企業如何創造及維持著具有競爭的優勢，一直以來都是是各個產業界關注的重要議題。在一些實際上的證實與研究顯示企業如果在環境變動快速的環境之中，經常會發生無法適應突然的變化。因此，本研究源自於動態能力的觀點，來探討企業在環境變動快速之環境下，應該要如何才能不斷的更新自我的優勢來適應環境的快速變動。此個案的研究方法我們採用『單一個案』來進行較深度的探究，選則上豐蛋品為主要探討對象，觀察其中如何由蛋品產業至液蛋領域，並且進一步定位於蛋品加工廠的發展經歷過程。二代接班將敘述是如何發現到環境的改變，並且調整企業的組織與結構並且加以實施在企業上，並且依賴過往路徑上所學習到的技術與人才，來追求企業持續的成長與優勢。

How companies create and maintain competitive advantages has always been an important issue of concern to various industries. In some practical confirmations and studies, it has been shown that companies often fail to adapt to sudden changes if they are in a rapidly changing environment. Therefore, this research is derived from the perspective of dynamic capabilities to explore how companies can constantly update their own strengths to adapt to rapid changes in the environment in a rapidly changing environment. The research method of this case is to use a "single case" to conduct a deeper inquiry. The selection of the egg is the main object of discussion, and observe how it is from the egg industry to the liquid egg field, and further locate the development process of the egg processing factory. . The second generation succession will describe how to identify changes in the environment, and adjust the organization and structure of the enterprise and implement it in the enterprise, and rely on the technology and talents learned in the past path to pursue the continuous growth and advantages of the enterprise.

中文參考文獻
朱淑娟(2017)。從雞蛋芬普尼事件看食安的三個問題。取自https://www.storm.mg/article/322418?srcid=73746f726d2e6d675f36313630353738316430346131623461_1564475562
邱奕嘉.(2018)。博士二代接班最痛苦的事：一堆難搞的老臣！。取自
https://www.businessweekly.com.tw/article.aspx?id=23057&type=Blog
劉偉澍(2006)。有效的溝通管理e-Learning課程。
李建興、林珮萱、白育綸(2018)。掌門人vs.接班人談溝通-揭開不能說的祕密。取自
https://www.gvm.com.tw/article.html?id=55070
蕭瑞麟(2007)。不用數字的研究-鍛鍊深度思考力的質性研究。臺灣培生出版。.
行政院農業委員(2010)。認識液蛋。取自
https://kmweb.coa.gov.tw/subject/ct.asp?xItem=274212&ctNode=6547&mp=339&kpi=0&hashid=
潘淑滿(2003)。質性研究理論與應用。台北：心理。
許輔(2018)。雞蛋管理大變革-明年液蛋業者全登錄-跨部會管理漏洞用法規彌補。取自https://www.agriharvest.tw/theme_data.php?theme=article&sub_theme=article&id=2544&fbclid=IwAR3Glb9RJ2trfLqbq0bPPN6QcPUcyFmI36aWkbFMOS_WR2giuw8WQ8mWVEA
嚴思祺(2014)。BBC中文網台灣特約記者台灣爆發"地溝油"食安危機。取自https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/china/2014/09/140904_tw_gutter_oil
英文參考文獻
Aoki, M.(1999), “The participatory generation of information rents and the theory of the firm”, In M. Aoki, B. Bishop, P. and Wiseman, N., “External ownership and innovation in the United Kingdom”, Applied Economics. Vol, 31,No.4, pp.443-450.
Argyres, S. N.,(1990)“Technology strategy, governance structure and interdivisional coordination”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. Vol,28, No.3, pp.337-358.
Camp, R.(2000), Benchmarking: The Search for Industry Best Practices that Lead to Superior Performance. Journal. Vol.21, No.10/11, pp.1105-1121.
Carlsson & El Sawy.(2008)Decision making in turbulent environments is challenging because managers must decide and act rapidly . Understanding the Elusive Black Box of Dynamic Capabilities. Decision Sciences. Volume 42 Number 1. February 2011.P239
Eisenhardt & Martin,(2000) As noted, it is often extremely difficult, if not impossible, to routinize change beyond recognizing shared principles that should be adhered to in order to deal with it. Any routines underlying the enterprise’s dynamic capabilities need to be tied to real-time knowledge creation and general enough to avoid overly focusing managerial attention on the lessons of the past .Dynamic Capabilities: Routines versus Entrepreneurial Action.Journal of Management Studies 49:8 December 2012 .P1397
Galunic, D. C. and Eisenhardt, M. K.(2001) “Architectural innovation and modular corporate forms”, Academy of Management Journal. Vol.44, No.6, pp.1229–1250.
Gustafsson, and O.E. Williamon (1995) The Firm as a Nuxus of Treaties.
Helfat, E. C.(1997) “Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation: The case of R&D”, Strategic Management Journal. Vol.18, No.5, pp.339-360.
Mason.( 2002) “Qualitative interviewing therefore tends to be seen as involving the construction or reconstruction of knowledge more than the excavation of it “,Qualitative Researching Second Edition.JENNIFER MASON. 2nd edition.P63.
Myers, M. D. (2013). Qualitative research in business and management: Sage.
Penrose, E. (1959). The theory ofthe growth ofthe firm.JohnWiley&Sons,NewYork.
Qualitative Researching Second Edition, JENNIFER MASON , SAGE Publications ,London • Thousand Oaks • New Delhi ,P63
Richardson, G. B., “The organization of industry”, The Economic Journal. Vol.82, No.3, 1972, pp.883-896.
Snape,D.&Spencer,L.(2003)TheFoundations of Qualitative Research DIGITISED BOOK CHAPTER | Chapter 1, pp. 1-23
Teece, D. J.(1986) “Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy”, Research Policy. Vol.15, No.6, pp.285-305.
Teece, D. J.(1997)Pisano, G. and Shuen, A., “Dynamic capabilities and strategic management”, Strategic Management Journal. Vol.18, No.7, pp.509-533.

Teece, Pisano, & Shuen.(1997)In turbulent environments, dynamic capabilities—“the ability to integrate, build, and reconfigure internal and external competencies to address rapidly-changing environments” Understanding the Elusive Black Box of Dynamic Capabilities. Decision Sciences. Volume 42 Number 1. February 2011.P239-240
Yin, K. R.(1995)Case Study Research: Design and Methods. London : Sage, 1994.
Zander, U. and Kogut, B., “Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation
of organizational capabilities: An empirical test”, Organization Science. Vol.6,
No.1, pp.76-92.
Zollo,M and Winter G.S.(2002) further argue that learning facilitates reconfiguration and innovation. Therefore, learning is proposed as an enabler of reconfiguration by helping re- vamp existing operational capabilities Understanding the Elusive Black Box of Dynamic Capabilities. Decision Sciences. Volume 42 Number 1. February 2011.P245
Zollo, M. and Winter G. S.(2002) “Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities”, Organization Science. Vol.13, No.3, pp.339-351.
Zott, C. (2003) “Dynamic capabilities and the emergence of intra-industry differential firm performance: Insights from a simulation study”, Strategic Management Journal. Vol.24, No.2, pp.97-125.