簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 黃貞慈
Huang, Jhen-Cih
論文名稱: 漸進式不平穩平面之軀幹運動對亞急性中風病患之平衡及功能性結果之效益探討:雙盲隨機對照試驗
Effects of progressive unstable surface trunk exercises on balance and functional outcomes in sub-acute stroke patients: a double-blind randomized controlled trial
指導教授: 林桑伊
Lin, Sang-I
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 醫學院 - 物理治療學系
Department of Physical Therapy
論文出版年: 2019
畢業學年度: 107
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 75
中文關鍵詞: 軀幹運動不平穩平面中風軀幹控制平衡
外文關鍵詞: Trunk exercise, Unstable surface, Stroke, Trunk control, Balance
相關次數: 點閱:62下載:2
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 研究背景與目的:中風患者常有軀幹控制受損的問題而使平衡能力受損。雖有研究利用不平穩平面來訓練中風病患的軀幹控制,但其成效仍不明確。本實驗旨在探討在不平穩平面上進行軀幹控制運動對於亞急性中風病患的軀幹控制、坐姿平衡、站姿平衡以及行走能力會有何種影響。
    研究方法:本篇為雙盲隨機對照試驗,收取27位亞急性中風患者,受試者隨機分配到實驗組 (14名) 或控制組 (13名)。實驗組接受每回30分鐘、一周兩回、總長六周的不平穩平面軀幹運動,而控制組則是接受相同訓練時間的上肢活動訓練。首先利用傅格-梅爾下肢評估量表(Fugl-Meyer Assessment of lower limb)、手握力測試以及足底感覺閾值評估則用來測量受試者感覺動作功能,並使用測力板擷取受試者壓力中心之數值以偵測軀幹控制能力(坐姿且雙腳懸空)、坐姿平衡(坐姿且雙腳著地)以及站姿平衡 (站姿)表現,一種姿勢中各包含五種任務,分別為靜止狀態下張眼或閉眼、軀幹傾向患側邊或向前,以及健側手臂快速高舉過頭等任務。同時,也利用軀幹損傷量表 (Trunk Impairment Scale) 以及中風復健動作評估量表(Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement) 兩種臨床量表來測量受試者軀幹以及肢體的動作功能。另外,採用六公尺行走測試用來測試受試者行走能力。統計方面,在組間比較使用曼惠二氏U檢定法觀察組間前測及後測有無顯著差異,組內比較使用雙樣本中位數差異檢定來檢測組內在介入前後是否有顯著差異。
    結果:在壓力中心方面,在坐姿且雙腳懸空的姿勢下做靜止維持張眼的任務時,實驗組在後測相較於控制組有顯著更小的壓力中心擺盪面積以及顯著更小的壓力中心前後擺盪範圍,實驗組在同一姿勢下的軀幹前傾及向患側傾之距離在後測皆顯著的高於控制組,在非患測手高舉過頭的任務也發現實驗組在後測時手舉速度顯著高於控制組。在坐姿且雙腳著地的姿勢下,兩組之間在後測沒有顯著的差異。在站姿時,實驗組的軀幹前傾及向患側傾之距離在後測皆顯著高於控制組,且實驗組在後測時,其非患側手高舉任務之手舉速度也顯著高於控制組。在六公尺行走測試中,實驗組相較於控制組在後測顯著地花費更少時間即能完成測試。在軀幹損傷量表以及中風復健動作評估量表評估中,兩組在後測無發現顯著的組間差異。
    結論:在不平穩平面上進行軀幹控制運動對於促進亞急性中風病人在靜態、動態以及自發動作情況下之軀幹控制能力是有益的,同時也可以促進中風病人在動態以及自發動作情況之站立平衡以及行走功能。此種運動可以被運用在中風病患日常的復健療程當中,以促進他們的軀幹控制、站立平衡以及行走能力。

    Introduction: Impaired trunk control is common in stroke patients, and may affect balance function. Unstable surface has been reported to be used in trunk control training for stroke patients; however, its effects are still unclear. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of trunk exercise on unstable surface on trunk control ability in stroke patients, and investigate whether this exercise could also improve sitting balance, standing balance and walking ability of subacute stroke patients.
    Methods: This was a double blind study. A total of 27 sub-acute stroke patients were randomly assigned to the experimental group (n = 14) or control group (n = 13). The experimental group received 30 minutes per session, 2 sessions per week for a total of 6 weeks of trunk control exercise on unstable surfaces, while the control group received upper extremities exercises for the same amount of time. Force plates were used to obtain and calculate the center of pressure (COP) to investigate trunk control ability (sitting dangling), sitting balance (sitting with feet supported) and standing (standing balance). There were 5 tasks in each posture, including static tasks with eyes open or closed, leaning to the affected side or forward, and the unaffected arm rising upward. The Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS) and Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement (STREAM) were used to assess trunk and limbs’ motor function. The 6 meters walking test was used to assess walking ability, and the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of lower limb, hand grip strength test and cutaneous sensation assessments were used to assess sensorimotor function. The between-group comparisons were made using Mann-Whitney U test, while the Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to analyze the within group differences.
    Result: In the force plates assessments, during sitting dangling, the experimental group had significantly smaller COP sway area and anterior-posterior (AP) range than the control group while sitting static with eyes open after exercise. Significant greater trunk leaning distance and increased velocity of the unaffected arm raised were found in the experimental group during leaning tasks and arm raising task after exercise, compared to the control group. During sitting with feet supported, no significant differences between the experimental group and the control group were found after exercise. During standing, significantly greater trunk leaning distance and increased velocity of the unaffected arm raised were found in the experimental group after exercise, compared to the control group. What is more, the experimental group took significantly less time than the control group in 6 meters walking test after training. There were no significant differences in TIS and STREAM scales after training for the both group.
    Conclusion: Trunk control exercise on unstable surface was beneficial for improving trunk control ability under static, dynamic, and self-initiated movement conditions. Also, it could improve standing balance under dynamic and self-initiated movement conditions and walking ability in sub-acute stroke patients. We recommended this exercise protocol to be implemented in stroke patients’ rehabilitation program to improve their balance and walking ability.

    Contents Abstract................................................I 中文摘要...............................................III 致謝....................................................V List of tables.......................................VIII List of figures........................................IX Chapter 1. Introduction.................................1 1.1. Overview........................................1 1.2. Definition, epidemiology and impact of stroke...1 1.3 Trunk control and balance ability in stroke patients................................................2 1.3.1 Introduction of trunk control...................3 1.3.2 Impaired trunk control post stroke..............4 1.3.3 Relationship between trunk control and balance ability in stroke.......................................5 1.4. Trunk exercise in stroke rehabilitation.........6 1.5. Mechanisms of trunk exercise on unstable surface. ........................................................7 1.6. Measurements of trunk performance and balance ability after trunk exercises...........................8 1.6.1 Clinical measures of trunk control..............9 1.6.2 Biomechanical measurements.....................10 1.7. Conclusion.....................................10 Chapter 2. Research Designs and Methodology............12 2.1 The Setting .......................................12 2.2 Research Design....................................12 2.3 Participants.......................................12 2.4 Procedure..........................................13 2.5 Training program...................................14 2.6 Assessments........................................19 2.6.1 Trunk control and balance tasks on the force plate .......................................................19 2.6.2 Trunk and limbs motor function assessment with clinical scales........................................22 2.6.3 Sensorimotor functions and walking ability.......23 2.7 Instrumentation....................................27 2.8 Data reduction.....................................27 2.9 Statistical analysis...............................31 Chapter 3. Results.....................................32 3.1 Sensorimotor function..............................32 3.2 Tasks performance during sitting dangling position with COP analysis......................................35 3.3 Tasks performance during sitting with feet supported position with COP analysis.............................41 3.4 Tasks performance during standing position with COP analysis...............................................46 3.5 Walking ability of the subjects....................52 3.6 Trunk and limbs motor function assessment with clinical scales:.......................................53 Chapter 4. Discussion..................................55 Chapter 5. Conclusion..................................59 Reference..............................................60 Appendix...............................................67 1.Trunk Impairment Scale ..............................67 2.Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement (STREAM) .......................................................70 3.Brunnstrom Motor Stage Assessment of Lower Limb .......................................................72 4.Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Lower Limb..................73 5.Modified Ashworth Scale for grading spasticity.......75

    Reference
    1. Susan, B.O. and T.J.S. Sullivan, Physical rehabilitation. 2007: Fifth edition. Philadelphia : F.A. Davis, 2007. p.645-646.
    2. Pereira, S., et al., Anticipatory postural adjustments during sitting reach movement in post-stroke subjects. J Electromyogr Kinesiol, 2014. 24(1): p. 165-71.
    3. Cause-of-Death Statistics 2017 https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/DOS/cp-3960-41756-113.html.
    4. Morgenstern, L.B., et al., Guidelines for the management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke, 2010. 41(9): p. 2108-2129.
    5. Forster, A. and J. Young, Incidence and consequences of falls due to stroke: a systematic inquiry. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 1995. 311(6997): p. 83-86.
    6. Chae, J., R.D. Zorowitz, and M.V. Johnston, Functional outcome of hemorrhagic and nonhemorrhagic stroke patients after in-patient rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 1996. 75(3): p. 177-82.
    7. Kelly, P.J., et al., Functional recovery following rehabilitation after hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2003. 84(7): p. 968-72.
    8. Lin, H.-C., et al., Urbanization and Stroke Prevalence in Taiwan: Analysis of a Nationwide Survey. Journal of Urban Health : Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 2007. 84(4): p. 604-614.
    9. Gillen, G., Stroke rehabilitation: A function-based approach (4th ed.). 2015, St. Louis: Mosby/Elsevier. 398.
    10. Tyson, S.F., et al., Balance disability after stroke. Phys Ther, 2006. 86(1): p. 30-8.
    11. Vincent-Onabajo, G., H.Y. Musa, and E. Joseph, Prevalence of Balance Impairment Among Stroke Survivors Undergoing Neurorehabilitation in Nigeria. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2018. 27(12): p. 3487-3492.
    12. Harris, J.E., et al., Relationship of Balance and Mobility to Fall Incidence in People With Chronic Stroke. Physical Therapy, 2005. 85(2): p. 150-158.
    13. Shumway-Cook, A., Motor control : theory and practical applications. 2001: Second edition. Philadelphia : Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, [2001] ©2001.
    14. Hamrin, E., et al., Muscle strength and balance in post-stroke patients. Ups J Med Sci, 1982. 87(1): p. 11-26.
    15. de Oliveira, C.B., et al., Balance control in hemiparetic stroke patients: main tools for evaluation. J Rehabil Res Dev, 2008. 45(8): p. 1215-26.
    16. Garland, S.J., T.J. Stevenson, and T. Ivanova, Postural responses to unilateral arm perturbation in young, elderly, and hemiplegic subjects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1997. 78(10): p. 1072-7.
    17. Acasio, J.C., et al., Associations between trunk postural control in walking and unstable sitting at various levels of task demand. J Biomech, 2018. 75: p. 181-185.
    18. Dickstein, R., et al., Anticipatory postural adjustment in selected trunk muscles in post stroke hemiparetic patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2004. 85(2): p. 261-7.
    19. Borghuis, J., A.L. Hof, and K.A. Lemmink, The importance of sensory-motor control in providing core stability: implications for measurement and training. Sports Med, 2008. 38(11): p. 893-916.
    20. Karatas, M., et al., Trunk muscle strength in relation to balance and functional disability in unihemispheric stroke patients. Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 2004. 83(2): p. 81-7.
    21. Cabanas-Valdes, R., G.U. Cuchi, and C. Bagur-Calafat, Trunk training exercises approaches for improving trunk performance and functional sitting balance in patients with stroke: a systematic review. NeuroRehabilitation, 2013. 33(4): p. 575-92.
    22. Bohannon, R.W., D. Cassidy, and S. Walsh, Trunk muscle strength is impaired multidirectionally after stroke. Clinical Rehabilitation, 1995. 9(1): p. 47-51.
    23. Bohannon, R.W., Lateral trunk flexion strength: impairment, measurement reliability and implications following unilateral brain lesion. Int J Rehabil Res, 1992. 15(3): p. 249-51.
    24. Ryerson, S., et al., Altered trunk position sense and its relation to balance functions in people post-stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther, 2008. 32(1): p. 14-20.
    25. Esparza, D.Y., et al., Hemispheric specialization in the co-ordination of arm and trunk movements during pointing in patients with unilateral brain damage. Exp Brain Res, 2003. 148(4): p. 488-97.
    26. Cirstea, M.C. and M.F. Levin, Compensatory strategies for reaching in stroke. Brain, 2000. 123 ( Pt 5): p. 940-53.
    27. Perlmutter, S., F. Lin, and M. Makhsous, Quantitative analysis of static sitting posture in chronic stroke. Gait Posture, 2010. 32(1): p. 53-6.
    28. van Nes, I.J., et al., Posturographic assessment of sitting balance recovery in the subacute phase of stroke. Gait Posture, 2008. 28(3): p. 507-12.
    29. Jijimol, G., R.K. Fayaz, and P.V. Vijesh, Correlation of trunk impairment with balance in patients with chronic stroke. NeuroRehabilitation, 2013. 32(2): p. 323-5.
    30. Howe, T.E., et al., Lateral weight transference exercises following acute stroke: a preliminary study of clinical effectiveness. Clin Rehabil, 2005. 19(1): p. 45-53.
    31. Campbell, G.B. and J.T. Matthews, An integrative review of factors associated with falls during post-stroke rehabilitation. J Nurs Scholarsh, 2010. 42(4): p. 395-404.
    32. Behm, D.G., K. Anderson, and R.S. Curnew, Muscle force and activation under stable and unstable conditions. J Strength Cond Res, 2002. 16(3): p. 416-22.
    33. Au-Yeung, S.S., Does weight-shifting exercise improve postural symmetry in sitting in people with hemiplegia? Brain Inj, 2003. 17(9): p. 789-97.
    34. Dean, C.M. and R.B. Shepherd, Task-related training improves performance of seated reaching tasks after stroke. A randomized controlled trial. Stroke, 1997. 28(4): p. 722-8.
    35. Mudie, M.H., et al., Training symmetry of weight distribution after stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study comparing task-related reach, Bobath and feedback training approaches. Clin Rehabil, 2002. 16(6): p. 582-92.
    36. Verheyden, G., et al., Additional exercises improve trunk performance after stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 2009. 23(3): p. 281-6.
    37. Saeys, W., et al., Randomized controlled trial of truncal exercises early after stroke to improve balance and mobility. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 2012. 26(3): p. 231-8.
    38. Kumar, A., Effect of trunk control retraining in hemiparetic patients with postural disturbances. Indian Journal of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, 2010. 4(2): p. 6-9.
    39. Seo, D.K., et al., The Effect of Trunk Stabilization Exercise on the Thickness of the Deep Abdominal Muscles and Balance in Patients with Chronic Stroke. Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 2012. 24(2): p. 181-185.
    40. Lee, Y., et al., The Effect of Dual Motor Task Training while Sitting on Trunk Control Ability and Balance of Patients with Chronic Stroke. Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 2012. 24(4): p. 345-349.
    41. Pollock, A.S., et al., The effect of independent practice of motor tasks by stroke patients: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil, 2002. 16(5): p. 473-80.
    42. Haruyama, K., M. Kawakami, and T. Otsuka, Effect of Core Stability Training on Trunk Function, Standing Balance, and Mobility in Stroke Patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 2017. 31(3): p. 240-249.
    43. Karthikbabu, S., et al., Comparison of physio ball and plinth trunk exercises regimens on trunk control and functional balance in patients with acute stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil, 2011. 25(8): p. 709-19.
    44. Behm, D.G., Neuromuscular Implications and Applications of Resistance Training. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 1995. 9(4): p. 264-274.
    45. Rutherford, O.M. and D.A. Jones, The role of learning and coordination in strength training. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol, 1986. 55(1): p. 100-5.
    46. Vera-Garcia, F.J., S.G. Grenier, and S.M. McGill, Abdominal muscle response during curl-ups on both stable and labile surfaces. Phys Ther, 2000. 80(6): p. 564-9.
    47. Cosio-Lima, L.M., et al., Effects of physioball and conventional floor exercises on early phase adaptations in back and abdominal core stability and balance in women. J Strength Cond Res, 2003. 17(4): p. 721-5.
    48. Park, J.H. and G. Hwangbo, The effect of trunk stabilization exercises using a sling on the balance of patients with hemiplegia. J Phys Ther Sci, 2014. 26(2): p. 219-21.
    49. Lee, J.S. and H.G. Lee, Effects of sling exercise therapy on trunk muscle activation and balance in chronic hemiplegic patients. J Phys Ther Sci, 2014. 26(5): p. 655-9.
    50. Bae, S.H., et al., Effects of Trunk Stabilization Exercises on Different Support Surfaces on the Cross-sectional Area of the Trunk Muscles and Balance Ability. J Phys Ther Sci, 2013. 25(6): p. 741-5.
    51. Jung, K.S., H.Y. Cho, and T.S. In, Trunk exercises performed on an unstable surface improve trunk muscle activation, postural control, and gait speed in patients with stroke. J Phys Ther Sci, 2016. 28(3): p. 940-4.
    52. Ibrahimi, N., H. Singh, and M. Maurya, Effect of sitting balance training under varied sensory input on balance and quality of life in stroke patients. Indian J Physiother Occup Ther, 2010. 4: p. 40–45.
    53. Van Criekinge, T., et al., Are unstable support surfaces superior to stable support surfaces during trunk rehabilitation after stroke? A systematic review. Disabil Rehabil, 2018. 40(17): p. 1981-1988.
    54. Li, Z., et al., Reliability and validity of center of pressure measures for balance assessment in older adults. Journal of physical therapy science, 2016. 28(4): p. 1364-1367.
    55. Collin, C. and D. Wade, Assessing motor impairment after stroke: a pilot reliability study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 1990. 53(7): p. 576-9.
    56. Ahmed, S., et al., The Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement (STREAM): a comparison with other measures used to evaluate effects of stroke and rehabilitation. Phys Ther, 2003. 83(7): p. 617-30.
    57. Verheyden, G., et al., The Trunk Impairment Scale: a new tool to measure motor impairment of the trunk after stroke. Clin Rehabil, 2004. 18(3): p. 326-34.
    58. Andersson, A.G., A. Seiger, and P. Appelros, Hip fractures in persons with stroke. Stroke research and treatment, 2013. 2013: p. 954279-954279.
    59. Bohannon, R.W. and P.A. Larkin, Lower extremity weight bearing under various standing conditions in independently ambulatory patients with hemiparesis. Phys Ther, 1985. 65(9): p. 1323-5.
    60. Schinkel-Ivy, A., J.S. Wong, and A. Mansfield, Balance Confidence Is Related to Features of Balance and Gait in Individuals with Chronic Stroke. Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association, 2017. 26(2): p. 237-245.
    61. Haruyama, K., M. Kawakami, and T. Otsuka, Effect of Core Stability Training on Trunk Function, Standing Balance, and Mobility in Stroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 2016. 31(3): p. 240-249.
    62. Cabanas-Valdes, R., et al., The effect of additional core stability exercises on improving dynamic sitting balance and trunk control for subacute stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil, 2016. 30(10): p. 1024-1033.
    63. Genthon, N., et al., Biomechanical assessment of the sitting posture maintenance in patients with stroke. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 2007. 22(9): p. 1024-9.
    64. Wang, C.H., et al., Inter-rater reliability and validity of the stroke rehabilitation assessment of movement (stream) instrument. J Rehabil Med, 2002. 34(1): p. 20-4.
    65. Gladstone, D.J., C.J. Danells, and S.E. Black, The fugl-meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 2002. 16(3): p. 232-40.
    66. Twitchell TE. The restoration of motor function following hemiplegia in man. Brain. 1951 Dec 1;74(4):443-80.
    67. Chen KL, Chen CT, Chou YT, et al.: Is the long form of the Fugl-Meyer Motor Scale more responsive than the short form in patients with wtroke? Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2014, Advance online publication.
    68. Hiengkaew, V., K. Jitaree, and P. Chaiyawat, Minimal detectable changes of the Berg Balance Scale, Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale, Timed "Up & Go" Test, gait speeds, and 2-minute walk test in individuals with chronic stroke with different degrees of ankle plantarflexor tone. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2012. 93(7): p. 1201-8.
    69. Shechtman, O., et al., Grip strength in the frail elderly. Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 2004. 83(11): p. 819-26.
    70. Rantanen, T., et al., Handgrip strength and cause-specific and total mortality in older disabled women: exploring the mechanism. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2003. 51(5): p. 636-41.
    71. Bohannon, R.W. and M.B. Smith, Interrater Reliability of a Modified Ashworth Scale of Muscle Spasticity. Physical Therapy, 1987. 67(2): p. 206-207.
    72. Tan, L.S., The clinical use of the 10g monofilament and its limitations: a review. Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 2010. 90(1): p. 1-7.
    73. Lam, H.S., et al., The validity and reliability of a 6-Metre Timed Walk for the functional assessment of patients with stroke. Physiother Theory Pract, 2010. 26(4): p. 251-5.
    74. Carpes, F.P., F.B. Reinehr, and C.B. Mota, Effects of a program for trunk strength and stability on pain, low back and pelvis kinematics, and body balance: a pilot study. J Bodyw Mov Ther, 2008. 12(1): p. 22-30.
    75. Wu, M., et al., Trunk exercise using the Swiss ball improves the functional balance and walking of stroke patients in the early stages of recovery. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 2018. 61: p. e206-e207.
    76. Lee, W.A., Anticipatory control of postural and task muscles during rapid arm flexion. J Mot Behav, 1980. 12(3): p. 185-96.
    77. Benvenuti, F., et al., Flexibility of anticipatory postural adjustments revealed by self-paced and reaction-time arm movements. Brain Res, 1997. 761(1): p. 59-70.
    78. Stevenson, T.J. and S.J. Garland, Standing balance during internally produced perturbations in subjects with hemiplegia: validation of the balance scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1996. 77(7): p. 656-62.
    79. Geurts, A.C.H., et al., A review of standing balance recovery from stroke. Gait & Posture, 2005. 22(3): p. 267-281.
    80. Rajachandrakumar, R., et al., Atypical anticipatory postural adjustments during gait initiation among individuals with sub-acute stroke. Gait Posture, 2017. 52: p. 325-331.
    81. van Meulen, F.B., et al., Analysis of Balance during Functional Walking in Stroke Survivors. PloS one, 2016. 11(11): p. e0166789-e0166789.
    82. Verheyden, G., et al., Time course of trunk, arm, leg, and functional recovery after ischemic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 2008. 22(2): p. 173-9.
    83. Kantor, E., et al., Does body stability depend on postural chain mobility or stability area? Neurosci Lett, 2001. 308(2): p. 128-32.
    84. Maurer, C. and R.J. Peterka, A new interpretation of spontaneous sway measures based on a simple model of human postural control. J Neurophysiol, 2005. 93(1): p. 189-200.
    85. Thrasher, T.A., et al., Responses of the trunk to multidirectional perturbations during unsupported sitting in normal adults. J Appl Biomech, 2010. 26(3): p. 332-40.
    86. Vette, A.H., et al., Posturographic measures in healthy young adults during quiet sitting in comparison with quiet standing. Med Eng Phys, 2010. 32(1): p. 32-8.
    87. Verheyden, G., et al., Discriminant ability of the Trunk Impairment Scale: A comparison between stroke patients and healthy individuals. Disabil Rehabil, 2005. 27(17): p. 1023-8.
    88. Winter, D.A., Human balance and posture control during standing and walking. Gait & Posture, 1995. 3(4): p. 193-214.
    89. Park, E.Y. and Y.I. Choi, Psychometric Properties of the Lower Extremity Subscale of the Fugl-Myer Assessment for Community-dwelling Hemiplegic Stroke Patients. J Phys Ther Sci, 2014. 26(11): p. 1775-7.

    下載圖示 校內:2024-08-29公開
    校外:2024-08-29公開
    QR CODE