| 研究生: |
蔡涵如 Tsai, Han-Ju |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
工作記憶與類別學習中的知識分化現象 Working Memory And Knowledge Partitioning in Categorization |
| 指導教授: |
楊立行
Yang, Lee-Xieng |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
社會科學院 - 認知科學研究所 Institute of Cognitive Science |
| 論文出版年: | 2008 |
| 畢業學年度: | 96 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 96 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 類別學習 、工作記憶容量 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | working memory capacity, category learning |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:64 下載:3 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
工作記憶容量被定義為可以控制並保持注意力,以面對干擾或使其分心的事物時
的機制,具有個別差異。工作記憶容量的測量可反映個人由記憶所激發項目的能力,
提取或保留這些項目於注意力焦點(focus of attention),並忽略干擾,將干擾抑制於注
意力焦點之外的能力。而工作記憶容量的測量也被證實與許多認知作業有關,工作記
憶的有限容量更是許多認知作業表現上的一個重要限制,因此測量工作記憶容量有助
於解釋認知作業表現上所出現的個別差異。由於類別學習對人類知識的形成有極為重
要的影響,類別學習中的知識分化現象可以清楚展現人類類別學習的個別差異,因此
本研究欲以受試者工作記憶容量大小試圖解釋類別學習中展現知識分化的個別差異
現象。因此沿用Yang 和Lewandowsky (2003,2004)類別學習實驗的類別結構以及五
項工作記憶作業為實驗作業,工作記憶作業分別為反向數字記憶作業、記憶更新作業、
運算廣度作業、語句判斷作業以及空間短期記憶作業。實驗一中檢驗工作記憶容量與
可口語化規則又心理可分割刺激材料的類別學習表現間的關係,結果發現工作記憶容
量大的受試者,類別學習表現越好,且越容易展現出知識分化的現象。實驗二中檢驗
工作記憶容量與不可口語化規則又心理無法分割刺激材料的類別學習表現間的關係,
但工作記憶容量與不可口語化規則又心理無法分割刺激材料的類別學習表現間的關
係不明確,可能是由於類別學習作業難度的提昇,以至於受試者的類別學習表現不明
確。
Working memory capacity was defined to mechanism which can control and sustain
attention in the face of interference and distraction and demonstrate individual difference.
Measuring working memory capacity reflects the ability to activate items in memory, to
bring or maintain them in the focus of attention, and to ignore or disregard interference
items or distractions. Subject’s working memory capacity correlate highly with their
performance of many cognitive tasks. The limitation of working memory reflects some
ability that is fundamental to cognitive abilities. Also category learning is important to
human conception formation. Knowledge partitioning in category learning showed clear
individual difference. So, in our research, we tried to confer the relationship between
working memory capacity and knowledge partitioning. We used Yang and Lewandowsky
(2004) experiment to be our category learning task and five working memory tasks. There
were two experiments in this research, the only difference between experiment 1 and 2 is
the rule of category learning task can be verbalized (exp 1) or not (exp 2). Experiment 1
found that the larger working memory capacity, the better category learning performance
and easier to show knowledge partitioning. Experiment 2 found that the relationship
between working memory capacity and category learning was not clear. Perhaps the
difficulty of category learning task in experiment 2 is higher than experiment 1.
蘇湘綉。(民96 年)。「文化差異、作業難度及規則口語化對知識分化的影響」。
碩士學位論文,國立中正大學心理學研究所。
Ackerman, P. L., Beier, M. E., & Boyle, M. O. (2005). Working Memory and Intelligence:
The Same or Different Constructs? Psychological Bulletin, 131, 30-60.
Ashby, F. G., & Maddox, W. T.(2005). Human category learning. Annual Review of
Psychology. 56, 149-178.
Atkinson, R. C. and Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its
control processes. In K. W. Spence and J. T. Spence (Eds.), The Psychology of
learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (vol. 2). New York:
Academic Press.
Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford: Oxford university.
Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities. A survey of factor-analytic studies. New
York: Cambridge University Press.
Conway, A. R. A., & Engle, R. W. (1994). Working memory and retrieval: A
resource-dependent inhibition model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,
123, 354-373.
Conway, A. R. A., & Engle, R. W. (1996). Individual differences in working memory
capacity: More evidence for a general capacity theory. Memory, 4, 577-590.
Conway, A. R. A., Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2003). Working memory capacity and its
relation to general intelligence. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 547-552.
Cowan, N. (1998). An embedded-process model of working memory. In A. Miyake & P.
shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and
executive control. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and
80
reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450-466.
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1983). Individual differences in integrating information
between and within sentence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning,
Memory, and Cognition, 9, 561-583.
DeCaro, M. S., Thomas, R. D., & Beilock, S. I. (2008). Individual differences in category
learning: Sometimes less working memory capacity is better than more. Journal of
Cognition, 107, 284-294.
DeLosh, E. L., Busemeyer, J. R., & McDaniel, M. A. (1997). Extrapolation: The sine qua
non for abstraction in function learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 968-986.
Engle, R. W. (2001). What is working-memory capacity?. In H. L. Roediger III & J. S.
Nairne (Eds.), The Nature of Remembering: Essays in Honor of Robert G. Crowder
(pp. 297-314). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Engle, R. W. (2002). Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions
in Psychological Science, 11, 19–23.
Engle, R. W., Cantor, J., & Carullo, J. J. (1992). Individual differences in working memory
and comprehension: A test of four hypotheses. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 972-992.
Engle, R. W., Kane, M. J., & Tuholsky, S. W. (1999a). Individual differences in working
memory capacity and what they tell us about controlled attention, general fluid
intelligence, and functions of prefrontal cortex. In A. Miyake & P. shah (Eds.), Models
of working memory (pp 102-134). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Jensen & Figueroa, (1975). Forward and Backward Digit Span Interaction With Race and
1Q: Predictions from Jensen's Theory, Journal of Educational Psychology, 67,
882-893
81
Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2003).Working-memory capacity and the control of attention:
The contribution of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 47-70.
King, J., & Just, M. A. (1991). Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of
working memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 580-602.
Kyllone, P. C., & Christal, R. E. (1990). Reasoning ability is (little more than) working
memory capacity?! Intelligence, 14, 389-433.
Lewandowsky, S., Kalish, M., & Ngand, S. K. (2002). Simplified learning in complex
situations: Knowledge partitioning in function learning. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: General, 131,163-193.
Lewandowsky, S., & Kirsner, K. (2000). Knowledge portioning: context-dependent use of
expertise. Memory & Cognition, 28, 295-305.
Lewandowsky, S., Robert, L., & Yang, L-X. (2006). Knowledge partitioning in
categorization: Boundary conditions. Memory & Cognition. 34, 1163-1178.
Maddox, W. T., & Ashby, F. G. (2004). Dissociating explicit and procedural-learning
based systems of perceptual category learning. Behavioral Processes, 66, 309–332.
Neath, I., & Surprenant, A. M. (2003). Human memory(2nd ed.). CA:Wadsworth /
Thomson Learning.
Oberauer, K., Lange, E., & Engle, R. W. (2004). Working memory capacity and resistance
to interference. Journal of, Memory and Language, 51, 80-96.
Oberauer,K., Süβ,H. -M., Schulze, R.,Wilhelm,O.,&Wittmann,W.W. (2000). Working
memory capacity — Facets of a cognitive ability construct. Personality and
Individual Differences, 29, 1017−1045.
Oberauer, K., Süβ, H. -M., Wilhelm, O., & Wittmann, W. W. (2003). The multiple faces of
working memory — Storage, processing, supervision, and coordination. Intelligence,
82
31, 167−193.
Oberauer, K., Schulze, R., Wilhelm, O., & Süβ, H. -M. (2005). Working memory and
intelligence — Their correlation and their relation: A comment on Ackerman, Beier,
and Boyle (2005).
Shiffrin, R. M. (1993). Short-term memory: A brief commentary. Memory & Cognition, 21,
193-197.
Süβ, H. -M., Oberauer, K.,Wittmann,W.W.,Wilhelm, O., & Schulze, R. (2002).Working
memory capacity explains reasoning ability— and a little bit more. Intelligence, 30,
261−288.
Smith, E. E. & Jonides, J. (1999). Storage and Executive Processes in the Frontal Lobes.
Science, 283, 1657 – 1661.
Tuholsky, S. W., Engle, R. W., & Baylies, G. C. (2001). Individual differences in working
memory capacity and enumeration. Memory & Cognition, 29, 484-492.
Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory task dependent? Journal of,
Memory and Language, 28, 127-154.
Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. W. (2005). Individual differences in working memory capacity
and learning: Evidence from serial reaction time task. Memory & Cognition, 33,
213-220.
Yang, L.-X., & Lewandowsky, S. (2003). Context-gated knowledge partitioning in
categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and
Cognition, 28, 663-679.
Yang, L.-X., & Lewandowsky, S. (2004). Knowledge partitioning in categorization:
constraints on exemplar models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning,
Memory, and Cognition, 30, 1045-1064.