| 研究生: |
湯逸然 Thong, Yi-Lan |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
路線貨運業者在Stackelberg 賽局下之超額訂單訂價策略 The Over-order Pricing Strategies of Common Carriers Under The Stackelberg Game |
| 指導教授: |
林正章
Lin, Cheng-Chang |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 交通管理科學系 Department of Transportation and Communication Management Science |
| 論文出版年: | 2015 |
| 畢業學年度: | 103 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 70 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | stackelberg賽局 、超額訂單 、路線貨運業 、需求不確定性 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Stackelberg game, Common carriers, Over-order, Demand uncertainty |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:148 下載:1 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究是以路線貨運業者為例,探討有主從關係的雙占市場,兩位業者間需求皆固定的情境一及領導者需求不確定但已知跟隨者需求確定的情境二下,推導出跟隨者的反應函數,並利用這反應函數進行stackelberg運算,代入領導者的利潤函數,來求得兩位業者的stackelberg均衡貨運量。
在情境二中,本研究導入超額訂單的概念,參考報童模型的模式,並從文獻尋找適當的利潤函數表現方式,寫出本研究的利潤函數,來進行業者間stackelberg運算,並同時求解超額訂單的均衡運能(運輸規劃的capacity)。
本研究使用目前適合台灣貨運業市場的需求反函數,並使用更貼近市場狀況的常態分配的需求不確定性,結果發現可用航空業超額訂位(overbooking)的概念,來發展本研究的超額訂單(over-order)運能規劃,來降低業者的不確定性,並得到更好的市場均衡價格及利潤 。
This study is focused on the duopoly market’s stackelberg equilibrium of the two carriers in the freight delivery industry. The leader carrier of the market as our research main subject and our study objective is to find out the carriers’ best response under our two designed scenario model, once is the both carrier demand are certain and another one is the leader’s demand is affected by a non-price factor. And we derived the reaction function of follower and designed a calculating process to solve our model problem. We introduced an over-order concept into our second scenario which is learned from the overbooking and newsboy model literature expected to solve the uncertainty demand of leader and to get more profit. We used the Cobb-Douglas nonlinear inverse demand function to find out the demand and equilibrium price of the market and this function have proved suitable for described the less-than-truckload freight market of Taiwan. We used a hub-and spoke operations network to test our calculating model and find out that we can get a higher equilibrium market price and more profit through our designed over-order model.
參考文獻
一、 中文部分
1. 陳昭宏、張有恆,「航空公司動態營收管理策略模式之研究」,運輸計畫季87刊,1999 年,第28 卷 第4 期 第593-608 頁。
2. 陳建青,(2013),考慮主從式競爭關係下之最佳營運網路設計-以路線貨物運輸業為例,成功大學交通管理科學系學位論文,1-44。
3. 林嵩然,(2003),路線貨物運輸業需求不確定性載運規劃問題之研究,成功大學交通管理科學系學位論文,1-71。
4. 李宗儒、周宣光、林正章[當代物流管理:理論與實務],2007
5. 中華民國汽車貨運商業同業公會全國聯合會,2011
6. 宅配通食品電子商務之物流成功案例,2012
7. 宅配通官方網站
二、 英文部分
1. Barron, E. N. (2013). Game theory: an introduction (Vol. 2). John Wiley & Sons.
2. Beckmann, M. J. (1958). Decision and team problems in airline reservations.Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 134-145.
3. Chen, X., & Hao, G. (2013). Co-opetition alliance models of parallel flights for determining optimal overbooking policies. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 57(5), 1101-1111.
4. Davis, P. (1994). Airline ties profitability yield to management. SIAM News,27(5), 1-4.
5. Julien, L. A. (2011). A note on Stackelberg Competition. Journal of Economics,103(2), 171-187.
6. Kasilingam, R. G. (1997). An economic model for air cargo overbooking under stochastic capacity. Computers & industrial engineering, 32(1), 221-226.
7. Kimes, S. E. (1989). Yield management: a tool for capacity-considered service firms. Journal of operations management, 8(4), 348-363.
8. Lin, C. C., & Lee, S. C. (2015). Zone pricing for time-definite LTL freight transportation with elastic demand. Computers & Operations Research, 62, 51-60.
9. Nagarajan, M., & Sošić, G. (2008). Game-theoretic analysis of cooperation among supply chain agents: Review and extensions. European Journal of Operational Research, 187(3), 719-745.
10. Qin, Z., & Yang, J. (2008). Analysis of a revenue-sharing contract in supply chain management. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 11(1), 17-29.
11. Smith, B. C., Leimkuhler, J. F., & Darrow, R. M. (1992). Yield management at American airlines. interfaces, 22(1), 8-31.
12. Sulistio, A., Kim, K. H., & Buyya, R. (2008, May). Managing cancellations and no-shows of reservations with overbooking to increase resource revenue. InCluster Computing and the Grid, 2008. CCGRID'08. 8th IEEE International Symposium on (pp. 267-276). IEEE.
13. Suzuki, Y. (2002). An empirical analysis of the optimal overbooking policies for US major airlines. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 38(2), 135-149.
14. Suzuki, Y. (2006). The net benefit of airline overbooking. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 42(1), 1-19.
15. Von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (2007). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton university press.
16. Wang, X., & Fung, R. Y. (2014). An option-based hedging mechanism for managing the risk of overbooking in parallel airline alliances. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 70, 146-162.
校內:2017-08-27公開