| 研究生: |
鄭貴揚 Cheng, Kuei-Yang |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
IC設計公司的智慧資本與企業績效之研究 Intellectual Capital and Firm Performance of IC Design Companies in Taiwan |
| 指導教授: |
吳萬益
Wu, Wann-Yih 譚伯群 Tan, Bertram |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 企業管理學系碩士在職專班 Department of Business Administration (on the job class) |
| 論文出版年: | 2004 |
| 畢業學年度: | 92 |
| 語文別: | 英文 |
| 論文頁數: | 87 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 智慧資本 、績效評估 、資料包絡分析法 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Intellectual capital, Performance evaluation, Data envelopment analysis |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:103 下載:5 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
智慧資本作為策略性資源取代土地資本、原料資本與金融資本,成為企業價值創造的源泉。智慧資本的管理決定一個企業生存、調適和競爭的能力。在今日競爭激烈的環境,企業如何運用智慧資本創造價值並建立持續競爭優勢,已成為今日企業的重要管理議題。對於智慧資本內涵與存量的衡量,學者已提出許多不同的技術與方法,然而對於智慧資本管理效率的衡量仍相對不足。有鑑於此領域實證研究的相對缺乏,因此本研究之目的在於探討廠商管理與運用智慧資本之效率。
此外,本研究嘗試建立一多元投入與多元產出的績效衡量模式,評估企業在智慧資本存量及流量運用的績效。而績效主要在衡量資源被使用的程度,如何運用最少的資源,透過最佳的資源配置方式,獲取較高利潤,是企業管理者所關心的課題。本研究目的主要有兩點: 1.建構IC設計產業之智慧資本衡量與經營績效指標並分析其智慧資本運用效率。 2.分析IC設計產業智慧資本管理效率的變動狀況,並依據企業的相對效率與效率改變將其分類,使企業可據此瞭解相對於競爭者其智慧資本管理與運用的狀況並加以改善。
本研究採用資料包絡法與Malmquist生產力指數探討41家台灣IC設計公司在2002年的智慧資本運用的相對效率與1999年至2002年績效的改變狀況。透過客觀的數據分析,提供相關結論作為業界提升智慧資本運用績效時之參考。智慧資本的有效管理與運用將決定企業生存競爭之能力,本研究初步建構一智慧資本管理效率評估模型,研究分析發現多數企業的智慧資本運用效率仍有改善空間,而約三分之二企業的效率在4年中並未獲得改善,最後並依據企業的效率將其分類,使企業可據此瞭解其相對效率狀況,並作為企業改進與提升競爭力之參考。
Firms gain competitive advantage and superior performance through the acquisition, holding and subsequent use of strategic assets - both tangible and intangible assets. In the face of an intensely competitive environment, firms are challenged with the task of managing and leveraging intellectual capital. Although the importance of intellectual capital in assuring superior performance is well accepted, few studies have investigated the nature of relationship between those two variables. The objective of this study is to focus on the efficiency of firms at converting intellectual capital stocks into performance.
The purposes of this study are: (1). to establish an assessment model to measure the intellectual capital stocks of Taiwan IC design companies, (2). to evaluate and compare the performances of 41 IC design companies, and (3). to examine the efficiency change of 41 IC design companies from 1999 to 2002.
This study adopted data envelopment analysis (DEA) and the Malmquist productivity index to measure the performances of 41 Taiwan IC design companies in 2002 and the efficiency change from 1999 to 2002. The results revealed that about one third of the companies have excellent efficiency of managing intellectual capital. But the efficiency of two thirds of companies is getting worse from 1999 to 2002. Moreover, the entire industry can be partitioned into six clusters based on relative efficiency of managing intellectual capital and efficiency change. It is expected this study can provide useful information for future research in alternative contexts.
1. Amit, R. and Shoemaker, P.J.H. (1993), “Strategic Assets and Organizational Rent,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 647-659.
2. Anderson, P., and Peterson, N. C. (1993), “A Procedure for Ranking Efficient Units in Data Envelopment Analysis,” Management Science, Vol. 39, No.10, pp.1261–1264.
3. Asia Pacific Intellectual Property Association (APIPA), “Taiwan Patent Database (TWP),” Available online: http://twp.apipa.org.tw.
4. Banker, R.D., Charnes, A. and Cooper, W.W. (1984), “Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis,” Management Science, Vol. 30, No. 9, pp. 1078-1092.
5. Barney, J.B. (1991), “Firm Resources and Sustainable Competitive Advantage,” Journal of Management, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 99-120.
6. Bhat, R., Verma, B. B. and Reuben, E., “Methodology Note: Data Envelopment Analysis,” Health Policy Development Network (HELPONET), India. Available online: http://www.iimahd.ernet.in/~rbhat/Download/ Methodology%20note.pdf.
7. Bontis, N. (1999), “Managing Organizational Knowledge by Diagnosing Intellectual Capital: Framing and Advancing the State of the Field,” International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 18, No. 5/6/7/8, pp. 433-462.
8. Bontis, N. (2001), “Assessing Knowledge Assets: A Review of the Models Used to Measure Intellectual Capital,” International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 41-60.
9. Bontis, N., Keow, W. C. C. and Richardson, S. (2000), “Intellectual Capital and Business Performance in Malaysian Industries,” Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 85-100.
10. Brooking, A. (1996), Intellectual Capital: Core Assets for the Third Millennium Enterprise, London: Thomson Business Press, London.
11. Bukowitz, W. R. and Petrash, G. P. (1997), “Visualizing, Measuring and Managing Knowledge,” Research Technology Management, Vol. 40, No. 4, pp. 24-31.
12. Buren, M. E. V. (1999), “A Yardstick for Knowledge Management,” Training & Development, Vol. 53, No. 5, pp. 71-78.
13. Caves, D. W., Christensen, L. R. and Diewert, W. E. (1982), “The Economic Theory of Index Numbers and the Measurement of Input, Output and Productivity,” Econometrica, Vol. 50, No. 6, pp.1393–1414.
14. Chang, P. L. (1993), “Measuring the R&D Efficiency of Manufacturing Films in Taiwan,” Research Project of National Science Council (NSC), Institute of Management Science, National Chiao Tung University (in Chinese).
15. Chang, S. C., Lee, Z. Y. and Yu, H.C. (2003), “Performance Evaluation of IC Design Companies Listed in TSE,” Industry Forum, Vol. 5, No.1, Available online: http://www.itis.org.tw/forum/content5/02if37a.htm (in Chinese).
16. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Golany, B. and Seiford, L. M. (1985), “Foundations of Data Envelopment Analysis for Pareto-Koopmans Efficient Empirical Production Functions,” Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 30, No. 1,2, pp. 91-107.
17. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Lewin, A.Y. and Seiford, L.M. (1994), Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology, and Applications, Kluwer Academic Publisher, Boston.
18. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W. and Rhodes. E. (1978), “Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 2, No. 6, pp. 429-444.
19. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W. and Rhodes. E. (1981), “Evaluating Program and Managerial Efficiency: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis to Program Follow Through,” Management Science, Vol. 27, No. 6, pp. 668-697.
20. Chatzkel, J. (2002), “A Conversation with Göran Roos,” Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp.96-117.
21. Chuang, L. M. (2002), “An Empirical Study on the Construction of Organizational Innovation Model in Taiwanese Information and Electronic Industry,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Institute of Business Administration, National Cheng Kung University (in Chinese).
22. Coelli, T. (1996), “A Guide to DEAP Version 2.1: A Data Envelopment Analysis (Computer) Program,” CEPA Working Paper.
23. Cooper, W. W., Park, K. S. and Yu, G. (2001), “An Illustrative Application of IDEA (Imprecise Data Envelopment Analysis) to a Korean Mobile Telecommunication Company,” Operations Research, Vol. 49, No. 6, pp.807-820.
24. Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., Tone, K. (2000), Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References, and DEA-Solver Software, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
25. Dyson, R. G., Allen, R., Camanho, A. S., Podinovski, V. V., Sarrico, C. S. and Shale, E. A. (2001), “Pitfalls and Protocols in DEA,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 132, No. 2, pp.245-259.
26. Dzinkowski, R. (2000), “The Measurement and Management of Intellectual Capital: An Introduction,” Financial Management, Vol. 78, No. 2, pp. 32-35.
27. Edvinsson, L. and Malone, M.S. (1997), Intellectual Capital: Realizing Your Company’s True Value by Finding its Hidden Brainpower, HarperBusiness, New York.
28. Edvinsson, L. and Sullivan, P. (1996), “Developing a Model for Managing Intellectual Capital,” European Management Journal, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 356-364.
29. Fabless Semiconductor Association (FSA), “The Evolution of Fabless and the FSA: Impacting the Semiconductor Industry,” Available online: http://www.fsa.org/resources/presentations/pangburn071002.pdf.
30. Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Lindgern, B. and Ross, P. (1992), “Productivity Changes in Swedish Pharmacies 1980-1989: A Non-Parametric Malmquist Approach,” Journal of Productivity Analysis, Vol. 3, pp. 85-101.
31. Farrell, M. J. (1957), “The Measurement of Productive Efficiency,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, Vol.120, Part 3, pp.253-281.
32. Fitzsimmons, J. A. and Fitzsimmons, M. J. (1994), Service Management, 2nd ed., Irwin McGraw-Hill, Inc.
33. Golany, B., and Roll, Y. (1989), “An Application Procedure for DEA,” OMEGA, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 237-250.
34. Harvey, M. G. and Lusch, R. F. (1999), “Balancing the Intellectual Capital Books: Intangible Liabilities,” European Management Journal, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 85-92.
35. Hudson, W. (1993), Intellectual Capital: How to Build It, Enhance It, Use it, New York: John Wiley & Sons, New York.
36. Hwang, S. N., Lin, C. T. and Kang, C. F. (1998), “Measuring the Managerial Performance of Electronics Industry in Taiwan and Researching the Relationship Between Managerial Performance and Stock Prices Change,” Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp.27-50 (in Chinese).
37. Industrial Technology Research Institute (ITRI), Industrial Economics & Knowledge Center (IEK), Industrial Technology Intelligence Service & Promotion Project, Hsinchu: ITRI IEK Press, Hsinchu (in Chinese).
38. Johnson, W. H. A. (1999), “An Integrative Taxonomy of Intellectual Capital: Measuring the Stock and Flow of Intellectual Capital Components in the Firm,” International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 18, No. 5/6/7/8, pp. 562-575.
39. Kao, C., Hwang, S. N. and Sueyoshi T. (2003), Management Performance Evaluation: Data Envelopment Analysis, Hwatai, Taipei (in Chinese).
40. Kao, S. C., Chang, H. C. and Yun, S. L. (2002), “A Multirelation Based Approach to Core Resources, Resource Allocation Strategies, and Performance for High Technology Companies in Taiwan,” Journal of National Taipei University of Technology, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp.261-280 (in Chinese).
41. Kauffmann, P., Unal, R., Fernandez, A. and Keating, C. (2000), “A Model for Allocating Resources to Research Programs by Evaluating Technical Importance and Research Productivity,” Engineering Management Journal, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp.5-8.
42. Klein, D.A. and Prusak, L. (1994), “Characterizing Intellectual Capital,” Available online: http://www.cbi.cgey.com/pub/docs/ Characterizing_Intellectual_Capital.pdf.
43. Kozmetsky, G. and Yue, P. (1998), “Comparative Performance of Global Semiconductor Companies,” Omega, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp.153-175.
44. Linton, J. D. and Cook, W. D. (1998), “Technology Implementation: A Comparative Study of Canadian and U.S. Factories,” INFOR, Vol. 36, Iss. 3, pp.142-150.
45. Lovell, C.A.K., “Production Frontiers and Productive Efficiency,” in: Ed. Fried, H.O., Lovell, C.A.K. and Schmidt, S.S. (1993), The Measurement of Productive Efficiency: Techniques and Applications, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 3-67.
46. Mouritsen, J. (1988), “Driving Growth: Economic Value Added versus Intellectual Capital,” Management Accounting Research, Vol. 8, No. 6, pp. 15-23.
47. National Science Council (2002), Indicators of Science and Technology, Republic of China (2002), Available online: http://nscnt22.nsc.gov.tw/tech/index.asp.
48. Oral, M., Kettani, O. and Lang, P. (1991), “A Methodology for Collective Evaluation and Selection of Industrial R&D Projects,” Management Science, Vol. 37, No. 7, pp.871-885.
49. Pena, I. (2002), “Intellectual Capital and Business Start-up Success,” Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 180-198.
50. Pulic, A. and Bornemann, M. (1999), “The Physical and Intellectual Capital of Austrian Banks,” Available online: http://users.austro.net/measuring-ip/OPapers/Pulic/Bank/en-bank.html.
51. Reitsperger, W. D., Daniel, S. J., Tallman, S. B. and Chismar, W. G. (1993), “Product Quality and Cost Leadership: Compatible Strategies?” Management International Review, Vol. 33, pp.7-21.
52. Riahi-Belkaoui, A. (2003), “Intellectual Capital and Firm Performance of US Multinational Firms,” Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 215-226.
53. Roos, G. and Roos, J. (1997), “Measuring Your Company’s Intellectual Performance,” Long Range Planning, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 413-426.
54. Roos, J., Roos, G., Dragonetti, N. C. and Edvinsson, L. (1997), Intellectual Capital: Navigating in the New Business Landscape, London: MacMillan Business, London.
55. Schmidt, P. (1986), “Frontier Production Functions,” Econometric Reviews, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 289-328.
56. Shao, B. B. M. and Lin, W. T. (2002), “Technical Efficiency Analysis of Information Technology Investments: A Two-stage Empirical Investigation,” Information & Management, Vol. 39, No. 5, pp.391-401.
57. Society of Management Accountants of Canada (SMAC), (1998), The Management of Intellectual Capital: The Issues and the Practice, Issues Paper #16, Hamilton: The Society of ManagementAccountants of Canada.
58. Stewart, T.A. (1991), “Brainpower: How Intellectual Capital is Becoming America’s Most Valuable Asset,” Fortune, pp. 44-60.
59. Stewart, T.A. (1997), Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organizations, New York: Doubleday Currency, New York.
60. SubbaNarasimha, P. N., Ahmad, S. and Mallya, S. N. (2003), “Technological Knowledge and Firm Performance of Pharmaceutical Firms,” Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp.20-23.
61. Sullivan, P. H. (2000), Value-Driven Intellectual Capital; How to Convert Intangible Corporate Assets into Market Value, Wiley, Canada.
62. Sveiby, K.E. (1997), The New Organizational Wealth: Managing and Measuring Knowledgebased Assets, San Francisco: Barrett-Kohler Publishers, San Francisco.
63. Sveiby, K.E. (2001), “Methods for Measuring Intangible Assets,” Available online: www.sveiby.com/articles/IntangibleMethods.htm.
64. Tavares, G. (2002), A Bibliography of Data Envelopment Analysis (1978-2001), Technical Report RRR 01-02, RUTCOR, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey.
65. Thore, S., Phllips, F., Ruefli, T.W. and Yue, P. (1996), “DEA and the Management of the Product Cycle: The U.S. Computer Industry,” Computer & Operation Research, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp.341-356.
66. Ulrich, D. (1998), “Intellectual Capital = Competence x Commitment,” MIT Sloan Management Review, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 15-26.
67. Verma, D. and Sinha, K. K. (2002), “Toward a Theory of Project Interdependencies in High Tech R&D Environments,” Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 20, No. 5, pp.451-468.
68. Wernerfelt, B. (1984), “A Resource-based View of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 171-180.
69. Xie, S. Y. (1994), “An Evaluation of Research and Development Performance in the Chemical Industry,” Master’s Thesis, Institute of Management Science, National Chiao Tung University (in Chinese).