簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 劉季倫
Liu, Chi-Lun
論文名稱: 以時頻相似性分析進行軸承失效之偵測
Time-Frequency-Based Similarity Analysis for Bearing Fault Detection
指導教授: 鄧維光
Teng, Wei-Guang
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 工學院 - 工程科學系
Department of Engineering Science
論文出版年: 2020
畢業學年度: 108
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 35
中文關鍵詞: 時頻域相似性分析軸承失效偵測主成份分析霍特林T平方統計
外文關鍵詞: time-frequency domain, similarity analysis, bearing fault detection, principal component analysis, Hotelling’s T2 Statistics
相關次數: 點閱:128下載:1
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 隨著科技的演進,工業4.0的概念漸漸普及,而數據分析這項技術也在多年來對各項產業帶來重大影響,包括決策制定、提高生產率、降低成本等等。尤其工業大數據更在近年來受到各製造業的重視。由生產製程中所產生的數據十分大量,若要從龐大的數據中找出有用的資訊,製造業者勢必要具備處理複雜資料的能力。此外,在工業製程中,即使是微小的故障或錯誤都有可能對業者造成重大的損失,因此,機器、零件甚至是系統的失效診斷已成為學界與業界極為關注的議題。本研究針對軸承的失效偵測整合出一套基於時頻域的相似性分析流程。在此分析流程中,主成份分析被應用於降低資料維度,以轉換出最能夠代表原始資料的少數主成份。並結合霍特林T平方統計,計算資料群之間的相似性,以比較軸承於運作過程中,不同使用階段與健康狀態之間的相似性。而藉由此流程,能夠制定出一項足以準確偵測軸承失效時間的指標,以便讓機具的操作人員能在第一時間對異常的軸承進行檢查,降低異常軸承對產品、生產系統甚至操作人員安全所帶來的影響。

    As technology keeps developing, the idea of Industry 4.0 has been widespread around the world. Data analysis, one of the concepts of Industry 4.0, has made changes to various fields of industries for years, including decision making, productivity improvement, lowering the cost, and so on. Specifically, in the field of manufacturing industry, industrial big data is a fairly popular technique nowadays. Since the amount of data generated from the machine and system is usually massive, it is important for manufacturers to be able to deal with the complex data, and further extract some useful information from the data. Moreover, a simple malfunction in a system may lead to huge loss in the manufacturing industry. Fault diagnosis, which aims to identify faults occurring on the components, machines, and even the whole system, has then become one of the issues that the manufacturers pay most attention to. In this work, we propose a system flow of conducting similarity analysis of bearing vibration data in the time-frequency domain. Principal component analysis, one of the important steps in this system flow, is applied to reduce the dimensionality of complex data. Simultaneously, a set of principal components, which can mostly explain the original data, are generated. In addition, Hotelling’s T2 Statistics is adopted to evaluate the similarity between groups of data, in order to identify the similarity between healthy bearings and used bearings. With this system flow, an indicator that is able to detect bearing fault is generated, which can offer the on-site operating personnel an exact time to check the abnormal bearings, and thus lower the influence caused by the abnormal bearings.

    Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Motivation and Overview 1 1.2 Contributions of This Work 2 Chapter 2 Preliminaries 3 2.1 Maintenance of the Industrial Equipment 3 2.1.1 Types of Maintenance 3 2.1.2 Fault Diagnosis 5 2.2 Usage and Faulty Conditions of Bearings 6 2.3 Extracting Features from Vibration Data 7 2.3.1 Vibration Data Analysis in Frequency Domain 7 2.3.2 Statistical Features Extracted from Vibration Data 8 2.4 Dealing with High-Dimensional Data 8 2.5 Common Techniques for Fault Detection 9 2.5.1 Detecting Faults by Similarity Analysis 9 2.5.2 Detecting Faults by Frequency Domain Analysis 11 Chapter 3 Proposed Scheme for Bearing Fault Detection 12 3.1 Overview of Our Approach 12 3.1.1 Problem Definition 12 3.1.2 Overview of the Proposed Method 13 3.2 Steps of Data Preprocessing 13 3.3 Principal Component Analysis (PCA) 14 3.3.1 Comparison of PCA and ICA 15 3.3.2 Applying PCA on Vibration Frequency Components 17 3.4 Hotelling's T2 Statistics 18 3.5 Combining PCA and Hotelling's T2 Statistics 19 Chapter 4 Empirical Studies 21 4.1 Datasets Used in Our Experiments 21 4.2 Results of Data Preprocessing 22 4.3 Experimental Results 23 4.3.1 Results of Adopting PCA-T2 23 4.3.2 Results of Adopting XJTU-SY Bearing Dataset 25 4.3.3 Results of Adopting IMS Bearing Dataset 29 4.4 Discussion 30 Chapter 5 Conclusions and Future Works 31 Bibliography 32

    [1] J. Lee, H.-D. Ardakani, S. Yang, and B. Bagheri, “Industrial Big Data Analytics and Cyber-Physical Systems for Future Maintenance & Service Innovation,” Procedia CIRP, 38:3-7, 2015.
    [2] N. Amruthnath, and T. Gupta, “Fault Class Prediction in Unsupervised Learning Using Model-Based Clustering Approach,” Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Information and Computer Technologies, May 2018.
    [3] F. Al-Badour, M. Sunar, and L. Cheded, “Vibration Analysis of Rotating Machinery Using Time-Frequency Analysis and Wavelet Techniques,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 25(6): 2083-2101, August 2011.
    [4] J. Lee, H.-A. Kao, and S. Yang, “Service Innovation and Smart Analytics for Industry 4.0 and Big Data Environment,” Procedia CIRP, 16:3-8, 2014.
    [5] C. Gkerekos, I. Lazakis, and G. Theotokatos, “Ship Machinery Condition Monitoring Using Vibration Data Through Supervised Learning,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Maritime Safety and Operations, pp. 103-110, October 2016.
    [6] A.-R. Mohanty, “Machinery Condition Monitoring: Principles and Practices,” CRC Press, 2015.
    [7] R.-B. Randall, “Vibration-Based Condition Monitoring: Industrial, Aerospace and Automotive Applications,” John Wiley & Sons, 2011.
    [8] Z. Gao, C. Cecati, and S.-X. Ding, “A Survey of Fault Diagnosis and Fault-Tolerant Techniques - Part I: Fault Diagnosis with Model-Based and Signal-Based Approaches,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 62(6): 3757-3767, June 2015.
    [9] A. Nabhan, M. Nouby, A.-M. Sami, and M.-O. Mousa, “Bearing Fault Detection Techniques - A Review,” Turkish Journal of Engineering, Sciences and Technology, 3(2), 2015.
    [10] B. Wang, Y. Lei, N. Li, and N. Li, “A Hybrid Prognostics Approach for Estimating Remaining Useful Life of Rolling Element Bearings,” IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 69(1):401-412, March 2020.
    [11] C. Scheffer, and P. Girdhar, “Practical Machinery Vibration Analysis and Predictive Maintenance,” Elsevier, 2004.
    [12] R.-J. Romero-Troncoso, “Multirate Signal Processing to Improve FFT-Based Analysis for Detecting Faults in Induction Motors,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 13(3):1291-1300, June 2017.
    [13] F. Huang, A. Sava, K.-H. Adjallah, and Z. Wang, “Bearings Degradation Monitoring Indicator Based on Segmented Hotelling T Square and Piecewise Linear Representation,” Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation, October 2018.
    [14] C. Bianchini, F. Immovilli, M. Cocconcelli, R. Rubini, and A. Bellini, “Fault Detection of Linear Bearings in Brushless AC Linear Motors by Vibration Analysis,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 58(5):1684-1694, May 2011.
    [15] H. Yu, H.-R. Li, Z.-K. Tian, and W.-G. Wang, “Rolling Bearing Degradation State Identification Based on LPP Optimized by GA,” International Journal of Rotating Machinery 2016, August 2016.
    [16] E. Skubalska-Rafajłowicz, “Random Projections and Hotelling’s T2 Statistics for Change Detection in High-Dimensional Data Streams,” International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, 23(2):447-461, June 2013.
    [17] F. Tsung, and K. Wang, “Adaptive Charting Techniques: Literature Review and Extensions,” Frontiers in Statistical Quality Control 9, pp. 19-35, January 2010.
    [18] J. Tian, C. Morillo, M.-H. Azarian, and M. Pecht, “Motor Bearing Fault Detection Using Spectral Kurtosis-Based Feature Extraction Coupled with K-Nearest Neighbor Distance Analysis,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 63(3):1793-1803, March 2016.
    [19] J. Shlens, “A Tutorial on Principal Component Analysis,” arXiv:1404.1100, April 2014.
    [20] S. Wold, K. Esbensen, and P. Geladi, “Principal Component Analysis,” Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 2(1-3):37-52, August 1987.
    [21] L.-J. Cao, K.-S. Chua, W.-K. Chong, H.-P. Lee, and Q.-M. Gu, “A Comparison of PCA, KPCA and ICA for Dimensionality Reduction in Support Vector Machine,” Neurocomputing, 55(1-2):321-336, September 2003.
    [22] D. Lubo-Robles, “Development of Independent Component Analysis for Reservoir Geomorphology and Unsupervised Seismic Facies Classification in the Taranaki Basin, New Zealand,” University of Oklahoma Graduate College, May 2018.
    [23] NIST/SEMATECH E-Handbook of Statistical Methods,
    https://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/
    [24] F. Aparisi, and C.-L. Haro, “Hotelling's T2 Control Chart with Variable Sampling Intervals,” International Journal of Production Research, 39(14):3127-3140, 2001.
    [25] V. Chandola, A. Banerjee, and V. Kumar, “Anomaly Detection: A Survey,” ACM Computing Surveys, 41(3):1-58, July 2009.
    [26] D. Shickel, “Reactive vs. Preventive vs. Predictive Maintenance,” June 2020, https://www.prometheusgroup.com/posts/reactive-vs-preventive-vs-predictive-maintenance
    [27] Y.-G. Lei, T.-Y. Han, B. Wang, N.-P. Li, T. Yan, and J. Yang, “XJTU-SY Rolling Element Bearing Accelerated Life Test Datasets: A Tutorial,” Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 55(16):1, August 2019.
    [28] P. Sharma, “The Ultimate Guide to 12 Dimensionality Reduction Techniques (with Python codes),” August 2018,
    https://www.analyticsvidhya.com/blog/2018/08/dimensionality-reduction-techniques-python/
    [29] S. Doğan, “Why Scree Plot is Important in PCA?” April 2020,
    https://medium.com/@sercandogan/why-scree-plot-is-important-in-pca-a66cd7dcd624
    [30] S. Trivedi, “Blind Source Separation in Magnetic Resonance Images,” January 2010
    https://onionesquereality.wordpress.com/2010/01/30/blind-source-separation-in-magnetic-resonance-images/
    [31] B. Brown, “Hotelling’s T2 Test,” https://www.slideserve.com/bette/hotelling-s-t-2-test

    無法下載圖示 校內:立即公開
    校外:不公開
    電子論文尚未授權公開,紙本請查館藏目錄
    QR CODE