| 研究生: |
黃繼賢 Huang, Chi-Hsien |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
實質選擇權在投資計劃評估之應用:統寶光電投資方案 Application of Real Option on investment project of Toppoly Corporation |
| 指導教授: |
許溪南
Hsu, Hsi-Nan |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 企業管理學系 Department of Business Administration |
| 論文出版年: | 2003 |
| 畢業學年度: | 91 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 55 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 實質選擇權 、資本預算 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | capital budgeting, real options |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:107 下載:3 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
傳統的資本預算評估方法,將波動性全然視為企業的風險,忽略波動性所可能帶來的超額報酬,以至於企業在評估資本預算計畫時採用過高的折現率,此舉將導致管理當局接收錯誤的資訊,錯失具有執行價值的投資機會。
有鑑於此,本研究採用彈性具有正向價值之觀念,將統寶光電之延遲、擴充、縮減、放棄等實質選擇權依二項式模型進行估算,並將計算所得之結果加回傳統之資本預算方法,並以加總後之總額做為投資決策是否值得進行之判斷依據,希望能提供給管理當局一個較為全面的視野,避免過多的主觀意識,使評估的結果更為合理。本研究得到下列結論:
透過統寶光電公司之投資計畫由不應執行轉為應該執行的過程,本文證明了管理彈性是有價值的。由於實質選擇權視投資機會為一連串的選擇權,而折現現金流量法則視投資機會為需立即執行的計劃,因此在做投資案的評估時,實質選擇權法較折現現金流量法多考慮了經理人決策上的彈性,尤其是針對光電業這類營收波動幅度劇烈的產業中,實質選擇權法比傳統之預算方法更能幫助經理人有效使且快速的調整投資決策,幫助企業資源進行更有效率之配置。
傳統的折現現金流量評價法在考量彈性價值的因素之後,更能顯現出投資計劃的真正價值,但此現象並不意味實質選擇權模型可以完全取代折現現金流量評價模型。針對需要立即做決定之投資計劃,折現現金流量法仍是一個有效的衡量法,而實質選擇權法則是適用於不確定性甚高的環境下之部份包含階段性及選擇權觀念的投資計劃。
The traditional capital budgeting means regards the violence as the risk of business. It ignores the extra rewards which comes from the violence,
so that the business will take a too high discounting rate and refuse the valuable opportunity for investments.
Therefore, the study regards the flexibility of decision as the positive concept. This study add the flexible value into the outcome of the
traditional capital budgeting and the financial manager will make the decisions depending upon the former outcomes.The conclusions in this study are shown as follows:
1. This stusy demonstrates that the managerial flexibility is valuable.Because the real options regards the opportunity of investments as the
project which is indispensable to be executed instantly. Therefore,when financial managers take the means of real options to measure the capital budgeting , it will do good to the managers to make decisions quickly and help the firms to allocate their resources efficiently.
2. The real options can’t replace the traditional discounting-cash-flow completely. When a manager faces to a steady environment, the method of discounting-cash-flow still is a good measure means. When a manager faces to an uncertain environment, maybe the real options will be a better choice.
參考文獻
一、英文部份:
1. Amram, M., and N. Kulatilaka, 1999, Real Options: Managing Strategic Investment in an Uncertain World, Harvard Business School Press.
2. Baldwin, C., and R. Ruback, 1986, “Inflation, uncertainty, and investment,”Journal of Finance 41, No. 3, pp.657-699.
3. Black, F. S. and M. Scholes, 1973, “The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 81, pp.14-26.
4. Brennan, M. and E. Schwartz, 1985, “Evaluating Natural Resource Investments,”Journal of Business, Vol. 58, No. 2, pp.23-37.
5. Carr, p., 1988, “The Valuation of Sequential Exchange Opportunities,” Journal of Finance 43, pp.1235-1256.
6. Chung, Kee H. and Charoenwong, L., 1991, “Investment Option, Assets in Place, and the risk of stocks,” Financial Management, Autumn, pp. 21-33.
7. Copeland, T., Tim Koller, Jack Murrin, 2000, “Valuation: Measuring and Managing” the Value of Companies, 3rd Edition, John Wiley& Sons,Inc,
pp.176-190.
8. Copeland, T., 2001, “The Real Options Approach to Capital Allocation,” Strategic Finance, pp.33-37.
9. Cox, j., S. Ross, and M. Rubinstein, 1979, “Option Pricing: A Simplified Approach,”
Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 7, No.3, pp.32-45.
10. Damodaran, Aswarth, 2000, “The Promise of Real Options,” Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp.29-44.
11. Dixit, A. K. and R. S. Pindyck, 1994, Investment under Uncertainty. Princeton
University Press.
12. Dixit, A. K. and R.S. Pindyck, 1995, “The Option Approach to Capital Investment,”
Harvard Business Review, Vol.62, pp.56-68.
13. Gonzalo, C., E. Schwartz and M.Salinas, 1998, “Evaluing Environmental Investments : A Real Options Approach,” Management Science, Vol. 44, No. 8, August, pp.65-87.
14. Hurry, D., A. T. Miller and E. H. Bowman, 1992, “Calls on High Technology: Japanese Exploration of venture capital Investment in the United States,” Strategic Management Journal Vol.13, pp.85-101.
15. Kensinger, J., 1987, “Adding the Value of Active Management into the Capital Budgeting Equation,” Midland Corporate Finance Journal 5, No.1, pp.31-42.
16. Kester, W. C., 1984, “Today’s Options for Tomorrow’s Growth,” Harvard Business Review 62, pp.153-160.
17. Luehrman, Timothy A., 1997, “A Better Tool for Valuing Operations” Harvard Business Review, May, pp.138.
18. Luehrman, T. , 1998, “Investment Opportunities as Real Options: Getting Started with the Numbers,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 76, Iss.4, Jul/ Aug, pp.55-67.
19. Majd, S. and R. S. Pindyck, 1987, “Time to Build Option Value and Investment Decisions,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.18, No.1, pp.23-41.
20. Margrabe, W., 1978, “ The Value of an Option to Exchange One Asset for Another,” Journal of Finance 33, pp.177-186.
21. Martha, A. and N. Kulatilaka, 1999, “Real Option: Managing Strategic Investment in an Uncertain World,” Harvard Business School Press, pp.82-103.
22. Martha, A. and N. Kulatilaka, 1999, “Uncertainty: The new rules for Strategy,” The
Journal of Business Strategy, Vol.20 Issue.3, pp.19-31.
23. McDonald, R. L. and D. R. Siegel, 1985, “Investment and Valuation of Firms when
There is an Option to Shut Down,” International Economics Review, Vol. 26, No.2, pp.331-349.
24. McDonald, R. L. and D. R. Siegel, 1986, “The Value of Waiting to Invest,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, November, pp.707-727.
25. Miles, J. A., 1986, “Growth Options and the Real Determinations of Systematic Risk,” Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, Spring, pp.95-105.
26. Modigliani, F., Miller, M., 1958. “The cost of capital, corporation finance, and the theory of investment” American Economic Review 48, pp. 261-297.
27. Myer, S. C. and S. Majd, 1990, “Abandonment Value and Project Life,” Advances in Futures and Options Reserch, Vol.4, pp.78-91.
28. Myer, S. C., 1974, “Interactions of Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions,”Journal of Finance, Vol.29, pp.34-49.
29. Myer, S. C., 1977, “Determinants of Corporate Borrowing,” Journal of Financial Economics, No.2, pp.21-42.
30. Myer, S. C., 1987, “Financial Theory and Financial Strategy,” Midland Corporate
Finance Journal, No.1, pp.44-58.
31. Piet, S., and U. Raman, 1994, “International Capital Budgeting Using Option Pricing Theory,” Managerial Finance, Vol.20, No.8, pp.82-103.
32. Pindyck, R. S., 1988, “Irreversible Investment, Capacity Choice, and the Value of
the Firm,” American Economic Review 78, pp.969-985.
33. Pindyck, R. S., 1991, “Irrecersibility, Uncertainty, and Investment,” Journal of
Economic Literature, Vol.29, pp.31-39.
34. Steven, R.G., and M.W. A, 1997, “Investment in Technological Innovation: An Option Pricing Approach,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.44, pp.79-91.
35. Timothy A. Luehrman, 1997, “Using APV: a better tool for valuing operations”
Harvard Business Review 62, pp.153-160.
36. Trigeorgis, L., 1991, “A Log-Transformed Binomial Numerical Analysis Method for Valuing Complex Multi-Option Investments,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol.26, No.3, pp.41-48.
37. Trigeorgis, L.,1993, “Real Option and Interactions with Financial Flexibility,”
Financial Management, Vol.22, No.3, pp.65-77.
38. Trigeorgis, L., 1996, “Real Options: Managerial Flexibility and Strategy in
Resource Allocation,” The MIT Press, pp.173-187.
39. Trigeorgis, L. and S. P. Manson, 1987, “Valuing Managerial Flexibility,” Mildland
Corporate Finance Journal 5, No.1, pp.14-21.
40. Trigeorgis, L. and S. P. Mason, 1997, “Valuing Managerial Flexibility and Strategy in Resource Allocation,” Mildland Corporate Journal 5, No.1, pp.20-36.
二、中文部份:
41. 王銘杰,應用選擇權定價模式評估BOT 投資計畫,交通大學管理科學研究所未出版碩士論文,民國86 年6 月。
42. 李存修,選擇權之交易實務、投資策略與評價模式,財團法人中華民國證券暨期貨市場發展基金會,民國82 年8 月。
43. 林逸群,實質選擇權在資本預算之應用研究-以橡膠業設廠投資個案為例,台灣科技大學管理技術研究所未出版碩士論文,民國88 年6 月。
44. 林建成,寬頻網路投資案之成長價值評估-以實質選擇權觀點評估東森多媒體公司,政治大學企研所未出版碩士論文,民國89 年6 月。
45. 周麗娟、張大成,金融選擇權與實質選擇權,台北銀行月刊,第二十八卷第三期,民國87 年3 月。
46. 吳志堅,以實質選擇權評估高科技產業的投資計畫-以南亞科技為例,政治大學財務管理學系未出版碩士論文,民國90 年6 月。
47. 徐守德、黃玉娟、陳伯蒼,投資計畫評估-選擇權評價理論之應用,管理評論第十七卷第三期,民國87 年10 月。
48. 郭志強,實質選擇權在BOT 專案計畫之應用研究,台灣科技大學管理技術研究所未出版碩士論文,民國86 年6 月。
49. 陳伯蒼,投資計畫評估-選擇權評價理論之應用,中山大學財務管理研究所未出版碩士論文,民國86 年6 月。
50. 張傳章,企業金融的12 堂課,天下文化出版社,民國91 年7 月。
51. 曹潘素雲,實質選擇權在土地入股投資決策上之應用,台灣大學財務金融研究所未出版碩士論文,民國91 年1 月。
52. 蔡進國,實質選擇權在土地評價上之應用-傳統評估方法與實質選擇權法之分析比較,台灣大學財務金融研究所未出版碩士論文,民國86 年6 月。
53. 蔡曉虹,實質選擇權應用於企業評價之案例研究,台灣科技大學管理研究所EMBA 學程未出版碩士論文,民國91 年7 月。