| 研究生: |
張銀鶯 Chang, Ying-Ying |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
企業策略、資訊策略、供應鏈策略與供應鏈績效
關聯性之研究-以機械產業為實證 A Study on the Relationship among Enterprise Strategies, Information Strategies, Supply Chain Strategies and Supply Chain Performance to Machinery Industry |
| 指導教授: |
吳宗正
Wu, Chung-Cheng |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 高階管理碩士在職專班(EMBA) Executive Master of Business Administration (EMBA) |
| 論文出版年: | 2006 |
| 畢業學年度: | 94 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 76 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 供應鏈策略 、企業策略 、資訊策略 、供應鏈績效 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Supply Chain Performance, Supply Chain Strategies, Information Strategies, Enterprise Strategies |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:78 下載:4 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
台灣加入WTO 後,面對全球國際化、貿易自由化的競爭環境更顯激烈,我國機械產業,在這個國際化、全球化及資訊網路的推波助瀾環境下,其企業策略、資訊策略、供應鏈策略與供應鏈績效關聯性實有研究之必要。本研究採用問卷調查方式,探討機械產業之企業策略、資訊策略、供應鏈策略與供應鏈績效關聯性,以協助機械產業制定合適的供應鏈策略進而提升供應鏈績效。研究對象是針對台灣地區營業規模較大之機械產業公司,參考天下雜誌2005年5月份出版之台灣地區1000大製造業排行榜,其中符合工研院IEK-ITIS計畫(2005)所定義之狹義機械業,共有58家公司。採用郵寄問卷方式,以銷售、採購、生管、財務及資訊部門主管為主要對象,總共回收39家有效樣本。運用基本敘述統計、因素分析、信效度分析、差異性分析及線性結構關係模式,對所收集之樣本問卷做實證分析。本研究之結論如下:企業策略對資訊策略為直接關聯,對供應鏈策略也是直接關聯,對供應鏈績效則為間接關聯;供應鏈策略對供應鏈績效為直接關聯,資訊策略對於供應鏈績效也是直接關聯。綜上所述的實証,企業策略、資訊策略、供應鏈策略與供應鏈績效之關聯性,是呈現顯著性。
關鍵字:企業策略、資訊策略、供應鏈策略、供應鏈績效
The paper is to discuss the relationship among Enterprise Strategies, Information Strategies, Supply Chain Strategies and Supply Chain Performance for Machinery Industry. The sample of the study collected 58 published companies listed in Top 1000 in Common Wealth 2005. By conducting analysis in the study, we find out that there is direct relationship between Enterprise Strategies and Information Strategies. Besides it, there is direct relationship between Enterprise Strategies and Supply Chain Strategies. But there is indirect relationship between Enterprise Strategies and Supply Chain Performance. There is direct relationship between Supply Chain Strategies and Supply Chain Performance. And, there is direct relationship between Information Strategies and Supply Chain Performance.
Key word: Enterprise Strategies, Information Strategies, Supply Chain Strategies, Supply Chain Performance
一、中文部分:
1. 王守義(2003),企業電子化應用策略與方法之探討-台灣工具機業的實證研
究,東海大學工業工程與經營資訊研究所碩士論文。
2. 司徒達賢(2001),策略管理新論,智勝文化,第一、二章,第5-57頁。
3. 吳仁裕(2000),企業策略、資訊策略、人力資源管理策略對組織績效的影響,
中央大學資訊管理學系碩士班碩士論文。
4. 吳思華(2000),策略九說-策略思考的本質,麥田出版社,第一章,第35-61
頁。
5. 吳統雄 (1990),電話調查:理論與方法,第二版,聯經出版社。
6. 吳智仁(2001),電子商務應用與供應鏈績效間之相關性-以國內資訊產業為
例,政治大學資訊管理學系碩士學位論文。
7. 李慶恩、盧舜年、鄒坤霖(2003),供應鏈管理的第一本書,商周出版。
8. 高強,黃旭南,末吉俊幸著(2003),管理績效評估:資料包絡分析法,華泰文
化事業公司。
9. 高翠霜譯(2000),績效評估( Harvard business review on measuring
corporate performance),天下遠見出版社。
10. 陳順宇 (2004),多變量分析,四版,華泰文化。
11. 陳鴻基、嚴紀中(2004),管理資訊系統理論 科技、實務與應用第二版,雙葉
書廊有限公司。
12. 辜樹仁 (2005),天下雜誌2005年一千大調查,第272-274頁。
13. 黃思明(2004),神達維他命計畫,98%的訂單可在2天內交貨,天下文化 。
14. 經濟部工業局(2004),產業全球運籌電子化擴散計畫。
15. 經濟部技術處(2005),2005年機械產業年鑑,工研院IEK-ITIS計畫。
16. 經濟部商業司(2000),Internet 商業應用導入指引。
17. 經濟部統計處 (2005),中華民國台灣地區造業自動化及電子化調查報告。
18. 葉詠滋(2003),影響供應鏈策略及其效益之相關因素研究-以台灣製造業為
例,成功大學國際企業研究所碩士論文。
19. 劉熒潔 (2002),從ERP、SCM、CRM到電子商務,文魁資訊股份有公司。
20. 吳琮璠、謝清佳(2003),資訊管理-理論與實務,第五版,智勝文化。
二、英文部分:
1. Afuah, A. & Tucci, C. L. (2002), Internet Business Models and
Strategies, McGraw-Hill.
2. Applegate, L. A. & Austin, R. D. & Mcfarlan, F. W. (2005), Corporate
Information Strategy and Management 6th Edition, McGraw-Hill.
3. Bagozzi, R. P. & Yi, Y. (1988), On the Evaluation of Structural
Equation Models, Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 16, No. 1, 76-94.
4. Beamon, B. M. (1999), Measuring Supply Chain erformance,International
Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol.19, No.3, 275-292.
5. Boar, B. H. (1996), Strategic Thinking for Information Technology,
Wiley Computer publishing.
6. Bowersox, D. J. & Closs, D. J. (1996), Logistics Management – The
Integrated Supply Chain Process. McGraw-Hill.
7. Choi, S. Y. & Stable, D. O. & Winston, A. B. (1997), The Economics of
Electronic Commerce, Macmillan Technical Publishing, U.S.A.
8. Cohen, S. & Roussel, J. (2005), Strategic Supply Chain Management,
McGraw-Hill.
9. Coyle, J. J. & Bardi,E. J. & Jr, C. J. L. (2003), The Management of
Business Logistics: A Supply Chain Perspective, The Thormosn Learning
inc.
10. David, F. R. & Perter D. (2004), Strategic Management:Concepts And
Cases, U. K. Pearson Education, Inc.
11. Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981), Evaluating Structural Equation
Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error, Journal of
Marketing Research, Vol. 18, No.3 , 39-50.
12. Hair, J. F.&Anderson, R. E. &Tatham, R. L.&Black, W. C. (1998),
Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th Ed., Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs,
NJ.
13. Henderson, J. C. & Venkatraman, N. (1994), Strategic Alignment: A
Model for Organization Transformation Via Information Technology, in
Information Technology and the Corporation of the 1990s Research
Studies, Allen, T. J. , Scorr Morton, M. S. , Eds.New York, Oxford
University Press.
14. Hill, C. L. & Jones, G. R. (2004), Strategy Management, Boston:
Houghton Mifflin Company.
15. Hofer, C. W. & Cshendel, D. (1978), Strategic Formulation:Analytical.
Concepts. N.Y.: West Publishing, St. Paul, Minesota Company.
16. Kaiser, H. F.(1974), An Index of Factorial Simplicity, Psychometrika,
Vol. 39, No.1, 31-36.
17. King, W. R. & Thompson S. H. (1996), Key Dimensions of Facilitators
and Inhibitors for the Strategic Use of Information Technology,
Journal of Management Information Systems. Armonk, Vol. 12, No. 4, 35-
53.
18. Krajewski, L. J. & Larry P. R. (1999), Operations Management,
Addision- Wesley.
19. Krause, D. R. (1997), Supplier Development: Current Practices and
Outcomes, International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management
,Vol. 33, No. 2, 12-19.
20. Lancioni, R .A. & Smith, M. F. & Oliva, T. A. (2000), The Role of the
Internet in Supply Chain Management,Industrial Marketing Management,
Vol. 29, No. 1, 45-56.
21. Luftman, J. N. & Lewis, P. R. & Oldach, S. H. (1993), Transforming
the Enterprise: the Alignment of Business and Information Technology
Strategies, IBM system Journal, Vol. 32, No. 1, 198-221.
22. Marchand, D. A. & Davenpor, T. H. (2004), Mastering Information
Management, Financial Times Mastering.
23. Miller, A. & Dess, G. G. (1999), Strategic Management, New York:
McGraw -Hill, Inc.
24. Morash, E. A. & Droge, C. L. M. & Vickery, S. K. (1996), Strategic
Logistics Capabilities for Competitive Advantage and Firm Success.
Journal of business Logistics, Vol. 17, No. 1, 1-21.
25. Neely, A.&Gregory, M. & Platts, K. (1995), Performance Measurement
System Design, Internation Journal of Operations & Production
Management, Vol. 15, No. 4, 80-116.
26. Porter, M. E. (1980), Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing
Industries and Competitors. N. Y. : The Free Pres.
27. Porter, M. E. (1996), What Is Strategy, Harvard Business Review, Vol.
74, No. 6, 61-78.
28. Porter, M. E. & Millar, V. E. (1985), How Information Gives You
Competitive Advantage, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 63, No. 4, 149-
160.
29. Rai, A. &Patnayakuni, R. & Patnayakuni, N. (1997), Technology
Investment and Business Performance, Association for Computing
Machinery Communication of the ACM, Vol. 40, No. 7, 89-97.
30. Stroeken, J. H. M. (2000), Information technology, innovation and
supply chain structure, International Journal of Technology Management
, Vol. 20, No. 1, 2, 156-175.
31. Tan, F. B. (1995), The responsiveness of information technology to
business strategy formation: anempirical study. Journal of information
Technology, Vol.10, No. 3, 171-178.
32. Tan, K .C. & Kannan, V. R. & Handfield, R. B. & Ghosh, S. (1998),
Managing Competition, Quality, Customer Relations, And the Supply Base
, And Its Impacton firm Performance, Proceedings 1998 of the
Decision Science Institute.
33. Turban, E.&King, D. &Lee, J.&Viehland, D. (2004), Electronic
Commerce A Managerial Perspective, Person International Edition.