| 研究生: |
蘇意傑 Su, Yi-Jie |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
岩石力學機制對自然裂縫地層裂縫滲透率影響之研究 Study of Geomechanical Effects on Fracture Permeability in Naturally Fractured Reservoirs |
| 指導教授: |
謝秉志
Hsieh, Bieng-Zih |
| 共同指導教授: |
林再興
Lin, Zsay-Shing |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
工學院 - 資源工程學系 Department of Resources Engineering |
| 論文出版年: | 2012 |
| 畢業學年度: | 100 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 87 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 自然裂縫地層 、應力敏感性 、岩石力學 、彈性係數 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | naturally fractured reservoirs, stress-sensitive, geomechanics, elastic parameter |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:71 下載:4 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究的主要目的是以解析法研究岩石力學機制對自然裂縫地層之裂縫滲透率及其壓力反應之影響。
本研究以Jabbari理論為基礎,針對其壓力解析解中的彈性函數積分項進行函數特性分析並推導出近似式。然後推導出應力敏感性自然裂縫地層之暫態壓力近似解。本研究也推導出壓力反應之前、後期階段之視直線壓力解,以及研究前期階段結束時間、後期階段開始時間與裂縫特性參數之關係。利用所推導的壓力解,本研究建立了裂縫特性參數與彈性參數之分析程序,並利用案例分析來驗證所推導之方程式與參數分析程序。
本研究所獲得之主要結果為:(1)本研究推導出應力敏感性自然裂縫地層之壓力近似解,並推導出壓力反應前期階段及後期階段之視直線壓力解,而改善Jabbari理論並有助於應力敏感性自然裂縫地層之井壓測試分析。(2)利用所推導之前期階段與後期階段的視直線壓力解,使之與完整壓力解比對,並設定無因次壓力偏離值為0.1 以作為前期階段結束時間與後期階段開始時間的分析判斷準則,利用迴歸分析而得其與裂縫特性參數之關係為:t_Da≅0.157*ω/λ、t_Db≅1.042*1/λ 。(3)由案例研究之結果可知,利用本研究所建立之裂縫特性參數分析流程所推求之地層參數結果與現場資料(在案例中為產生一組生產資料所使用之設定值)相當接近,而證實本研究模式之可用性。(4)在生產過程中,受到應力影響時,會相對的減少生產所需壓力差使得壓力反應前期階段與後期階段皆出現視直線效應,但兩條視直線不會平行。若使用傳統壓力分析方法針對後期階段之視直線進行滲透率推求,會產生過度高估的結果。
The purpose of this study was to use an analytical method to study the geomechanical effects on the fracture permeability and pressure response in stress-sensitive naturally fractured reservoirs.
The characteristic properties and the approximate expression of the elastic intergral function, which was derived in Jabbari’s theory for stress-sensitive naturally fractured reservoirs, was analyzed and studied. The approximate solution of the bottom-hole pressure for the Jabbari theory was derived. The apparent linear equations for the early time and late time regions were then derived, as well as the equations for the starting time and ending time of the transition region. Based on the equations derived in this study, the estimation procedures for the fracture characteristic parameters and the elastic parameter of stress-sensitive naturally fractured reservoirs were established. A case study was used to validate the derived equations and the estimate procedures.
The major results and conclusions obtained from this study are:(1)The approximate pressure solution for stress-sensitive reservoirs was derived. The apprent linear equations for the early time and late time regions were derived to improve the application of Jabbari’s theory in well testing analysis.(2)The equations for estimating the starting time and ending time of the transition regions were derived and can be expressed as:t_Da≅0.157*ω/λ and t_Db≅1.042*1/λ. The criteria used to analyze the the starting time and ending time of the transition regions was the dimensionless pressure of 0.1.(3)The estimation procedures established in this study for analyzing the fracture characteristic parameters and the elastic parameter of stress-sensitive naturally fractured reservoirs were validated from the case study analysis.(4)The pressure drop of stress-sensitive reservoirs was smaller than that of non- stress-sensitive(traditional) reservoirs. The pressure responses were not parallel straight lines in the early time and late time regions in stress-sensitive reservoirs. The formation permeability might be overestimated when traditional well testing analysis is used.
1.Abdassh, D., Ershaghi, I.: “Triple Porosity Systems for Representing Naturally Fractured Reservoirs,” Soc. Pet. Eng. J., pp. 113-127, April 1986.
2.Aguilera, R.: “Well test Analysis of Naturally Fractured Reservoirs” SPE Formation Evaluation, pp. 239-252, September 1987.
3.Amyx, J.W., Bass, D.M. and Whiting, R.L. (1960). Petroleum Reservoir Engineering – Physical Properties. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc. p. 291.
4.Bagheri, M., Settari, A.: “Modeling of Geomechanics in Naturally Fractured Reservoirs,” Soc. Pet. Eng. J., pp. 108-118, SPE 93083, February, 2008.
5.Bandis, S.C., Lumsden, A.C., and Barton, N.R.: “Fundamentals of Rock Joint Deformation,” International J. of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science, 1983.
6.Chacon, A., Tiab, D.:“Effects of Stress on Fracture Properties of Naturally Fractured Reservoirs,” SPE Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, SPE 107418, April 2007.
7.Chen, H.Y., Teufel, L.W., and Lee, R.L.: “Coupled Fluid Flow and Geomechanics in Reservoir Study -1.Theory and Governing Equations,” Soc. Pet. Eng. J., pp. 507-519, SPE 30752, October 1995.
8.Friedel, T., Voigt, H.D.: “Analytical solutions for the radial flow equation with constant-rate and constant-pressure boundary conditions in reservoirs with pressure-sensitive permeability,” SPE Rocky Mountain Petroleum Technology Conference, SPE 122768, April 2009.
9.Jabbari, H., Zeng, Z., and Ostadhassan, M.: “Impact of In-Situ Stress Change on Fracture Conductivity in Naturally Fractured Reservoirs: Bakken Case Study,” American Rock Mechanics Association, June 2011a.
10.Jabbari, H., Zeng, Z.: “A Three-Parameter Dual Porosity Model for Naturally Fractured Reservoirs,” SPE Western North American Regional Meeting, SPE144560, May 2011b.
11.Janna, W.S. (2009). Introduction to Fluid Mechanics. CRC Press, USA.
12.Kazemi, H.: “Pressure Transient Analysis of Naturally Fractured Reservoirs with Uniform Fractures Distribution,” Soc. Pet. Eng. J., Vol. 246. , pp. 451-462, June 1969a.
13.Kazemi, H., Seth, M.S., and Thomas, G.W.: “The Interpretation of Interference Tests in Naturally Fractured Reservoirs with Uniform Distribution,” Soc. Pet. Eng. J., Vol. 246, pp. 463-472, December 1969b.
14.Lee, J. (1982) Well testing. Dallas, TX: Society of Petroleum Engineers of the AIME.
15.Lorenz, J.C., Natl, S.: “Stress-Sensitive Reservoirs,” Soc. Pet. Eng. J., pp. 61-63, January 1999.
16.Mavor, M.J. and Cinco-Ley, H.: “Transient Pressure Behavior of Naturally Fractured Reservoirs,” Soc. Pet. Eng. J. pp. 1-9, SPE 7977, April 1979.
17.Mckee, C.R., Bumb, A.C., and Koenlg R.A.: “Stress-Dependent Permeability and Porosity of Coal and other Geologic Formations,” SPE Formation Evaluation pp. 81-91, March 1988.
18.Najurieta, H.L.: “A Theory for Pressure Transient Analysis in Naturally Fractured Reservoirs,” Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, pp. 1241-1250, July 1980.
19.Odeh, A. S.: “Unsteady-State Behavior of Naturally Fractured Reservoir,” Soc. Pet. Eng. J., Vol. 234, pp. 60-66., March 1965.
20.Olarewaju, J.S., Lee, W.J.: “New Pressure-Transient Analysis Model for Dual-Porosity Reservoirs,” SPE Formation Evaluation, pp. 384-388, September 1989.
21.Pinzon, C.L., Chen, H.Y., and Teufel, L.W.: “Numerical Well Test Analysis of Stress-Sensitive Reservoirs,” SPE Rocky Mountain Petroleum Technology Conference, SPE 71034, May 2001.
22.Reiss, L.H.: “The Reservoir Engineering Aspects of Fractured Formations”, Editions Technip, Paris, 1980.
23.Robertson, E.P., Christiansen, R.L.: “A permeability Model for Coal and Other Fractured, Sorptive-Elastic Media,” SPE Eastern Regional Meeting, SPE 104380, October 2006.
24.Warren, J. E. and Root, P. J.: “The Behavior of Naturally Fractured Reservoir,” Soc. Pet. Eng. J., Vol. 228, pp. 245-255, SPE 426, September 1963.