在全球空氣汙染日益嚴重的情況下，全球開始積極重視各重大汙染源。由於交通汙染源大多為公路運輸產生的排放，國際間開始廣泛推廣「低排放區」，透過管制高汙染車輛進入管制區來達成區域內的空氣整潔，但此種限制措施常被視為限制民眾的出行自由，因此容易引起居民的抗議。臺灣將相似政策⸺低碳交通區，列為淨零轉型措施之一，然而目前僅有地方政府的條例草案，社會上缺乏對此政策的討論。因此本研究透過整合過往重要理論模型，除了探討影響民眾對低碳交通區接受度的影響因素，更進一步了解民眾在不同的時空環境下面對不同的配套方案，是否具有特定偏好。
研究一結果顯示，對政策的態度為民眾接受此政策的關鍵因素，而態度又來自個人心理規範及對政策的觀感共同構築而成，其中政策的感受對接受度的影響更甚。表示當政策可能干涉日常生活時，民眾期望政府能以最小影響達成政策目的，尤其涉及政策將實施於生活圈時，對政府的信任將成為接受度的直接影響因素，再次證明了政府須提供給民眾安心感的重要性。將樣本進一步剖析可以發現，不同環境意識及用車習慣的群體間對接受度的影響因素亦不盡相同。因此若要減少對民眾的影響，勢必須先了解民眾對配套方案之偏好，因此本研究第二階段即探討民眾對各假設方案之偏好。
研究二的結果顯示，當政策實施在生活圈時，尤其是實施時間較近時，民眾傾向以豁免方式先避免政策帶來的影響，在尚有時間因應時部分民眾開始願意考慮豁免外的替代方案。而當政策實施於生活圈外時，民眾對於轉乘停車場及通行證普遍持開放態度。綜合來說，民眾在不同時空環境下，不同的政策特性影響了對該方案的偏好。
綜合兩項研究結果顯示，政策制定者在施行低碳交通區時，除應盡量減少對民眾日常的衝擊並提供適當的補償機制，更應致力於營造整體社會低碳出行的氛圍，包含從教育以及相關硬體環境，以激發民眾自發性的減碳行為；而相關配套措施則需考量不同人群特性與在地條件，減少民眾出行不適感，方能獲得更廣泛的支持。

Air pollution from transportation has increasingly been recognized for its environmental and health impacts. The Taiwanese government has proposed a “Low-carbon transport zone” policy to reduce transport emissions, similar to the implementation of low emission zones internationally. Due to limited domestic research, this study explores public attitudes toward the policy in two parts: acceptance and policy preference.
A structural equation model (SEM) was developed in the first stage to identify key factors influencing acceptance. Results show that perceived fairness and infringement on freedom are major factors shaping overall attitudes and directly affecting acceptance. Normative beliefs about low-carbon transport also influence attitudes. A latent profile analysis was conducted to divide respondents into four groups based on environmental values and behavior, showing that group characteristics affect the strength of structural relationships.
After confirming the importance of policy perception in acceptance, the second study examined preferences for different policy schemes. A hybrid choice model (HCM) was applied using ranked responses to compare preferences across schemes. Four scenarios combining temporal and spatial distance were used to explore the effect of psychological distance. Results show that preferences vary by context; for example, exemption schemes are most preferred when the policy is implemented locally. Environmental awareness, policy perception, and travel behavior also influence preferences.

方舒賢(2007)。道路定價對私人運具通勤者旅運相關行為之影響-台灣與新加坡之比較。國立暨南國際大學碩士論文，南投縣。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/ds53pv
交通部(2023a)。運具電動化及無碳化關鍵戰略行動計畫(核定本)。
交通部(2023b)。自用小客車使用狀況調查報告。
交通部 (2023c)。機車使用狀況調查報告。
吳萍樺(2006)。私人運具通勤者於不同道路定價情境下之接受意向及旅運相關行為之研究。國立暨南國際大學碩士論文，南投縣。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/fy66ch
凃春杏(2017)。誰在乎生態交通？影響哈瑪星居民生態交通行為意向之因素。國立中山大學碩士論文，高雄市。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/p7b8ax
凌瑞賢(2015)。運輸規劃原理與實務(第三版)。鼎漢工程。
高雄市交通局(2016a)。2017 高雄生態交通全球盛典─ 哈瑪星生態交通示範計畫。城市發展半年刊, (20), 26~46。
高雄市交通局(2016b)。哈瑪星、西子灣風景區，105年9月1日起全面管制遊覽車進入。取自https://www.tbkc.gov.tw/Message/Bulletin/News?ID=24732798-0663-449e-8c48-55cd30c67bbe。檢索日期：2024年10月21日。
陳正暐(2014)。中部空品區PM2.5排放污染源分析。國立中興大學碩士論文，台中市。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/7zum4y
陳佛鐘(2009)。徵收進城擁擠費對私人機動車輛使用者行為之影響分析。國立交通大學碩士論文，新竹市。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/f8cy86
陳柏君, 黃于真, 林佩霖, 江承軒, 戴子純, 韋懿軒, 朱珮芸, 鄔德傳, 李忠遠, 黃士騰, & 紀佳伶(2023)。低碳交通區推動機制之研究(1/2)設置之評估與配套措施。交通部運輸研究所。
陳柏君, 黃于真, 林佩霖, 江承軒, 戴子純, 韋懿軒, 朱珮芸, 鄔德傳, 李忠遠, 黃士騰, & 紀佳伶(2024)。低碳交通區推動機制之研究(2/2)-推動指引。交通部運輸研究所。
陳靜怡(2011)。台商對外投資大陸之區位順序選擇行為: 層級貝氏順序羅吉斯迴歸模型之應用。管理與系統, 18(4), 719-743。
楊欣瑜(2018)。臺灣不同空品區大氣細懸浮微粒有害空氣污染物來源解析及暴露風險評估。國立陽明大學碩士論文，新竹市。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/2rj7vp
楊家銘(2012)。減少微粒汙染物的健康影響評估:以交通相關空氣汙染與室外空氣汙染為例。國立交通大學博士論文，新竹市。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/77yebh
衛福部(2024年06月17日)。112年國人死因統計結果。衛生福利部(Ministry of Health and Welfare)。取自https://www.mohw.gov.tw/cp-16-79055-1.html。檢索日期：2024年09月28日。
衛福部(2025年06月16日)。113年國人死因統計結果。衛生福利部(Ministry of Health and Welfare)。取自https://www.mohw.gov.tw/cp-7177-82775-1.html。檢索日期：2025年07月08日
鄭亭宜(2017)。台灣中部空品區空氣污染物對民眾健康之影響。國立中興大學碩士論文，台中市。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/h7hv5a
交通部(2023)。運具電動化及無碳化關鍵戰略行動計畫(核定本)。
環保署(現環境部)(2023a)。淨零綠生活關鍵戰略行動計畫(核定本)。
環保署(現環境部) (2023b)。空氣品質維護區管制推動，移動污染源改善有成。行政院環境保護署空保處。取自https://enews.moenv.gov.tw/Page/3B3C62C78849F32F/57551cb2-a89d-46b1-9ede-ac5f21c06c60。檢索日期：2024年10月06日。
環訓所(2015)。節能減碳的下一步?取自https://record.moenv.gov.tw/epaper/10498/ep-4.html。檢索日期：2025年05月01日。
環境部(2024a)。空氣品質維護區管制。環境部。取自https://air.moenv.gov.tw/EnvTopics/MobilSource_12.aspx。檢索日期：2024年10月06日。
環境部(2024b)。空氣品質維護區管制平臺。取自https://mobile.moenv.gov.tw/AirWeb/NewMain。檢索日期：2024年10月06日。
Ahn, J., Lee, J., Lee, J. D., & Kim, T. Y. (2006). An analysis of consumer preferences among wireless LAN and mobile internet services. ETRI journal, 28(2), 205-215.
Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In Action control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11-39). Springer.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
Ajzen, I. (2002). Residual effects of past on later behavior: Habituation and reasoned action perspectives. Personality and social psychology review, 6(2), 107-122.
AMAT. (2022). AREA C and AREA B in Milan. A. M. A. E. T. (AMAT).
Amsterdam, G. (2023). Zero-Emission Mobility in Amsterdam Implementation Agenda 2023-2026.
Amsterdam, G. (2024). Low and zero emission zone. Retrieved 2024.10.10 from https://www.amsterdam.nl/en/traffic-transport/low-emission-zone/
Bamberg, S., Hunecke, M., & Blöbaum, A. (2007). Social context, personal norms and the use of public transportation: Two field studies. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(3), 190-203.
Bamberg, S., & Möser, G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(1), 14-25.
Bamberg, S., & Rölle, D. (2003). Determinants of people's acceptability of pricing measures–replication and extension of a causal model. In Acceptability of transport pricing strategies (pp. 235-248). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Beaumais, O., Prunetti, D., Casabianca, A., & Pieri, X. (2015). Improving solid waste management in the island of beauty (Corsica): A latent-class rank-ordered logit approach with observed heterogenous ranking capabilities. Revue d'économie politique, 125(2), 209-231.
Beggs, S., Cardell, S., & Hausman, J. (1981). Assessing the potential demand for electric cars. Journal of Econometrics, 17(1), 1-19.
Belga. (2024). Most Brussels drivers support Good Move plan - study. Retrieved October 24, from https://www.brusselstimes.com/1283443/most-brussels-drivers-support-good-move-plan-study
Ben-Akiva, M., Walker, J., Bernardino, A. T., Gopinath, D. A., Morikawa, T., & Polydoropoulou, A. (2002). Integration of choice and latent variable models. Perpetual motion: Travel behaviour research opportunities and application challenges, 2002, 431-470.
Bhalla, K., Shotten, M., Cohen, A., Brauer, M., Shahraz, S., Burnett, R., Leach-Kemon, K., Freedman, G., & Murray, C. J. (2014). Transport for health: the global burden of disease from motorized road transport.
Bhat, C. R. (2011). The maximum approximate composite marginal likelihood (MACML) estimation of multinomial probit-based unordered response choice models. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 45(7), 923-939.
Blake, J. (1999). Overcoming the ‘value‐action gap’in environmental policy: Tensions between national policy and local experience. Local environment, 4(3), 257-278.
Botetzagias, I., Dima, A.-F., & Malesios, C. (2015). Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior in the context of recycling: The role of moral norms and of demographic predictors. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 95, 58-67.
Britton, R. (2024a). Almost 40% of Aberdeen LEZ fine appeals successful as council 'fails to get its house in order'. Aberdeen Live. https://www.aberdeenlive.news/news/aberdeen-news/almost-40-aberdeen-lez-fine-9810883
Britton, R. (2024b). Aberdeen LEZ: Poll sees 90% of residents oppose to new traffic measures. Aberdeen Live. https://www.aberdeenlive.news/news/aberdeen-news/aberdeen-lez-poll-sees-90-9217160
Calfee, J., Winston, C., & Stempski, R. (2001). Econometric Issues in Estimating Consumer Preferences from Stated Preference Data: A Case Study of the Value of Automobile Travel Time. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(4), 699-707.
Castillo, A. d. (2024). Madrid’s Low Emission Zones are annulled by the courts. Retrieved Mar 29, 2025, from https://madridsecreto.co/en/low-emission-zones-annulled/
Ceccato, R., Rossi, R., & Gastaldi, M. (2024). Low emission zone and mobility behavior: Ex-ante evaluation of vehicle pollutant emissions. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 185, 104101.
Chamberlain, R. C., Fecht, D., Davies, B., & Laverty, A. A. (2023). Health effects of low emission and congestion charging zones: a systematic review. The Lancet Public Health, 8(7), e559-e574.
Chapaaan, R. G., & Staelin, R. (1982). Exploiting rank ordered choice set data within the stochastic utility model. Journal of marketing research, 19(3), 288-301.
Chen, C.-D., Fan, Y.-W., & Farn, C.-K. (2007). Predicting electronic toll collection service adoption: An integration of the technology acceptance model and the theory of planned behavior. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 15(5), 300-311.
Chen, C.-F., & Chao, W.-H. (2011). Habitual or reasoned? Using the theory of planned behavior, technology acceptance model, and habit to examine switching intentions toward public transit. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 14(2), 128-137.
Chen, M.-F. (2016). Extending the theory of planned behavior model to explain people's energy savings and carbon reduction behavioral intentions to mitigate climate change in Taiwan–moral obligation matters. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 1746-1753.
Chen, M. F. (2015). An examination of the value‐belief‐norm theory model in predicting pro‐environmental behaviour in T aiwan. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 18(2), 145-151.
Cheung, G. W., Cooper-Thomas, H. D., Lau, R. S., & Wang, L. C. (2024). Reporting reliability, convergent and discriminant validity with structural equation modeling: A review and best-practice recommendations. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 41(2), 745-783.
Chini, M. (2022, October 26). Schaerbeek Good Move protests: Two police officers and firefighter injured. The Brussels Times. https://www.brusselstimes.com/312587/schaerbeek-good-move-protests-two-police-officers-and-firefighter-injured
Christiansen, P. (2018). Public support of transport policy instruments, perceived transport quality and satisfaction with democracy. What is the relationship? Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 118, 305-318.
Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. routledge.
Coi, A. H.-M. G. (2024, May 29). Safer, cleaner and more lucrative: The Good Move plan transforms Brussels’ city center — but remains politically divisive. POLITICO. https://www.politico.eu/article/brussels-city-center-good-move-success-politics-pentagon-belgian-district-automotive-traffic-reduction/
Commission, E. (2024). Urban Vehicle Access Regulations. Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport,European Commission. Retrieved 2024.10.02 from https://transport.ec.europa.eu/transport-themes/urban-transport/urban-vehicle-access-regulations_en
Cools, M., Brijs, K., Tormans, H., Moons, E., Janssens, D., & Wets, G. (2011). The socio-cognitive links between road pricing acceptability and changes in travel-behavior. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 45(8), 779-788.
Corless, R. S. B. (2023). Sound and fury as anti-Ulez protesters make their feelings plain. Retrieved 2025/3/29, from https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/08/29/sound-and-fury-as-anti-ulez-protesters-make-feelings-plain/
Crippa, M., Guizzardi, D., Pagani, F., Banja, M., Muntean, M., Schaaf, E., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Becker, W.E., Quadrelli, R., Risquez Martin, A., Taghavi-Moharamli, P., Köykkä, J., Grassi, G., Rossi, S., Melo, J., Oom, D., Branco, A., San-Miguel, J., Manca, G., Pisoni, E., Vignati, E. and Pekar, F. (2024). 全球大氣研究排放資料庫 (GHG emissions of all world countries, Issue. https://edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu/report_2024#emissions_table
Croissant, Y. (2012). Estimation of multinomial logit models in R: The mlogit Packages. R package version 0.2-2.
Cui, S., Tian, L., Xu, Y., & Wang, Y. (2024). Measuring acceptance of tradable credit scheme and its effect on behavioral intention through theory of planned behavior. Transport Policy, 150, 174-188.
Dagsvik, J. K., & Liu, G. (2009). A framework for analyzing rank-ordered data with application to automobile demand. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 43(1), 1-12.
Diamantopoulos, A., Sarstedt, M., Fuchs, C., Wilczynski, P., & Kaiser, S. (2012). Guidelines for choosing between multi-item and single-item scales for construct measurement: a predictive validity perspective. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 40, 434-449.
Drews, S., & Van den Bergh, J. C. (2016). What explains public support for climate policies? A review of empirical and experimental studies. Climate policy, 16(7), 855-876.
Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000). New trends in measuring environmental attitudes: measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: a revised NEP scale. Journal of social issues, 56(3), 425-442.
Environnement, B. (2024a). The LEZ in the Brussels-Capital Region. https://www.lez.brussels/mytax/en/practical?tab=Impact
Environnement, B. (2024b, 2024.10.01). La prime Mobilité Bruxell’Air, pour se déplacer autrement dans la capitale. https://environnement.brussels/citoyen/services-et-demandes/primes-et-aides-financieres/la-prime-mobilite-bruxellair-pour-se-deplacer-autrement-dans-la-capitale
Eriksson, L., Garvill, J., & Nordlund, A. M. (2006). Acceptability of travel demand management measures: The importance of problem awareness, personal norm, freedom, and fairness. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26(1), 15-26.
Eriksson, L., Garvill, J., & Nordlund, A. M. (2008). Acceptability of single and combined transport policy measures: The importance of environmental and policy specific beliefs. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 42(8), 1117-1128.
F. Hair Jr, J., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & G. Kuppelwieser, V. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) An emerging tool in business research. European business review, 26(2), 106-121.
Finstad, K. (2010). Response interpolation and scale sensitivity: Evidence against 5-point scales. Journal of usability studies, 5(3), 104-110.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2011). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. Psychology press.
Fok, D., Paap, R., & Van Dijk, B. (2012). A rank‐ordered logit model with unobserved heterogeneity in ranking capabilities. Journal of applied econometrics, 27(5), 831-846.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.
Franco, C., & Ghisetti, C. (2022). What shapes the “value-action” gap? The role of time perception reconsidered. Economia Politica, 39(3), 1023-1053.
Franke, G., & Sarstedt, M. (2019). Heuristics versus statistics in discriminant validity testing: a comparison of four procedures. Internet research, 29(3), 430-447.
Fujii, S., Gärling, T., Jakobsson, C., & Jou, R.-C. (2004). A cross-country study of fairness and infringement on freedom as determinants of car owners' acceptance of road pricing. Transportation, 31, 285-295.
Fung, A. (2006). Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public administration review, 66, 66-75.
Gardner, B., Abraham, C., Lally, P., & de Bruijn, G.-J. (2012). Towards parsimony in habit measurement: Testing the convergent and predictive validity of an automaticity subscale of the Self-Report Habit Index. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 9(1), 102.
Gärling, T., Eek, D., Loukopoulos, P., Fujii, S., Johansson-Stenman, O., Kitamura, R., Pendyala, R., & Vilhelmson, B. (2002). A conceptual analysis of the impact of travel demand management on private car use. Transport Policy, 9(1), 59-70.
Geisser, S. (1974). A predictive approach to the random effect model. Biometrika, 61(1), 101-107.
GLA. (2024). ULEZ Facts. Greater London Authority. Retrieved 2024.10.03 from https://www.london.gov.uk/programmes-strategies/environment-and-climate-change/pollution-and-air-quality/ultra-low-emission-zone-ulez-london/ulez-facts
Greene, W. H. (2007). Econometric modeling guide. LIMDEP version, 10.
Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Porumbescu, G., Hong, B., & Im, T. (2013). The effect of transparency on trust in government: A cross‐national comparative experiment. Public administration review, 73(4), 575-586.
Haboucha, C. J., Ishaq, R., & Shiftan, Y. (2017). User preferences regarding autonomous vehicles. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 78, 37-49.
Hair, J. (2009). Multivariate data analysis. Exploratory factor analysis.
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-152.
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European business review, 31(1), 2-24.
Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook. Springer Nature.
Hammar, H., & Jagers, S. C. (2006). Can trust in politicians explain individuals' support for climate policy? The case of CO2 tax. Climate policy, 5(6), 613-625.
Han, H., Hsu, L.-T. J., & Sheu, C. (2010). Application of the theory of planned behavior to green hotel choice: Testing the effect of environmental friendly activities. Tourism management, 31(3), 325-334.
He, Y., Sun, Y., Zhao, Z., Chen, M., Waygood, E. O. D., & Shu, Y. (2024). Impact of social-psychological factors on low-carbon travel intention: Merging theory of planned behavior and value-belief-norm theory. Heliyon, 10(6), e28161.
Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: updated guidelines. Industrial management & data systems, 116(1), 2-20.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 43, 115-135.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). Testing measurement invariance of composites using partial least squares. International Marketing Review, 33(3), 405-431.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In New challenges to international marketing (Vol. 20, pp. 277-319). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Hiratsuka, J., Perlaviciute, G., & Steg, L. (2018). Testing VBN theory in Japan: Relationships between values, beliefs, norms, and acceptability and expected effects of a car pricing policy. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 53, 74-83.
Holman, C., Harrison, R., & Querol, X. (2015). Review of the efficacy of low emission zones to improve urban air quality in European cities. Atmospheric Environment, 111, 161-169.
Hossain, M. S., & Fatmi, M. R. (2022). Modeling individuals’ preferences towards different levels of vehicle autonomy: A random parameter rank-ordered logit model. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 163, 88-99.
Howard, M. C., & Hoffman, M. E. (2018). Variable-centered, person-centered, and person-specific approaches: Where theory meets the method. Organizational Research Methods, 21(4), 846-876.
Hsieh, C.-m. (2005). Age and relative importance of major life domains. Journal of aging studies, 19(4), 503-512.
Hsieh, H.-S. (2022). Road pricing acceptability and persuasive communication effectiveness. Transport Policy, 125, 179-191.
Huijts, N. M., Molin, E. J., & Steg, L. (2012). Psychological factors influencing sustainable energy technology acceptance: A review-based comprehensive framework. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 16(1), 525-531.
Hult, G. T. M., Ketchen, D. J., Griffith, D. A., Finnegan, C. A., Gonzalez-Padron, T., Harmancioglu, N., Huang, Y., Talay, M. B., & Cavusgil, S. T. (2008). Data equivalence in cross-cultural international business research: assessment and guidelines. Journal of International Business Studies, 39, 1027-1044.
IATA. (2021). Our Commitment to Fly Net Zero by 2050. https://www.iata.org/en/programs/sustainability/flynetzero/
ICAO. (2022). Long term global aspirational goal (LTAG) for international aviation https://www.icao.int/environmental-protection/Pages/LTAG.aspx
IEA. (2023). Tracking Clean Energy Progress 2023. IEA. https://www.iea.org/reports/tracking-clean-energy-progress-2023
IMO. (2023). IMO. Retrieved 2024.09.20 from https://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/Environment/Pages/2023-IMO-Strategy-on-Reduction-of-GHG-Emissions-from-Ships.aspx
Jakobsson, C., Fujii, S., & Gärling, T. (2000). Determinants of private car users' acceptance of road pricing. Transport Policy, 7(2), 153-158.
Jakovcevic, A., & Steg, L. (2013). Sustainable transportation in Argentina: Values, beliefs, norms and car use reduction. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 20, 70-79.
Jaramillo, P., Ribeiro, S. K., Newman, P., Dhar, S., Diemuodeke, O. E., T. Kajino, D. S. L., Nugroho, S. B., Ou, X., Strømman, A. H., & Whitehead, J. (2022). Transport (9781009157926). (Climate Change 2022 - Mitigation of Climate Change, Issue. C. U. Press. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg3/chapter/chapter-10/
Jenkins, M., & Gomez, D. (2025). Unveiling the multidimensional nature of policy acceptability: A cross‐national approach. Policy Studies Journal.
Jones, C., Hine, D. W., & Marks, A. D. G. (2017). The Future is Now: Reducing Psychological Distance to Increase Public Engagement with Climate Change. Risk Analysis, 37(2), 331-341.
Jöreskog, K. G. (1970). A general method for estimating a linear structural equation system. ETS Research Bulletin Series, 1970(2), i-41.
Jung, T., & Wickrama, K. A. (2008). An introduction to latent class growth analysis and growth mixture modeling. Social and personality psychology compass, 2(1), 302-317.
Kim, E., Ham, S., Yang, I. S., & Choi, J. G. (2013). The roles of attitude, subjective norm, and perceived behavioral control in the formation of consumers’ behavioral intentions to read menu labels in the restaurant industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 35, 203-213.
Kim, J., Schmöcker, J.-D., Bergstad, C. J., Fujii, S., & Gärling, T. (2014). The influence of personality on acceptability of sustainable transport policies. Transportation, 41(4), 855-872.
Kim, J., Schmöcker, J.-D., Fujii, S., & Noland, R. B. (2013). Attitudes towards road pricing and environmental taxation among US and UK students. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 48, 50-62.
Kim, M. J., Hall, C. M., Chung, N., Kim, M., & Sohn, K. (2023). What Makes Tourists Use Public Transport? Value-Belief-Norm Theory, Environmental, Social, and Governance Factors, and the Sustainable Development Goals. Journal of Travel Research, 63(6), 1426-1441.
Klenert, D., Mattauch, L., Combet, E., Edenhofer, O., Hepburn, C., Rafaty, R., & Stern, N. (2018). Making carbon pricing work for citizens. Nature Climate Change, 8(8), 669-677.
Klöckner, C. A. (2013). A comprehensive model of the psychology of environmental behaviour—A meta-analysis. Global environmental change, 23(5), 1028-1038.
Knamiller, C., Rashid, R., Bryant, M., Bailey, E., & McEachan, R. R. (2024). Who shouts the loudest? A qualitative study exploring barriers and enablers to implementing a low emission zone in a Northern UK city. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 25, 101112.
Kockelman, K. M., Podgorski, K., Bina, M., & Gadda, S. (2009). Public perceptions of pricing existing roads and other transportation policies: the Texas perspective. Journal of the Transportation Research Forum,
Koop, G., & Poirier, D. J. (1994). Rank‐ordered logit models: An empirical analysis of Ontario voter preferences. Journal of applied econometrics, 9(4), 369-388.
Kresnanto, N. C. (2024). Measurement of public acceptance of TDM policies using combination of public policy acceptance (PPA) and value belief norm (VBN) approach. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology.
Kumar, S., & Kant, S. (2007). Exploded logit modeling of stakeholders' preferences for multiple forest values. Forest policy and economics, 9(5), 516-526.
Kyselá, E., Ščasný, M., & Zvěřinová, I. (2019). Attitudes toward climate change mitigation policies: a review of measures and a construct of policy attitudes. Climate policy, 19(7), 878-892.
Layton, D. F. (2000). Random coefficient models for stated preference surveys. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 40(1), 21-36.
Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1968). Latent structure analysis. (No Title).
Li, X., Han, C., Huang, H., Pervez, A., Xu, G., Hu, C., Jiang, Q., & Wei, Y. (2023). Pursuing higher acceptability and compliance for electric two-wheeler standardization policy in China: The importance of socio-demographic characteristics, psychological factors, and travel habits. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 167, 103557.
Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (1998). The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. Journal of personality and social psychology, 75(1), 5.
Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. Springer Science & Business Media.
Lubke, G., & Neale, M. C. (2006). Distinguishing between latent classes and continuous factors: Resolution by maximum likelihood? Multivariate behavioral research, 41(4), 499-532.
Lund, I., & Wang, M. (2024). Low Emission Zones: The stakeholders perspectives of the economic impacts.
Lurkin, V., Hambuckers, J., & van Woensel, T. (2021). Urban low emissions zones: A behavioral operations management perspective. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 144, 222-240.
Mahdavi, T. (2021). Application of the ‘theory of planned behavior’to understand farmers’ intentions to accept water policy options using structural equation modeling. Water Supply, 21(6), 2720-2734.
Malina, C., & Scheffler, F. (2015). The impact of Low Emission Zones on particulate matter concentration and public health. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 77, 372-385.
Marchetti, E., & Antonelli, C. (2024). Social aspects of low emission zones: Milan case study. In: Bruxelles: IEEP.
Margaryan, S. (2021). Low emission zones and population health. Journal of Health Economics, 76, 102402.
Martino, A., & e Territorio, T. T. (2012). Milano: from pollution charge to congestion charge (Presentation to TML Leuven, Issue.
Matthews, L. (2017). Applying multigroup analysis in PLS-SEM: A step-by-step process. Partial least squares path modeling: Basic concepts, methodological issues and applications, 219-243.
McFadden, D. (1972). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior.
Mehdizadeh, M., & Shariat-Mohaymany, A. (2021). Who are less likely to vote for a low emission charging zone? Attitudes and adoption of hybrid and electric vehicles. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 146, 29-43.
Milioti, C., Pramatari, K., & Zampou, E. (2021). Choice of prevailing delivery methods in e-grocery: a stated preference ranking experiment. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 49(2), 281-298.
Morgan, G. B. (2015). Mixed mode latent class analysis: An examination of fit index performance for classification. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 22(1), 76-86.
Morton, C., Mattioli, G., & Anable, J. (2021). Public acceptability towards Low Emission Zones: The role of attitudes, norms, emotions, and trust. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 150, 256-270.
Mulholland, J. (2023). Glasgow's LEZ: Bid to halt scheme FAILS. Retrieved Mar 29, 2025, from https://www.glasgowtimes.co.uk/news/scottish-news/23891597.glasgows-lez-bid-halt-scheme-fails/
Münzel, C., Plötz, P., Sprei, F., & Gnann, T. (2019). How large is the effect of financial incentives on electric vehicle sales?–A global review and European analysis. Energy Economics, 84, 104493.
Nair, G. S., Astroza, S., Bhat, C. R., Khoeini, S., & Pendyala, R. M. (2018). An application of a rank ordered probit modeling approach to understanding level of interest in autonomous vehicles. Transportation, 45, 1623-1637.
Nair, G. S., Bhat, C. R., Pendyala, R. M., Loo, B. P., & Lam, W. H. (2019). On the use of probit-based models for ranking data analysis. Transportation research record, 2673(4), 229-240.
Nilsson, A., Schuitema, G., Jakobsson Bergstad, C., Martinsson, J., & Thorson, M. (2016). The road to acceptance: Attitude change before and after the implementation of a congestion tax. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 46, 1-9.
Nordfjærn, T., & Rundmo, T. (2019). Acceptance of disincentives to driving and pro-environmental transport intentions: the role of value structure, environmental beliefs and norm activation. Transportation, 46(6), 2381-2396.
Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(4), 535-569.
Offe, C. (1999). How can we trust our fellow citizens. Democracy and trust, 52(1), 42-87.
Özkan, Ö., Norman, P., Rowe, R., Day, M., & Poulter, D. (2024). Predicting drivers’ intentions to voluntarily use intelligent speed assistance systems: An application of the theory of planned behaviour. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 104, 532-543.
Parijs, P. V. (2023, July 24). Good Move, fair move? Brussels’ mobility plan under attack. The Brussels Times. https://www.brusselstimes.com/615772/good-move-fair-move-brussels-mobility-plan-under-attack
Park, J., & Ha, S. (2014). Understanding Consumer Recycling Behavior: Combining the Theory of Planned Behavior and the Norm Activation Model. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 42(3), 278-291.
Parkhurst, G., & Meek, S. (2014). The effectiveness of park-and-ride as a policy measure for more sustainable mobility. In Parking issues and policies (pp. 185-211). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Pestel, N., & Wozny, F. (2021). Health effects of Low Emission Zones: Evidence from German hospitals. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 109, 102512.
Peters, J. F., Burguillo, M., & Arranz, J. M. (2021). Low emission zones: Effects on alternative-fuel vehicle uptake and fleet CO2 emissions. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 95, 102882.
Player, L., Prosser, A. M. B., Thorman, D., Tirion, A. S. C., Whitmarsh, L., Kurz, T., & Shah, P. (2023). Quantifying the importance of socio-demographic, travel-related, and psychological predictors of public acceptability of low emission zones. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 88, 101974.
Ramaswamy, V., DeSarbo, W. S., Reibstein, D. J., & Robinson, W. T. (1993). An empirical pooling approach for estimating marketing mix elasticities with PIMS data. Marketing science, 12(1), 103-124.
Rejeb, R., Bouscasse, H., Mathy, S., & Treibich, C. (2025). Enhancing Public Acceptability of Low Emission Zones: The Role of Accompanying Measures. Available at SSRN 5153350.
Ru, X., Qin, H., & Wang, S. (2019). Young people’s behaviour intentions towards reducing PM2.5 in China: Extending the theory of planned behaviour. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 141, 99-108.
Ryu, K., & Han, H. (2010). Predicting tourists' intention to try local cuisine using a modified theory of reasoned action: The case of New Orleans. Journal of travel & tourism marketing, 27(5), 491-506.
Sánchez-García, M., Zouaghi, F., Lera-López, F., & Faulin, J. (2021). An extended behavior model for explaining the willingness to pay to reduce the air pollution in road transportation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 314, 128134.
Sánchez, M., López-Mosquera, N., Lera-López, F., & Faulin, J. (2018). An Extended Planned Behavior Model to Explain the Willingness to Pay to Reduce Noise Pollution in Road Transportation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 177, 144-154.
Sarstedt, M., Henseler, J., & Ringle, C. M. (2011). Multigroup analysis in partial least squares (PLS) path modeling: Alternative methods and empirical results. In Measurement and research methods in international marketing (pp. 195-218). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Schade, J., & Schlag, B. (2003). Acceptability of urban transport pricing strategies. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 6(1), 45-61.
Schmöcker, J.-D., Pettersson, P., & Fujii, S. (2012). Comparative analysis of proximal and distal determinants for the acceptance of coercive charging policies in the UK and Japan. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 6(3), 156-173.
Schuitema, G., & Steg, L. (2008). The role of revenue use in the acceptability of transport pricing policies. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 11(3), 221-231.
Schuitema, G., Steg, L., & Forward, S. (2010). Explaining differences in acceptability before and acceptance after the implementation of a congestion charge in Stockholm. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 44(2), 99-109.
Schwartz, S. H. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 221-279). Elsevier.
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in experimental social psychology/Academic Press.
Seabrook, V. (2025). ULEZ lowers air pollution most in London boroughs that opposed it, data reveals. Retrieved 2025/3/29, from https://news.sky.com/story/anti-poison-ulez-scheme-has-lowered-air-pollution-most-in-london-boroughs-that-opposed-it-13323222
Sharma, I., & Mishra, S. (2023). Ranking preferences towards adopting autonomous vehicles based on peer inputs and advertisements. Transportation, 50(6), 2139-2192.
Shi, H., Wang, S., & Zhao, D. (2017). Exploring urban resident’s vehicular PM2.5 reduction behavior intention: An application of the extended theory of planned behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production, 147, 603-613.
Shin, Y. H., Moon, H., Jung, S. E., & Severt, K. (2017). The effect of environmental values and attitudes on consumer willingness to pay more for organic menus: A value-attitude-behavior approach. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 33, 113-121.
Shmueli, G., Ray, S., Estrada, J. M. V., & Chatla, S. B. (2016). The elephant in the room: Predictive performance of PLS models. Journal of business Research, 69(10), 4552-4564.
Shmueli, G., Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J.-H., Ting, H., Vaithilingam, S., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: guidelines for using PLSpredict. European journal of marketing, 53(11), 2322-2347.
Silva, R. A., Adelman, Z., Fry, M. M., & West, J. J. (2016). The impact of individual anthropogenic emissions sectors on the global burden of human mortality due to ambient air pollution. Environmental health perspectives, 124(11), 1776-1784.
Singh, A. S., Zwickle, A., Bruskotter, J. T., & Wilson, R. (2017). The perceived psychological distance of climate change impacts and its influence on support for adaptation policy. Environmental Science & Policy, 73, 93-99.
Smith, H. J., Pettigrew, T. F., Pippin, G. M., & Bialosiewicz, S. (2012). Relative deprivation: A theoretical and meta-analytic review. Personality and social psychology review, 16(3), 203-232.
Sparkman, G., Lee, N. R., & Macdonald, B. N. J. (2021). Discounting environmental policy: The effects of psychological distance over time and space. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 73, 101529.
Spurk, D., Hirschi, A., Wang, M., Valero, D., & Kauffeld, S. (2020). Latent profile analysis: A review and “how to” guide of its application within vocational behavior research. Journal of vocational behavior, 120, 103445.
Srinivasan, S., Bhat, C. R., & Holguin-Veras, J. (2006). Empirical analysis of the impact of security perception on intercity mode choice: A panel rank-ordered mixed logit model. Transportation research record, 1942(1), 9-15.
Steg, L., Dreijerink, L., & Abrahamse, W. (2005). Factors influencing the acceptability of energy policies: A test of VBN theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(4), 415-425.
Steg, L., & Schuitema, G. (2007). Behavioural responses to transport pricing: a theoretical analysis. In Threats from Car Traffic to the Quality of Urban Life: Problems, Causes and Solutions (pp. 347-366). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (1997). The role of problem awareness in willingness-to-change car use and in evaluating relevant policy measures. Traffic and transport psychology. Theory and application.
Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A., & Kalof, L. (1999). A Value-Belief-Norm Theory of Support for Social Movements: The Case of Environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 6(2), 81-97.
Steven. (2024). Hoe werken milieuzones in Amsterdam? Retrieved 2024.10.10 from https://vicky.one/blog/milieuzones-in-amsterdam/
Sun, X., Feng, S., & Lu, J. (2016). Psychological factors influencing the public acceptability of congestion pricing in China. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 41, 104-112.
Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in science education, 48, 1273-1296.
Tarriño-Ortiz, J., Gómez, J., Soria-Lara, J. A., & Vassallo, J. M. (2022). Analyzing the impact of Low Emission Zones on modal shift. Sustainable Cities and Society, 77, 103562.
Taylor, M. (2025). Dramatic fall in London’s levels of deadly pollutants after Ulez expansion. Retrieved 2025/3/29, from https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/mar/07/london-air-pollution-down-since-ulez-expansion-study
Terry, D. J., & Hogg, M. A. (1996). Group norms and the attitude-behavior relationship: A role for group identification. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 22(8), 776-793.
TfL. (2024a). Driving. Transport for London. Retrieved 2024.10.02 from https://tfl.gov.uk/modes/driving/
TfL. (2024b). Ultra Low Emission Zone (ULEZ) Key Fact Sheet. T. f. London.
Triandis, H. C. (1979). Values, attitudes, and interpersonal behavior. Nebraska symposium on motivation,
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological review, 110(3), 403.
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychol Rev, 117(2), 440-463.
Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Wakslak, C. (2007). Construal Levels and Psychological Distance: Effects on Representation, Prediction, Evaluation, and Behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 83-95.
Turner, M. C., Andersen, Z. J., Baccarelli, A., Diver, W. R., Gapstur, S. M., Pope III, C. A., Prada, D., Samet, J., Thurston, G., & Cohen, A. (2020). Outdoor air pollution and cancer: An overview of the current evidence and public health recommendations. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians, 70(6), 460-479.
Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why people obey the law. Princeton university press.
Vermunt, J. K., & Magidson, J. (2002). Latent class cluster analysis. Applied latent class analysis, 11(89-106), 60.
Verplanken, B. (2006). Beyond frequency: Habit as mental construct. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45(3), 639-656.
Verplanken, B., & Aarts, H. (1999). Habit, attitude, and planned behaviour: is habit an empty construct or an interesting case of goal-directed automaticity? European review of social psychology, 10(1), 101-134.
Verplanken, B., & Orbell, S. (2003). Reflections on past behavior: a self‐report index of habit strength 1. Journal of applied social psychology, 33(6), 1313-1330.
Vinzi, V. (2010). Handbook of partial least squares. In: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
Vygotsky, L. S. (2014). Genesis of the higher mental functions. In Learning to think (pp. 32-41). Routledge.
Wang, S., Fan, J., Zhao, D., Yang, S., & Fu, Y. (2016). Predicting consumers’ intention to adopt hybrid electric vehicles: using an extended version of the theory of planned behavior model. Transportation, 43, 123-143.
Warren, M. E. (1999). Democracy and trust. Cambridge University Press.
Wei, Y., Mao, B., Xu, L., & Ao, C. (2023). Accounting for the importance of psychological distance in assessing public preferences for air quality improvement policies: an application of the integrated choice and latent variable model. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(16), 47455-47469.
Weller, B. E., Bowen, N. K., & Faubert, S. J. (2020). Latent Class Analysis: A Guide to Best Practice. Journal of Black Psychology, 46(4), 287-311.
Whitmarsh, L., & O'Neill, S. (2010). Green identity, green living? The role of pro-environmental self-identity in determining consistency across diverse pro-environmental behaviours. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(3), 305-314.
WHO. The Global Health Observatory. World Health Organization. Retrieved 24.09.18 from https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/themes/air-pollution
WHO. (2006). Air quality guidelines: global update 2005: particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen dioxide, and sulfur dioxide. World Health Organization.
WHO. (2024). Sustainable development goal indicator 3.9.1: mortality attributed to air pollution. W. H. Organization. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240099142
Zachary Azdad, Barbara Stoll, & Müller, J. (2022). The development trends of lowand zero-emission zones in Europe (Transport & Environment, Issue. C. C. Campaign.
Zhao, P., & Gao, Y. (2022). Public transit travel choice in the post COVID-19 pandemic era: An application of the extended Theory of Planned behavior. Travel Behaviour and Society, 28, 181-195.
Zheng, Z., Liu, Z., Liu, C., & Shiwakoti, N. (2014). Understanding public response to a congestion charge: A random-effects ordered logit approach. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 70, 117-134.
Zong, W., Din, A. U., Rahman, I. U., Han, H., Wang, J., Ma, Z., & Alhrahsheh, R. R. (2024). Perceived seriousness of environmental issues and the influence of willingness to pay for hybrid vehicles: An anthropological extension of the theory of planned behavior. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation.
교통국. (2020). 서울시, 효과 입증한 `녹색교통지역` 한양도성-강남-여의도 3도심 확대. (D0000041172573).
서울특별시청. (2024). 녹색교통지역 5등급 차량 운행제한이란? 서울특별시청. Retrieved 2024.10.11 from https://news.seoul.go.kr/traffic/greentraffic