簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 曾娟娟
Tseng, Chuan-Chuan
論文名稱: 創新之行為理論:注意力基礎觀點
A Behavioral Theory of Innovation: An Attention-Based View
指導教授: 方世杰
Fang, Shih-Chieh
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 企業管理學系
Department of Business Administration
論文出版年: 2010
畢業學年度: 98
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 88
中文關鍵詞: 注意力基礎觀點行為理論知識搜尋創新能力
外文關鍵詞: attention-based view, behaviour theory, knowledge search, innovative competence
相關次數: 點閱:111下載:3
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 先前的研究並未充分探討當管理者對創新的注意力不同時,則公司的搜尋行為將會有所不同,如此將會影響一個公司的創新能力! 我們將整合注意力基礎觀點來討論公司針對創新所進行的的知識搜尋行為。注意力基礎觀點主張管理者注意力是一個組織最珍貴的資源,而且如何分配注意力給特定活動的決定是解釋為何有些公司能夠適應外在環境的變化並且推出新的產品與製程的主要關鍵因素。
    為了回應這樣的理論,我們針對全球LCD主要的26家製造廠商,收集它們從西元1980年至西元2001年的專利活動資料,進行本研究的實證。進而得到兩項發現,第一點是:當公司進行知識搜尋行為時,如果使用漸進性注意力與互補性注意力時,會對相同的技術領域產生負面的影響;第二點是:當公司進行知識搜尋行為時,如果是使用破壞性注意力時,會對相同的技術領域產生正面的影響.這樣的實證結果建議:如果一個公司要維持技術領先的位置,則經營者應使用知識搜尋的破壞性注意力。

    Previous studies have not fully explored how firms’ search behaviours may be heterogeneous when managers’ attention for innovations is different, in turn, influence innovative competence. We bridge this gap by integrating an attention-based view (ABV) to study firms’ knowledge search behaviours for innovation. Attention-based theories of the firm suggest that managerial attention is the most precious resource of an organization and the decision to allocate attention to particular activities is a key to explain why some firms are able to both adapt to changes in their external environment and to introduce new products and processes. In response to this theory, we collect a longitudinal patent data of 26 major LCD manufacturers from 1980 to 2001 for empirical study and find two insights. First, firms with incremental attention and complementary attention when searching knowledge will correlate negatively to domain impact. Second, firms using radical attention when searching knowledge will correlate positively to domain impact. This empirical study suggests that in order to maintain technological leadership, managers should pay radical attention when they search knowledge.

    TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION...................1 1.1. Research Background...................1 1.2. Research Questions?...................6 CHAPTER TWO THEORY BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESES DEVELOPMENT....9 2.1 Theory Background....................9 2.1.1 Attention-Based View.................9 2.1.1.1. What is attention.................9 2.1.1.2. The Evolution of Attention: from Individual to Organizational....10 2.1.1.3. Attention-Based Theory of the Firm..........12 2.1.1.4. Empirical Literature on the Attention-Based View.....18 2.1.2. The Behavioral Theory of Innovation...........26 2.1.2.1. Theoretical Model................26 2.1.2.2. Three Components of the Behavioral Theory of Innovations..28 2.1.3. Search Theory....................29 2.1.3.1. Problemistic Search................32 2.1.3.2. Slack Search..................33 2.1.3.3. Local Search..................34 2.1.3.4. Boundary-Spanning Search.............35 2.1.4. Knowledge Search Attention..............36 2.1.4.1. Incremental Attention...............38 2.1.4.2. Complementary Attention..............39 2.1.4.3. Supplementary Attention..............39 2.1.4.4. Radical Attention.................39 2.1.5. Innovative Competence................40 2.1.5.1. Domain Impact.................41 2.1.5.2. Overall Impact..................42 2.2. Hypotheses Development.................43 2.2.1. Knowledge Search Attention and Innovative Competence....44 2.2.1.1. Incremental Attention and Impact...........44 2.2.1.2. Complementary Attention and Impact.........45 2.2.1.3. Supplementary Attention and Impact..........47 2.2.1.4. Radical Attention and Impact............48 CHAPTER THREE RESEARCH DESIGN................50 3.1 Sample and Data....................50 3.1.1 Sample......................50 3.1.2. LCD technology overview...............52 3.1.3. Patent Citation...................53 3.2 Variables and Measurements................56 3.2.1 Dependent Variables.................56 3.2.1.1. Domain Impact.................57 3.2.1.2. Overall Impact..................57 3.2.2 Independent Variables.................58 3.2.2.1. Four types of Knowledge Search Attention......58 3.2.3 Control Variables..................60 3.2.3.1. Patent Counts...................60 3.2.3.2. Average Citation Age................60 3.3 Statistical Method....................61 CHAPTER FOUR RESULTS.....................63 4.1 Knowledge Search Attention and Domain Impact.........63 4.2 Knowledge Search Attention and Overall Impact.........65 CHAPTER FIVE CONCLUSION....................68 5.1 Discussion......................68 5.2 Practical implications...................70 5.3 Theoretical implications..................71 5.4 Limitations and Future Research...............72 REFERENCES......................74

    Albert, M. B., Avery, D., Narin, F., & McAllister, P. 1991.Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patents. Research Policy, 20(3): 251–259.
    Alcacer, J., & Gittelman, M. 2006. Patent citations as a measure of knowledge flows: The influence of examiner citations. Review of Economics and Statistics, 88: 774–779.
    Aldrich, H.E., Auster, E. 1986. Even dwarfs started small: liabilities of size and age and their strategic implications. In Research in Organizational Bavehior, Staw,B., Cummings, L. (eds). 8: 165–198.
    Amara, N. & Landry, R.J. 2005. Sources of information as determinants of novelty of innovation in manufacturing firms: Evidence from the 1999 Statistics Canada Innovation Survey. Technovation, 25:245–259.
    Ahuja, G. 2000. Collaboration, networks, structural holes, and innovation: a longitudinal Study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3): 425–455.
    Ahuja, G., & Lampert, J. 2001. Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: a longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7): 521–543.
    Anderson, P. & Tushman, M. 1990. Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: a cyclical model of technological change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 604–33.
    Argote, L, & Greve, H.R. 2007. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm—40 Years and Counting: Introduction and Impact. Organization Science, 18(3):337-349.
    Barney, J. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1): 99-121.
    Barnard, C. I. 1938. The Functions of the Executive. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
    Barron, D.N., West, E., & Hannan, M.T. 1994. A time to grow and a time to die: growth and mortality of credit unions in New York City, 1914–1990. American Journal of Sociology, 100: 196–241.
    Bierly, P., & Chakrabarti, A. 1996. Generic knowledge strategies in the US pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 123–135.
    Bogner, W., & Bansal, P.1998. Integration of technological knowledge and the creation of competitive advantage in knowledge-based industries. In Hitt, M., Ricart, J. and Nixon, R. (Eds), Managing Strategically in an Interconnected World. London: John Wiley and Sons, 167–184.
    Birkinshaw, J., Bouquet, C., & Ambos, T. C. 2007. Managing executive attention in the global company. MIT Sloan Management Review, 48: 39–45.
    Bouquet, C., Morris A., & Birkinshaw, J. 2008. International attention and multinational enterprise performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 40: 108–131
    Bouquet, C., & Birkinshaw, J. 2008. Weight versus Voice: How Foreign Subsidiaries Gain Attention from Corporate Headquarters. Academy of Management Journal, 51(3): 577-601.
    Bourgeois, L. J. 1981. On the measurement of organizational slack. Academy of Management Review, 6: 29-39.
    Brown, S.L., & Eisenhardt, K.M. 1995. Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions. Academy of Management Review, 20(2): 343-378.
    Burgelman, R.A. 1983. A process model of internal corporate venturing in a diversified major firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28: 223–244.
    Calori, R., Johnson, G., & Sarnin, P. 1994. CEOs’ cognitive maps and the scope of the organization. Strategic Management Journal, 15(6): 437–457.
    Cassiman, B., & Veugelers, R. 2006. In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: Internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition. Management Science, 52(1):68-82.
    Calori, R., Johnson, G., & Sarnin, P. 1994. CEOs’ cognitive maps and the scope of the organization. Strategic Management Journal, 15(6): 437–457.
    Chen, W.R., & K. D. Miller. 2007. Situational and institutional determinants of firms' R&D search intensity. Strategic Management Journal, 28(4): 369-381.
    Chen, W.R. 2008. Determinants of Firms’ Backward and Forward Looking R&D Search Behavior. Organization Science, 19(4): 609-622.
    Chesbrough, H. 2003. Open Innovation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, MA.
    Chia, R. 2004. Strategy-as-practice: Reflections on the research agenda. European Management Review, 1(1): 29.
    Cho, T.S., & Hambrick, D.C. 2006. Attention as the mediator between top management team characteristics and strategic change: The case of airline deregulation. Organization Science, 17(4): 453–469.
    Cohen, W., & Levinthal, D. 1990. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective of learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1): 128–152.
    Cohen, M. D., & March,J.G., & Olsen, J.P. 1972. A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly,17(1):1–25.
    Cowan, D. A. 1986. Developing a process model of problem recognition. Academy of Management Review, 11(4): 763–776.
    Christensen, J.F. 2002. Building innovate assets and dynamic coherence in multi-technology companies. In: Foss, N.J., Robertson, P.L. (Eds.), Resource, Technology and Strategy. Explorations in the Resource-based Perspective. Routledge, London, pp. 123–152.
    Cyert, R., & March, J. 1963. A behavioral theory of the firm, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Das, T.K., & Teng, B.S. 2000. A resource-based theory of strategic alliance. Journal of Management, 26(1): 31-61.
    Davenport T.H., & Beck J.C. 2001. The attention economy: understanding the new currency of business, Harvard Business School Press.
    Daft, R. L., & Weick, K. E. 1984. Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Academy of Management Review, 9(2): 284–295.
    DeCarolis, D. M., & Deeds, D. L. 1999. The impact of stocks and flows of organizational knowledge on firm performance: An empirical investigation of the biotechnology industry. Strategic Management Journal, 20: 953–968.
    Deng, Z., Lev, B., & Narin, F. 2001. Science and technology as predictors of stock performance. Financial Analysts Journal, 20: 953–968.
    Dosi, G. & Marengo, L. 2007. On the evolutionary and behavioral theories of organizations: a tentative roadmap. Organization Science, 18(3):491-502.
    Drews, J. 2000. Drug discovery: a historical perspective. Science, 287: 1960–1964.
    Dutton, J. E., Fahey, L., & Narayanan, V. K. 1983. Toward understanding strategic issue diagnosis. Strategic Management Journal, 4(4): 307–323.
    Dutton, J. E., & Duncan, R. B. 1987. The creation of momentum for change through the process of strategic issue diagnosis. Strategic Management Journal, 8(3): 279–295.
    Duttton, J.E. 1988. Understanding strategic agenda building and its implications for managing change. in Managing ambiguity and change. ed., Pondy L.R., Bola R.J., and Howard T. (Chichester, England:Wiley), 127-144.
    Dutton, J. E., Walton, E.J., & Abrahamson, E. 1989. Important dimensions of strategic issues: Separating the wheat from the chaff. Journal of Management Studies, 26(4): 379–396.
    Dutton, J.E., & Ashford, S.J. 1993. Selling issues to top management. Academy of Management Review, 18(3): 397–428.
    Eisenhardt, K., & Tabrizi, B. 1995. Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in the global computer industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(1): 84-110.
    Elsbach, K. D., Barr, P. S., & Hargadon, A. B. 2005. Identifying situated cognition in organizations. Organization Science, 16(4): 422–433.
    Ernst & Young, 1993, Biotech 93 Arthur Young High Technology Group: San Francisco, CA.
    Fabrizio,K.R. 2009. Absorptive capacity and the search for innovation. Research Policy, 38: 255-267.
    Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. 1984. Social cognition, New York: Random House.
    Fleming, L. 2001. Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Science, 47: 117–132.
    Fleming, L., & Sorenson, O. 2004. Science as a map in technological search. Strategic Management Journal, 25: 909-928.
    Freeman, C., & Soete, L. 1997. The Economics of Industrial Innovation, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
    Galunic, D. & Rodan, S. 1998. Resource recombinations in the firm: knowledge structure and the potential for Schumpeterian innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 19(12): 1193–1201.
    Gavetti, G., & Levinthal, D.A. 2000. Looking Forward and Looking Backward: Cognitive and Experimental Search. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(1): 113-137.
    Gavetti, G., & Levinthal, D.A. 2004. The strategy field from the perspective of management science: Divergent strands and possible integration. Management Science, 50(10): 1309-1318.
    Gavetti, G. 2005. Cognition and Hierarchy: Rethinking the microfoundations of capabilities’ development. Organization Science, 16(6): 599-617.
    Gavetti, G., Levinthal, D.A. & Ocasio, W. 2007. Neo- Carneige: The Carneige School’s Past, Present, and Reconstructing for the Future. Organization Science, 18(3): 523-536.
    Gavetti, G., & Rivkin, J.W. 2007. On the Origin of Strategy: Action and Cognition over Time. Organization Science, 18(3): 420-439.
    Gebauer, H. 2009. An attention-based view on service orientation in the business strategy of manufacturing companies. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 24(1): 79-98.
    Gemunden, H., Heydebreck, M. & Wijnberg, R. 1992. Technological interweavement: a means of achieving innovation success. R&D Management, 22:359–376.
    Gittelman, M., & Kogut, B. 2003. Does good science lead to valuable knowledge? Biotechnology firms and the evolutionary logic of patent citations. Management Science, 49: 366–395.
    Grant, R. 2002. Contemporary Strategy Analysis: Concepts, Techniques, Applications, 4th edition. Oxford: Blackwell.
    Greve, H.R., 2003. A behavioral theory of R&D expenditures and innovations: evidence from shipbuilding. Academy of Management Journal, 46(6):685-702.
    Griliches, Z. 1981. Market value, R&D and patents..Econom. Lett., 7 :183–187.
    Griliches, Z. 1990. Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. J. Econom. Literature, 28: 1661–1707.
    Grimpea, C. & Sofka,W. 2009. Search patterns and absorptive capacity: Low- and high-technology sectors in European countries. Research Policy, 38: 495-506.
    Grinyer, P., & McKiernan, P. 1990. Generating major change in stagnating companies. Strategic Management Journal, 11(4): 131–146.
    Hall, B. H. 2000. Innovation and market value. R. Barrell, G. Mason, M. O’Mahoney, eds. Productivity, Innovation and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
    Hall, B. H., & Ham-Ziedonis, R. 2001. The patent paradox revisited: An empirical study of patenting in the US semiconductor industry,1979–1995. RAND J. Econom. 32(1) :101–128.
    Hall, B. H., & Trajtenberg, M. 2000. Market value and patent citations: A first look. NBER working paper #7741. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
    Hall, B., Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. 2005. Market value and patent citations, Rand Journal of Economics, 36(1): 16–38..
    Hansen, M. T., & Haas, M. R. 2001. Competing for attention in knowledge markets: Electronic document dissemination in a management consulting company. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(1): 1–28.
    Harfhoff, D., Narin, F., Scherer, F.M., & Vopel, K. 1999. Citation frequency and the value of patented inventions. Review of Economics and Statistics, 81(3): 511-515.
    Hausman, J., Hall, B., & Griliches, Z. 1984. Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents–R&D relationship. Econometrica, 52(4): 909–938.
    He, Z., P., & Wong. 2004. Exploration vs. Exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15(4) 481-494.
    Helfat, C. 1994. Evolutionary trajectories in petroleum firm R&D. Management Science, 40:1720-1747.
    Henderson, R. M., & Clark. K.B. 1990. Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1): 9–30.
    Henderson, R. M., Cockburn, I.M. 1994. Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management Journal, Special Issue 15: 63–84.
    Hoffman, A.J. & Ocasio, W. 2001. Not all events are attended equally:toward a middle-range theory of industry attention to external events. Organization Science, 12(4): 414-434.
    Huber, G. 1991. Organizational learning: The contributing processes and a review of the literatures. Organization Science, 2(1): 88-115.
    Huff, A. S. 1990. Mapping strategic thought. Chichester: Wiley.
    Hutchins, E. 1995. Cognition in the wild. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    Jaffe, A., Trajtenberg, G. M.. Fogarty, M. 2000. Knowledge spillovers and patent citations: Evidence from a survey of inventors. American Economic Review, 90 (2): 215–218.
    Jarzabkowski, P. 2004. Strategy as practice: Recursiveness, adaptation, and practices-in-use. Organization Studies, 25(4): 529–560.
    Jarzabkowski, P., Balogun, J., & Seidl, D. 2007. Strategizing: The challenges of a practice perspective. Human Relations, 60(1):5–27.
    Jiang, L., Tan, J., Thursby, M. 2010. Incumbent firm invention in emerging fields: evidence from the semiconductor industry. Strategic Management Journal, Published online Early View.
    Jones, B. D., & Baumgartner, F.R. 2005. The politics of attention: How government prioritizes problem, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Kahneman, D. 1973. Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
    Katila, R. 2002. New product search over time: past ideas in their prime. Academy of Management Journal, 45(5): 995–1010.
    Katila, R., & Ahuja, G. 2002. Something old, something new: a longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6): 1183–1194.
    Kiesler, S., & Sproull, L. 1982. Managerial response to changing environments: Perspectives on problem sensing from social cognition. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27(4): 548–570.
    Kogut, B, & Zander, U. 1992. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3): 383–397.
    Koput, K.W. 1997. A chaotic model of innovative search: some answers, many questions. Organization Science, 8(5): 528–542.
    Kuhn, T. 1962.. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    Lanjouw, J., & Schankerman, M. 2004. Patent quality and research productivity: measuring innovation with multiple indicators. Economic Journal , 114: 441–465.
    Laursen, K., & Salter, A. 2006. Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performances among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2): 131–150.
    Leonard-Barton, D. 1992. Core capabilities and core rigidities: a paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 13: 111–126.
    Levinthal, D., J. & March, G. 1981. A model of adaptive organizational search. Journal Economics Behavior Organization, 2(4):307–333.
    Levitt, B., & March, J.G. 1988. Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14: 319–340.
    Makadok, R., & Walker, G. 1996. Search and selection in the money market fund industry. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 39-54.
    March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. 1958. Organizations. New York: Wiley.
    March, J. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1): 71-87.
    March, J., & Olsen, J. 1976. Ambiguity and choice in organizations, Bergen, Norway: Universitetsforlaget.
    March, J. G. 1994. A Primer on Decision Making: How Decisions Happen, Free Press, New York.
    Martin, X. & Mitchell, W. 1998. The influence of local search and performance heuristics on new design introduction in a new product market. Research Policy, 26: 753–771.
    Miller, C., Burke, L., & Glick, W. 1998. Cognitive diversity among upper-echelon executives: implications for strategic decision process. Strategic Management Journal, 19(1): 39-58.
    Mintzberg, H. 1973. The nature of managerial work. New York: Harper & Row.
    Mitroff, I., Mason, R., & Person, C. 1994. Creating corporate entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Executive, 8: 11–21.
    Mowery, D.C., Oxley, J.E., & Silverman, B.S. 1996. Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 77–91.
    Narin, F. 1993. Patent Citation Analysis: The Strategic Application of Technology Indicators. Patent World :2530.
    Narin, F., Thomas P., & Breitzman, A. 2001. Using patent indicators to predict stock portfolio performance. B. Berman, ed. From Ideas to Assets: Investing Wisely in Intellectual Property. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 293–308.
    Nelson, R., & Winter. S. 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Nelson, R.R. 2008. Bounded rationality, cognitive maps, and trial and error learning. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 67(1): 78-89.
    Nerkar, A. 2003. Old is gold? The value of temporal exploration in the creation of new
    knowledge. Management Science, 49(2): 211–229.
    Nerkar, A., & Roberts, P.W. 2004. Technological and product-market experience and the success of new product introductions in the pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management Journal, 25(8-9): 779–799.
    Nigam, A. & Ocasio, W. 2009. Event attention, environmental sensemaking, and change in institutional logics: an inductive analysis of the effects of public attention to Clinton’s health care reform initiative. Organization Science, Articles in Advance: 1–19.
    Ocasio, W., 1997. Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 187–206.
    Ocasio, W. 2001. How do organizations think? Lant T. K., Shapira Z., eds. Organizational Cognition: Computation and Interpretation. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 39–60.
    Ocasio, W., & Joseph, J. 2005. An attention-based theory of strategy formulation: Linking micro- and macro perspectives in strategy processes. Advances in Strategic Management: Strategy Process, 22: 39-61.
    Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. 1997. The technological competencies of the world’s largest firms: complex and path-dependent, but not much variety. Research Policy, 26:141–156.
    Phene, A., Fladmoe-Lindquist, K., Marsh, L. 2006. Breakthrough innovations in the U.S. biotechnology industry: the effects of technological space and geographic origin. Strategic Management Journal, 27: 369-388.
    Powell, W.W., Koput, K.W., & Smith-Doerr L. 1996. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 116–145.
    Postrel, S. 2002. Islands of shared knowledge specialization and mutual understanding in problem-solving teams. Organization Science, 13(3) 303-320.
    Quintana-Garcia C., Benavides-Velasco, C.A. 2008. Innovative competence, exploration and exploitation: the influence of technological diversification. Research Policy, 37(3): 492-507.
    Ranger-Moore J. 1997. Bigger may be better, but is older wiser? Organizational age and size in the New York life insurance industry. American Sociological Review, 62: 903–920.
    Roberts, P.W. 1999. Product innovation, product-market competition, and persistent profitability in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management Journal, 20(7): 655–670.
    Rosenkopf, L., & Nerkar, A. 1999. On the complexity of technological evolution: exploring coevolution within and across hierarchical levels in optical disc technology. In Variations in Organization Science: In Honor of D. T. Campbell, Baum J, McKelvey W (eds). Sage:Thous& Oaks, CA, 169–183.
    Rosenkopf, L., & Tushman, M. 1998. The coevolution of community networks and technology: lessons from the flight simulation industry. Industrial and Corporate Change, 7(2): 311–346.
    Rosenkopf, L., & Nerkar, A. 2001. Beyond local research: boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management Journal, 22(4): 287–306.
    Rosenkopf, L., P. Almeida. 2003. Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Science, 49(6): 751-766.
    Sahal, D., 1985. Technological guideposts and innovation avenues. Research Policy,14: 61–82.Schneider, S. L. 1992. Framing and conflict: Aspiration level contingency, the status quo, and current theories of risky choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18:1040–1057.
    Schumpeter JA. 1934. The Theory of Economic Development. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA
    Shan, W., & Song, J. 1997. Foreign direct investment and the sourcing of technological advantage: evidence from the biotechnology industry. Journal of International Business Studies, 28(2): 267–284.
    Shane, H., & Klock, M.1997. The relation between patent citations and Tobin’s q in the semiconductor industry. Rev. Quant. Finance Accounting , 9(2):131–146.
    Shattuck, L. G., & Miller, N. L. 2006. Extending naturalistic decision making to complex organizations: A dynamic model of situated cognition. Organization Studies, 27(7): 989–1009.
    Simon, H.A. 1947. Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organizations (2nd ed.), New York: Macmillan.
    Smith, K., Grimm C., Gannon, M., & Chen. M.J. 1991. Organizational information processing, competitive responses, and performance in the U.S. domestic airline industry. Academy of Management Journal, 34(1): 60-85.
    Sorenson, J., & Stuart, T. 2000. Aging, obsolescence and organizational innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(1): 81–112.
    Stolpe, M. 2002. Determinants of knowledge diffusion as evidences in patent data: the case of liquid crystal display technology. Research Policy, 31(7): 1181–1198.
    Stuart, T.,J. & Podolny. 1996. Local search and the evolution of technological capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 21-38.
    Subramaniam, M., Youndt, M.A., 2005. The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Academy of Management Journal, 48: 450–463.
    Teece, D. J. 1980. Economies of scope and the scope of the enterprise. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1(3): 223–247.
    Teece, D.J. 1996. Firm organization, industrial structure, and technological innovation. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 31:193–224.
    Teece DJ, Pisano G, & Shuen A. 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7): 509–533.
    Thornton, P. H. 2004. Markets from culture: Institutional logics and organizational decisions in higher education publishing, Stanford: Stanford Business Books.
    Trajtenberg, M., Henderson, R., & Jaffe, A. 1997. University versus Corporate Patents: A Window on the Basicness of Invention. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 5(1): 1950.
    Trajtenberg, M., 1990a. A penny for your quotes: patent citations and the value of innovations. RAND Journal of Economics, 21 (1): 172–187.
    Trajtenberg, M. 1990b. Economic Analysis of Product Innovation. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
    Tuggle, C.S, Sirmon D.G., & Christopher, R. 2010. Commanding board of director attention: investigating how organizational performance and CEO duality affect board members’ attention to monitoring. Strategic Management Journal, Published online Early View :
    Tushman, M., & Anderson, P. 1986. Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(3): 439–465.
    Tushman, M., & Rosenkopf, L. 1992. Organizational determinants of technological change: toward a sociology of technological evolution. Research in Organizational Behavior, 14: 311–347.
    Wilson, D. C., & Jarzabkowski, P. 2004. Thinking and acting strategically: New
    challenges for interrogating strategy. European Management Review, 1(1): 14–20.

    下載圖示
    校外:立即公開
    QR CODE