集合住宅內部共用空間占用問題層出不窮，原本清楚區分的公私領域，因住戶一方擴大私有領域而使得界線變動，造成另一方日常生活的影響，現行雖有法規或是管委會規定，占用卻沒有得到改善。本研究以台南市中西區三星社區為例，其四至七樓以上住棟之間的連通走廊被住戶擺放私人物品、成為儲藏室的現況，探討集合住宅內部共用空間占用問題，以領域性觀點切入討論住戶的領域行為，分析占用如何影響住戶間的社會互動，挖掘在集合住宅共用空間占用所帶來的影響和占用背後原因。
本研究盤點集合住宅共用空間型態和領域分布，透過直接觀察、問卷調查、半結構式訪談，分析連通走廊占用原因，和占用是否影響社會互動。研究發現三星社區的住戶最初因社區住棟配置和管理死角產生的不安全感，進而產生將連通走廊隔絕，減少互通的需求，也形成最初的占用；並且與現行占用戶訪談了解空間佈局、自發性擴大使用為占用的原因，補足過往都市計畫領域在討論集合住宅占用議題時，偏重在法令規範，而未能正視住戶因心理和物理層面下所依循的生活脈絡。
同時，針對住戶社會互動，對於非占用的住戶而言，他人占用的行為在心理層面上雖令人討厭，但有介於不干擾自己日常生活，故不會實質去改變與占用戶的互動模式，雙方仍保持聯繫。最後，透過分析集合住宅住戶的領域行為和社會互動，本研究以共用空間發現的互動模式，提出未來在推行集合住宅需納入住戶領域性的需求，拓展至空間佈局的改善和公私介面設計。

The problem of occupancy of common space in collective housing is complicated. The lines between public and private uses that should be distinguished have been blurred due to the expansion of private, causing impacts on residents’ daily life. Although there are existing laws or regulations from community committees, the occupation still exists. The study takes the Sanxing Community as an example, in which its corridors between the buildings from the fourth floor to the seventh floor are used as storage rooms by residents for their personal belongings. This study explores the problem of the occupation of the common space in collective housing. From a territoriality perspective, the paper then discusses the territorial behavior of residents, analyzes how occupation affects social interaction among residents, and digs out the reasons and impacts occupation causes.
Through observation, questionnaires, and semi-structured interviews, the study summarizes the pattern of common space and territory distribution in collective housing and analyzes the reasons for the occupation of corridors, whether the occupation affects social interaction. The study finds out that residents of the Sanxing community felt insecure due to the layout and management of the community, which led to cutting out corridors’ connections. Also, from the current occupiers’ answers, the reason why they use common space is based on the spatial layout and their own will. These findings supply a different view, combing residents’ psychological and physical needs, rather than focusing on legal regulation to deal with occupation.
At the same time, regarding the social interaction between residents, for non-occupiers, although the behavior of others occupying is annoying on the psychological level, the act does not interfere with their everyday life, so it will not substantially affect the interaction between residents, and they will maintain daily interaction. Finally, by analyzing the territorial behavior and social interaction of the residents, the study uses the findings of the interactive pattern of common space and proposes that in the future, the implementation of collective housing should incorporate the territoriality need of the residents and extend it to the improvement of the spatial layout and the design of the public-private interface.

英文
Altman, I.（1975） Environment and Social Behavior: Privacy, Personal Space, Territory, and Crowding. Brooks/Cole, Monterey.
Altman, I.（1976）. Environmental psychology and social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2（2）, 96-113.
Abu-Ghazzeh, T.M. （1997）. The dialectic dimensions of homes as an expression of identity and communality in Amman, Jordan, Housing Studies, 12（2）, pp. 247–263.
Abu-Ghazzeh, T. M. （2000）. Environmental Messages in Multiple-family Housing: territory and personalization. Landscape Research, 25（1）, 97-115.
Abbaszadeh, S., Ibrahim, R., Baharuddin, M. N., & Salim, A. （2009）. IDENTIFYING PERSIAN TRADITIONAL SOCIO-CULTURAL BEHAVIORS FOR APPLICATION IN THE DESIGN OF MODERN HIGH-RISE RESIDENCES. ArchNet-IJAR, 3（3）.
Astuti, S. B., Setijanti, P., & Soemarno, I. （2017）. Personalization of space in private and public setting within vertical housing as sustainable living. DIMENSI （Journal of Architecture and Built Environment）, 44（1）, 37-44.
Aryani, N. P., & Jen-Tu, K.（2021）. Environmental behavior analysis of social housing units in Surabaya, Indonesia. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 20（4）, 398-413.
Becker, F. D., & Mayo, C.（1971）. Delineating personal distance and territoriality. Environment and Behavior, 3（4）, 375.
Brown, B. B., & Altman, I. （1983）. Territoriality, defensible space and residential burglary: An environmental analysis. Journal of environmental psychology, 3(3), 203-220.
Brown, G., Lawrence, T. B., & Robinson, S. L.（2005）. Territoriality in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 30（3）, 577-594.
Brunia, S., & Hartjes‐Gosselink, A.（2009）. Personalization in non‐territorial offices: a study of a human need. Journal of Corporate Real Estate.
Brown, G., & Zhu, H. （2016）. ‘My workspace, not yours’: The impact of psychological ownership and territoriality in organizations. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 48, 54-64.
Karn, V., R. Lickiss, D. Hughes and J. Crawley（1993）.Neighbour Disputes. Coventry: Institute of Housing.
Conway, J., & Adams, B. （1977）. The social effects of living off the ground. Habitat International, 2（5/6）, 595–614.
Churchman, A., & Ginsberg, Y.（1984）. The image and experience of high rise housing in Israel. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 4（1）, 27-41.
Crow, G., Allan, G., & Summers, M. （2002）. Neither busybodies nor nobodies: managing proximity and distance in neighbourly relations. Sociology, 36（1）, 127-145.
Cockayne, E. （2012） Cheek by Jowl: A History of Neighbours, Random House.
Cheshire, L., & Fitzgerald, R. （2015）. From private nuisance to criminal behaviour: neighbour problems and neighbourhood context in an Australian city. Housing Studies, 30（1）, 100-122.
Doroudi, R., & Lavassani, S. H. H. (2021, October). Connection of coupled buildings: A state-of-the-art review. In Structures (Vol. 33, pp. 1299-1326). Elsevier.
Edney, J. J.（1974）. Human territoriality. Psychological Bulletin, 81（12）, 959.
Edney, J. J.（1975）. Territoriality and control: A field experiment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31（6）, 1108.
Evans, G. W. (2003). The built environment and mental health. Journal of urban health, 80(4), 536-555.
Festinger, L., Schachter, S., & Back, K. (1950). Social pressures in informal groups; a study of human factors in housing.
Fleming, R., Baum, A., & Singer, J. E. (1985). Social support and the physical environment.
Forrest, R., La Grange, A., & Ngai‐Ming, Y.（2002）. Neighbourhood in a high rise, high density city: some observations on contemporary Hong Kong. The Sociological Review, 50（2）, 215-240.
Farrell, S. J., Aubry, T., & Coulombe, D.（2004）. Neighborhoods and neighbors: Do they contribute to personal well‐being? Journal of community psychology, 32（1）, 9-25.
Gates, A. S., Stevens, H., & Wellman, B.（1973）. What makes a'good neighbor'?. In annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, August, New York.
Ginsberg, Y., & Churchman, A.（1985）. The pattern and meaning of neighbor relations in high-rise housing in Israel. Human Ecology, 13（4）, 467-484.
Greider, T., & Krannich, R. S. （1985）. Neighboring patterns, social support, and rapid growth: a comparison analysis from three western communities. Sociological Perspectives, 28（1）, 51-70.
Gifford, R.（2007）. The consequences of living in high-rise buildings. Architectural science review, 50（1）, 2-17.
Laumann, E. O.（1973）. Bonds of pluralism: The form and substance of urban social networks. New York: J. Wiley.
Lang, J. （1987）.Creating Architectural Theory: the Role of the Behavioral Sciences in Environmental Design. New York: Van norstrand reinhold.
Keller, S. I.（1968）. The urban neighborhood: A sociological perspective （No. 33）. Random House.
Kasarda, J. D., & Janowitz, M. （1974）. Community attachment in mass society. American sociological review, 328-339.
Kinney, J. M., Stephens, M. A. P., & Brockmann, A. M. (1987). Personal and environmental correlates of territoriality and use of space: An illustration in congregate housing for older adults. Environment and Behavior, 19(6), 722-737.
Kearns, A., Whitley, E., Mason, P., & Bond, L. （2012）. ‘Living the high life’? Residential, social and psychosocial outcomes for high-rise occupants in a deprived context. Housing Studies, 27(1), 97-126.
Lipman, A.（1968）. Building design and social interaction. The Architects Journal, 147, 23-30.
Nguyen, L., van den Berg, P., Kemperman, A., & Mohammadi, M. (2020). Where do people interact in high-rise apartment buildings? Exploring the influence of personal and neighborhood characteristics. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(13), 4619.
McGahan, P.（1972）. The neighbor role and neighboring in a highly urban area. Sociological Quarterly, 13（3）, 397-408.
Michelson, W., & Michelson, W. M.（1977）. Environmental choice, human behavior, and residential satisfaction.
McCarthy, D., & Saegert, S. （1978）. Residential density, social overload, and social withdrawal. Human Ecology, 6（3）, 253-272.
Musterd, S. & van Kempen, R. (2005) Large Housing Estates in European Cities: Opinions of Residents on Recent Developments (Utrecht: Urban & Regional Research Centre).
Morgan, D. （2009）. Acquaintances: The Space Between Intimates And Strangers: The Space Between Intimates and Strangers. McGraw-Hill Education （UK）.
Mahdavinejad, M., Mashayekhi, M., & Ghaedi, A（2012） Designing communal spaces in residential complexes. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 51, 333-339.
Newman, O. (1996). Creating defensible space. US Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research.
Nguyen, L., van den Berg, P., Kemperman, A., & Mohammadi, M. （2020）. Where do people interact in high-rise apartment buildings? Exploring the influence of personal and neighborhood characteristics. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17（13）, 4619.
Prezza, M., Amici, M., Roberti, T., & Tedeschi, G.（2001）. Sense of community referred to the whole town: Its relations with neighboring, loneliness, life satisfaction, and area of residence. Journal of community psychology, 29（1）, 29-52.
Rainwater, L. (1966). Fear and the house-as-haven in the lower class. Journal o f the American Institute of Planners 32: 23-31.
Rainwater, L. (1970). Behind Ghetto Walls. Aldine, Chicago.
Royal, M. A., & Rossi, R. J.（1996）. Individual‐level correlates of sense of community: Findings from workplace and school. Journal of community psychology, 24（4）, 395-416
Reynald, D. M., & Elffers, H.（2009）. The future of Newman’s Defensible Space Theory: Linking Defensible Space and the routine activities of place. European Journal of Criminology, 6（1）, 25-46.
Rollwagen, H. （2016）. The relationship between dwelling type and fear of crime. Environment and Behavior, 48（2）, 365-387.
Sampson, R. J. (2000). Whither the sociological study of crime?. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 711-714.
Sebba, R., & Churchman, A.（1983）. Territories and territoriality in the home. Environment and Behavior, 15（2）, 191-210.
Sundstrom, E., Sundstrom, M. G., & Eric, S.（1986）. Work places: The psychology of the physical environment in offices and factories. CUP Archive.
Skjaeveland, O., Gärling, T., & Maeland, J. G.（1996）. A multidimensional measure of neighboring. American Journal of Community Psychology, 24（3）, 413-435.
Stokoe, E. H., & Wallwork, J. （2003）. Space invaders: The moral‐spatial order in neighbour dispute discourse. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42（4）, 551-569.
Stokoe, E.（2006）. Public intimacy in neighbour relationships and complaints. Sociological Research Online, 11（3）, 137-157.
Taylor, R. B., Gottfredson, S. D., & Brower, S. （1984）. Block crime and fear: Defensible space, local social ties, and territorial functioning. Journal of Research in crime and delinquency, 21（4）, 303-331.
Taylor, R. B.（1988）. Human territorial functioning: An empirical, evolutionary perspective on individual and small group territorial cognitions, behaviors, and consequences （No. 8）. Cambridge University Press.
Unger, D. G., & Wandersman, A.（1985）. The importance of neighbors: The social, cognitive, and affective components of neighboring. American journal of community psychology, 13（2）, 139-169.
Vinsel, A., Brown, B. B., Altman, I., & Foss, C. (1980). Privacy regulation, territorial displays, and effectiveness of individual functioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1104.
Weiss, R. S.（1982）. Relationship of social support and psychological well-being. The modern practice of community mental health, 148-162.
Willmott, P.（1986）. Social networks, informal care and public policy （No. 655）. Policy Studies Institute.
Wortley, R., & McFarlane, M.（2011）. The role of territoriality in crime prevention: A field experiment. Security Journal, 24（2）, 149-156.
Wu, W., & Ge, X. J.（2020）. Communal space design of high-rise apartments: A literature review. Journal of Design and Built Environment, 20（1）, 35-49.
Zito, J. M. （1974）. Anonymity and neighboring in an urban, high-rise complex. Urban Life and Culture, 3（3）, 243-263.
 中文
畢恆達（1983）。高層國宅之空間設計與鄰里關係―國光社區個案研究。國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究學報。
Amos Rapoport（1985），張玟玟譯。《住屋形式與文化》。台北：境與象出社。
張福明（1986）。都市住宅配置形式與鄰里活動關係之研究。國立臺灣大學土木工程研究所碩士論文，台北市。
蕭惠文（1986）。台北市都市集合住宅空間形式轉化研究。中原大學建築工程研究所碩士論文，桃園市。
王文安（1987）。光復後台灣居住空間型態的演變與未來發展之研究。淡江大學建築研究所碩士論文，新北市。
陳益仁（1989）。從領域理論試探住宅之空間架構。國立成功大學建築及都市設計研究所碩士論文，台南市。
劉勇信（1995）。臺灣集合住宅共用空間領域性之研究。國立成功大學建築研究所碩士論文，台南市。 
張哲凡（1995）。光復後臺灣集合住宅發展過程之研究，國立成功大學建築研究所碩士論文，台南市。
袁筱媛（2003）。學生宿舍中之領域性與私密性相關行為研究－以中原大學良善宿舍為例。中原大學室內設計研究所碩士論文，桃園縣。 
徐磊青和楊公俠。（2005）。《環境心理學—環境、知覺和行為》，台北：五南圖書出版服份有限公司。
朱政德和林昭邑。（2007）。集合住宅類型對鄰里關係與居住意識的影響-以台北市集合住宅為例。設計學研究，10（1），115-137.
林詩涵（2007）。國宅戶外空間類型與犯罪恐懼感認知之關係研究-以台南市國宅社區為例。國立成功大學建築學系碩博士班碩士論文，台南市。
朱政德（2011）。都市型集合住宅之住戶平面計畫的供給特性：以台北市集合住宅為例。建築學報，（77），19-43。
鄭穎和谷口元（2011）。從領域性研究的視角論「公」、「私」的權益。建築學報，（2），91-94。
陳聰亨（2013），《集合住宅規劃設計》，詹氏書局，臺北。
邱啟新（2015）。「朗讀違章」與「建構蘭花屋」：當代台灣違建論述之公共空間觀點與公共性詮釋。建築與規劃學報，16（1），21-39。
沈孟穎、傅朝卿（2015）。臺灣「國民」住宅設計與現代住居空間再現。住宅學報，24（1）。
張承澔（2018）。國內集合住宅屋頂空間之使用型態及公共性探討。輔仁大學景觀設計學系碩士班碩士論文，新北市。