操作可見性是一個抽象的名詞，然而，他是一個真實存在的現象，因為它存在於產品和使用者間互動遺留在產品上的訊息。醫療器材的開發通常需要歷經多年的研發期，保留了許多的操作可見性訊息。基於這個理由，這個論文有兩個研究目標:第一個是使用操作可見性量化原則，建立醫療器材商品化的標準流程。第二是將操作可見性認知行為導入資料分析，並使用模糊理論和灰色理論計算。
基於這兩個目標，研究規劃了一個醫療系統零組件輔助組裝特徵設計(或系統概念設計)模型。研究開發階段，我們記錄了工程師遺留在零組件上的操作可見性的組裝特徵。透過操作可見性模糊平均評估和操作可見性模糊灰關聯分析評量零組件的組裝特徵設計和系統概念設計的結果。計算過程是一個簡單的模擬流程不考量數據量。系統概念設計的成效將透過模糊綜合評價評量。
最後以醫美用，研發多年，仍為零組件狀態，待商品化設計的震波消脂器做為案例，驗證上述方法的有效性和實用性。

Affordance is an abstract noun. However, it is a true phenomenon, since the phenomenon exists in the interaction between a product and its users in a form of the feature and information left on the product body. The development of a medical system usually took over several years, and kept more affordance information. Based on the reason, this thesis proposes two goals for research: the first is to establish a standard process for suitable medical device commercialization design by using the affordance quantization principle; the second is to introduce the cognitive behavioral information of affordance into database analysis and calculation with the fuzzy theory and grey theory.
Based on the proposed two goals, the study has made a model for the medical system components with the accessory feature design and/or the systemic concept design. We recorded the accessory feature of components by affordance information left from engineers during the research and development phase. The result of the modified component design based on the affordance information and systemic concept design are evaluated by affordance fuzzy mean evaluation and affordance fuzzy grey relational analysis. The calculation process is simply the simulation process without considering the data volume. The results of the systemic concept design are evaluated by fuzzy comprehensive evaluation.
Finally, the case of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for the medical aesthetics is employed, which have been studied and run for research for several years and will be commercialized, to illustrate the design methods and to validate the effectiveness and practicability of the proposed methods.

Albrechtsen, H., Andersen, H. H. K., Bødker, S., & Pejtersen, A. M. (2001). Affordances in activity theory and cognitive systems engineering. Roskilde: Risø National Laboratory.
Allen, D., Karanasios, S., & Slavova, M. (2011). Working With Activity Theory: Context, Technology, and Information Behavior. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(4), 776-788. doi: 10.1002/asi.2144
Altshuller, G. (1984). Creativity As an Exact Science: Taylor & Francis.
Altshuller, G., & Shulyak, L. (1996). And Suddenly the Inventor Appeared: TRIZ, the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving: Technical Innovation Center, Incorporated.
Altshuller, G., Shulyak, L., Fedoseev, U., & Rodman, S. (1998). 40 Principles: TRIZ Keys to Innovation: Technical Innovation Center.
Amabile, T. (1996). Creativity in Context: Update to the Social Psychology of Creativity: Westview Press.
Chaussy, C., Schüller, J., Schmiedt, E., Brandl, H., Jocham, D., & Liedl, B. (1984). Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for treatment of urolithiasis. Urology, 23(5 Spec No), 59-66.
Chen, L. H., & Lee, C. F. (2008). Perceptual Information for User-Product Interaction: Using Vacuum Cleaner as Example. International Journal of Design, 2(1), 45-53.
Chou, J. R. (2014). An ideation method for generating new product ideas using TRIZ, concept mapping, and fuzzy linguistic evaluation techniques. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 28(4), 441-454. doi: 10.1016/j.aei.2014.06.006
Cleveland, R. O., Anglade, R., & Babayan, R. K. (2004). Effect of stone motion on in vitro comminution efficiency of Storz Modulith SLX. J Endourol, 18(7), 629-633.
Djajadiningrat, J. P. (1998). Cubby: What You See Is Where You Act. Interlacing the Display and Manipulation Spaces. (Doctoral dissertation), Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands.
Galvao, A. B., & Sato, K. (2005). Affordances in product architecture: Linking technical functions and users' tasks. Paper presented at the ASME 2005 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, US.
Gaver, W. W. (1991). Technology affordances. Paper presented at the the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Reaching Through Technology, New York: ACM.
Gibson, J. (1979a). The Ecological Approach to VisuaI Perception. Boston: Honghton Mifflin in Company.
Gibson, J. (1979b). A Study in the Psychology of Decorative Art The Purple Perils (pp. 110-121): A selection of James J. Gibson's unpublished essays on the psychology of perception(www.trincoll.edu/depts/ecopsyc/perils).
Hancock, H. E., Rogers, W. A., Schroeder, D., & Fisk, A. D. (2004). Safety symbol comprehension: Effects of symbol type, familiarity, and age. Human Factors, 46(2), 183-195. doi: 10.1518/hfes.46.2.183.37344
Hartson, H. R. (2003). Cognitive, physical, sensory, and functional affordances in interaction design. Behaviour and Information Technology, 22(5), 315-338.
Hsiao, S.-W., Hsu, C.-F., & Lee, Y.-T. (2012). An online affordance evaluation model for product design. Design studies, 33(2), 126-159.
Hsiao, H.-H., Hsiao, S.-W., & Liang, S.-M.(2016). Improving product based on affordance with fuzzy theory for product development strategy. International Journal of Production Research, 1-12.
Hurley, W. J. (2001). The analytic hierarchy process: a note on an approach to sensitivity which preserves rank order. Computers & Operations Research, 28(2), 185-188. doi: 10.1016/S0305-0548(99)00125-2
Janackovic, G. L., Savic, S. M., & Stankovic, M. S. (2013). Selection and ranking of occupational safety indicators based on fuzzy AHP: a case study in road construction companies : case study. 24(3), 175-189.
Jones, E., Mann, D., Harrison, D. D., & Stanton, P. N. (2001). An Eco-innovation Case Study of Domestic Dishwashing through the Application of TRIZ Tools. Creativity and Innovation Management, 10(1), 3-14. doi: 10.1111/1467-8691.00186
Kobayashi, H. (2006). A systematic approach to eco-innovative product design based on life cycle planning. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 20(2), 113-125. doi: 10.1016/j.aei.2005.11.002
Koffka, K. (2013). Principles Of Gestalt Psychology: Routledge.
Krehl, P. (2001). Chapter 1 - History of Shock Waves. In G. Ben-Dor, O. Igra & T. Elperin (Eds.), Handbook of Shock Waves (pp. 1-142). Burlington: Academic Press.
Liang, S.-M., Yeh, C.-N., Yan, J.-J., Wan, L.-R., & Lee, J.-W. (2008). An in-vitro Experiment on Lysing Adipose Tissue by Shock Waves. Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering, 28(4), 203-209.
Liang, S.-M., Zheng, K.-F., Yan, J.-J., Wan, R.-R., & Wen, C.-Y. (2010). Animal Study on Lysing Adipose Tissues by Shock Waves. Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering, 30(3), 145-151.
Liang, S. M., Chang, M. H., & Yang, Z. Y. (2014). Development and Performance Evaluation of an Electromagnetic-type Shock Wave Generator. Review of Scientific Instruments, 85(1), 015113-015117.
Linde, H., Hall, D. M., & Herr, G. H. (1999). Powerful and structured innovation using contradictions for orientation. Journal of Engineering Design, 10(3), 205-223.
Linde, H., & Neumann, U. (1999). WOIS-way of contradiction oriented innovation strategy to innovate processes and products. Paper presented at the Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing, 1999, Tokyo.
Linde, H. J., Hall, D. M., & Herr, G. H. (1999). Powerful and Structured Innovation using Contradictions for Gaining Orientation. Journal of Engineering Design, 10(3), 205-222. doi: 10.1080/095448299261281
Liu, F., Zhang, W.-G., & Fu, J.-H. (2012). A new method of obtaining the priority weights from an interval fuzzy preference relation. Information Sciences, 185(1), 32-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2011.09.019
Loske, A. M. (2001). Chapter 12 - Applications of Shock Waves in Medicine. In G. Ben-Dor, O. Igra & T. Elperin (Eds.), Handbook of Shock Waves (pp. 415-440). Burlington: Academic Press.
Maier, J. R. A., & Fadel, G. M. (2009). Affordance-based design methods for innovative design, redesign and reverse engineering. Research in Engineering Design, 20(4), 225-239. doi: 10.1007/s00163-009-0064-7
Maier, J. R. A., Fadel, G. M., & Battisto, D. G. (2009). An affordance-based approach to architectural theory, design, and practice. Design studies, 30(4), 393-414. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2009.01.002
McGrenere, J., & Ho, W. (2000). Affordances: Clarifying and Evolving a Concept. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface, May, 179-186.
Mitchell, C. T. (1996). Affordances for Information Technology New Thinking in Design:Conversations on Theory and Practice (pp. 94-97). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Mumford, M. D., & Gustafson, S. B. (1988). Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103(1), 27-43. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.103.1.27
Nijstad, B. A., Stroebe, W., & Lodewijkx, H. F. M. (2003). Production blocking and idea generation: Does blocking interfere with cognitive processes? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(6), 531-548. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00040-4
Norman, D. A. (1999). Affordances and design. Retrieved from http://www.jnd.org/ dn.mss/Affordances-and-design.html
Norman, D. A. (2013). The Design of Everyday Things: Revised and Expanded Edition: Basic Books.
Ogot, M. (2011). Conceptual design using axiomatic design in a TRIZ framework. Procedia Engineering, 9(0), 736-744. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.03.163
Pugh, S. (1991). Total Design: Integrated Methods for Successful Product Engineering. Wokingham: Addison-Wesley.
Pols, A. J. K. (2012). Characterising affordances: The descriptions-of-affordances-model. Design studies, 33(2), 113-125. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.007
Rassweiler, J., & Alken, P. (1990). ESWL '90 — state of the art. Urological Research, 18(1), S13-S23. doi: 10.1007/bf00301523
Rassweiler, J. J., Knoll, T., Köhrmann, K.-U., McAteer, J. A., Lingeman, J. E., Cleveland, R. O., Bailey, M. R., & Chaussy, C. (2011). Shock Wave Technology and Application: An Update. European Urology, 59(5), 784-796. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.02.033
Reed, E. S. (1996). Encountering the World: Toward An Ecological Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Shah, J. J., Kulkarni, S. V., & Vargas-Hernandez, N. (2000). Evaluation of Idea Generation Methods for Conceptual Design: Effectiveness Metrics and Design of Experiments. Journal of Mechanical Design, 122(4), 377-384. doi: 10.1115/1.1315592
Skolarikos, A., Alivizatos, G., & de la Rosette, J. (2006). Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy 25 Years Later: Complications and Their Prevention. European Urology, 50(5), 981-990. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.01.045
Steward, D. V. (1981). The Design Structure System: A Method for Managing the Design of Complex Systems. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, EM-28(3), 71--74.
Wang, T.-C., & Chen, Y.-H. (2008). Applying fuzzy linguistic preference relations to the improvement of consistency of fuzzy AHP. Information Sciences, 178(19), 3755-3765. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2008.05.028
Ward, T. B. (2007). Creative cognition as a window on creativity. Methods, 42(1), 28-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2006.12.002
Whitaker, R. (2007). Criticisms of the Analytic Hierarchy Process: Why they often make no sense. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 46(7–8), 948-961. doi: 10.1016/j. mcm.2007.03.016
Wolbarst, A. B., & Cook, G. (2005). Physics of Radiology: Medical Physics Pub.
Xu, Y. J. (2007). The dynamics of interactive information retrieval behavior, Part I: An activity theory perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(7), 958-970. doi: 10.1002/asi.20569
You, H. C., & Chen, K. S. (2007). Applications of affordance and semantics in product design. Design studies, 28(1), 23-38. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2006.07.002
Zimmermann, H. J. (2001). Fuzzy Set Theory—and Its Applications: Springer Netherlands.