簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 黃子涵
Huang, Tzu-Han
論文名稱: 台灣校舍綠簾系統對PM₂.₅ 濃度改善之效果
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Reducing PM₂.₅ Levels by Green Curtain System at Schools in Taiwan
指導教授: 蔡耀賢
Tsay, Yaw-Shyan
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 規劃與設計學院 - 建築學系
Department of Architecture
論文出版年: 2025
畢業學年度: 113
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 103
中文關鍵詞: 立體綠化 、校園綠化 、CFD 、PM₂.₅ 、Nature-Based Solutions
外文關鍵詞: CFD, Particle Matter, Nature-Based Solutions, Vertical Greenery, School Greening
相關次數: 點閱:127  下載:0 
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 臺灣冬季受東北季風影響,PM₂.₅ 高濃度事件頻繁,對校園師生健康構成潛在威脅。本研究旨在探討綠簾系統(Green Curtain System, GCS)作為校園PM₂.₅ 濃度改善的自然解決方案之效益,並提出其於臺灣校舍環境的合適配置策略 。
    研究方法首重建立一個可信的GCS對於PM₂.₅ 吸附之物理模型,此模型透過計算流體力學(CFD)數值模擬,並結合前期於成功大學六樓陽台實測的風速及PM₂.₅ 濃度數據進行比對與驗證。此驗證模型進一步整合了植栽對氣流的阻力效應與污染物沉積機制,確保模擬的物理合理性。
    接著運用此模型針對臺灣地區常見的三種圍塑型國小校舍(Type A、B、C)進行模擬分析,深入探討建築中庭的高寬比以及主導風向對綠簾PM₂.₅ 吸附效率的影響。模擬結果指出,H/L比與綠簾安裝樓層及建築物座向為影響PM₂.₅ 吸附效率的主要因子。當H/L比小於0.2時,校舍中庭較為開闊,氣流可直接穿透,故綠簾安裝於迎風面可直接攔截外部PM₂.₅ ,效益較佳;而當H/L比大於0.2時,狹窄中庭易形成氣流回流或滯留區,導致PM₂.₅ 於背風側累積,此時綠簾設置於背風側高樓層的減緩效益最為顯著。此外,多中庭校舍在H/L值較高時,其吸附效益隨之提升,且後棟相較前棟吸附效果更佳。
    研究亦進一步選取臺北、臺中、臺南、高雄四所實際國小案例進行應用模擬,評估綠簾在不同方位、樓層與綠覆率下的實際防護效益。案例分析證實,綠簾系統能有效降低校園PM₂.₅ 濃度,尤其在高背景濃度地區,儘管達到WHO標準的空間比例較低,但其PM₂.₅ 吸附量仍具顯著的改善效益,研究亦發現,對於H/L比高的校舍,即使降低綠簾覆蓋率,PM₂.₅ 吸附效益的減損幅度也相對平緩,提供了成本效益的考量彈性。
    本研究確立了GCS作為校園空氣品質改善的有效策略,並提供了基於CFD模擬的具體設計建議,研究成果可作為未來校園規劃參考,協助依據各地氣候條件、建築形態及風場特性佈設綠簾系統,以營造更為健康、環境友善且可永續發展的學習環境 。

    Taiwan often experiences elevated PM₂.₅ levels during winter due to the northeast monsoon, posing health risks to students and staff in school environments. To address this issue, this study adopts Green Curtain Systems (GCS) as a Nature-based Solution. A reliable plant adsorption model was developed by combining Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations with field measurements.
    Wind speed, wind direction, and PM₂.₅ concentration data were collected from a sixth-floor balcony at National Cheng Kung University over multiple seasons. These data were used to construct and validate the CFD-based plant adsorption model. The validated model was then applied to simulate typical enclosed elementary school buildings in Taiwan. The analysis focused on how height-to-length (H/L) ratios, building orientations, and prevailing wind directions affect the performance of GCS.
    Results showed that both the H/L ratio and the placement of GCS relative to wind direction were key factors influencing PM₂.₅ removal efficiency. Installing GCS on upper floors facing the leeward side achieved the best results due to airflow separation within the courtyard. Overall, the analysis demonstrated that GCS can effectively improve air quality when adjusted to local environmental conditions. This study suggests that future school planning should consider wind patterns and building form when deploying GCS to improve healthy and environmental quality.

    第一章 緒論1 1-1 研究背景與動機1 1-3 研究範圍與流程3 第二章 文獻回顧與相關理論5 2-1 都市綠化與生態環境5 2-2 陽台綠化與懸浮微粒污染9 2-3 校園綠化與環境教育12 第三章 研究方法14 3-1 實驗場域及環境因子量測14 3-2 CFD數值模擬理論 16 3-3 模型驗證與誤差分析30 第四章 綠簾於校舍效益影響因子35 4-1校舍類型歸納35 4-2基本校舍模擬39 4-3影響因子分析47 第五章 校舍案例模擬與應用48 5-1 校舍案例選定 48 5-2 環境資料分析 50 5-3模擬結果與設計決策52 第六章 結論與建議69 6-1研究結果討論69 6-2研究限制71 6-3後續研究建議72 參考文獻73 附錄一78

    1. 謝昀昊(2016)。陽台立面綠化對室內熱環境與能耗改善之評估─以臺南地區為例。國立成功大學
    2. 陳庭萱(2023)。陽台綠簾系統改善熱環境及懸浮微粒之研究。國立成功大學
    3. 內政部建築研究所(2014)。《屋頂綠化技術手冊》。內政部建築研究所
    4. 教育部 《校園樹木植栽及養護手冊》
    5. 行政院教育部(2019)。《國民小學及國民中學設施設備基準》。行政院公報,第25卷,第138期。
    6. 林建勳 (2017) 。金屬擴張網應用於陽台綠化之系統開發 。國立成功大學
    7. 王惠君, & 張藤實. (2012). 日治時期臺北市旭, 南門, 樺山等三所小學校之建築變遷. 臺灣博物季刊
    8. 內政部建築研究所(1991)。優先尺度探討及應用方法示例:一、國民住宅廚房及衛浴空間;二、國民中小學普通教室空間。內政部建築研究所
    9. Karimi, A., Shirmardi, M., Hadei, M., Birgani, Y. T., Neisi, A., Takdastan, A., & Goudarzi, G. (2019). Concentrations and health effects of short-and long-term exposure to PM2. 5, NO2, and O3 in ambient air of Ahvaz city, Iran (2014–2017). Ecotoxicology and environmental safety, 180, 542-548.
    10. Lo, W. C., Ho, C. C., Tseng, E., Hwang, J. S., Chan, C. C., & Lin, H. H. (2022). Long-term exposure to ambient fine particulate matter (PM2. 5) and associations with cardiopulmonary diseases and lung cancer in Taiwan: a nationwide longitudinal cohort study. International journal of epidemiology, 51(4), 1230-1242.
    11. Pérez, G., Coma, J., Martorell, I., & Cabeza, L. F. (2014). Vertical Greenery Systems (VGS) for energy saving in buildings: A review. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 39, 139-165.
    12. Diener, A., & Mudu, P. (2021). How can vegetation protect us from air pollution? A critical review on green spaces' mitigation abilities for air-borne particles from a public health perspective-with implications for urban planning. Science of the Total Environment, 796, 148605.
    13. Bell, J. F., Wilson, J. S., & Liu, G. C. (2008). Neighborhood greenness and 2-year changes in body mass index of children and youth. American journal of preventive medicine, 35(6), 547-553.
    14. Perini, K., & Rosasco, P. (2013). Cost–benefit analysis for green façades and living wall systems. Building and Environment, 70, 110-121.
    15. Wong, N. H., Tay, S. F., Wong, R., Ong, C. L., & Sia, A. (2003). Life cycle cost analysis of rooftop gardens in Singapore. Building and environment, 38(3), 499-509.
    16. Sicard, P., Agathokleous, E., Anenberg, S. C., De Marco, A., Paoletti, E., & Calatayud, V. (2023). Trends in urban air pollution over the last two decades: A global perspective. Science of The Total Environment, 858, 160064.
    17. Khomenko, S., Cirach, M., Pereira-Barboza, E., Mueller, N., Barrera-Gómez, J., Rojas-Rueda, D., ... & Nieuwenhuijsen, M. (2021). Premature mortality due to air pollution in European cities: a health impact assessment. The Lancet Planetary Health, 5(3), e121-e134.
    18. Piracha, A., & Chaudhary, M. T. (2022). Urban air pollution, urban heat island and human health: a review of the literature. Sustainability, 14(15), 9234.
    19. Singh, N., Singh, S., & Mall, R. K. (2020). Urban ecology and human health: implications of urban heat island, air pollution and climate change nexus. In Urban ecology (pp. 317-334). Elsevier.
    20. Raji, B., Tenpierik, M. J., & Van Den Dobbelsteen, A. (2015). The impact of greening systems on building energy performance: A literature review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 45, 610-623.
    21. Aram, F., García, E. H., Solgi, E., & Mansournia, S. (2019). Urban green space cooling effect in cities. Heliyon, 5(4).
    22. Qaid, A., Lamit, H. B., Ossen, D. R., & Shahminan, R. N. R. (2016). Urban heat island and thermal comfort conditions at micro-climate scale in a tropical planned city. Energy and Buildings, 133,
    23. 577-595.
    24. Halecki, W., Stachura, T., Fudała, W., Stec, A., & Kuboń, S. (2023). Assessment and planning of green spaces in urban parks: A review. Sustainable Cities and Society, 88, 104280.
    25. Ren, F., Qiu, Z., Liu, Z., Bai, H., & Gao, H. O. (2023). Trees help reduce street-side air pollution: A focus on cyclist and pedestrian exposure risk. Building and Environment, 229, 109923.
    26. Pérez-Urrestarazu, L., Fernández-Cañero, R., Franco-Salas, A., & Egea, G. (2015). Vertical greening systems and sustainable cities. Journal of Urban Technology, 22(4), 65-85.
    27. Srbinovska, M., Andova, V., Mateska, A. K., & Krstevska, M. C. (2021). The effect of small green walls on reduction of particulate matter concentration in open areas. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 123306.
    28. Radujković, M., Versele, A., & Breesch, H. (2024). Exploratory Analysis of a Novel Modular Green Wall’s Impact on Indoor Temperature and Energy Consumption in Residential Buildings: A Case Study from Belgium. Energies, 17(21), 5267.
    29. Priya, U. K., & Senthil, R. (2025). Influence of balcony greenery on indoor temperature reduction in tropical urban residential buildings. Energy and Buildings, 115915.
    30. Wang, S., Abbas, J., Sial, M. S., Álvarez-Otero, S., & Cioca, L. I. (2022). Achieving green innovation and sustainable development goals through green knowledge management: Moderating role of organizational green culture. Journal of innovation & knowledge, 7(4), 100272.
    31. Shah, A. S., Lee, K. K., McAllister, D. A., Hunter, A., Nair, H., Whiteley, W., ... & Mills, N. L. (2015). Short term exposure to air pollution and stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis. bmj, 350.
    32. Lo, W. C., Ho, C. C., Tseng, E., Hwang, J. S., Chan, C. C., & Lin, H. H. (2022). Long-term exposure to ambient fine particulate matter (PM2. 5) and associations with cardiopulmonary diseases and lung cancer in Taiwan: a nationwide longitudinal cohort study. International journal of epidemiology, 51(4), 1230-1242.
    33. Moya, T. A., van den Dobbelsteen, A., Ottele, M., & Bluyssen, P. M. (2019). A review of green systems within the indoor environment. Indoor and built environment, 28(3), 298-309.
    34. Li, X., Zhang, T., Sun, F., Song, X., Zhang, Y., Huang, F., ... & Shao, F. (2021). The relationship between particulate matter retention capacity and leaf surface micromorphology of ten tree species in Hangzhou, China. Science of the Total Environment, 771, 144812.
    35. Andrade, G. C., Santana, B. V. N., Rinaldi, M. C. S., Ferreira, S. O., da Silva, R. C., & da Silva, L. C. (2022). Leaf surface traits related to differential particle adsorption–a case study of two tropical legumes. Science of The Total Environment, 823, 153681.
    36. Chang, Y. H., Chen, T. H., Chung, H. Y., Hsiao, H. Y., Tseng, P. C., Wang, Y. C., ... & Tsay, Y. S. (2024). The health risk reduction of PM2. 5 via a green curtain system in Taiwan. Building and Environment, 255, 111459.
    37. Weerakkody, U., Dover, J. W., Mitchell, P., & Reiling, K. (2019). Topographical structures in planting design of living walls affect their ability to immobilise traffic-based particulate matter. Science of the Total Environment, 660, 644-649.
    38. Cole, L. B. (2015). Green building literacy in the school building: A study of five middle schools in the United States. Children, Youth and Environments, 25(3), 145-174.
    39. Vakalis, D., Lepine, C., MacLean, H. L., & Siegel, J. A. (2021). Can green schools influence academic performance?. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 51(13), 1354-1396.
    40. Dadvand, P., Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J., Esnaola, M., Forns, J., Basagaña, X., Alvarez-Pedrerol, M., ... & Sunyer, J. (2015). Green spaces and cognitive development in primary schoolchildren. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 112(26), 7937-7942.
    41. Jimenez, R. B., Bozigar, M., Janulewicz, P., Lane, K. J., Hutyra, L. R., & Fabian, M. P. (2023). School greenness and student‐level academic performance: Evidence from the Global South. GeoHealth, 7(8), e2023GH000830.
    42. Wong, N. H., Tay, S. F., Wong, R., Ong, C. L., & Sia, A. (2003). Life cycle cost analysis of rooftop gardens in Singapore. Building and environment, 38(3), 499-509.
    43. Ferziger, J. H., Perić, M., & Street, R. L. (2019). Computational methods for fluid dynamics. springer. DOI:10.1007/978-3-642-56026-2
    44. Zhai, Z. J., Zhang, Z., Zhang, W., & Chen, Q. Y. (2007). Evaluation of various turbulence models in predicting airflow and turbulence in enclosed environments by CFD: Part 1—Summary of prevalent turbulence models. Hvac&R Research, 13(6), 853-870.
    45. Wilcox, D. C. (1998). Turbulence modeling for CFD (Vol. 2, pp. 103-217). La Canada, CA: DCW industries.
    46. Yakhot V, Orszag SA, Thangam S, Gatski TB, Speziale CG. Development of turbulence models for shear flows by a double expansion technique. Physics of Fluids A: Fluid Dynamics (1992) 4(7):1510–1520.
    47. Khalaji, M. N., Koca, A., & Kotcioğlu, İ. (2019). Investigation of numerical analysis velocity contours k-ε model of RNG, standard and realizable turbulence for different geometries. International Journal of Innovative Research and Reviews, 3(2), 29-34.
    48. Tominaga, Y., Mochida, A., Yoshie, R., Kataoka, H., Nozu, T., Yoshikawa, M., & Shirasawa, T. (2008). AIJ guidelines for practical applications of CFD to pedestrian wind environment around buildings. Journal of wind engineering and industrial aerodynamics, 96(10-11), 1749-1761.
    49. Blocken, B. (2014). 50 years of computational wind engineering: past, present and future. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 129, 69-102.
    50. Orrego, D.F., Arias, W., Lopez, D., Velasquez, H.. (2012). Experimental and CFD study of a single phase cone-shaped helical coiled heat exchanger: an empirical correlation. Colombia: Conference on Efficiency, Costs, Optimization, Simulation and Environmental Impact of Energy Systems, ISBN online: 978-88-6655-322-9. p.302-320
    51. Tien, P. W., Mohammadi, M., & Calautit, J. K. (2021). Providing Comfortable Environment in Skygardens Within High-Rise Buildings: Analysis of the Impact of Vegetation on Wind and Thermal Comfort. Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems, 9(2), 1-28.
    52. Zhuo, C., Tong, X., Hao, B., Chen, Z., & Liu, H. (2023). Feasibility analysis using a porous media model to simulate the wind protection effect of windbreak forests. Land Degradation & Development, 34(1), 207-220.
    53. Gromke, C., & Ruck, B. (2007). Influence of trees on the dispersion of pollutants in an urban street canyon—experimental investigation of the flow and concentration field. Atmospheric Environment, 41(16), 3287-3302.
    54. Hong, B., Lin, B., & Qin, H. (2017). Numerical investigation on the coupled effects of building-tree arrangements on fine particulate matter (PM2. 5) dispersion in housing blocks. Sustainable cities and society, 34, 358-370.
    55. Budaniya, M., & Rai, A. C. (2022). Effectiveness of plants for passive removal of particulate matter is low in the indoor environment. Building and Environment, 222, 109384.
    56. Fadl, M. S., & Karadelis, J. (2013). CFD simulation for wind comfort and safety in urban area: A case study of Coventry University central campus. International journal of architecture, engineering and construction, 2(2), 131-143.

    QR CODE