鄰里公園設計、景觀知覺、地方依附及社區發展之間密切相關，彼此相互影響，塑造著城市和社區的面貌與發展方向。鄰里公園設計不僅僅是提供休閒娛樂的場所，更是城市綠地系統的重要組成部分。一個美觀、功能完善的公園能夠提升居民的生活品質，加強其對社區的歸屬感和認同感。景觀知覺則受公園設計的影響，它反映了人們對周圍環境的感知和評價。而地方依附則強調了居民對於所居住地區的情感連結和認同感，良好的鄰里公園設計可以促進地方依附的形成與加強。
鄰里公園設計與社區發展密切相關，一個適合社區需求、能夠促進居民互動與健康生活的公園有助於社區的綜合發展。因此，公園設計、景觀知覺、地方依附及社區發展之間的關聯性需要在城市規劃中得到充分重視，以實現城市和社區的可持續發展。
本研究以臺南市為研究範圍，並以公園使用者作為調查對象，面對面發放400份問卷，回收有效問卷382份，數據經由統計分析與討論。研究結果如下：利用結構方程模式分析，結果顯示公園設計、景觀知覺、地方依附三個構念直接或間接影響社區發展，「公園設計」須透過「景觀知覺」與「地方依附」對「社區發展」產生影響，公園設計與社區發展之間具有中介效果。
在規劃社區發展時，公園設計和景觀知覺確實同等重要。公園作為社區公共空間的一部分，其設計直接影響居民對社區的感知和評價。優雅美觀的公園能夠提升景觀知覺，增強居民對社區的歸屬感和舒適感。然而，在公園設計之前，提升地方依附感更是關鍵。地方依附感指的是居民對所居住地區的情感連結和認同感。只有當居民對社區充滿了歸屬感和認同感時，他們才會更加關心社區的發展，積極參與社區事務，促進社區的綜合發展。因此，提升地方依附感是確保社區發展目標實現的重要前提。公園設計、景觀知覺和地方依附感密不可分，在規劃社區發展時，需要同等重視這三者，並通過合理的設計和管理，促進社區的健康發展。公園設計、景觀知覺和地方依附感是社區發展不可或缺的三個重要元素。它們相互關聯、相互影響，在規劃社區發展時應該同等重視，共同推動社區向更加健康、和諧的方向發展。

The design of neighborhood parks, landscape perception, place attachment, and community development are closely related, influencing each other and shaping the appearance and development direction of cities and communities. The design of neighborhood parks is not only about providing recreational spaces but also an essential part of the urban green space system. A well-designed and functional park can enhance the quality of life of residents and strengthen their sense of belonging and identity to the community. Landscape perception is influenced by park design, reflecting people's perception and evaluation of their surroundings. Place attachment emphasizes residents' emotional connection and identity with their living area. A good neighborhood park design can promote and strengthen place attachment.
Neighborhood park design is closely related to community development. A park that meets the needs of the community and promotes resident interaction and healthy living contributes to comprehensive community development. Therefore, the relationship between park design, landscape perception, place attachment, and community development needs to be fully considered in urban planning to achieve sustainable development of cities and communities.
This study focuses on Tainan City, targeting park users as survey subjects. Four hundred questionnaires were distributed face-to-face, with 382 valid responses collected. Data were analyzed and discussed using statistical methods. The research results are as follows: Using structural equation modeling analysis, the results show that park design, landscape perception, and place attachment directly or indirectly influence community development. "Park design" needs to influence "community development" through "landscape perception" and "place attachment," indicating a mediating effect between park design and community development.
When planning community development, park design and landscape perception are equally important. As part of the community's public space, park design directly affects residents' perception and evaluation of the community. A well-designed and beautiful park can enhance landscape perception, increasing residents' sense of belonging and comfort. However, before park design, enhancing place attachment is more critical. Place attachment refers to residents' emotional connection and identity with their living area. Only when residents feel a strong sense of belonging and identity with their community will they care more about its development and actively participate in community affairs, promoting comprehensive community development. Therefore, enhancing place attachment is a crucial prerequisite for achieving community development goals. Park design, landscape perception, and place attachment are inseparable and should be equally emphasized in community development planning. Through reasonable design and management, the healthy development of the community can be promoted.
Park design, landscape perception, and place attachment are three indispensable elements for community development. They are interrelated and mutually influential. In community development planning, equal importance should be placed on these three aspects to jointly promote the community towards a healthier and more harmonious direction.

Bhattacharyya， J. （2004）. Theorizing community development. Community Development， 34（2）， 5-34.
Bishop， P.， & Timmerman， R. （2019）. Designing Successful Communities. In： Oxford Housing Sprint.
Brueggemann， W. G. （2013）. The practice of macro social work： Nelson Education.
Chen， N.， Dwyer， L.， & Firth， T. （2011）. Conceptualising the dimensionality of place attachment for a tourism destination. 한국관광학회 학술대회 발표논문집， 847-859.
Cunningham， G. （2008）. Stimulating asset based and community driven development： Lessons from five communities in Ethiopia. From Clients to Citizens， Communities Changing the Course of Their Own Development， 263-298.
El Hadidy， W. （2008）. Possibilities for income-deprived but capability-rich communities in Egypt. From clients to citizens： Communities changing the course of their own development， 1Agency， C. （2000）. Eat the View： Promoting Sustainable， Local Produce： Countryside Agency.
El Hadidy， W. （2008）. Possibilities for income-deprived but capability-rich communities in Egypt. From clients to citizens： Communities changing the course of their own development， 13-38.
Flaherty， J.， & Brown， R. B. （2010）. A multilevel systemic model of community attachment： Assessing the relative importance of the community and individual levels. American Journal of Sociology， 116（2）， 503-542.
Hair， J. F.， Anderson， R. E.， Babin， B. J.， & Black， W. C. （2010）. Multivariate data analysis： A global perspective （Vol. 7）. In： Upper Saddle River， NJ： Pearson.
Hammitt， William E.， Erik A. Backlund， and Robert D. Bixler. "Experience Use History， Place Bonding and Resource Substitution of Trout Anglers During Recreation Engagements." Journal of Leisure Research 36， no. 3 （2004）： 356-78.
Hanyu， K. "Visual Properties and Affective Appraisals in Residential Areas in Daylight." Journal of Environmental Psychology 20， no. 3 （2000）： 273-84.
Hull IV， R. B. （1992）. Image congruity， place attachment and community design. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research， 181-192.
Korpela， K. M. （1989）. Place-identity as a product of environmental self-regulation. Journal of environmental psychology， 9（3）， 241-256.
Korpela， K. M. （2012）. Place attachment. The Oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology， 148-163.
Kyle， G. T.， Mowen， A. J.， & Tarrant， M. （2004）. Linking place preferences with place meaning： An examination of the relationship between place motivation and place attachment. Journal of environmental psychology， 24（4）， 439-454.
Lewicka， M. （2011）. Place attachment： How far have we come in the last 40 years? Journal of environmental psychology， 31（3）， 207-230.
Manzo， L. C. （2005）. For better or worse： Exploring multiple dimensions of place meaning.
Journal of environmental psychology， 25（1）， 67-86.
Manzo， L. C.， & Devine-Wright， P. （2013）. Place attachment： Advances in theory， methods and applications： Routledge.
Nanistova， E. "The Dimensions of the Attachment to Birthplace and Their Verification after the 40 Years Following the Forced Relocation." Sociologia 30， no. 4 （1998）： 377-94.
Nasar， Jack L. "Adult Viewers'Preferences in Residential Scenes. A Study of the Relationship of Environmental Attributes to Preference." Environment and Behavior 12， no. 5 （1983）： 589-614.
Pretorius， E.， & Nel， H. （2012）. Reflections on the problem-based approach and the asset- based approach to community development. The Social Work Practitioner- Researcher/Die Maatskaplikewerk Navorser-Praktisyn， 24（2）， 266-287.
Proshansky， H. M.， Fabian， A. K.， & Kaminoff， R. （1983）. Place-identity： Physical world
Scannell， L.， & Gifford， R. （2010）. Defining place attachment： A tripartite organizing framework. Journal of environmental psychology， 30（1）， 1-10.
Schenck， R. （2010）. Introduction to participatory community practice.
Sherer， P. M. （2006）.The benefits of parks： Why America needs more city parks and open space.
Trentelman， C. K. （2009）. Place attachment and community attachment： A primer in the lived experience of a community sociologist. Society and natural，
Tsaur， S.-H.， Liang， Y.-W.， & Weng， S.-C. （2014）. Recreationist-environment fit and place attachment. Journal of environmental psychology， 40， 421-429.
Tuan， Y.-F. （1977）. Space and place： The perspective of experience： U of Minnesota Press. Tuan， Y.-F. （1980）. Rootedness versus sense of place. Landscape， 24， 3-8.
Vaske， J. J.， & Kobrin， K. C. （2001）. Place attachment and environmentally responsible behavior. The Journal of Environmental Education， 32（4）， 16-21.
Vorkinn， Marit， and Hanne Riese. "Environmental Concern in a Local Context： The Significance of Place Attachment." Environment and Behavior 33， no. 2 （2001）： 249-63.
Wiiliams， Daniel R. "Notes on Measuring Recreational Plcae Attachment." （2000）.
Williams， D. R.， & Roggenbuck， J. W. （1989）. Measuring place attachment： Some preliminary results. Paper presented at the NRPA Symposium on Leisure Research， San Antonio， TX.
Williams， D. R.， & Vaske， J. J. （2003）. The measurement of place attachment： Validity and generalizability of a psychometric approach. Forest science， 49（6）， 830-840.
Wohlwill， J.F.，Environmental aesthetics： the environment as source of affect， in Human
Behavior and Environment， I.A.a.J.F. Wohlwill， Editor.，（1976）： New York.
內政部營建署，（1999），公園綠地管理及設施維護手冊。 台北市：內政部營建署。
洪德仁， 潘蓬彬， & 楊志彬， （2005），公民會議與社區營造以北投社區社造協定公民會議為例.
徐震，（1994），社區與社區發展： 正中書局. 流傳文化. 墨文堂文化.
黃世輝， & 宮崎清，（2002），從產品設計到社區設計： 台灣總體營造的發與方法. P58- 76.
郭翡玉，（1982），鄰里公園使用之分析─台北市四個地區比較，臺灣大學土木工程研究所。
侯錦雄、姚靜婉，（1997），市民休閒生活態度與公園使用滿意度之相關研究。
侯錦雄，（1999），休閒生活態度與鄰里公園使用行為之不同層級城市比較─以台北、台中、彰化市居民 為例。戶外遊憩研究，12（2），55-69。
黃定國，（1993），從都會區居民休閒生活傾向研究社區開放空間設計指標，行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。
曾雯瑾，（2009*，不同規模鄰里公園之使用差異性探討 -以新竹市東區三個鄰里公園為例 。
溫聰敏，（1982），鄰里公園設計程序之探討—以台中黎明社區為例，東海大學建築研究所。
簡克興，（1995），台中市存有寺廟之鄰里公園的使用行為之研究，東海大學景觀所。
張祺堂、李威儀，（1995），社區鄰里公園活動屬性之分析---都市開放空間之研究（Ι），中華民國建築學會第八屆建築研究成果發表會論文集。
游文心、潘正宸（2020），身心障礙孩童在台北市共融遊戲場遊玩經驗初探。
特殊教育季刊，156，9-22。