environmental factors from the spatial distribution of agricultural artifacts, and understand how people understand and transform the environment.
With the rapid development of statistical analysis and geographic information systems (GIS) with computer computing today, the study of landscape under materialism is even more favored by archaeologists. Computer operations are used to find the laws between material culture and environmental variables. Archaeologists will use the most ideal foraging mode and the hypothesis of economic man to explain how human beings rationally develop the landscape.
However, it is easy to ignore the influence of culture on land use patterns only from the landscape research assumed by hypothesis of economic man. Discussions based on the objective attributes of the land will make the land use pattern mis-evaluated Because indigenous peoples have a set of logical thinking to deal with the environment, and the way they use environmental resources does not completely conform to the model assumptions used in site catchment analysis.
In order to reflect this deficiency, the author would like to use the Paiwan Tjuvecekadan village as a research case. From the perspective of landscape archaeology, the landscape itself is the interaction between human beings and the environment. Therefore, the author hopes to use the theoretical framework of landscape archaeology, site catchment analysis and ethnoarchaeological strategies, to try to analyze the relationship between the distribution of farming legacy and environmental resources of the Tjuvecekadan village
王相華、田玉娟
2009〈台灣六個原住民部落之山田燒墾農耕方式及其傳統生態知識〉,《國家公園學報》19:4:10-20。
巴清雄
2018〈霧台魯凱族傳統永續農耕制度〉,台北:國立臺灣大學農藝學研究所博士論文。
江芝華
2008〈考古學的家屋社會研究〉,《國立臺灣大學考古人類學刊》68:109-136。
吳偉鴻
2016〈運用地理資訊系統建立考古遺址預測模型的案例〉,《國立臺灣大學考古人類學刊》84:39-76。
杜詩韻
2012《原住民知識與土地利用關係之研究-以兩個排灣族部落農業與狩獵活動為例》,花蓮:國立東華大學自然資源與環境學系碩士論文。
林文傑
2018〈排灣族聚落的建構:以屏東縣春日鄉七佳社為例〉,台南:國立成功大學考古學研究所碩士論文。
官大偉
2008〈什麼傳統?誰的領域?:從泰雅族馬里光流域傳統領域調查經驗談空間知識的轉譯〉,《國立臺灣大學考古人類學刊》69:109-141。
2017〈傳統領域:一個原住民族發展的關鍵議題〉,《台灣原住民研究論叢》22:45-76。
郭東雄, 陳淑美
2017〈排灣族生態環境適應之研究:以Tjuvecekadan(老七佳部落)為例〉,《實踐博雅學報》25:75-100。
郭東雄
2013〈台灣排灣族石板屋聚落文化空間之研究〉,高雄:國立高雄大學地理學系博士論文。
陳玉美
2003〈考古學中人與環境關係的研究:以Site Catchment 為例〉,《國立臺灣大學考古人類學刊》60:97-114。
陳瑪玲
2008〈由GIS觀看史前人群與地景關係-GIS在考古學上的運用〉,《數位典藏地理資訊》87-101。
陳啟仁
2016《屏東縣春日鄉Tjuvecekadan(老七佳部落)石板屋聚落保存及發展計畫成果報告》,屏東縣資產保護所委託國立高雄大學永續居住環境科技中心。
童春發
1989〈原住民的土地倫理觀念-以排灣族的想法為例〉,《原住民教育季刊》16:43-52。
2011《排灣族擬人化的命名土地制度:三個遺址地名的田野調查與文化詮釋》。台東縣:國立台灣史前文化博物館。
童春發和洪湘雲
2017《排灣族Padain部落歷史研究》。南投縣:國史館台灣文獻館。
張海
2010〈景觀考古學-理論、方法與實踐〉,《 南方文物》4: 8-17。
2014《GIS與考古學空間分析》。北京:北京大學出版社。
張文傑
1990〈排灣族與雅美族的農耕及生計適應:以土文村和朗島村為例〉,台北:國立台灣師範大學地理研究所碩士論文。
黃居正
2005〈時間、勞動與生態—原住民族財產權的核心論題〉,《清華科技法律與政 策論叢》2:5-48。
黃應貴
1975〈經濟適應與發展:一個台灣中部為山族聚落的研究〉,《中央研究院民族學研究所集刊》36:35-55。
1995《空間、力與社會》。台北:中央研究院民族學研究所。
黃叔璥
1722《臺海使槎錄》。臺灣文獻叢刊第四種,臺北:臺灣銀行經濟研究室,。
臺灣省林業試驗所
1996《台灣森林土壤調查報告(一)-荖濃溪事業區》。台北:臺灣省林業試驗所,行政院農業委員會。
臺灣總督府臨時臺灣舊慣調查會
2003《番族慣習調查報告書第五卷:排灣族 第三冊》。台北:中央研究院民族學研究所。
1921《番族慣習調查報告書第五卷:排灣族 第冊》。台北:中央研究院民族學研究所。
劉益昌、曾振名、高業榮、戴瑞春、吳佰祿、方建明
1994《交通部台灣區國道新建工程局國道南橫公路路線研選文化遺址調查計畫報告》。台北:交通部委託財團法人中華顧問工程司。
劉廷攸
2012〈鵝鑾鼻第三/四文化相遺址的集域分析與漁獵地景〉,台北:臺灣大學人類學碩士論文。
趙秀英、廖秋吉、鍾興華
2013《排灣族Tjuvecekadan(老七佳)部落》,屏東:原民會文化園區。
臺灣省政府農林廳山地農牧局
1984《山坡地土壤調查報告-屏東縣》,台北:行政院農委會。
蔣斌、李靜怡
1995 〈北排灣族屋的空間結構與意義〉,《空間、力與社會》,黃應貴
編,頁167-212。台北:中央研究院民族所。
蕭德昌
2010〈臺灣原住民族傳統習慣的適應與變遷:以排灣族新興村的土地、親屬組織文化實踐為例〉,台東:臺東大學南島文化研究所碩士論文。
鐘興華
2002〈從Vetsik(徽號)看排灣族社會文化之變遷-以Chivetskadan部落為例〉,台北:國立政治大學民族學系碩士論文。
謝政道
2007〈排灣族傳統社會結構之研究〉,《人文社會科學研究》1:123-143。
鍾國風
2014〈祭壺器的社會生命史—阿美族東昌村的民族學調查與靜浦文化的考古學研究〉,台北:國立政治大學民族學系博士論文。
譚昌國
2007《排灣族》,台北:三民書局。
Andrea L. Anderson, Thomas R. Rocek
2018 GIS modeling of agricultural suitability in the highlands of the Jornada branch of the Mogollon culture of southcentral New Mexico. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 22:142-153.
Avraham Faust
2017 The Bounded Landscape:Archaeology, Language, Texts, and the Israelite Perception of Space. Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology,30 (1):3-32.
Binford, L. R.
1962 Archaeology as Anthropology. American Antiquity,28: 217-225.
1983 In pursuit of the past: decoding the archaeological record. Thames and Hudson, New York.
1987 Data, Relativism and Archaeological Science. Man, 22 (3) : 391-404.
Bender, B., Hamilton, S., and Tilley, C.
1997 Leskernick: Stone worlds; alternative narrative; nested landscapes. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, 63: 147-178.
Bruno David and Julian Thomas
2008 Handbook of Landscape Archaeology. Walnut Creek, CA, Left Coast.
Carson, Mike T.
2016 Archaeological Landscape Evolution- The Mariana Islands in the Asia-Pacific Region. Springer, Berlin.
Conolly, James, and Mark Lake
2006 Geographical Information Systems in Archaeology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cassels, R.
1972 Locational analysis of prehistoric settlement in New Zealand. The Australian Journal of Anthropology, 8: 212-222.
C.O.Hunt and R.J.Rabett
2014 Holocene landscape intervention and plant food production strategies in island and mainland Southeast Asia. Journal of Archaeological Science, 51: 22-33.
Crumley, C. L., and Marquardt,W. H.
1987 Regional Dynamics: Burgundian Landscapes in Historical Perspective.Academic Press, San Diego.
1990 Landscape: A unifying concept in regional analysis., Interpreting Space: GIS and Archaeology, In Allen K. M. S., Green, S. W., and Zubrow, E. B. W. (eds.) Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 73-79.
Donna C. Roper
1979 The Method and Theory of Site Catchment Analysis: A Review. Archaeological Method and Theory, 2: 119-140.
Dorothy Graves McEwan and Kirsty Millican
2012 In Search of the Middle Ground:Quantitative SpatialTechniques and Experiential Theory in Archaeology, J Archaeol Method Theory,19: 491–494.
Dorothy Graves McEwan
2012 Qualitative Landscape Theories and Archaeological Predictive Modelling—A Journey Through No Man’s Land? J Archaeol Method Theory, 19: 526-547.
Di Hu
2011 Advancing Theory? : Landscape Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems. PIA ,21: 80-90.
Eleazer D. Hunt
1992 Upgrading Site-Catchment Analyses with the Use of GIS: Investigating the SettlementPatterns of Horticulturalists. World Archaeology, 24(2) : 283-309.
Flannery, K. V.
1976 Empirical determination of site catchments in Oaxaca and Tehuacan. In The early Mesoamerican village, edited by K. V. Flannery. New York: Academic Press,103-117.
Gary Lock
2001 Theorising the practice or practing the theory: archaeology and GIS. Archaeology Polona,39: 153-164.
Giddens, A.
1984 The Constitution of Society: An Outline of the Theory of Structuration. University of California Press, Berkeley.
Greider and Garkovich
1994 Landscapes: The Social Construction of Nature and the Environment. Rural Sociology,59 (1) : 1-24
Hassan Fazeli Nashli and Ruth Young
2013 Landlord Villages of Iran as Landscapes of Hierarchy and Control. International Journal of Historical Archaeology volume,17: 143-158.
Healy, A., Lippitt, C.D., Phillips, D., Lane, M.,
2017 A comparison of suitability models to identify prehistoric agricultural fields in western New Mexico. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports,11: 427-434.
Henri Lefebvre
1991 The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell
Higgs, E.S. and Vita-Finzi, C
1972 Prehistoric economies: a territorial approach. Papers in economic prehistory: studies by members and associates of the British Academy Major Research Project in the Early History of Agriculture, Cambridge University,London,27-36.
Hodder, I.
1985 Postprocessual Archaeology. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, 8: 1-26
Hodder, I. and C.Orton
1976 Spatial analysis in archaeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Hodder, I., Yan Liu and Xu Yan
2016 Interview with Professor Ian Hodder. Journal of Relics from South, 1: 35-50.
Isaac I.T.Ullah
2010 A GIS method for assessing the zone of human-environmental impact around archaeological sites: a test case from the Late Neolithic of Wadi Ziqlâb, Jordan. Journal of Archaeological Science, 38: 623-632.
Kurt F. Anschuetz, Richard H. Wilshusen, and Cherie L. Scheick
2001 An Archaeology of Landscapes: Perspectives and Directions. Journal of Archaeological Research, 9 (2) : 157-211.
Knapp, A. B.
1996 Archaeology Without Gravity: Postmodernism and the Past. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory,3 (2) : 127-158.
Knapp, A. B., and Ashmore, W.
1999 Archaeological landscapes:Constructed, conceptualized, ideational. In Ashmore,W., and Knapp, A. B. (eds.), Archaeologies of Landscape: Contemporary Perspectives, Blackwell Publishers, Malden, MA:1–30.
Leslie A. White
1949 The science of culture. New York: Grove Press
1959 The Evolution of Culture. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Matthew Johnson
1999 Archaeological Theory:An Introduction. Blackwell, Oxford.
Michael J. Harrower
2006 Environmental versus social parameters, landscape, and the origins of Irrigation in southwest Arabia (Yemen). PhD Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, The Ohio State University, Columbus.
Morphy, H.
1993 Colonialism, history, and the construction of place:The politics of landscape in northern Australia. In Bender,B. (ed.), Landscape Politics and Perspectives, Berg, Providence, pp. 205–243.
Monica Janowski
2011 Footprints and Marks in the Forest: the Penan and the Kelabit of Borneo.In Why Cultivate? Anthropological and archaeological approaches to foraging-farming transitions in SE Asia, pp. 121-132.
P. V. Kirch
2004 Environment, Agriculture, and Settlement Patterns in a Marginal Polynesian Landscape. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,101 :9936-9941
Patty Jo Watson
1995 Archaeology, Arthropology ,and the Culture Concept. American Anthropologist, 97 :683-691.
Patricia J. White
2015 Reconstructing Ancient and Modern Land Use Decisions in the Copan Valley, Honduras:A GIS Landscape Archaeology Perspective. Ohio University's Voinovich School of Leadership and Public Affairs.
Randall H. McGuire
1992 Archeology and the First Americans. American Anthropologist, 94 :816-836.
Robert C. Dunnell and William S. Dancey
1983 The Siteless Survey: A Regional Scale Data Collection Strategy. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory,6 :267-287.
Severin Fowles
2010 The Southwest School of Landscape Archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology,39 :453-468.
Tilley, C.
1994 A Phenomenology of Landscape:Places, Paths and Monuments. Oxford.
Trigger, B.G.
1998 Archaeology and Epistemology:Dialoguing across the Darwinian Chasm. American Journal of Archaeology ;102 :1-34.
Thomas, J.
1993 The politics of vision and the archaeologies of landscape. In Bender, B. (ed.),Landscape:Politics and Perspectives, Berg, Oxford, pp. 19-48.
Wetherbee Bryan Dorshow
2012 Modeling agricultural potential in Chaco Canyon during the Bonito phase:a predictive geospatial approach. Journal of Archaeological Science,39: 2098-2115.
Whittlesey, S. M.
1997 Archaeological landscapes: A methodological and theoretical discussion. In Vanishing River: Landscapes and Lives of the Lower Verde Valley. The Lower Verde Valley Archaeological Project: Overview, Synthesis, and Conclusions, Whittlesey, S. M., Ciolek-Torrello, R., and Altschul, J. H. (eds.), SRI, Tucson, pp. 17–28.
Willey, Gordon R.
1953 Prehistoric Settlement Patterns in the Viru Valley, Peru. Smithsonian Institute:Washington DC.