我國自 2016 年推行能源轉型政策，並以離岸風電作為主要策略項目。在離岸風電規劃上，經濟部透過三階段政策（示範獎勵、潛力場址與區塊開發）部署風場場址，並以彰化海域為主要案場所在。而為因應離岸風場規劃對於既有海域使用的影響，交通部航港局亦公告了彰化風場航道及其航行指南，以律定彰化海域之船舶航行秩序。然而，除了離岸風場本身招致既有漁業使用者的批評外，航行指南一經發布即引發漁民質疑指南內有關漁船禁漁、禁航之措施，並經由臺中、彰化與雲林等地高達201位地方漁民，委託法律扶助團體向行政院提起行政訴願，以爭取既有捕撈與航行權利。
綜觀國內海域使用衝突的相關研究中，多表明了離岸風場設置對於傳統漁業所造成的潛在時空影響；部分研究則從離岸風電政策與法制本身，探討制度安排的矛盾與法律基礎的不穩定，對於離岸風電開發的影響。儘管法律與政策事務學者試圖突顯法律與空間的聯繫，海域使用關係與衝突在這其中卻被化約為單純的法律問題，從而忽略了社會衝突中各行動者的主體性與社會權力結構。此外，當前國家公正轉型行動計畫亦指出離岸風電政策在權益關係人界定及其協助方面，仍有方法論或知識的缺口。因此，本研究透過法律地理學者Delaney (2010) 的規範圈理論回應上述議題，並以彰化風場與航道事件為個案，旨在探討彰化沿近海漁民主張的使用權利（捕撈與航行權利）如何與我國沿近海法律和空間相互構成？
本研究在個案研究之方法論選擇下，以彰化風場與航道事件為個案，並透過文件回顧、分析與深度訪談進行資料蒐集與分析。在研究結果上，本文指出擾動後的漁業使用面臨了高度重疊與複雜的規範痕跡重構，這將導致離岸風場與中、小型漁船（筏）之間的潛在衝突發生。此外，在國家能源轉型政策下，航業使用與漁業使用主管機關相繼在海域空間秩序重組下妥協，在話語競逐中落居下風，而不利於整體使用秩序之調和。因此，在離岸風場與航道內部的漁業使用，除了主管機關間的薄弱共識外，尚須倚靠漁民–漁會–風電廠商間的共識與默契，以及在規範技術人員的協助下透過法律程序得到體制上的回應。綜上所述，本研究詳述了海域使用衝突議題中法律與空間的關係性與行動者的主體性，補足國內相關研究之缺口。同時，於法律地理學取徑下拓展海洋場域應用，提供未來研究發展之可能。

Since 2016, the Taiwanese government has actively promoted energy transition policies, leading to disruptions for coastal and offshore fishermen in Changhua caused by offshore wind farms and channel. These developments have impacted fishermen’s rights to access and use marine resources. Previous research has largely overlooked the agency of stakeholders and the influence of social power structures in marine spatial conflicts. Moreover, the current National Just Transition Action Plan has acknowledged shortcomings in identifying stakeholders in offshore wind power policy. In response, this research adopts legal geographer Delaney’s (2010) theory of nomosphere to address these issues.
This research selects the Changhua offshore wind farm and channel as a case study, employing a qualitative methodology to collect and analysis soft data. The findings highlight that the wind farms-fishermen conflicts stem from overlapping nomospheric traces and fundamentally different relations to the sea. It also draws attention to the discursive contestations among actors in marine spatial conflicts—particularly the negotiations between government agencies; the informal consensus and tacit understandings between fishermen, fishery associations, and wind power developers; and the role of nomospheric technicians in navigating legal procedures. In sum, this research emphasizes the agency of actors in maritime spatial conflicts and extends the applicability of legal geography to the ocean.

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: University Press.
Benson, M. H. (2014). Rules of Engagement: The Spatiality of Judicial Review. In I. Braverman, N. Blomley, D. Delaney, & A. S. Kedar (Ed.), The expanding spaces of law : a timely legal geography (pp. 215–238). Stanford University Press.
Bennett, L., & Layard, A. (2015). Legal Geography: Becoming Spatial Detectives. Geography Compass, 9(7), 406–422.
Bennett, N. J., Blythe, J., White, C. S., & Campero, C. (2021). Blue growth and blue justice: Ten risks and solutions for the ocean economy. Marine Policy, 125, 104387.
Blomley, N. (1994). Law, Space, and the Geographies of Power. The Guilford Press.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.
Braverman, I., Blomley, N., Delaney, D., & Kedar, A. S. (2014). Introduction Expanding the Spaces of Law. In I. Braverman, N. Blomley, D. Delaney, & A. S. Kedar (Ed.), The expanding spaces of law : a timely legal geography (pp. 1–29). Stanford University Press.
Brinkmann, S. (2018). The Interview. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (5th ed.), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 997–1028). SAGE Publications.
Calyx, C., Jessup, B., & Sihombing, M. (2020). Asserting land rights through technology and democratic expression: the effect of the Indigenous Peoples Alliance of the Archipelago v Indonesia case. In T. O’Donnell, D. F. Robinson, & J. Gillespie (Ed.), Legal Geography: Perspectives and Methods (pp. 37–57). Routledge.
Carl, F. S. (1996). Book Reviews: NICHOLAS K. BLOMLEY, Law, Space, and the Geographies of Power. New York and London: The Guilford Press, 1994, 260 pp. Social & Legal Studies, 5(3), 445–447.
Chen, C. L. (2012). Unfinished business: Taiwan's experience with rights-based coastal fisheries management. Marine Policy, 36(5), 955–962.
Chung, H. S. (2021). Taiwan’s Offshore Wind Energy Policy: From Policy Dilemma to Sustainable Development. Sustainability, 13(18), 10465.
Delaney, D. (2010). Spatial, the Legal and the Pragmatics of World-Making: Nomospheric Investigations. Routledge.
Derman, B. B. (2020). Legal Geographies. In A. Kobayashi (7th ed.), International Encyclopedia of Human Geography (pp. 145–150). Elsevier.
Esteban, M. D., López-Gutiérrez, J. S., & Negro, V. (2022). Offshore Wind Power Basics. In T. M. Letcher (2nd ed.), Comprehensive Renewable Energy (pp. 430–462). Elsevier.
Fang, H. F. (2014). Wind energy potential assessment for the offshore areas of Taiwan west coast and Penghu Archipelago. Renewable Energy, 67, 237–241.
Gao, A. M. Z., Yeh, T. K., & Chen, J. S. (2022). An unjust and failed energy transition strategy Taiwan’s goal of becoming nuclear-free by 2025. Energy Strategy Reviews, 44, 100991.
Haggett, C., ten Brink, T., Russell, A., Roach, M., Firestone, J., Dalton, T., & McCay, B. J. (2020). OFFSHORE WIND PROJECTS AND FISHERIES: Conflict and Engagement in the United Kingdom and the United States. Oceanography, 33(4), 38–47.
Heffron, R. J. & McCauley, D. (2018). What is the ‘Just Transition’? Geoforum, 88, 74–77.
International Energy Agency (2022). World Energy Outlook 2022. International Energy Agency.
International Renewable Energy Agency (2023a). Renewable energy statistics 2023. International Renewable Energy Agency.
International Renewable Energy Agency (2023b). World Energy Transitions Outlook 2023: 1.5°C Pathway, 1, International Renewable Energy Agency.
Jan, S., Wang, J., Chern, C. S., & Chao, S. Y. (2002). Seasonal variation of the circulation in the Taiwan Strait. Journal of Marine Systems, 35(3–4), 249–268.
Kaldellis, J. K. & Boulogiorgou, D. (2022). Wind Energy Contribution in the Planet Energy Balance and Future Prospects. In T. M. Letcher (2nd ed.), Comprehensive Renewable Energy (pp. 13–44). Elsevier.
Kao, S. M. & Pearre, N. S. (2017). Administrative arrangement for offshore wind power developments in Taiwan: Challenges and prospects. Energy Policy, 109, 463–472.
Liang, W. D., Tang, T. Y., Yang, Y. J., Ko, M. T., & Chuang, W. S. (2003). Upper-ocean currents around Taiwan. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 50(6–7), 1085–1105.
Liao, H. R., & Yu, H. S. (2005). Morphology, Hydrodynamics and Sediment Characteristics of the Changyun Sand Ridge offshore Western Taiwan. Terrestrial Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, 16(3), 621–640.
McFarland, P. (2020). Ask an “expert”: phenomenology and key informant interviews as a research method in legal geography. In T. O’Donnell, D. F. Robinson, & J. Gillespie (Ed.), Legal Geography: Perspectives and Methods (pp. 185–198). Routledge.
Massey, D. (1992). Politics and space/time. New Left Review, 196, 65–84.
Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Morrissey, J. & Heidkamp, C. P. (2019). A transitions perspective on coastal sustainability. In C. P. Heidkamp, & J. Morrissey (Ed.), Towards Coastal Resilience and Sustainability (pp. 15–32). Routledge.
Ntona, M., & Schröder, M. (2020). Regulating oceanic imaginaries: the legal construction of space, identities, relations and epistemological hierarchies within marine spatial planning. Maritime Studies, 19, 241–254.
O’Donnell, T., Robinson, D. F., & Gillespie, J. (2020). An Australasian and Asia-Pacific approach to legal geography. In T. O’Donnell, D. F. Robinson, & J. Gillespie (Ed.), Legal Geography: Perspectives and Methods (pp. 3–15). Routledge.
Schwandt, T. A. & Gates, E. F. (2018). Case Study Methodology. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (5th ed.), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 600–630). SAGE Publications.
Sylvestre, M. E., Blomley, N., & Bellot, C. (2020). Law and Territory: A Legal Geography. In M. E. Sylvestre, N. Blomley, & C. Bellot (Ed.), Red Zones: Criminal Law and the Territorial Governance of Marginalized People (pp. 23–37). Cambridge University Press.
Tsai, H. H., Tseng, H. S., Huang, C. K, & Yu, S. C. (2022). Review on the Conflicts between Offshore Wind Power and Fishery Rights: Marine Spatial Planning in Taiwan. Energies, 15(22), 8768.
Tseng, H. S. & Kao, S. M. (2022). Conflicts between Fisheries and Offshore Wind Power in Taiwan: Legal and Administrative Prospects. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 10(11), 1745.
Van de Graaf, T. & Colgan, J. (2016). Global energy governance: a review and research agenda. Palgrave Communications, 2(1), 15047.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage.
Zhang, Y., Zhang, C., Chang, Y. C., Liu, W. H., & Zhang, Y. (2017). Offshore wind farm in marine spatial planning and the stakeholders engagement Opportunities and challenges for Taiwan. Ocean & Coastal Management, 149, 69–80.
行政院訴願委員會（2023）。行政院訴願決定書（院臺訴字第1125001123號、1125001158號、1125001162號、1125001168號訴願判決）。行政院訴願委員會。
交通部（2021）。航港局重申「彰化風場航道漁船無需提早8小時報到」。
交通部全球資訊網。擷取自：https://www.motc.gov.tw/ch/app/data/view?module=argue&id=1687&serno=202111050001。（2025年4月14日）
交通部航港局（2021）。彰化風場航道航行指南。交通部航港局。
呂欣怡（2020）。會議作為未來時間性的匯集與競逐—台灣離岸風電環評的民族誌分析。臺灣人類學刊，18(2)，79–128。
呂欣怡（2022）。從時間面向重思離岸風電與沿岸漁業的衝突。考古人類學刊，97，123–168。
呂欣怡、劉如意（2017）。離岸風力發電設置過程的社會爭議與化解機制。收錄於周桂田、張國輝（編），（能）怎麼轉：啟動臺灣能源轉型鑰匙（頁169–186）。臺大風險政策中心。
李秉芳（2017）。離岸風機環評大會闖關 環團、漁民百人抗議衝擊漁業生態。民報。擷取自：https://www.peoplemedia.tw/news/de5f7d49-8920-4b99-abb5-a03a0e963ab6。（2025年4月14日）
吳哲豪（2015）。抗議風力發電工程 80艘漁船集結。中央通訊社。擷取自： https://www.cna.com.tw/news/asoc/201507270319.aspx。（2025年4月14日）
林吉洋（2020）。「瘋」電滅漁！全台最大漁場北方三島遭風電圈地開發，北部眾漁會群起反彈，誓言反對到底。上下游新聞。擷取自：https://www.newsmarket.com.tw/blog/142062/。（2025年4月14日）
林吉洋（2024）。為能源開發沒收漁業權？專用漁業權新制點燃漁會不滿，漁業署：主張權利也須負擔責任。上下游新聞。擷取自：https://www.newsmarket.com.tw/blog/202274/。（2025年4月14日）
國家發展委員會（2023）。臺灣 2050 淨零轉型「公正轉型」關鍵戰略行動計畫。國家發展委員會。
國家發展委員會、行政院環境保護署、經濟部、科技部、交通部、內政部、行政院農業委員會、金融監督管理委員會（2022）。臺灣2050淨零排放路徑及策略總說明。國家發展委員會。
黃忠成（2010）。淺談依領海法所為公告事項及法律性質。海軍學術雙月刊，44(4)，114–126。
黃思敏（2021）。離岸風電區塊開發 經濟部預計5月中公告 漁業署：選址應離岸15公里。環境資訊中心。擷取自：https://e-info.org.tw/node/230720。（2025年4月14日）
黃異（2018）。漁業法。新學林。
經濟部（2023）。臺灣2050淨零轉型「風電/光電」關鍵戰略行動計畫(核定本)。經濟部。
經濟部能源局（2020）。能源轉型白皮書。經濟部能源局。
農業部漁業署（2019）。全國申請休漁獎勵金情形-依噸級別。農業部漁業署。擷取自：https://www.fa.gov.tw/view.php?theme=GIO_others&subtheme=&id=50。（2025年6月12日）
農業部漁業署（2024）。民國112年（2023）漁業統計年報。農業部漁業署。
漁民權益暨環境永續中心（2024）。台灣離岸風電與漁業聯絡指南建議。漁民權益暨環境永續中心。