寶特瓶紗紡織品是近年來推廣的綠色再生產品，繼美國、德國、日本之後，台灣是第四個開發出PET再生環保紗的國家。因為大多數的人對於寶特瓶紗紡織產品不太認識，因此本研究想利用此機會探討寶特瓶紗紡織產品以運動外套為例，進行從消費知覺價值觀點探討品牌效益、產品價格對消費者購買意圖影響之研究。
本研究主要以問卷作為量測工具，總共發放300份問卷，對象為使用過寶特瓶紗運動外套的大學生，並以台南市的國立大學和私立大學為發放之主要對象。回收之有效問卷為234份，回收率為78%。
本研究結論如下：
1.消費知覺價值的功能性價值對消費者購買意圖有正向影響。
2.消費知覺價值的社會性價值對消費者購買意圖無影響。
3.消費知覺價值的情感性價值對消費者購買意圖有正向影響。
4.消費知覺價值的嘗新性價值對消費者購買意圖無影響。
5.價格之接受度不會增強消費知覺價值對購買意圖的影響效果。
6.品牌效益之特質會影響消費知覺價值對購買意圖的影響效果。
7.消費者屬性之差別會增強消費知覺價值對購買意圖的影響效果。
本研究針對分析結果，提出一些消費知覺價值對消費者購買意圖探討後的結論與建議，並希望能對未來類似之研究有相當程度的參考價值。
關鍵詞：消費知覺價值、消費者購買意圖、產品價格、品牌效益。

SUMMARY
PET bottle yarn textile is a kind green recycled product promoted in recent years. Taiwan is the 4th nation which has developed PET renewable green yarn following US, German and Japan. As most of us know little of PET bottle yarn textile, the study is going to use the chance to discuss PET bottle yarn textile product. Taking sport jacket as an example, it takes study on the influences of brand benefit and product price to the consumer’s purchase intention from the consumer’s perceived value.
The study research hypothesis are as the following:
1. The consumer’s perceived value has influence to the consumer’s purchase intention.
2. The acceptability of price will enhance influence effect of consumer’s perceived value to consumer’s purchase intention.
3. The characteristics of brand benefit will affect the influence effect of consumer’s perceived value to consumer’s purchase intention.
4. Consumer property difference will enhance influence effect of consumer’s perceived value to consumer’s purchase intention.
Aiming at analysis results, the study proposes some conclusion and suggestion after discussion of consumer’s perceived value to consumer’s purchase intention, and hopes the study will have reference value in certain degree to future similar study.
Keywords: Brand Benefit、Product Price、Consumers’ Purchase Intention、Consumer’ Perceived Value.
INTRODUCTION
Environmental goods become more and more common in the market, and PET Bottles Yarn Sports Jacket is also one of the promising environmental goods. The study takes PET bottles yarn sports jacket to explore the impact of consumer’s perceived value to consumer’s purchase intention and studies whether it cause influences of consumer’s perceived value to consumer’s purchase intention under the mediums of price acceptability and brand benefit.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The study methods of the study are as the following:
1. Study Objects
The purposes of the study are to understand the relation between the consumers’s perceived value and consumer’s purchase intention, and understand whether it may cause different influence effectiveness via different production price and brand benefit. Therefore, questionnaire is distributed to PET bottles yarn sports jacket users for investigation. Sample selection process is mainly for customers with purchase of PET bottles yarn sports jacket and it is taken distribution to national universities or private universities. The distribution objects are college students in Tainan City.
2. Measurement Tool
The study mainly takes questionnaire as a measurement tool. Total 300 copies of questionnaires are distributed. The objects are college students who have used PET bottles yarn sports jacket, and it takes national universities and private universities in Tainan City as main distribution objects. In the questionnaire, variables questions are 35 and personal attribute questions are 6. Recovered valid questionnaires are 234 copies and recovery rate is 78%.
3. Analysis Methods
The study mainly discusses whether the consumer will be affected by the consumer’s perceived value of PET bottles yarn sports jacket, and it will make the consumer’s purchase intention produce changes, and make the consumer’s perceived value and consumer’s purchase intention exist interference effect furthermore due to different influences of product price and brand benefit.
On the application of statistical software, the study uses SPSS perform statistical analysis. The statistical methods used are summarized as the following:
(1) Reliability test
(2) Descriptive statistical analysis
(3) Factors analysis
(4) Multiple regression analysis
(5) ANOVA analysis
(6) T-test analysis
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The study mainly to discuss the influence effects of the relation between consumer’ perceived value and consumer’s purchase intention, and the interference effectiveness of different product price and brand benefit to the consumer’s perceived value and consumer’s purchase intention. It takes PET bottles yarn sports jacket as an example, and conclusion is proposed according to the verification results of study.
1. The consumer’s perceived value has influence to the consumer’s purchase intention.
The consumer may purchase PET bottles yarn sports jacket due to the additional features and may be suffered by specific attraction of promotion and ads etc. When the function of PET bottles yarn sports jacket is felt after using, it may increase the relation of consumer’s purchase intention. At the same time, the consumer may verify the received information and recognition before personal purchasing to enhance the confidence to PET bottles yarn sports jacket. Then, it will produce the intention of recommendation or re-purchasing.
2. The acceptability of price will not enhance influence effect of consumer’s perceived value to consumer’s purchase intention.
The reason that product price medium is not established may be that the PET bottles yarn sports jacket is a kind of novel products. When the consumer purchases PET bottles yarn sports jacket, in the test, it has indicated that the consumer may purchase the product of the price is within affordable range. Therefore, the price difference cannot produce direct influence to the relation of consumer’s purchase intention.
3. The characteristics of brand benefit will affect the influence effect of consumer’s perceived value to consumer’s purchase intention.
In the study, the brand benefit indicates college students may consider the brand factor when purchasing PET bottles yarn sports jacket. The brand may enhance the sense of trust of consumer to the product, so that the consumer may purchase the product.
4. Consumer property difference will enhance influence effect of consumer’s perceived value to consumer’s purchase intention.
The study discovers that interviewed male and female college students may have identification to PET bottles yarn sports jacket. Furthermore, no matter male or female college students, they may pay more attention on appearance design or function design of PET bottles yarn sports jacket. From the study, it can obtain the consumption features of most current young consumer group.
CONCLUSION
From the study, it indicates that consumer has obvious functional value to the PET bottles yarn sports jacket. Therefore, the industry can enhance the functional value in the future and make consumers have more choices. In this way, it may be conductive for the manufacturers to have proof and direction coping with the market competiveness, and it can be taken as the materials for following product marketing strategy. Brand benefit will have influence effectiveness to the consumer’s perceived value and consumer’s purchase intention. The product price may have lower influence effectiveness to the consumer’s perceived value and consumer’s purchase intention. Therefore, the industry can focus on the attributes to strengthen planning, so as to comply with the demands and expectation of consumer to the PET bottles yarn sports jacket. To understand the potential features of consumer in purchasing and plan marketing strategies cater to specific consumer groups, it cannot only enlarge market scope and demands, but can strengthen the separation efficiency of market, reduce the mutual competiveness of products with similar characteristics in the same industry and improve overall output value of the industry and profits of manufacturers.

一、 中文文獻
（一）專書
1.Keller, K. L. (2001)品牌管理，Strategic brand management: Building, measuring, and managing brand equity，吳克振譯，台北市：華泰文化。
2.Keller, K. L. (2008)策略品牌管理，Strategic brand management: Building, measuring, and managing brand equity，徐世同譯，台北市：華泰文化。
3.Kotler & Armstrong（2004）Principles of Marketing，10th Edition，方世榮譯，行銷學原理，東華書局，P.395。
4.Kotler & Armstrong（2004）Principles of Marketing ，10th Edition，方世榮譯，行銷學原理，東華書局，P.406。
5.方世榮譯（2004），Kotler & Armstrong，Principles of Marketing ，10th Edition，行銷學原理，東華書局，CH11、CH12。
6.吳萬益（2008），企業研究方法第三版，華泰文化。
7.羅文坤（1986），行銷傳播學，三民書局股份有公司，P.383-489。
（二）期刊與文章
1.方自傑（2012），遠東新世紀加速轉型，遠東人月刊3月刊。
2.吳寶安（2009），遠東新推環保再生，工商時報。
3.紡拓會（2007），紡拓會標語，紡拓會期刊。
4.高宜凡（2010），寶特瓶變世足球衣，遠見雜誌289期。
5.許以頻（2011），咖啡渣+寶特瓶織出神奇布料，天下雜誌485期。
6.楊芙宜（2011），紡織衣材大革命，台灣光華雜誌8月刊。
7.鄭朝陽（2010），再生衣：寶特瓶、咖啡渣做的，紡織科技解析，科學與醫學版，聯合報。
（三）學術論文
1.江啟明（1989），模組化行銷偵測系統，交通大學管理學研究所碩士論文。
2.周媛媛（2013），綠色商品的消費者行為分析-以自行車為例，南華大學旅遊管理學系休閒環境管理碩士班碩士論文。
（四）網站上資料
1.環保署（2011），廢物品及容器回收稽核認證量統計，環保署公告。
2.鄭澄宇（2012）遠東新世紀股份有限公司產品簡介，www.fenc.com。
3.顏炳煌（2009），三新紡織股份有限公司產品簡介，www.colortex.com.tw。
二、 英文文獻
1.Ahtola, O.T.（1985）Hedonic and Utilitarian Aspects of Consumer Behavior：An Attitudinal Perspective, in Advances in Consumer Research, Eds., ElizabethC. Hirschman and Morris B.Holbrook, Provo, UT：Association for Consumer Research, 12, p.7-10.
2.Andrews, I.R. and Valenzi, E.R.（1970）Overpayment Inequity or Self-Image as a Worker, A Critical Examination of an Experimental Induction Procedure, Organizational Behavior and Hunan Performance, P.266-276.
3.Belk, Russell W（1975）Situation Variable and Consumer Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.12, P.157-164.
4.Bettman, J.R.（1979）An Information Processing Theory of Consumer Choice, Readind, MA：Addison-Wesley.
5.Bloch, Peter H. and Richins, Marsha L.（1983）A theoretical Model for the Study of Product Importance Perceptions. Journal of Marketing, P.69-81.
6.Clark, K., Belk, R.（1978）The Effects of Product Involvement and Task Definition on Anticipated Consumer Effort, Advances in Consumer Research, Vol.5, P.313-318.
7.Demby, E.（1974）Psychographics and From Whence it Came. Life Style and Psychographics, P.22-29.
8.Dhar, Ravi and Steven J. Sherman（1996）The Effect of Common and Unique Features in Consumer Choice, Journal of Consumer Research, 23（December）, P.193-203.
9.Engel, James F., and Roger D. Blackwell（1982）Consumer Research, New York, Dryden Press.
10.Engel, J., R.D. Blackwell, and P.W. Miniard（1986）Consumer Behavior, New York：CBS College Publishing.
11.Engel, James F., Roger D. Blackwell and Paul W. Miniard（1995）Consumer Behavior, New York：CBS College Publishing.
12.Fishbein, M.（1963）An Investigation of the Relationships between Beliefs about an Object and the Attitude Toward that Object. In I. Ajzen and M. Fishbein, Eds.（1980）Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior, P.28-77.
13.Gourville, J.T. & Soman, D.（2005）Over Choice and Assortment Type：When and Why Variety Backfires. Marketing Science, P.382-395.
14.Grewal, Dhruv, R. Krishnan, Julie Baker and Norm Borin（1998）The Effect of Store Name, Brand Name and Price Discount on Consumers’ Evaluations and Purchase Intentions, Journal of Retailing, P.331-352
15.Garver, M.S., Mentzer, J.T.（1999）Logistics Research Methods：Employing Structural Equation Modeling to Test for Construct Validity, Journal of Business Logistics, P.33-57.
16.Guiltinan, Joseph P and Paul, Gordon W（1991）Marketing Management：Strategies and Programs, International Edition, McGraw-Hill, USA.
17.Harrell GD.（1986）Consumer Behavior. San Diego, CA：Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. P.587.
18.Hausman, A.（2000）A Multi-Method Investigation of Consumer Motivations in Impulse Purchasing Behavior, Journal of Consumer Marketing, P.403-419.
19.Hirschman Elizabeth, C（1980）Innovativeness, Novelty Seeking and Consumer Creativity. Journal of Consumer Research, P.283-295.
20.Hirschman, E.C and Holbrook, M.B（1982）Hedonic Consumption：Emerging Concepts, Methods and Propositions, Journal of Marketing, Vol.46, No.3, P.92-101.
21.Holak, Susan L.（1988）Determinants of Innovative Durables Adoption an Empirical Study With Implications for Early Product Screening, Journal of Product Innovation Management, P.50-69.
22.Holbrook（1980）Some Preliminary Notes on Research in Consumer Esthetics, Advance in Consumer Research, ed., Olson C. Jerry, Ann Arbor：Association for Consumer Research, 7, P.104-108.
23.Keller, K. L.（1993）Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 1-22.
24.Keller, K. L.（1998）Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
25.Leland Ott and Barbara Feigin（1978）Some Practical Consideration in Market Segmentation, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.XV, August, p.73.
26.Leo R. Vijayasarathy & Joseph M. Jones（2000）Print and Internet Catalog Shopping：Assessing Attitudes and Intentions, Internet Research, Vol.10, P.191-202.
27.Martineau, P.（1958）The Personality of the Retail Store, Harvard Business Review, Vol.36, P.47-55.
28.Midgley, David F. and Grahame R. Dowling（1993）A Longitudinal Study of Product Form Innovation：The Interaction between Predispositions and Social Messages, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.19, P.611-625.
29.Modahl M（2000）Now or never：How Com-Panies Must Change Today to Win the Battle for Internet Consumers. New York：Harper Business.P.237
30.Nicosia, F.M.（1968）Consumer Decision Process, Marketing and Advertising Implication, Prentice-Hall Inc., P.29.
31.Nicosia, F.M.（1966）Marketing and Advertising Implication. Englewood Cliffs, N.J. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
32.Olshavsky, Richard W. and Donald H. Granbois（1979）Consumer Decision Making-Factor Fiction? Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.6, Iss.2, P.93-100.
33.Richins M.L & Bloch P.H.（1986）After the New Wears Off：The Temporal Context of Product Involvement, Journal of Consumer Research, P.280-285.
34.Richardson, V.（1994）Conducting Research on Practice. Educational Researcher, 23（5）,P.5-10.
35.Rogers, E.M.（1962）Diffusion of Innovation. 1ed. New York：Free Press. P.172-180.
36.Rogers, E.M., Diffusion of Innovation（1983） 3rd edition, US, Free Press：New York.
37.Rook, D.W.（1987）The Buying Impulse. Journal of Consumer Research, 14（Sep）, P.189-199.
38.Schiffman, L.G. & L.L. Kanuk（1991）Consumer Behavior, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
39.Schwartz, S.H., Feldman, K.A., Brown, M.E.＆ Heingartner, A.（1969）Some Personality Correlates of Conduct in Two Situations of Moral Conflict. Journal of Personality, 37, P.41-57.
40.Sheth, J.N.（1974）An Investigation of Relationships Among Evaluative Beliefs, Affect, Behavioral Intention, and Behavior, in Consumer Behavoir：Theory and Application, ed, John U. Farley, John A. Howard and L. Winston Ring, P.89-114.
41.Sheth, Jadgish N.（1979）The Surpluses and Shortages in Consumer Behavior Theory and Research, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol.7, Iss.4, P.414-427.
42.Sheth, Jagdish N.（1991）Consumption Values and Market Choices：Theory and Applications, South-western, USA.
43.Walters, C.G. & Paul, W.G.（1970）Consumer Behavior：An Intergrated Framework. 3th Ed. New York：Richard D. Irwin, Inc.
44.Young, S. and Feigin, B.（1975）Using the Benefit Chain for Improved Strategy Formulation, Journal of Marketing, Vol.39（3）, P.72-74.
45.Zaichowsky, J.L.（1985）Measuring the involvement construct, Journal of Consumer Research, December, P.341–352.
46.Zeithaml, Valarie A.（1988）Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value：A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52, no.3, P.2-22.