簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 胡明熙
Hu, Ming-Hsi
論文名稱: 全動式翼前緣延伸功能研究
A study on the function of all moving leading edge extension
指導教授: 陳文立
Chen, Wen-Lih
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 工學院 - 航空太空工程學系
Department of Aeronautics & Astronautics
論文出版年: 2021
畢業學年度: 109
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 192
中文關鍵詞: SU-57全動式翼前緣延伸CFD 模擬高攻角
外文關鍵詞: SU-57, All moving leading edge root extension, CFD, High angle of attack
相關次數: 點閱:135下載:9
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 取得制空權為現今各個國家在戰爭狀態下的首要目標,為了達成此
    目的擁有性能優越的戰機是缺一不可的條件,而現今對於優越戰機的定
    義不外乎為具備隱形功能、能高速飛行,最重要的是還要具備優秀的機
    動性,為了提高機動性早期各國無不為自己所研發的戰機加入前置翼
    (Canard),如歐洲各國聯合研發的颱風戰機,法國的飆風戰機,俄羅斯的
    SU-33,美國的 HIMAT 計畫皆為前置翼的設計,但當戰鬥機發展到了第
    五代戰鬥機後,由於隱形功能這項指標,會增加雷達散射面的前置翼逐
    漸被翼前緣延伸(Leading Edge Extension,LEX)所取代,翼前緣延伸的設計本不能像前置翼一樣可以偏轉,但近期俄羅斯所研發的第五代戰鬥機
    SU-57 卻出現了第一個全動式翼前緣延伸,為了了解此部件的功能,本研
    究將針對SU-57在0.5馬赫下搭配不同攻角與全動式翼前緣延伸向下偏轉
    角進行流場現象的探討。
    本研究採用三維模型重建目標戰機之三維模型,並運用成本較低的
    CFD(Computational Fluid Dynamics)計算流體力學方法來模擬戰機在 0.5III馬赫下搭配不同攻角與全動式翼前緣延伸向下偏轉角的流場現象,其中使用 RANS(Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equation)雷諾平均納維-斯托克斯方程並搭配 Menter SST k-ω 紊流模型來進行模擬,網格部分則是使用六面體網格進行節點劃分。
    由於全動式翼前緣延伸在功能與作用方式上與前緣襟翼相同,因此
    全動式翼前緣延伸為一種前緣襟翼,且全動式翼前緣延伸主要被設計用
    來減少機身阻力與提高機身升阻比,當全動式翼前緣延伸在高攻角時隨
    著攻角的增加而更加向下偏轉,進而減少氣流分離的現象並提高高攻角
    飛行性能,此外由於全動式翼前緣延伸偏轉後也可提供顯著的低頭力矩,
    因此它還可以當作一控制面來控制整機的俯仰動作。

    SU-57 is the first aircraft designed with the AML (All Moving Leading Edge Root Extension). It means that it’s LERX (Leading Edge Root Extension) can deflect. Since AML can deflect its relatively large area, some engineers argue that AML is designed to function like a canard that is just blended into the fuselage. Others think that AML is functioning as a leading-edge flap because its deflection angle can be as large as that of a wing leading-edge flap.
    To understand the effects iduced by deflecting AML at difference angles of attack, in this study, a SU-57 Like model is designed with different deflection angles in the range from 0 to 15 degree, and angle of attack is set from 0 to 35 degree. A CFD software STARCCM+ is employed to conduct the investigation.
    The CFD results show that deflecting AML generally increases lift-to-drag ratio. At higher angle of attack, the flow on the upper surface remains attached with AML deflection. Thus, flow separation is prevented. This is the main reason for the aircraft generating higher lift under conditions of high angle of attack with the deployment of AML deflection.
    The results suggest that the AML behaves more like a leading-edge flap. More specifically, it can be regarded as a leading-edge flap for the fuselage because it makes the flow to reattach on the upper surface and significantly improve the lift-to-drag ratio of the V fuselage rather than the wing.

    摘要 II 誌謝 VIII 圖目錄 XII 表目錄 XX 符號說明 XXII 第 1 章 緒論 1 1.1 研究背景 1 1.2 文獻回顧 2 1.3 研究目的與動機 44 第 2 章 數學模型 46 2.1 統御方程式 46 2.2 雷諾平均納維-斯托克斯方程(RANS) 48 2.3 SST K-?紊流模型 51 第 3 章 研究方法 55 3.1 SU-57 55 3.1.1 計算流域與網格 57 3.1.2 邊界條件 59 3.2 F-16XL 驗證 60 3.2.1 計算流域與網格 62 3.2.2 邊界條件 64 3.3 運算公式 66 第 4 章 結果與討論 68 4.1 幾何模型介紹 68 4.1.1 SU-57 68 4.1.2 F-16XL 73 4.2 網格獨立性測試與驗證結果 75 4.2.1 SU-57 網格獨立性測試結果 75 4.2.2 F-16XL 驗證結果 76 4.2.3 18%-SCALE F-16XL 驗證結果 83 4.3 SU-57 模擬結果 84 4.3.1 未偏轉與偏轉 5 度 84 4.3.2 未偏轉與偏轉 10 度 111 4.3.3 未偏轉與偏轉 15 度 137 4.3.4 全動式翼前緣延伸功能探討 162 第 5 章 結論與未來展望 185 5.1 結論 185 5.2 未來展望 186 參考文獻 188

    [1] Orr Kelly, "Hornet: The Inside Story of the F/A-18,"Presidio Pr, 1990.

    [2] P. B. Earnshaw, J. A. Lawford, "Low-Speed Wind-Tunnel Series of Sharp-Edged Experiments on Delta Wings," A.R.C. R. & M 3424, 1964.

    [3] Edward C. Polhamus, "A Concept of the Vortex Lift of Sharp-Edge Delta Wings Based on A Leading-Edge-Suction Analogy," NASA TN D-3767, 1966.

    [4] William A. Moore, Gary E. Erickson, Dale J. Lorincz and Andrew M. Skow, "Effects of Forebody, Wing and Wing-Body-LEX Flowfields on High Angle of Attack Aerodynamics," SAE International, Vol. 88, Section 4: 790860–791108, pp. 3801-3825, 1998.

    [5] Michael J. Hemsch, James M. Luckring, "Connection Between Leading-Edge Sweep, Vortex Lift, and Vortex Strength for Delta Wings," Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 473-475, 1990.

    [6] Wentz W. H, McMahon M. C., "Further Experimental Investigations of Delta and Double-Delta Wing Flow Fields at Low Speeds," NASA CR-714, 1967.

    [7] Sychev V. V., "Three-Dimensional Hypersonic Gas Flow Past Slender Bodies at High Angles of Attack," Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics (USSR), Vol. 24, pp. 296-306, 1960.

    [8] Wentz W. H., Kohlman D. L., "Vortex Breakdown on Slender Sharp-Edged Wings," NASA CR 98737, 1968.

    [9] Edward C. Polhamus, Kenneth P. Spreemann, "Effect at High Subsonic Speed of Fuselage Forebody Strakes on the Static Stability and Vertical-Tail-Load Characteristics of A Complete Model Having A Delta Wing," NACA RM L57K15a, 1958.

    [10] William Green, Gordon Swanborough, "The Complete Book of Fighters," Salamander Books, 1994.

    [11] C. W. Smith, J. N. Ralston and H. W. Mann, "Aerodynamic of Forebody and Nose Strakes Based on F-16 Wind Tunnel Test Experience," NASA CR 3053, 1979.

    [12] Behrbohm Hermann, "Basic Low Speed Aerodynamics of the Short-Coupled Canard Configuration of Small Aspect Ratio," SAAB TN 60, 1965.

    [13] Blair B. Gloss, "The Effect of Canard Leading-Edge Sweep And Dihedral Angle on the Longitudinal and Lateral Aerodynamic Characteristics of A Close-Coupled Canard-Wing Configuration," NASA TN 0-7814, 1974.

    [14] David W. Lacey, "Aerodynamic Characteristics of the Close-Coupled Canard as Applied to Low-to-Moderate Swept Wings," DTNSRDC-79/001, 1979.

    [15] Matthew Robert Whiting, "Differential Canard Deflection for Generation of Yawing Moment on the X-31 With and Without the Vertical Tail," NASA-TM-111357, 1996.

    [16] Eugene L. Tu, "Effect of Canard Deflection on Close-Coupled Canard-Wing-Body Aerodynamics,"Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 138-145, 1994.

    [17] Sutrisno, Tri Agung Rohmat, Setyawan Bekti Wibowo and Sigit Iswahyudi, "Vortex Dynamics Study of the Canard Deflection Angles’ Influence on the Sukhoi Su-30-Like Model to Improve Stall Delays at High AoA," MDPI Journal of Aerospace, Vol. 6, Iss. 2, 2019.

    [18] Peter K. C. Rudolph, "High-Lift Systems on Commercial Subsonic Airliners," NASA CR 4746, 1996.

    [19] William P. Henderson, "Effects of Wing Leading-Edge Flap Deflections on Subsonic Longitudinal Aerodynamic Characteristics of a Wing-Fuselage Configuration With a 44∘ Swept Wing," NASA TP 135, 1978.

    [20] Rinoie K., "Low Speed Aerodynamic Characteristics of 60 degrees Rounded Leading-Edge Delta Wing with Vortex Flaps," Journal of Aircraf, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 37-44, 2000.

    [21] K. P. Nicholls, " Flap Systems on Supersonic Transport Aircraft," ICAS-96–4.4.4, 1996.

    [22] John E. Lamar, Clifford J. Obara and Bruce D. Fisher, "Flight, Wind-Tunnel, and Computational Fluid Dynamics Comparison for Cranked Arrow Wing (F-16XL-1) at Subsonic and Transonic Speeds," NASA TP-2001-210629, 2001.

    [23] Edwin L. Blosch, Brian R. Smith and Perry A. Wooden, "An Assessment of HPCMP CREATE-AV Kestrel for F-35 Aero/Performance Applications," AIAA 2015-0551, 2015.

    [24] Perry A. Wooden, Jeff J. Azevedo, "Use of CFD in Developing the JSF F-35 Outer Mold Lines," AIAA 2006-3663, 2006.

    [25] A. Burman, S. R. Mohan, "Improvement of High Alpha Aerodynamics for Compound Delta Wing Aircraft Using Leading Edge Vortex Controller," AIAA 2008-336, 2008.

    [26] Zhong Lei, Dong-Youn Kwak, "Numerical Investigation of Leading Edge Flap on Cranked Arrow Wing," AIAA 2005-5087, 2005.

    [27] Mingqian Chen, Peiqing Liu, Hao Guo and Qiulin Qu, "Effect of Sideslip on High-Angle-of-Attack Vortex Flow over Close-Coupled Canard Configuration," Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 53, No. 1, pp. 271-230, 2015.

    [28] F. R. Menter, "Two-Equation Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering Applications," AIAA Journal, Vol. 32, No. 8, pp. 1598-1605, 1994.

    [29] W. P. Jones, B. E. Launder, "The Prediction of Laminarization with A Two-Equation Model of Turbulence," Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, Vol. 15, pp. 301-314, 1972.

    [30] D. C. Wilcox, "Formulation of the k-omega Turbulence Model Revisited," AIAA Journal, Vol. 46, No.11, pp. 2823-2838, 2008.

    [31] David E. Hahne, "Low-Speed Aerodynamic Data for an 0.18-Scale Model of an F-16XL With Various Leading-Edge Modifications," NASA TM-1999-209703, 1999.

    [32] U.S. Standard Atmosphere 1976, U.S. Government Printing Office, 1976.

    [33] Luckring J. M., Hummel D., "What Was Learned from the New VFE-2 Experiments," AIAA 2008-383, 2008.

    [34] Chu J., Luckring J. M., "Experimental Surface Pressure Data Obtained on Delta Wing Across Reynolds Number and Mach Number Ranges," NASA TM-4645, 1996

    [35] https://www.boldmethod.com/learn-to-fly/aircraft-systems/canards/

    [36] https://napoleon130.tripod.com/id591.html

    下載圖示 校內:2023-12-31公開
    校外:2023-12-31公開
    QR CODE