簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 廖方瑜
Liao, Fang-yu
論文名稱: 比較電子郵件廣告之許可式郵件與垃圾郵件:廣告價值、知覺入侵及廣告態度對廣告效果之研究
Comparison between Permission-based Email and Spam: The Impact of Advertising Value, Perceived Intrusiveness, and Advertising Attitude on Advertising Effectiveness
指導教授: 張心馨
Chang, Hsin-hsin
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 企業管理學系
Department of Business Administration
論文出版年: 2007
畢業學年度: 95
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 82
中文關鍵詞: 電子郵件廣告知覺入侵許可式行銷
外文關鍵詞: Permission Marketing, Email Advertising, Perceived Intrusiveness
相關次數: 點閱:75下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 行銷人員運用網際網路及電子郵件,可以提供客製化訊息給個別消費者;而且使用電子郵件僅需花費少量的邊際成本,即可與消費者產生互動。在電子郵件的應用中,許可式行銷(Permission Marketing)可獲得消費者的許可,以個人資料來定義可寄送的內容,而形成許可式郵件與垃圾郵件區分兩者之差異,以降低消費者對廣告信件的抗拒。許可式郵件的應用在理論上雖受到了肯定,但根據消費者的使用經驗卻有不同的解釋。過多的許可式信件在消費者注意力有限時,被認為是「垃圾郵件」(Spam);此外許可式信件的內容也未必能滿足消費者的需求。基於以上原因,本研究將廣告價值(Advertising Value)和知覺入侵(Perceived Intrusiveness)分別以電子郵件內容和消費者情緒引起機制作為衡量項目;同時以消費者對寄件者的態度(Attitude towards the Senders)和消費者回應(Consumer Response)作為廣告效果的衡量項目,另外又以廣告態度(Attitude towards the Advertising )作為知覺入侵和廣告效果之間的中介變數。經過資料分析,發現知覺入侵對於廣告價值和廣告效果的中介效果。此外,許可式郵件在廣告價值、廣告態度,以及廣告效果上皆優於垃圾郵件,並且使消費者產生較少的知覺干擾;同時消費者對於許可式郵件的回應取決於對寄件者的態度,而對垃圾郵件的回應則決定於對廣告方式的態度。

    From the viewpoint of marketing communication, new digital marketing channels, such as those concerned with the Internet and email, are considered to be powerful opportunities to reach consumers by delivering a personalised message with relevant content. With low marginal cost, email presents itself as an effective way to engage customers in dialogue: messages can be tailored to each customer according to his/her stage of the buying process. Email also allows customers to select their own preferences. Permission marketing applied in emails helps marketers to deliver relevant messages to consumers that are different from spam. However, consumer perception suggests that permission for such email is often assumed by an ambiguous evaluation. The perceived advertising value and perceived intrusiveness of such emails (including spam and permission emails) can be assessed by consumers indicating their opinions based on the content and presence of emails by receipting the messages. The goal of Internet advertising is to build brand names and induce consumer response to commercial campaigns and an assessment of consumer attitude towards the senders of such emails has been introduced as a measure of the effectiveness of advertising. Between the relation of perceived intrusiveness and advertising effectiveness, advertising attitude has been adopted as a mediator, as prior research has found it to be a predictor of advertising effectiveness. Besides an investigation into the causal relations between each construct, a comparison between permission email and spam has been conducted in this research. The results supported the hypotheses and demonstrated a difference between spam and permission emails. The results gave evidence to support the theoretical statement and hence, offer keys to implementation to both the theory and management.

    ABSTRACT ……………………………………………………………………....…i 摘要 ………………………………………………………………………..….…...ii 誌謝…………………………………………………………………………...……iii CONTENTS ……………………………………………………………………. …iv LIST OF TABLES ……………………………………………………………….…vii LIST OF FIGURES ……………………………………………………….……….viii CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Research Background ……………………………………………...…………..1 1.2 Research Objectives …………………………………………….…………...3 CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW AND RESEARCH HYPOTHESES 2.1 Email Marketing and Permission Marketing …………………………………..5 2.1.1 Email Marketing and Spam ……………………………………………5 2.1.2 Permission Marketing……………………………………..……………...6 2.1.3 Challenges in Permission Marketing……………………………………7 2.2 Perceived Intrusiveness …...………………………………………………..….8 2.3 Advertising Value…....………………………………………………………..10 2.3.1 Uses and Gratifications Research………………………………………10 2.3.2 Motivations, Uses, Gratifications and Active Audience………………11 2.3.3 Advertising Value………………………………………………………12 2.3.4 Quality of Information…………………………………………………14 2.3.5 Entertainment…………………………………………………………14 2.3.6 Financial Reward………………………………………………………16 2.4 Attitude Towards the Advertising……………………………………………17 2.5 Attitude Towards the Senders………………………………………………19 2.6 Consumer Response…………………………………………………………20 2.7 The Difference between Permission-based Emails and Spam……….……….22 CHAPTER 3 CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK AND RESEARCH DESIGN 3.1 Research Model ………………………………………………………………24 3.2 Measurement Development …………………………………………………..26 3.2.1 Construction of Definition and Item Generation ……………………….26 3.2.2 Pilot Test and Measurement Purification……………………………..29 CHAPTER 4 RESEARCH ANALYSIS AND RESULTS 4.1 Sample Demographics ………………………………………………………..36 4.2 Analysis of the Measurement Model …………………………………………37 4.2.1 Scale Purification: Validity and Reliability……………………………38 4.3 Structural Equation Model …………………………………………………...41 4.3.1 Assessment of Measurement Model……………………………………41 4.3.2 Mediation Effect………………………………………………………43 4.3.3 Hypotheses Testing………………………………………………….......44 4.4 Comparison between Permission–based Email and Spam…………….…45 4.4.1 Comparison of Constructs…………………………………………........45 4.4.2 Comparison in the Structural Equation Model……….………………46 CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5.1 Conclusions ……………………………………………………………….….49 5.1.1 The Phenomenon of Email Advertising………………………………49 5.1.2 Comparisons between Permission-based Email and Spam…………49 5.2 Implications: Theoretical and Managerial …………………………………50 5.2.1 Theoretical Implications ………………………………………………..50 5.2.2 Practical Implications …………………………………………………..51 5.3 Research Limitations and Future Research…………………………………52 REFERENCES …………………………………….…………………………………53 APPENDIX A: Questionnaire in Pilot Test-English Version………….……..…61 APPENDIX B: Questionnaire in Pilot Test-Chinese Version………………..…63 APPENDIX C: Questionnaire in Main Test-English Version………………..…69 APPENDIX D: Questionnaire in Main Test of Permission-based Email - Chinese Version…………………. ………………………………71 APPENDIX E: Questionnaire in Main Test of Spam- Chinese Version……....77

    1. Aaker, D.A. and Stayman, D.M. (1990), “Measuring audience perceptions of commercials and relating them to ad impact,” Journal of Advertising Research, 30(4): 7-10
    2. Abernethy, A.M. (1991), “Physical and mechanical avoidance of television commercials: An exploratory study of zipping, zapping, and leaving,” pp: 223-231, in: Proceeding of the 1991 Conference of the American Academy Advertising
    3. Abhilasha, M. (2000), "Advertising attitudes and advertising effectiveness, "Journal of Advertising Research, 40(3): 67-72
    4. Akhter, S. and Durvasula, S. (1991), “Customers’ attitudes toward direct marketing and purchase intention,” Journal of Direct Marketing, 5(3): 48-56
    5. Alwitt, L.F. and Prabhaker, P.R. (1994), " Identifying who dislikes television advertising: Not by Demographics Alone," Journal of Advertising Research, 34(6): 17-29
    6. Andrews, J.C. (1989), “The dimensionality of beliefs towards advertising in general, “ Journal of Advertising, 18(1):26-35
    7. Bagozzi, R.P., Yi, Y., and Philips, L.W. (1988) “On the evaluation of structural equation models,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16: 74-94
    8. Bandalos, D.L., & Finney, S. J. (2001), “Item parceling issues in structural equation modeling,” Advanced structural equation modeling: New developments and techniques. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
    9. Baron, R.M. and Kinney, D.A. (1986), “The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (51):1173–1182.
    10. Batra, R. and Michael L.R. (1986), "Affective responses mediating acceptance of advertising, "Journal of Consumer Research, 13(2): 234-249
    11. Bauer, R.A. and Greyser, S.A. (1968), Advertising in American: the consumer view, Boston, MA: Harvard University
    12. Bosshart, L., and Macconi, I. (1998), "Defining "entertainment", Communication Research Trends, 18(3): 3-6
    13. Bovee, M., Srivastava, R.P. and Mak, B. (2003), "A conceptual framework and belief function approach to assessing overall information quality, "International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 18(1): 51-74
    14. Brackett, L.K., JR, B.N.C. (2001), " Cyberspace advertising vs. other media: Consumers vs. mature student attitudes, " Journal of Advertising Research, 41(5): 23-32
    15. Brown, S.P. and Stayman, D.M. (1992), "Antecedents and consequences of attitude toward the ad: A meta analysis," Journal of Consumer Research, 19(1): 34-51
    16. Chandon, P., Wansink, B. and Laurent, G. (2000), "A benefit congruency framework of sales promotion effectiveness," Journal of Marketing, 64(4): 65-81
    17. Chang, S. and Morimoto, M. (2003), "A comparison between unsolicited e-mail and postal direct mail marketing methods: intrusiveness, perceived loss of control, and irritation," Journal of Interactive Advertising, 7(1):8-20
    18. Chen, Q. and Wells, D.W. (1999), "Attitude toward the Site," Journal of Advertising Research, 39(5): 27-37
    19. Conway, J.C. and Rubin, A.M. (1991), “Psychological predictors of television viewing motivation,” Communication Research, 18(4): 443-463
    20. Craig, A.J. (1989), "The dimensionality of beliefs toward advertising in general," Journal of advertising, 18(1): 26-35
    21. Dimmick, J., Kline, S., and Stafford, L. (2000), "The gratification niches of personal e-mail and the telephone," Communication Research, 27(2): 227-248
    22. Direct Marketing Association (2005), The DMA Releases 2005 Postal & E-mail Marketing Report, NY: Direct Marketing Association
    23. Ducoffe, R.H. (1996), "Advertising value and advertising on the web," Journal of Advertising Research, 36(5): 21-35
    24. Ducoffe, R.H. (1995)," How consumers assess the value of advertising, "Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 17(1): 1-18
    25. DuFrene, D.D., Engelland, B.T., Lehman, C.M. and Pearson, R.A. (2005), "Changes in consumer attitudes resulting from participation in a permission e-mail campaign," Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 27(1): 65-77
    26. Durand, R. and Lambert, Z. (1985), "Alienation and criticisms of advertising, "Journal of Advertising, 14(3): 9-17
    27. Eighmey, J. and McCord, L. (1998), “Adding value in the information age: Uses and gratifications of sites on the world wide web-The world wild web presents new challenges for advertisers and consumers alike,” Journal of Business Research, 41(3): 187-194
    28. Elliott, W.R., and Rosenberg, W.L. (1987), "The 1985 philadelphia newspaper strike: a sues and gratifications study," Jounalisim Quarterly, 64(4), 679-687
    29. Eysenck, M. (1982). Attention and Arousal, Cognition and Performance. NY: Springer-Verlag.
    30. Faber, R.J. (2002), “From the editor: A glance backward and the view ahead,” Journal of Advertising (41): 57-70
    31. Faber, R.J., Lee, M., and Nan, X. (2004),” Advertising and the consumer information environment online,” American Behavioral Scientist (48):447-466
    32. Fornell, C. and Larcker, D.F. (1981), “Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error,” Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1): 39-50
    33. Goldin, S. and Peppers, D. (1999), Permission Marketing: Turning Strangers into Friends, and Friends into Customers, Simon and Schuster, New York, 1999
    34. Goldsmith, R.E., Lafferty, B.A. (2002), "Consumers response to web sites and their influence on advertising effectiveness," Internet Research, 12(4): 318-328
    35. Ha, L. (1996), "Observations: Advertising clutter in consumer magazines: dimensions and effects, "Journal of Advertising Research, 36(4): 76-88
    36. Haghirian, P., Madlberger, M., and Tanuskova, A. (2005), "Increasing advertising value of mobile marketing- an empirical study of antecedents," Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
    37. Haley, R.L. and Baldinger, A.L. (1991), "The arf copy research validity project," Journal of Advertising Research, 31(2):114-135
    38. Haller, T.F. (1974), "What students think of advertising, "Journal of Advertising Research, 14(1):22-27
    39. Heijden, H., Verhangen, T. and Creemers, M. (2000),"Predicting online purchase behavior: replications and tests of competing models," Series Research Memoranda, 16:10-19
    40. Heinonen, K. and Strandvik, T. (2003), “Consumer responsiveness to mobile marketing, ” Stockholm Mobility Roundtable, Stockholm, pp. 22-23
    41. Henry, J.W. and Stone, R.W. (1999), “A structural equation model of end-user satisfaction with a computer-based medical information system”, Information Resources Management Journal, 7(3): 21-33
    42. Hoffman, D.L., and Novak, T.P. (1996), "Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: conceptual foundations," Journal of Marketing, 60(3): 50-68
    43. Houston, F.S. and Gassenheimer, J.B., “Marketing and Exchange,” Journal of Marketing, 51(4): 3-18
    44. Hu, L. and Bentler, P.M. (1999), “Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance Structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives,” Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1): 1-55
    45. James, W.L. and Kover , A.J. (1992), "Observations: Do overall attitudes toward advertising affect involvement with specific advertisements," Journal of Advertising Research, 32(5): 78-83
    46. IMT Strategies (1999), The Sales and Marketing Imperative: The Impact of Technology on Business Strategy, Stanford: IMT Strategies, Inc.
    47. Joreskog, K., and Sorbon, D. (1989), Lisrel VII User's Guide, Mooresvill, IN: Scientific Software
    48. Katz, E., Blumler, J.G., and Gurevitch, M. (1974), The Use of Mass Communications: Current perspectives on Gratifications Research, Beverly Hills: Sage
    49. Kaye, B.K. and Johnson, T.J. (2002), “Online and in the know: Uses and gratifications of the web for political inform,” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 46(1): 54-71
    50. Kent, R., and Brandal, H. (2003), "Improving e-mail response in a permission marketing context," International Journal of Market Research, 45(4): 489-503
    51. Ko, H., Cho, C.H., and Roberts, M.S. (2005), “Internet uses and gratifications: A structural equation model of interactive advertising,” Journal of Advertising, 34(2): 57-70
    52. Korgaonkar, P.I., and Wolin, L. D. (1999), “A multivariate analysis of web usage,” Journal of Advertising Research (39): 53-68
    53. Krishnamurthy, S. (2001), "A comprehensive analysis of permission marketing," Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6(2), available at: www.ascusc.org/jcmc
    54. Kumar, V. and Reinartz, W. J. (2006), Customer relationship management: A databased approach, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
    55. Larkin, E.F. (1977)," A Factor analysis of college student attitudes toward advertising," Journal of Advertising, 6(2): 42-46
    56. Leech, N.L., K.C. Barrett, and G.A. Morgan, 2005. SPSS for intermediate statistics: use and interpretation, Mahwah, N.J. : Lawrence Erlbaum.
    57. Lewis, D. and Bridger, D. (2001),The Soul of the New Consumer: Authenticity: What We Buy and Why in the New Economy, Naperville, IL: Nicholas Brealey Publishing
    58. Li, H., Edwards, S.M. and Lee, J.H. (2002), "Measuring the intrusiveness of advertisements: Scale development and aalidation," Journal of Advertising, 31(2): 37-47
    59. Li, H., Edwards, S.M. and Lee, J.H. (2002), " Forced exposure and psychological reactance: Antecedents and consequences of the perceived intrusiveness of pop-up ads," Journal of Advertising, 31(3): 83-95
    60. Lin, C.A. (1996), Clarifying Communication Theories: A Hands-On Approach, Ames: Iowa state University Press, pp: 79-89
    61. Luo, X. (2002), "Uses and gratifications theory and e-consumer behaviors: a structural equation modeling study," Journal of Interactive Advertising, 2(2): 44-54
    62. Lutz, R.J. (1985), "Affective and cognitive antecedents of attitudes toward the ad: A conceptual framework," Psychological Process and Advertising Effects: Theory, Research, and Applications, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
    63. MacKenzie, S.B. and R.J. Lutz (1989), "An empirical examination of the structural antecedents of advertisement," Journal of Marketing, 53(2): 48-65
    64. MacKenzie, S.B., Lutz, R.J. and Belch, G.E. (1986), "The role of attitude toward the ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: A test of competing explanations," Journal of Marketing Research, 23(2): 130-143
    65. MacPherson, K. (2001), Permission-based e-mail marketing that works! London: Dearborn Trade.
    66. Maddox, K. (1998), “E-commerce becoming reality,” Advertising Age (October 26)
    67. Mandelli, A. (2005),"Banners, e-mails, advertainment and sponsored search: Proposing a value perceptive for online advertising," International Journal of Internet Marketing and Advertising, 2.1/2:92-108
    68. Marinova, A., Murphy, J., and Massey, B (2002), "Permission e-mail marketing as a means of targeted promotion," Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 43(1): 61-69
    69. McMillan, S.J., Hwang, J.S., Lee, G. (2003), "Effect of structural and perceptual perceptual factors on attitudes toward the website," Journal of Advertising Research, 43(4):400-412
    70. McQuail, D. (1983), Mass Communication Theory: An Introduction. London: Sage
    71. Mendelsohn, H. (1964), "Listening to Radio," People, Society, and Mass Communication, The Free Press, pp. 239-249
    72. Mehta, A. (2000), "Advertising attitudes and advertising effectiveness," Journal of Advertising Research, 40(3):67-72
    73. Milne, G. and Gordon, M.E. (1993) "Direct mail privacy- Efficiency trade-offs within an implied social contract framework," Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 12(2): 206-216
    74. Milne, G.R., and Rohm, A.J., (2004), "Consumers' protection of online privacy and identity," Journal of Consumer Affairs, 38(2): 217-232
    75. Miron, D. (2003), "Enjoyment of violence, " Communication and Emotion: Essays in honors of Dolf Zillmann: 445-472, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
    76. Mitchell, A.A. and Olson, J.C. (1981)," Are product attribute beliefs the only mediator of advertising effects on brand attitudes," Journal of marketing research, 18(3): 318-332
    77. Morimoto, M., and Chang, S. (2006), "Consumers' attitudes toward unsolicited commercial e-mail and postal direct mail marketing methods: intrusiveness, perceived loss of contrel, and irritation," Journal of Interactive Advertising, 7(1): 8-20
    78. Muehling, D.D. (1987), "An investigation of factors underlying attitudes toward advertising in general," Journal of Advertising, 16(1): 32-40
    79. Neuborne, E. (2001), “Viral marketing alert! E-mail bearing ads are starting to raise consumers' temperatures,” Business Weeks, 19(March), EB8
    80. Papacharissi, Z., and Rubin, A.M. (2000), "Predictors of internet use," Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 44(2): 175-196
    81. Pasadeos, Y. (1990), "Perceived informativeness of and irritation with local advertising, "Journalism Quarterly, 67(1): 35-39
    82. Pervin, L. (1989), Goal Concepts in Personality and Social Psychology, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates , pp. 473-479
    83. Petty, R.E., and John, T.C. (1979), "Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message relevant cognitive responses, "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(10):1915-1926
    84. Pew Research Center (2003), “Spam: How is it hurting email and degrading life on the internet,” Pew Internet & American Life, http://www.pewinternet.org/reports/index.asp
    85. PIP Senior Research Fellow Deborah Fallows (2005), Spam and phishing, NW: Pew Internet & American Life Project
    86. Raney, A.A. (2003), "Disposition-based theories of enjoyment," Communication and Emotion: Essays in honor of Dolf Zillmann, pp. 61-84, NJ: Erlbaum
    87. Raney, A.A. and Bryant J. (2002), "Moral judgment and crime drama: An integrated theory of enjoyment," Journal of Communication, 52(2): 402-415
    88. Rogers, S., and Sheldon, K.M. (2002), “An improved way to characterize internet users,” Journal of Advertising Research, 42 (5):85-94
    89. Rotzoll, K., Hefner, J.E. and Sandage, C.J. (1989), "Advertising and the classical liberal world view," Advertising in society, IL: NTC Publishing Group
    90. Rubin, A.M. (1994), Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
    91. Salaun, Y. and Flores, K. (2001), " Information quality: meeting the needs of the consumer," International Journal of Information Management, 21(1): 21-37
    92. Sally, J.M., Hwang, J.S. and Lee, G. (2003), "Effects of structural and perceptual factors on attitudes toward the website," Journal of Advertising Research, 43(4): 400-209
    93. Salo, J. and Thatinen, J. (2005), “Retailer use of permission-based mobile advertising,” Advances in Electronic Marketing, USA: Idea Group Publishing, pp. 139-155
    94. Schlosser, A.E., Shavitt, S., and Kanfer, A. (1999),"A survey of internet users' attitudes toward internet advertising," Journal of Interactive Marketing, 13(3):34-54
    95. Scott, D.R. and Solomon, D.(1998), "What is wearout anyway", Journal of Advertising Research, 38(5):19-28
    96. Scott, J. (1994), “The measurement of information systems effectiveness: evaluating a measuring instrument,” in: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Information Systems, Vancouver, BC: 111-128
    97. Seybold, P. (2001), The Customer Revolution: How to Thrive WhenYour Customers are in Control, London: Random House Business Book
    98. Severin, W.J., and Tankard, J.W. (1997), Communication Theories: Origins, Methods, and Uses in the Mass Media ,4th ed, White Plain, NY :Longman
    99. Shimp, T.A. (1981), "Attitude toward the ad as a mediator of consumer brand choice," Journal of Advertising, 10(2): 9-16
    100. Siper, J.C., and Ward, B.T. (1995), "The ethical and legal quandary of e-mail privacy," Communications of the ACM, 38(12): 48-54
    101. Spam Filter Review (2003), Spam Statistics 2003, http://www.spamfilterreview.com/spam-statistics.html
    102. Speck, P.S. and Elliott, M.T. (1997), "Predictors of advertising avoidance in print and broadcast media," Journal of Advertising, 26(3), 61-76
    103. Stern, B. and Zaichowsky, J.L. (1991), "The impact of entertaining advertising on consumer response," Australian Marketing Researcher, 14(January): 68-80
    104. Stewart, D.W. (1999), "Advertising wearout: what and how you measure matters," Journal of Advertising Research, 39(5):39-42
    105. Stewart, D. and Pavlou, P.(2002), “From consumer response to active consumer: measuring the effectiveness of interactive media,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30(4): 376-39
    106. Sturges, P. (2002), "Remember the Human: the first rule of netiquette, libarians and the internet," Online Information Review, 26(3): 209-216
    107. Sutter, E. (1993), "Maítriser l'information pour garantir la qualité," AFNOR
    108. Tamborini, R. (2003), "Enjoyment and social functions of horror," Communication and Emotions: Essays in honor of Dolf Zillmann: 417-443, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
    109. Teeter, Jr.D.L. and Loving, B. (2001), Law of Mass Communications, 10th ed., New York: Foundation press
    110. Tezinde, T., Smith, B., and Murphy, J. (2002), “Getting permission: exploring factors affecting permission marketing,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 16(4): 28-36
    111. Thorson, E., and Leavitt, C. (1986), “Probabilistic functionalism and the search for a taxonomy of commercials”, available at: www.jiad.org
    112. Tsang, M.M., Ho, S.C. and Lian, T.P. (2004), "Consumer attitudes toward mobile advertising: An empirical study," International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 8(3):65-78
    113. Vandenberg, R. J., & Scarpello, V. (1991),”Multitrait-multimethod validation of the satisfaction with my supervisor scale”, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(1): 203–212.
    114. Yang, K.C.C., (2004), "Effects of consumer motives on search behavior using the internet," Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 7(4): 430-442
    115. Yu, J.,I. Ha, M. C. and J. Rho (2005), “Extending the TAM for a t-commerce”, Information and Management, 42(7): 965-976
    116. Zanot, E.J. (1984), "Public attitudes toward advertising: the American experience," International Journal of Advertising, 3(1):3-15
    117. Zillmann, D. and Bryant, J. (1994), "Entertainment as media effect", Media effects: Advances in Theory and Research: 437-461, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

    無法下載圖示 校內:2106-07-21公開
    校外:2106-07-21公開
    電子論文尚未授權公開,紙本請查館藏目錄
    QR CODE