簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 李祖翊
Yee, Lee Zcho
論文名稱: 配置計劃之系統方法
A SYSTEMATICS OF SUSTAINABLE SITEPLANNING
指導教授: 王明蘅
Wang, Ming-Hung
孔憲法
Kung, Shiann-Far
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 規劃與設計學院 - 建築學系
Department of Architecture
論文出版年: 2014
畢業學年度: 102
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 116
中文關鍵詞: 基地規劃永續發展類型管制設計法規範式開發方法圖層曡合法開放建築
外文關鍵詞: Site Planning, Sustainability, Type-based Design, Planned Development Methodology, Sieve Mapping, Open Building
相關次數: 點閱:171下載:3
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 「永續」是都市發展過程中之重要議題。本研究主要目的為針對開發計劃至基地規劃的整體操作過程提出一個友善、高效率、清晰且的系統方法。

    本研究的内容包含了大型與中型空間尺度的規劃課題。其中,在大型基地規劃使用了圖層疊合方法(Sieve Mapping)來創造注重環境敏感度的規劃方式,而中型基地規劃則運用類型管制設計法(Type-based Design) 與開放式建築(Open Building)來控制量體發展,同時利於計算以建築皮層生產的太陽能發電。此外,為了處理選擇與判斷的複雜性,本方法同時包含了質化與量化的決策技術。

    規劃方法由七個模組分成三階段所構成。初期的操作方法是處理較容易的數據為主,直至後期方法上則逐漸增加具創造性的專業操作。第一階段為基地選址評估,涵蓋三個模組:“發展計劃分析”、“可行性評估”和“適宜性評估”;第二階段為基地分析,由模組:“發展階段劃分”和“強度分佈”組成;第三階段則是基地設計與規劃,由“建築體量和規劃網格研究”以及“基地規劃”兩項模組組成。每個模組都涵括數個步驟與決策檢驗點,其内容基本上以流程圖表達。

    本研究最後選擇臺灣高雄橋頭新市鎮為基地進行示範。操作過程並非以解決特定基地問題為目標,而是藉著此示範來測試規劃方法的可行性。一個妥善的方法使整體規劃涵容更多可能性,以達成更好的都市發展。然而規劃者操作設計的能力、知識和經驗對利用該方法有顯著的影響,進而決定整體規劃最後呈現的水準與環境品質。

    Sustainability has been a crucial concern in urbanization. The purpose of the thesis research is to develop a planning methodology, which is a good and right way of transforming a development program into a sustainable siteplan. It is a user-friendly methodology that is efficient, almost transparent and systematically operable.

    The major contribution of the research is to setup connections between established methodologies of different scales to handle the processes between development intention and siteplan. Environmental sensitivity is emphasized through Sieve Mapping methodology in deciding appropriateness of the land use. Type-based Design and Open Building are implemented in medium scale siteplan making, to control good physical form of the environment, as well as to enable calculation of the photovoltaic envelope to generate solar renewable energy. Nevertheless, quantitative techniques are presented to handle the complexity in making planning decisions.

    The methodology is made up of seven modules and they are divided into three parts. The earlier parts are more rigid and mathematically oriented; and it becomes more flexible and creativity oriented in the later parts. Part 1 Site Selection is made up of “Program Analysis”, “Site Availability Evaluation”, and “Site Suitability Evaluation”; Part 2 Site Reading is made up of “Development Phasing” and “Intensity Division”; while Part 3 Design and Planning is made up of “Massing and Grid Development” and “Siteplan Making”. They are presented in the form of flow charts with the basic operational units of input, process and output.

    Demonstrations were performed on Qiao-tou, Kaohsiung with a supposition development program. Instead of solving any particular site issue, the purpose of this demonstration is to test the workability of procedures and processes in the designed methodology. A good planning methodology casts more possibilities to make a better siteplan, but the capability of planners to manipulate design, planning knowledge and experiences when utilizing the methodology plays a significant role, particularly in the later part, to decide the quality of the siteplan created.

    Abstract i 摘要 ii Acknowledgment iii Contents iv List of Figures vii List of Tables ix Chapter 1: Introduction 1 1.1: Scope and Context 2 1.2: Research Goals 3 1.2.1: Site Sensitive 3 1.2.2: Energy-Greening 4 1.2.3: Explicit Working Procedures 4 1.2.4: Modulated Operation 4 1.3: Literature Review 5 1.3.1: Planning 5 1.3.2: Type-based Design 7 1.3.3: Technical Supports 8 1.4: Limitations 9 1.4.1: Development Program 9 1.4.2: Site Issue 9 1.4.3: Group Planning Decision 9 Chapter 2: Methodology 10 2.1: Introduction 10 2.2: Organization of Methodology 11 2.3: Module 1 Program Analysis 13 2.4: Module 2 Site Availability Evaluation 14 2.5: Module 3 Site Suitability Evaluation 15 2.6: Module 4 Development Phasing 16 2.7: Module 5 Intensity Distribution 17 2.8: Module 6 Massing and Grid development 18 2.9: Module 7 Siteplan Making 19 Chapter 3: Demonstration Part 1 Site Selection 22 3.1: Demonstration Module 1 Program Analysis 22 3.1.1: Step 1.1 Target User Groups and Scenario 23 3.1.2: Step 1.2 Net Site Area 24 3.1.3: Step 1.3 Minimum Required Land Area 27 3.1.4: Checkpoint 1 28 3.2: Demonstration Module 2 Site Availability Evaluation 28 3.2.1: Step 2.1 Identify Critical Restriction Factors 29 3.2.2: Step 2.2 Mapping Critical Restricted Factors 31 3.2.3: Step 2.3 Site Availability Evaluation 34 3.2.4: Checkpoint 2 34 3.3: Demonstration Module 3 Site Suitability Evaluation 35 3.3.1: Step 3.1 Identify Site Values 35 3.3.2: Step 3.2 Mapping Site Values 37 3.3.3: Step 3.3 Ranking 39 3.3.4: Step 3.4 Weighting 41 3.3.5: Step 3.5 Scoring 43 3.3.6: Checkpoint 3 45 Chapter 4: Demonstration Part 2 Site Reading 46 4.1: Demonstration Module 4 Development Phasing 46 4.1.1: Step 4.1 Identify Phasing Factors 47 4.1.2: Step 4.2 Development Phasing with Qualitative Methodology 48 4.1.3: Step 4.2 Qualitative Development Phasing Methodology 49 4.1.4: Step 4.3 Quantitative Development Phasing Methodology 58 4.2: Demonstration Module 5 Intensity Distribution 59 4.2.1: Step 5.1 Scenario of Development Intensity 59 4.2.2: Step 5.2 Identify Intensity Distribution Factors 60 4.2.3: Step 5.3 Qualitative Methodology to Distribute Intensity 63 4.2.5: Step 5.4 Quantitative Methodology to Distribute Intensity 67 Chapter 5: Demonstration Part 3 Design and Planning 68 5.1: Demonstration Module 6 Massing and Grid Development 68 5.1.1: Step 6.1 Make Partial Sectors 69 5.1.2: Step 6.2 Section Analysis 75 5.1.3: Step 6.3 Zone Analysis 83 5.1.4: Step 6.4 Grid Modules and Grid Distribution 89 5.1.5: Step 6.5 Planning Grid System Capacity Evaluation 97 5.2: Demonstration Module 7 Siteplan Making 101 5.2.1: Step 7.1 Allocate Referral Planning Grid 101 5.2.2: Step 7.2 Make Siteplan Structure 104 5.2.3: Step 7.3 Allocate Massing into Site 106 5.2.4: Step 7.4 Siteplan Fine Tuning and Results Report 108 5.2.5: Checkpoint 4 111 Chapter 6: Conclusion 112 6.1: Achievement 112 6.2: Contribution 112 6.3: Limitation 113 6.4: Follow Up 113 References 114

    References:

    Alexander, C., et al. (1977). A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Bailey, J. (ed.). (1973). New Towns in America: The Design and Development Process. New York: Wiley.

    Beer, A.R. (1990). Environmental Planning for Site Development. New York: E.&F.N.Spon.

    Brown, G.Z. (1985). Sun, Wind, and Light: Architectural Design Strategies. John Wiley & Sons.

    Duany, A. & Speck, J. (Ed.). (2010). The Smart Growth Manual. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Duany, A., & Plater-Zyberk, E. (1992). Towns and Town-Making Principles. (2nd ed.). New York: Rizzoli.

    Duany, A., Plater-Zyberk, E., & Forman R.T.T. (2001). Suburban Nation: The Rise of Sprawl and the Decline of the American Dream. New York: North Point Press.

    Farr. D. (2008). Sustainable Urbanism: Urban Design with Nature. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Son.

    Grant, D.P. (1976). How to use an Alpha-beta Model for decision-making with multiple objectives. Design Methods and Theories, Vol. 10. No. 4, 200-211.

    Grant, D.P. (1976). How to use the method of Paired Comparisons: A systematic approach to the task of ranking things. Design Methods and Theories, Vol. 10, No 4, 212-218.

    Grant, D.P. (1977). How to weight objectives using The Churchman-Ackoff Method. Design Methods and Theories, Vol. 10, No 4, 219 -237.

    Habraken, N.J. (1981). The Grunsfeld Variations: A demonstration project on the coordination of a design team in urban design and architecture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Laboratory for Architecture and Planning.

    Habraken, N.J. (1998). The Structure of the Ordinary. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Habraken, N.J., Henk R. & Frans W. (1973). SAR 73, The Methodical Formulation of Agreements in the Design of Urban Tissues. Eindhoven: Stichting Architecten Research.

    Habraken, N.J., Joop, K. & John C. (1977). Deciding on Density: An investigation into high density, low rise, allotment for the Waldeck Area, The Hague. Eindhoven: Stichting Architecten Research.

    Howard, E. (1946). Garden Cities of To-Morrow. London: Faber and Faber.

    Jacobs, J. (1992). The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Vintage books. (Original work published 1961).

    Knowles, R.L. (1981). Sun Rhythm Form. Cambridge MA and London: MIT Press.

    LaGro, J.A. (2001). Site Analysis: Linking Program and Concept in Land Planning and Design. Toronto: John Wiley & Sons.

    Lynch, K. & Hack, G. (1984). Site Planning. (3rd Ed.) Cambridge MA and London: MIT Press.

    Lynch, K. (1960). The Image of the City. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Lynch, K. (1984). Good City Form. Cambridge MA and London: MIT Press.

    Marsh, W.M. (1978). Environmental analysis: For land use and site planning. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    McHarg, I.L. (1992). Design with Nature. New York: John Wiley & Sons. (Original work published 1969).

    McHarg, I.L. (2006). The Essential Ian McHarg: Writings on Design and Nature. Washington DC: Island Press

    Mohney, D. & Easterling, K. (Ed.). (1991). Seaside: Making a Town in America. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.

    Mutunayagam, N.B. & Bahrami, A. (1987). Cartography and Site Analysis with Microcomputers. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Olgyay, V. (1992). Design with Climate: Bioclimatic approach to architectural regionalism. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Parolek, D.G., Parolek, K. & Crawford, P.C., (2008). Form Based Codes: A Guide for Planners, Urban Designers, Municipalities, and Developers. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.

    Ward, S.V. (1992). The Garden City: Past, Present and Future. E.&F.N.Spon.

    Yeang, K. (1995). Designing with Nature: The Ecological basis for Architectural Design. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    歐文生等人(民97)。台灣太陽能設計用標準日射量之研究。建築學報。第64 期,103~118 頁。

    王明蘅 (民97)。衍異:開放住宅的系統設計。 臺北:建築與文化。

    羅運俊, 何辛年,王長貴 (民96)。陽能發電技術與應用。臺北:新文京。

    黃書禮 (民94)。生態土地使用規劃。 臺北:詹氏書局。(原著出版年﹕2000 年)

    SOURCES OF SITE DATA:

    Tseng, C.C. & Chang, N.B. (2001). Assessing relocation strategies of urban air quality monitoring stations by GA-based compromise programming. Environment International. Volume 26, Issues 7–8, June 2001, Pages 523–541.

    國土利用調查成果資訊網 (民101年5月下載)。內政部國土測繪中心。http://lui.nlsc.gov.tw/LUWeb

    李敏綺等人 (民101)。 橋頭區整體空間發展策略。未出版之統計數據。

    經濟部水利署水利規劃試驗所(民98)。典寶溪排水治理計畫。經濟部水利署。

    臺灣省農業實驗所(民88)。耕地土壤詳測。臺灣省農試所。

    下載圖示 校內:2016-02-11公開
    校外:2019-02-11公開
    QR CODE