台灣長期面臨污染問題，諸多重大污染事件帶來的危害至今仍難以消除，顯示污染整治推動不易。如何有效推動整治並提升民眾的調適能力以降低危害，已成為亟待關注的課題。穩定資金投入、政府支持與整治技術固然重要，然而民眾對污染資訊的認知以及社會關注亦是不可忽視的推動力量。且若能提升民眾對污染知識與資訊的掌握，將有助於強化其風險意識與應對能力，進而減少污染帶來的影響。目前台灣污染資訊揭露方式較為單一，可能導致其資訊掌握程度與敏感度不足。為此，本研究旨在釐清民眾對污染資訊的認知與風險感知，並透過探討污染資訊對房價的影響檢視不動產市場對污染議題的反應。此外，本研究亦透過問卷分析不同規模汙染場址附近社區居民對污染風險感知，據以提出政策建議。
首先透過回顧相關文獻，掌握污染對城市發展所帶來的深層影響。過去研究多指出污染引發的污名化效應對房價具負面影響，亦常以房價變化作為污染影響的分析途徑。基於此，本研究採用特徵價格法，分析高雄市鄰近15處污染工廠場址的住宅交易資料，探討列管因素對房價之影響，藉此初步檢視民眾對污染資訊的掌握情形。研究結果顯示，發生在列管前或後的住房交易平均價格並不具有顯著性的差異。證明汙染場址的負面外部性並未體現於不動產交易市場，然此結果無法直接證實民眾對污染資訊掌握度不佳，仍需進一步驗證。本研究進行問卷調查更深入了解民眾認知與行為反應，探究背後的真實情形與可能因素。
透過文獻回顧綜整並釐清污染資訊傳播以及計畫行為理論，有助於本研究確立研究構想與架構，並據以對民眾之污染風險感知進行衡量。本研究篩選多篇文獻所考量之變數並將其納入問卷設計，並選擇三處鄰近不同規模污染工廠的區域進行問卷調查，並使用探索性因素分析確立構面，以作為分析之依據。本研究採用Spearman相關性分析，探討資訊掌握度與風險感知對行為決策的影響。研究結果與前沿研究相同，顯示資訊掌握度與風險感知皆與行為決策之間存在顯著正向關係，證實民眾對污染資訊的掌握程度將影響日常生活的選擇或是購屋決策。此外，透過 Mann-Whitney U 檢定與 Kruskal-Wallis H 檢定分析不同污染場址規模、居住屬性及社經背景對各構面之影響，發現場址規模與資訊掌握度、風險感知具有顯著關聯，但與行為決策無顯著差異；至於大多數居住與社經屬性則未顯示與構面間存在顯著關係。
本研究發現，資訊掌握度確實會影響民眾行為決策，目前的污染列管資訊未對房價產生顯著影響，可能與民眾對污染資訊掌握程度不足密切相關，進一步凸顯資訊在行為決策中所扮演的關鍵角色。此外，居住與社會屬性與各構面之間的關聯，也有助於釐清未來政策宣導時應優先關注的對象，從而提升民眾對污染議題的認知，並推動污染整治工作的有效落實。

Taiwan has long faced soil contamination issues, with the impacts of serious contamination events remaining difficult to clean and redevelop. While stable funding, government support, and remediation technologies are crucial, public awareness and information access also play important roles in driving effective contamination management.
This study explores the effects of contaminated site information disclosure on housing prices and public risk perception, using Kaohsiung City as a case study. By applying the hedonic price method to housing transactions near 15 contaminated industrial sites, the study finds no significant price difference before and after official site listing. To further investigate, a questionnaire survey was conducted to examine the correlations between information awareness, risk perception, and behavioral decisions. Spearman correlation analysis reveals a significant positive correlation among these factors. Additionally, site scale was significantly associated with both information awareness and risk perception. However, socio-economic and residential characteristics showed limited influence.
Results show that inadequate access to contaminated site information may explain the no significant impact on housing prices, highlighting the importance of targeted information disclosure and risk communication. Policy recommendations in the study are proposed to enhance public understanding and promote effective contamination response.

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Ajzen, I. (1989). Attitude structure and behavior. In Attitude structure and function (pp. 241-274). Psychology Press.
Al-Khyat, S., Naji, D. M., Hamad, H. T., & Onyeaka, H. (2023). A review on soil contamination sources: impact on engineering properties and remediation techniques. Journal of Engineering & Sustainable Development, 27(3). doi: https://doi.org/10.31272/jeasd.27.3.1
Ali Abd Al-Hameed, K. (2022). Spearman's correlation coefficient in statistical analysis. International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications, 13(1), 3249-3255.
Anderson, B., Böhmelt, T., & Ward, H. (2017). Public opinion and environmental policy output: a cross-national analysis of energy policies in Europe. Environmental Research Letters, 12(11), 114011. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/aa8f80
Bristow, E. C., & Brumbelow, K. (2006). Delay between sensing and response in water contamination events. Journal of infrastructure systems, 12(2), 87-95. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2006)12:2(87)
Canter, L. W., Nelson, D. I., & Everett, J. W. (1992). Public perception of water quality risks-influencing factors and enhancement opportunities. Journal of Environmental Systems, 22(2), 163-187. doi: https://doi.org/10.2190/93D9-JF0N-EEF8-W4PW
Case, B., Colwell, P. F., Leishman, C., & Watkins, C. (2006). The impact of environmental contamination on condo prices: A hybrid repeat‐sale/hedonic approach. Real Estate Economics, 34(1), 77-107. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6229.2006.00160.x
Chandnani, G., Gandhi, P., Kanpariya, D., Parikh, D., & Shah, M. (2022). A comprehensive analysis of contaminated groundwater: Special emphasis on nature-ecosystem and socio-economic impacts. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 19, 100813. doi:https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2022.100813
Chau, K. W., & Chin, T. (2003). A critical review of literature on the hedonic price model. International Journal for Housing Science and its applications, 27(2), 145-165. doi: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2073594
Coi, A., Minichilli, F., Bustaffa, E., Carone, S., Santoro, M., Bianchi, F., & Cori, L. (2016). Risk perception and access to environmental information in four areas in Italy affected by natural or anthropogenic pollution. Environment international, 95, 8-15. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2016.07.009
Danthurebandara, M., Van Passel, S., Nelen, D., Tielemans, Y., & Van Acker, K. (2012). Environmental and socio-economic impacts of landfills. Linnaeus Eco-Tech, 2012, 40-52. doi: http://hdl.handle.net/1942/14494
Das, K. R., & Imon, A. (2016). A brief review of tests for normality. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 5-12. doi: https://doi.org/10.11648/J.AJTAS.20160501.12
De Castro, P., Roberto, P., Marsili, D., & Comba, P. (2016). Fostering public health awareness on risks in contaminated sites. Capacity building and dissemination of scientific evidence. Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità, 52(4), 511-515. doi: https://doi.org/10.4415/ann_16_04_09
De Dominicis, S., Fornara, F., Ganucci Cancellieri, U., Twigger-Ross, C., & Bonaiuto, M. (2015). We are at risk, and so what? Place attachment, environmental risk perceptions and preventive coping behaviours. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, 66-78. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.05.010
Deaton, B. J., & Hoehn, J. P. (2004). Hedonic analysis of hazardous waste sites in the presence of other urban disamenities. Environmental Science & Policy, 7(6), 499-508. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2004.08.003
Dixon, T., Otsuka, N., & Abe, H. (2011). Critical success factors in urban brownfield regeneration: an analysis of ‘hardcore’sites in Manchester and Osaka during the economic recession (2009–10). Environment and Planning A, 43(4), 961-980. doi: https://doi.org/10.1068/a43468
Dunse, N., & Jones, C. (1998). A hedonic price model of office rents. Journal of property valuation and investment, 16(3), 297-312. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/14635789810221760
Fang, Y., Ding, N., Li, X., Wang, S., & Jiao, W. (2022). The influence of the public’s prior knowledge on their acceptance of risk control method for contaminated sites: A case study in China. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 61(4), 2787-2797. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2021.08.005
Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S., Read, S., & Combs, B. (1978). How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. Policy Sciences, 9, 127-152. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00143739
Fishbein, M., & Yzer, M. C. (2003). Using theory to design effective health behavior interventions. Communication theory, 13(2), 164-183. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2003.tb00287.x
Frantál, B., Greer-Wootten, B., Klusáček, P., Krejčí, T., Kunc, J., & Martinát, S. (2015). Exploring spatial patterns of urban brownfields regeneration: The case of Brno, Czech Republic. Cities, 44, 9-18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2014.12.007
Ghabouli, E., Soltani, A., & Ranjbar, E. (2023). Heritage and the regeneration of urban brownfields: insights on public perception in Tehran, Iran. Heritage, 6(5), 4451-4471. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage6050235
Grasmück, D., & Scholz, R. W. (2005). Risk perception of heavy metal soil contamination by high‐exposed and low‐exposed inhabitants: The role of knowledge and emotional concerns. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 25(3), 611-622. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00628.x
Gregory, R., Slovic, P., & Flynn, J. (1996). Risk perceptions, stigma, and health policy. Health & place, 2(4), 213-220. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/1353-8292(96)00019-6
Guignet, D., Jenkins, R., Ranson, M., & Walsh, P. J. (2018). Contamination and incomplete information: Bounding implicit prices using high-profile leaks. Journal of environmental economics and management, 88, 259-282. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2017.12.003
Hadden, S. G. (1991). Public Perception of Hazardous Waste 1. Risk Analysis, 11(1), 47-57. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1991.tb00568.x
Hammond, E. B., Coulon, F., Hallett, S. H., Thomas, R., Hardy, D., & Beriro, D. J. (2023). Digital tools for brownfield redevelopment: Stakeholder perspectives and opportunities. Journal of Environmental Management, 325, 116393. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116393
Haninger, K., Ma, L., & Timmins, C. (2017). The value of brownfield remediation. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 4(1), 197-241. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/689743
Ho, S. S., Looi, J., Leong, A. D., & Leung, Y. W. (2019). Explicating factual and subjective science knowledge: Knowledge as a mediator of news attention and attitudes. Asian Journal of Communication, 29(1), 73-91. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2018.1518466
Islam, M. A., Saidin, Z. H., Ayub, M. A., & Islam, M. S. (2022). Modelling behavioural intention to buy apartments in Bangladesh: An extended theory of planned behaviour (TPB). Heliyon, 8(9). doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10519
Janmaimool, P., & Watanabe, T. (2014). Evaluating determinants of environmental risk perception for risk management in contaminated sites. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 11(6), 6291-6313. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110606291
Jiang, Y., Ye, Y., Sun, C., Guo, X., & Shi, Z. (2024). Monitoring public perceptions of contaminated sites based on social media. Ecological Informatics, 81, 102650. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2024.102650
Judge, M., Warren-Myers, G., & Paladino, A. (2019). Using the theory of planned behaviour to predict intentions to purchase sustainable housing. Journal of cleaner production, 215, 259-267. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.029
Kasperson, R. E., Renn, O., Slovic, P., Brown, H. S., Emel, J., Goble, R.,…Ratick, S. (1988). The social amplification of risk: A conceptual framework. Risk Analysis, 8(2), 177-187. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1988.tb01168.x
Kwak, S. G., & Kim, J. H. (2017). Central limit theorem: the cornerstone of modern statistics. Korean journal of anesthesiology, 70(2), 144. doi: https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2017.70.2.144
Kyriazos, T. A. (2018). Applied psychometrics: sample size and sample power considerations in factor analysis (EFA, CFA) and SEM in general. Psychology, 9(08), 2207. doi: https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2018.98126
Lee, S., & Golub, A. (2021). The residential property value premium of the proximity to carsharing and bikesharing services: Evidence from New York City. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 11, 100427. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2021.100427
Letang, S., & Taylor, R. (2012). Community perception of redevelopment changes and its impact on brownfields redevelopment success. OIDA International Journal of Sustainable Development, 5(11), 21-42. doi: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2220578
Li, C., & Huang, X. (2022). How does COVID-19 risk perception affect wellness tourist intention: Findings on Chinese generation Z. Sustainability, 15(1), 141. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010141
Li, X., Chen, W., Cundy, A. B., Chang, A. C., & Jiao, W. (2018). Analysis of influencing factors on public perception in contaminated site management: Simulation by structural equation modeling at four sites in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 210, 299-306. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.01.029
Li, X., Hu, Z., Cao, J., & Xu, X. (2022). The impact of environmental accountability on air pollution: A public attention perspective. Energy Policy, 161, 112733. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112733
Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of psychology.
Liu, N. (2024). Influence and mechanisms of perceived information disclosure in shaping public attitudes towards waste disposal facilities: Evidence from China. Ecological Indicators, 166, 112514. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112514
Longo, A., & Alberini, A. (2006). What are the effects of contamination risks on commercial and industrial properties? Evidence from Baltimore, Maryland. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 49(5), 713-737. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560600850028
Marris, C., Langford, I., Saunderson, T., & O'Riordan, T. (1997). Exploring the “psychometric paradigm”: Comparisons between aggregate and individual analyses. Risk Analysis, 17(3), 303-312. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1997.tb00868.x
Murch, A. W. (1971). Public concern for environmental pollution. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 35(1), 100-106. doi: 10.1088/0963-6625/7/3/001
Phopluechai, R., Arreeras, T., Jia, X., Phonsitthangkun, S., Arreeras, S., & Prommakhot, S. (2024). Examining Factors Affected to Travel Decision During Air Pollution Crisis in Chiang Rai Using Exploratory Factor Analysis. 2024 ASU International Conference in Emerging Technologies for Sustainability and Intelligent Systems (ICETSIS). doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICETSIS61505.2024.10459670
Pu, S., Shao, Z., Fang, M., Yang, L., Liu, R., Bi, J., & Ma, Z. (2019). Spatial distribution of the public's risk perception for air pollution: a nationwide study in China. Science of the Total Environment, 655, 454-462. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.232
Rosen, S. (1974). Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition. Journal of political economy, 82(1), 34-55. doi: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1830899
Ruggieri, S., Maltese, S., Drago, G., Panunzi, S., Cibella, F., Bianchi, F.,…Cori, L. (2021). Measuring risk perception in pregnant women in heavily polluted areas: A new methodological approach from the neho birth cohort. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(20), 10616. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182010616
Schmiege, S. J., Bryan, A., & Klein, W. M. (2009). Distinctions between worry and perceived risk in the context of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of applied social psychology, 39(1), 95-119. doi: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00431.x
Scovell, M., McShane, C., Swinbourne, A., & Smith, D. (2022). Rethinking risk perception and its importance for explaining natural hazard preparedness behavior. Risk Analysis, 42(3), 450-469. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13780
Sedgwick, P. (2012). Parametric v non-parametric statistical tests. Bmj, 344. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e1753
Sedgwick, P. (2014). Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. Bmj, 349. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7327
Shaw, R., Takeuchi, Y., & Rouhban, B. (2009). Education, capacity building and public awareness for disaster reduction. Landslides–disaster risk reduction, 499-515. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69970-5_26
Shreve, C., Begg, C., Fordham, M., & Müller, A. (2016). Operationalizing risk perception and preparedness behavior research for a multi-hazard context. Environmental hazards, 15(3), 227-245. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2016.1176887
Siegrist, M., Keller, C., & Kiers, H. A. (2005). A new look at the psychometric paradigm of perception of hazards. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 25(1), 211-222. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0272-4332.2005.00580.x
Simons, R. (2006). Peer Reviewed Evidence on Property Value Impacts by Source of Contamination. Section in When Bad Things Happen To Good Property. Environmental Law Institute Press. Washington DC, 350.
Skinner, K., Mylene, R., Danielle, B., Christopher, F., Amanda, B., & and Laird, B. (2024). Awareness and perceptions of contaminants in the Dehcho and Sahtú Regions of the Northwest Territories. International Journal of Circumpolar Health, 83(1), 2387381. https://doi.org/10.1080/22423982.2024.2387381
Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. science, 236(4799), 280-285. doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3563507
Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. (2016). Facts and fears: Understanding perceived risk. In The perception of risk (pp. 137-153). Routledge. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0445-4_9
Sujood, Hamid, S., & Bano, N. (2021). Behavioral intention of traveling in the period of COVID-19: an application of the theory of planned behavior (TPB) and perceived risk. International Journal of Tourism Cities, 8(2), 357-378. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJTC-09-2020-0183
Tendero, M., & Bazart, C. (2024). “I can't get no satisfaction”: Soil contaminated brownfield redevelopment in France. Cities, 145, 104719. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104719
Tonin, S., & Turvani, M. (2014). Redeveloping industrial land: are contamination and remediation schemes affecting the price of industrial real estate properties? Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 57(7), 1043-1065. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2013.782271
Vaughan, E. (1993). Chronic exposure to an environmental hazard: risk perceptions and self-protective behavior. Health Psychology, 12(1), 74. doi: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0278-6133.12.1.74
Wachinger, G., Renn, O., Begg, C., & Kuhlicke, C. (2013). The risk perception paradox—implications for governance and communication of natural hazards. Risk Analysis, 33(6), 1049-1065. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01942.x
Walsh, P., & Mui, P. (2017). Contaminated sites and information in hedonic models: An analysis of a NJ property disclosure law. Resource and Energy Economics, 50, 1-14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2017.06.005
Wang, X., & Yang, M. (2024). The effect of soil pollution information disclosure on housing prices. China Economic Review, 83, 102112. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2024.102112
Weber, O., Scholz, R. W., Bühlmann, R., & Grasmück, D. (2001). Risk perception of heavy metal soil contamination and attitudes toward decontamination strategies. Risk Analysis, 21(5), 967-967. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.215165
Wedding, G. C., & Crawford-Brown, D. (2007). Measuring site-level success in brownfield redevelopments: A focus on sustainability and green building. Journal of Environmental Management, 85(2), 483-495. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.10.018
Wester-Herber, M. (2004). Underlying concerns in land-use conflicts—the role of place-identity in risk perception. Environmental Science & Policy, 7(2), 109-116. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2003.12.001
Yang, F., Yao, S., & Li, Y. (2023). Solidarity mobilization and citizen participation effectiveness in urban area: The case of community recycling program. Cities, 143, 104623. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104623
Yang, X., Zhang, Z., Rao, S., Liu, B., & Li, Y. (2022). How does environmental information disclosure affect pollution emissions: firm-level evidence from China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(19), 12763. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912763
Yildiz, A., Dickinson, J., Priego‐Hernández, J., & Teeuw, R. (2023). Children's disaster knowledge, risk perceptions, and preparedness: A cross‐country comparison in Nepal and Turkey. Risk Analysis, 43(4), 747-761. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13937
Zhang, L., He, G.-z., Mol, A. P., & Lu, Y.-l. (2013). Public perceptions of environmental risk in China. Journal of risk research, 16(2), 195-209. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2012.726240
Zhou, Z., Liu, J., Zeng, H., Zhang, T., & Chen, X. (2020). How does soil pollution risk perception affect farmers' pro-environmental behavior? The role of income level. Journal of Environmental Management, 270, 110806. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110806
Zhu, W., Yao, N., Guo, Q., & Wang, F. (2020). Public risk perception and willingness to mitigate climate change: city smog as an example. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 42, 881-893. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-019-00355-x
Zhuang, J., Cox, J., Cruz, S., Dearing, J. W., Hamm, J. A., & Upham, B. (2016). Environmental stigma: Resident responses to living in a contaminated area. American Behavioral Scientist, 60(11), 1322-1341. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764216657381
POST- Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology. (1998). A brown and pleasant land. London: POST. https://post.parliament.uk/research-briefings/post-pn-117/
Ferber, U. and S. Tomerius (2003), "Brownfield Redevelopment: Strategies and Approaches in Europe and the United States", in Private Finance and Economic Development: City and Regional Investment, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264034860-7-en.
US Environmental Protection Agency.(2011). Handbook on the Benefits, Costs, and Impacts of Land Cleanup and Reuse (EPA-240-R-11-001). Author. https://www.epa.gov/environmental-economics/epa-handbook-benefits-costs-and-impacts-land-cleanup-and-reuse-2011
US Environmental Protection Agency. (2020).Brownfields and Land Revitalization Program History. Author. https://www.epa.gov/brownfields/brownfields-and-land-revitalization-program-history
Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R. (2010). News that matters: Television & American opinion. University of Chicago Press.
Messer, K., Schulze, W., Hackett, K., Cameron, T., & McClelland, G. (2004). Stigma: The Psychology and Economics of Superfund. Department of Applied Economics & Management, University of Colorado.
Miller, J. D. (1998). The measurement of civic scientific literacy. Public understanding of science, 7(3), 203.
Slovic, P. (2000). The perception of risk. Earthscan Publications.
Tomerius, S., & Ferber, U. (2003). Brownfield redevelopment: Strategies and approaches in Europe and the United States. Private Finance and Economic Development, 125.
Walker, R. V. (2013). Defining and identifying “stigma”. In Risk, Media and Stigma. Routledge, 353-359.
State of California Department of Real Estate. (2005). Disclosures in Real Property Transactions Sixth Edition. https://dre.ca.gov/Publications/CompleteListPublications.html.
Washington State Legislature Chapter 64.06 RCW. (2016). REAL PROPERTY TRANSFERS—SELLERS' DISCLOSURES. https://app.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=64.06
日本民法第570条.(2017修正). https://laws.e-gov.go.jp/law/129AC0000000089#Mp-Pa_3-Ch_2-Se_3-Ss_2
荷蘭Artikel 17 Burgerlijk Wetboek Boek 7. (2020). Afdeling 2. Verplichtingen van de verkoper. https://maxius.nl/burgerlijk-wetboek-boek-7/artikel17
European Environment Agency. EEA Glossary. https://www.eea.europa.eu/help/glossary/eea-glossary/contaminated-site.
United Nations. (2015). The 17 Goals. https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal11
POLITICO. (2017) https://www.politico.com/story/2017/04/27/fdr-signs-soil-conservation-act-april-27-1935-237538
土壌汚染調査の株式会社ジオリゾーム. (2024). 契約不適合責任の追完履行請求権. https://www.georhizome.co.jp/faq/faq-defects/.
NALOG.NL. (2022). Brokers will be required to disclose information on the sale of real estate. https://www.nalog.nl/zh-CN/news/2022/07/04/maklerov-obyazhut-raskryvat-informaciyu-po-prodazhe-nedvizhimosti/
Kernkamp, H. (2019). When your new Dutch home has hidden defects. https://minerva-advocaten.nl/en/news/home-hidden-defects
李春長，梁志民，簡啓珉，俞錚（2020）。高雄市環狀輕軌對鄰近地區住宅價格之影響: 以差異中之差異法結合分量迴歸模型之分析。Journal of Taiwan Land Research，23（2），195-221。
李翠萍（2015）。環境污染對鄰近區域的影響分析--以台中市污染場址周邊地價為例。中國行政評論，21（4），17-47。
許育齡，梁朝雲（2012）。探究想像力的意涵與特徵─ 探索性與驗證性因素分析之發現。教育心理學報，44（2），349-372。
黃乙芹，侯文萱，呂芊曄，李岳蓁，李佩珍，陳怡臻，林明彥，王毓正，李中一（2021）。台灣成年民眾之室外空氣污染健康識能調查。Taiwan Journal of Publich Health/Taiwan Gong Gong Wei Sheng Za Zhi，40（5）。
黃怡潔，江穎慧，張金鶚（2017）。臺北市公共住宅對周圍住宅價格之影響。都市與計劃，44（3），277-302。
黃柏翰（2006）。臺灣環境污染實錄安順廠事件之省思。應用倫理研究通訊，37，45-48。
趙子元（2011）。棕地再發展之挑戰: 美國經驗與台灣省思。都市更新簡訊，49。
鄧詠竹，曾子容，詹大千（2018）。健康資訊傳播對民眾空氣污染風險認知的影響。Taiwan Journal of Publich Health/Taiwan Gong Gong Wei Sheng Za Zhi，37（4）。
廖咸興，張芳玲（1997）。 不動產評價模式特徵價格法與逼近調整法之比較。住宅學報，5， 17-35。
毛　婷（2023）。輕軌設施對於鄰近房屋價值之影響—以淡海輕軌及高雄環狀輕軌為例。碩士學位論文，國立中山大學企業管理學系研究所。，高雄市
艾兆蕾（2005）。影響住宅區地價因素之空間分析—以鄉鎮與縣市為例。碩士學位論文，世新大學經濟學研究所(含碩專班)，臺北市。
沈柏瑜（2024）。基於社會融合觀點探討臺北市社會住宅混合居住政策-以大同區斯文首善與信義區廣慈社會住宅為例。碩士學位論文，國立成功大學都市計劃學系，臺南市。
沈晋輝（2022）。空氣污染對於房價的影響-以桃園重劃區為例。碩士學位論文，國立中央大學產業經濟研究所，桃園市。
林炎欣（2008）。房價特徵模型之空間自我相關問題分析。碩士學位論文，國立成功大學都市計劃學系碩博士班，臺南市。
許育誠（2002）。棕地再發展之研究─都市計畫內工業區更新之新方向。碩士學位論文，國立臺北大學都市計劃研究所，臺北市。
許芷涵（2020）。褐地對周邊房價的影響分析。碩士學位論文，國立政治大學地政學系，臺北市。
陳吟萍（2018）。以計畫行為理論及知覺價值探討高雄地區之購屋意圖及購屋行為之研究。碩士學位論文，國立高雄應用科技大學財富與稅務管理系碩士在職專班，高雄市。
陳玗君（2021）。空氣污染對房地產價格的影響 －台灣之實證研究。碩士學位論文，國立中央大學經濟學系，桃園市。
陳冠廷（2013）。Gis空間迴歸分析地價變異-以台南市東區為例。碩士學位論文，國立成功大學地球科學系專班，臺南市。
陳既翕（2013）。透天住宅特徵屬性對房價之影響分析 -以台南市永康區透天住宅為例。碩士學位論文，崑山科技大學房地產開發與管理研究所，台南市。
陳菁芬（2020）。高雄市鳳山區與左營區透天住宅價格影響因素之研究。碩士學位論文，國立中央大學金融系， 桃園縣。
黃郁欣（2022）。河川污染風險感知與調適行為研究-以桃園市中壢區新街溪流域為例。碩士學位論文，國立清華大學環境與文化資源學系所，新竹市。
黃紹東（2004）。台南市東區住宅價格之空間自我迴歸分析。碩士學位論文，國立成功大學都市計劃學系碩博士班，臺南市。
黃瓊如（2008）。台南市不動產價格因素之研究—特徵價格法之應用。碩士學位論文，屏東科技大學財務金融研究所學位論文，屏東縣。
楊鈞嵐（2013）。中科臺中園區附近居民及工廠員工之健康、空氣品質、環境風險感知與空氣品質之關聯性研究。碩士學位論文，國立臺中教育大學科學應用與推廣學系環境教育及管理碩士班，臺中市。
詹仁廷（2024）。臺北市宗教設施對周遭房價的影響 -以特徵價格法與雙重差分法評估。碩士學位論文，國立臺北大學經濟學系，臺北市。
劉元欽（2022）。從空氣污染之空間距離探討對房價的影響-以台化公司彰化廠為例。碩士學位論文，國立中興大學應用經濟學系所，臺中市。
蕭瑋彤（2022）。都市更新對高雄市房地產市場的時空影響效果：將差異中之差異法應用到特徵價格法模型。碩士學位論文，國立中山大學經濟學研究所，高雄市。
國家環境研究院（2024）。國家氣候變遷科學報告2024第五章氣候變遷風險評估與調適。 https://www.nera.gov.tw/zh-tw/ScienceReport.html
行政院環境保護署（2014）。 土壤及地下水污染整治與再開發對周邊不動產價格與租稅收益影響之探討。
行政院環境部（2023）。 環境部112年版年報提要分析。
環境部資料集目錄（2024）。土壤及地下水污染場址列管概況(2024.08.15). 環境部統計處。檢自：https://data.moenv.gov.tw/dataset/detail/STAT_P_125
內政部不動產交易實價查詢服務網不動產成交案件實際資訊資料供應系統（2025）。高雄市不動產買賣 (2025.03.20)。檢自：https://lvr.land.moi.gov.tw/
內政地理資訊圖資雲整合服務平台TGOS（2025）。批次門牌地址比對(2025.05.27). 內政部資訊服務司。檢自：https://www.tgos.tw/tgos/Addr/Compare
內政地理資訊圖資雲整合服務平台TGOS（2021）。捷運SHP (2025.05.27). 內政部國土測繪中心。檢自：https://www.tgos.tw/tgos/MoiMetadata/e24aa38c-b63b-4b74-a0c8-addd235c4edb
內政地理資訊圖資雲整合服務平台TGOS（2021）。臺鐵車站SHP (2025.05.27). 內政部國土測繪中心。檢自：https://www.tgos.tw/tgos/MoiMetadata/7f19e9e9-cc37-4f26-8496-ca94f329ab1d
內政地理資訊圖資雲整合服務平台TGOS（2021）。輕軌捷運SHP(2025.05.27). 內政部國土測繪中心。檢自：https://www.tgos.tw/tgos/MoiMetadata/de958762-5ee5-49d6-a3f7-4bf666c7b696
教育部統計處（2024）。國民小學與國民中學學校明錄(2025.04.04). 教育部統計處。檢自：ttps://depart.moe.edu.tw/ed4500/News_Content.aspx?n=5A930C32CC6C3818&sms=91B3AAE8C6388B96&s=8A351A43EC0708BF
監察院全球資訊網（2025）監察成果調查報告 (109.07.10公告)。檢自：https://www.cy.gov.tw/CyBsBoxContent.aspx?n=133&s=17215
高雄市里政資訊網（2025）後鄉里簡介。檢自：https://village.kcg.gov.tw/VillageDetail.aspx#divMap
高雄市路竹戶政事務所（2025）路竹區114年7月各里現住人口數按性別及年齡分(114.08.06公告)。檢自： https://lujhu-house.kcg.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=3CA109DECABC61D1&sms=DFBB21ED60A31940&s=3E649C92A1A1DCC0
高雄市里政資訊網（2025）北嶺里簡介。檢自：https://village.kcg.gov.tw/VillageDetail.aspx#divMap
大林蒲遷村計畫網站（2025）大林蒲說明會簡報 (114.06.24公告)。檢自：https://dalinpu.kcg.gov.tw/DRP/web_page/DRP003.jsp?DRP002001=A0111406040
行政院環境部（2010）。《土壤及地下水污染整治法》。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=O0110001
內政部地政司（2019）。《不動產說明書應記載及不得記載事項》。https://glrs.moi.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=FL