簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 李亦婷
Lee, I-Ting
論文名稱: 應用認知負荷理論觀點探討視覺隱喻教學法對學習效果之影響-以商業模式九宮格之教學為例
Applying the Viewpoint of Cognitive Load Theory to Exploring the Effect of Visual Metaphor Teaching Method on Learning Effectiveness - Using the Business Model Canvas as an Example
指導教授: 王維聰
Wang, Wei-Tsong
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 工業與資訊管理學系
Department of Industrial and Information Management
論文出版年: 2024
畢業學年度: 112
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 110
中文關鍵詞: 視覺隱喻認知負荷理論學習焦慮學習效果
外文關鍵詞: Visual Metaphor, Cognitive Load Theory, Learning Anxiety, Learning Effectiveness
相關次數: 點閱:104下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 近年來,隨數位教學的蓬勃發展,教育領域正日益受益於不斷演進的科技。在這個變革的時代,研究者們積極探索新的教學法,以提高學習效果並應對學習者在數位環境中所面臨的挑戰。本論文旨在深入研究,以認知負荷理論觀點為基礎,探討一種創新的教學法——視覺隱喻教學法,並以商業模式九宮格之教學為例,評估其對學習效果的影響,學習過程中學習者的認知負荷狀態,以及學習者的焦慮是否對認知負荷、學習焦慮造成影響。
    本研究設計實驗探討視覺隱喻教材及視覺隱喻圖像創作的教學設計效果。招募大專院校學生作為實驗受試者,透過遠距教學實驗數據及主觀評估問卷、實際學習效果等進行資料蒐集與數據分析,以驗證我們的結構方程模型。本研究共回收198份有效問卷,以獨立t檢定和結構方程模型進行驗證性分析。結果顯示,實驗組受試者感知的視覺隱喻品質、增生認知負荷、認知學習效果較高,學習焦慮、外部認知負荷則較低,且實驗組的學習成效顯著高於對照組。
    本研究補足視覺隱喻應用於教學場域的學術研究缺口,並將其與認知負荷理論結合,以解釋視覺隱喻提升學習效果的途徑。研究中透過實驗證實視覺隱喻對於學習的五大好處,包含易記憶性、易理解性、提升注意力、激發好奇心與創造力,表明視覺隱喻教學法能有效降低學習者外部認知負荷的觀點,且令學習者主動參與教學活動,能顯著提升增生認知負荷,認知負荷的變化亦透過認知學習效果的中介效果,進而提升實際學習效果。此外學習焦慮對外部認知負荷、認知學習效果皆有顯著影響,說明在教學中應盡可能降低學生的焦慮感,而視覺隱喻方法亦有降低學習焦慮之效。

    In this transformative era, researchers are exploring new teaching methods to enhance learning outcomes and address challenges in digital environments. This study examines an innovative method—visual metaphor instruction—based on cognitive load theory, using the Business Model Canvas as an example. It evaluates the impact on learning outcomes, cognitive load, and whether learners' anxiety affects these factors.
    Experiments were designed to explore the effects of visual metaphor materials and instructional design. College students and graduate students participated, and data were collected through remote teaching experiments, subjective assessment questionnaires, and actual learning outcomes. A total of 198 valid questionnaires were analyzed using independent t-tests and structural equation modeling. Results showed the experimental group perceived higher quality in visual metaphors, increased intrinsic cognitive load, and higher cognitive learning effectiveness, while experiencing lower learning anxiety and extraneous cognitive load. Additionally, the experimental group's learning outcomes were significantly higher than the control group's.
    Based on the SEM analysis results, visual metaphor instruction reduced learners' extraneous cognitive load, encouraged active participation, and enhanced intrinsic cognitive load. Changes in cognitive load mediated by cognitive learning effectiveness further improved outcomes. Additionally, learning anxiety significantly impacted extraneous cognitive load and cognitive learning effectiveness, suggesting teaching should minimize student anxiety. The visual metaphor method also reduced learning anxiety.
    In summary, this study fills a research gap by integrating visual metaphors in instructional design, providing valuable insights into their influence on cognitive load and learning outcomes in digital learning environments.

    摘要 I 目錄 VIII 表目錄 XI 圖目錄 XII 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究背景與動機 1 1.2 研究目的 2 1.3 研究範圍與限制 3 1.4 研究流程 4 第二章 文獻探討 6 2.1 商業模式九宮格 (Business Model Canvas) 6 2.1.1 商業模式與商業模式九宮格的起源與定義 6 2.1.2 商業模式九宮格九大要素 7 2.2 視覺隱喻 (Visual Metaphor) 9 2.2.1 視覺隱喻之定義 9 2.2.2 視覺隱喻之學習 11 2.2.3 視覺隱喻品質之評估 13 2.3 認知負荷理論 (Cognitive Load Theory) 15 2.3.1 認知負荷理論的分類 16 2.3.2 認知負荷理論於數位教學之研究 19 2.3.3 認知負荷的測量 21 2.4 學習焦慮 (Learning Anxiety) 22 2.5 學習效果 (Learning Effectiveness) 24 2.6 小結 25 第三章 研究方法 27 3.1 研究架構 27 3.2 研究假說 28 3.2.1 視覺隱喻品質與學習焦慮 28 3.2.2 視覺隱喻品質與認知負荷 28 3.2.3 學習焦慮與認知負荷 29 3.2.4 認知負荷與學習效果 30 3.2.5 學習焦慮與學習效果 31 3.3 實驗設計 31 3.3.1 變項說明 32 3.3.2 實驗對象 33 3.3.3 實驗流程 33 3.3.4 教材設計與測驗內容 35 3.4 問卷構面 37 3.5 問卷設計 38 3.5.1 視覺隱喻品質 39 3.5.2 認知負荷理論 41 3.5.3 學習焦慮 41 3.5.4 認知學習效果 42 3.6 資料分析方法 43 3.6.1 結構方程模型資料分析方法 43 3.6.2 實驗資料分析方法 46 3.7 前測與資料蒐集 47 3.7.1 前測 47 3.7.2 資料蒐集 51 第四章 資料分析與結果 52 4.1 敘述性統計分析 52 4.1.1 問卷回收狀況 52 4.1.2 基本資料敘述性統計 53 4.1.3 研究變項常態性檢定 56 4.2 實驗操弄驗證與同質性檢定 58 4.2.1 實驗操弄驗證 58 4.2.2 同質性檢定 59 4.3 結構方程模式-衡量模型 60 4.3.1 信度分析 60 4.3.2 效度分析 62 4.3.3 共線性檢驗 67 4.4 結構方程模式-結構模型 68 4.4.1 路徑分析 68 4.5 假說檢定 70 4.6 研究分析與討論 72 4.6.1 學習焦慮 72 4.6.2 外部認知負荷 73 4.6.3 增生認知負荷 73 4.6.4 學習效果 74 第五章 結論 75 5.1 學術貢獻 75 5.2 實務貢獻 76 5.3 研究限制與未來研究方向 77 5.3.1 研究限制 77 5.3.2 未來研究方向 78 參考文獻 79 附錄A 先驗知識、案例分析題目與答案 87 附錄B 正式問卷 90 附錄C 創作視覺隱喻圖像 94

    Alyami, H., Alawami, M., Lyndon, M., Alyami, M., Coomarasamy, C., Henning, M., Hill, A., & Sundram, F. (2019). Impact of using a 3D visual metaphor serious game to teach history-taking content to medical students: Longitudinal mixed methods pilot study. JMIR Serious Games, 7(3), e13748
    Alyami, M., Alyami, H., Sundram, F., & Haarhoff, B. A. (2017). Evaluation of a visual metaphor of suicide risk factors: Results from a pilot randomized controlled trial in psychology students. American Journal of Educational Research, 5(6), 606-611
    Alyami, H., Sundram, F., Hill, A. G., Alyami, M., & Cheung, G. (2015). Visualizing psychiatric formulation. Australasian Psychiatry, 23(5), 575-580.
    Anmarkrud, Ø., Andresen, A., & Bråten, I. (2019). Cognitive load and working memory in multimedia learning: Conceptual and measurement issues. Educational Psychologist, 54(2), 61-83.
    Arnold, J. (2000). Seeing through listening comprehension exam anxiety. TESOL Quarterly, 34(4), 777-786.
    Astutik, S., & Prahani, B. K. (2018). The Practicality and Effectiveness of Collaborative Creativity Learning (CCL) Model by Using PhET Simulation to Increase Students' Scientific Creativity. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 409-424.
    Bell, E., & Davison, J. (2013). Visual management studies: Empirical and theoretical approaches. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(2), 167-184.
    Bounegru, L., & Forceville, C. (2011). Metaphors in editorial cartoons representing the global financial crisis. Visual Communication, 10(2), 209-229.
    Brunken, R., Plass, J. L., & Leutner, D. (2003). Direct measurement of cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 53-61.
    Casadesus-Masanell, R., & Ricart, J. E. (2010). From strategy to business models and onto tactics. Long Range Planning, 43(2-3), 195-215.
    Chang, C. C., Liang, C., Chou, P. N., & Lin, G. Y. (2017). Is game-based learning better in flow experience and various types of cognitive load than non-game-based learning? Perspective from multimedia and media richness. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 218-227.
    Chang, C. C., Warden, C. A., Liang, C., & Lin, G. Y. (2018). Effects of digital game-based learning on achievement, flow and overall cognitive load. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 155-167.
    Chen, I. J., & Chang, C. C. (2009). Cognitive Load Theory: An Empirical Study of Anxiety and Task Performance in Language Learning. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 7(2), 729-746.
    Cheon, J., & Grant, M. M. (2012). The effects of metaphorical interface on germane cognitive load in web-based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60, 399-420.
    Choi, H. H., Van Merriënboer, J. J., & Paas, F. (2014). Effects of the physical environment on cognitive load and learning: Towards a new model of cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review, 26(2), 225-244.
    Christakou, A., Zervas, Y., Psychountaki, M., & Stavrou, N. A. (2012). Development and validation of the attention questionnaire of rehabilitated athletes returning to competition. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 17(4), 499-510.
    Chrysafiadi, K., & Virvou, M. (2013). PeRSIVA: An empirical evaluation method of a student model of an intelligent e-learning environment for computer programming. Computers & Education, 68, 322-333.
    Chuang, H. H., & Liu, H. C. (2012). Effects of different multimedia presentations on viewers’ information-processing activities measured by eye-tracking technology. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(2), 276-286.
    Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3(3), 149-210.
    Davey, J., & Lumsden, P. (2010). From cats to roller-coasters: creative use of posters to explore students' perceptions of PDP. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, Special Edition: Researching PDP Practice (November). https://doi.org/10.47408/jldhe.v0i0.98
    Diefenbach, M. A., Weinstein, N. D., & O'reilly, J. (1993). Scales for assessing perceptions of health hazard susceptibility. Health Education Research, 8(2), 181-192.
    Eppler, M. J. (2006). A comparison between concept maps, mind maps, conceptual diagrams, and visual metaphors as complementary tools for knowledge construction and sharing. Information Visualization, 5(3), 202-210.
    Feinstein, H. (1982). Meaning and visual metaphor. Studies in Art Education, 23(2), 45-55.
    Frederiksen, J. G., Sørensen, S. M. D., Konge, L., Svendsen, M. B. S., Nobel-Jørgensen, M., Bjerrum, F., & Andersen, S. A. W. (2020). Cognitive load and performance in immersive virtual reality versus conventional virtual reality simulation training of laparoscopic surgery: a randomized trial. Surgical Endoscopy, 34(3), 1244-1252.
    Gauntlett, D. (2004). Using creative visual research methods to understand media audiences. MedienPädagogik: Zeitschrift für Theorie und Praxis der Medienbildung, 9, 1-32.
    Gkiouzepas, L., & Hogg, M. K. (2011). Articulating a new framework for visual metaphors in advertising. Journal of Advertising, 40(1), 103-120.
    Hanson, L. (1993). Affective Response to Learning Via" Visual Metaphor.". ERIC Clearinghouse.
    Hatzithomas, L., Manolopoulou, A., Margariti, K., Boutsouki, C., & Koumpis, D. (2021). Metaphors and body copy in online advertising effectiveness. Journal of Promotion Management, 27(5), 642-672.
    Hawlitschek, A., & Joeckel, S. (2017). Increasing the effectiveness of digital educational games: The effects of a learning instruction on students’ learning, motivation and cognitive load. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 79-86.
    Hiniker, A., Hong, S., Kim, Y. S., Chen, N. C., West, J. D., & Aragon, C. (2017). Toward the operationalization of visual metaphor. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(10), 2338-2349.
    Hinton, P., McMurray, I., & Brownlow, C. (2014). SPSS Explained. London, England: Routledge Press.
    Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern language journal, 70(2), 125-132.
    Hoveskog, M., Halila, F., & Danilovic, M. (2015). Early phases of business model innovation: An ideation experience workshop in the classroom. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 13(2), 177-195.
    Hsu, T. C., & Hwang, G. J. (2023). Interaction of visual interface and academic levels with young students’ anxiety, playfulness, and enjoyment in programming for robot control. Universal Access in the Information Society, 22(1), 213-225.
    Huang, W., & Ho, J. C. (2018). Improving moral reasoning among college students: a game-based learning approach. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(5), 583-596.
    Huang, C. F., Nien, W. P., & Yeh, Y. S. (2015). Learning effectiveness of applying automated music composition software in the high grades of elementary school. Computers & Education, 83, 74-89.
    Im, T., & Kang, M. (2019). Structural relationships of factors which impact on learner achievement in online learning environment. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(1), 112-124.
    Jeffreys, M. R. (1993). Guided visual metaphor: a creative strategy for teaching nursing diagnosis. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications, 4(3), 99-106.
    Jegede, O. J., Alaiyemola, F. F., & Okebukola, P. A. (1990). The effect of concept mapping on students' anxiety and achievement in biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(10), 951-960.
    Jeong, S. H. (2008). Visual metaphor in advertising: Is the persuasive effect attributable to visual argumentation or metaphorical rhetoric?. Journal of Marketing Communications, 14(1), 59-73.
    Johnson, G. C. (2001). Accounting for pre-service teachers' use of visual metaphors in narratives. Teacher Development, 5(1), 119-140.
    Kashdan, T. B., Rose, P., & Fincham, F. D. (2004). Curiosity and exploration: Facilitating positive subjective experiences and personal growth opportunities. Journal of Personality Assessment, 82(3), 291-305.
    Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1975). Evaluating training programs: Tata McGraw-Hill Education.
    Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling(4th ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.
    Kline Kok, E. M., & Jarodzka, H. (2017). Before your very eyes: The value and limitations of eye tracking in medical education. Medical Education, 51(1), 114-122.
    Kress, G. R., & Van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. Psychology Press. Journal of Foreign Studies, 33(6), 164-168.
    Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
    Lazard, A. J., Bamgbade, B. A., Sontag, J. M., & Brown, C. (2016). Using visual metaphors in health messages: A strategy to increase effectiveness for mental illness communication. Journal of Health Communication, 21(12), 1260-1268.
    Leppink, J., Paas, F., Van der Vleuten, C. P., Van Gog, T., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. (2013). Development of an instrument for measuring different types of cognitive load. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 1058-1072.
    Leschke, J. (2013). Business model mapping: Application and experience in an introduction to entrepreneurship course. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 16, 77-92.
    Liao, C. W., Chen, C. H., & Shih, S. J. (2019). The interactivity of video and collaboration for learning achievement, intrinsic motivation, cognitive load, and behavior patterns in a digital game-based learning environment. Computers & Education, 133, 43-55.
    Lin, T. C., Liang, J. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2015). Conceptions of memorizing and understanding in learning, and self-efficacy held by university biology majors. International Journal of Science Education, 37(3), 446-468.
    Lin, T. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). A Multi-Dimensional Instrument For Evaluating Taiwanese High School Students’Science Learning Self-Efficacy In Relation To Their Approaches To Learning Science. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11, 1275-1301.
    Maas, J. D., & Leauby, B. A. (2005). Concept mapping-exploring its value as a meaningful learning tool in accounting education. Global Perspectives on Accounting Education, 2, 75-98.
    Maclnnis, D. J., Moorman, C., & Jaworski, B. J. (1991). Enhancing and measuring consumers’ motivation, opportunity, and ability to process brand information from ads. Journal of Marketing, 55(4), 32-53.
    Mandler, G., & Sarason, S. B. (1952). A study of anxiety and learning. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 47(2), 166-173.
    Manouchehri, K., Hassanabadi, H., Aghabarary, M., & Kavousian, J. (2020). Linkage between cognitive load theory and academic emotions: effects of emotion induction on anxiety, cognitive load and learning in nursing students. Contemporary Psychology, Biannual Journal of the Iranian Psychological Association, 14(2), 1-14.
    Mayer, R. E. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, 41, 31-48.
    Mayer, R. E. (2019). Thirty years of research on online learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33(2), 152-159.
    Mills, M. K. (2010). Using the jazz metaphor to enhance student learning and skill development in the marketing research course. Journal of Marketing Education, 32(3), 300-313.
    Miyoshi, M., Tsuboyama-Kasaoka, N., & Nishi, N. (2012). School-based" Shokuiku" program in Japan: application to nutrition education in Asian countries. Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 21(1), 159-162.
    Moran, T. P. (2016). Anxiety and working memory capacity: A meta-analysis and narrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 142(8), 831-864.
    Naismith, L. M., & Cavalcanti, R. B. (2015). Validity of cognitive load measures in simulation-based training: a systematic review. Academic Medicine, 90(11), S24-S35.
    Namkung, J. M., Peng, P., & Lin, X. (2019). The relation between mathematics anxiety and mathematics performance among school-aged students: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 89(3), 459-496.
    Nielsen, C., & Bukh, P. N. (2011). What constitutes a business model: the perception of financial analysts. International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 8(3), 256-271.
    Novak, J. D. (1980). Learning theory applied to the biology classroom. The American Biology Teacher, 42(5), 280-285.
    Osgerby, J., Marriott, P., & Gee, M. (2018). Accounting students perceptions of using visual metaphor as part of personal development planning: an exploratory case study. Accounting Education, 27(6), 570-589.
    Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: a handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers (Vol. 1). John Wiley & Sons.
    Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., & Tucci, C. L. (2005). Clarifying business models: Origins, present, and future of the concept. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 16(1), 1-25.
    Paas, F. G. (1992). Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: a cognitive-load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 429.
    Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 1-4.
    Paas, F., Tuovinen, J. E., Tabbers, H., & Van Gerven, P. W. (2016). Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. In Cognitive Load Theory, 38(1), 63-77.
    Park, Y., & Jo, I. H. (2019). Factors that affect the success of learning analytics dashboards. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67, 1547-1571.
    Parong, J., Wells, A., & Mayer, R. E. (2020). Replicated evidence towards a cognitive theory of game-based training. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(5), 922.
    Plass, J. L., & Kalyuga, S. (2019). Four ways of considering emotion in cognitive load theory. Educational Psychology Review, 31, 339-359.
    Platonova, M. (2019). Poster, Poster on the Wall, Do You Really Mean it All? Decoding Visual Metaphor ‘Global Warming’in Public Awareness Campaigns. Research in Language, 17(2), 147-166.
    Regueras, L. M., Verdu, E., Munoz, M. F., Perez, M. A., De Castro, J. P., & Verdu, M. J. (2009). Effects of competitive e-learning tools on higher education students: A case study. IEEE Transactions on Education, 52(2), 279-285.
    Roberts, D. (2019). Higher education lectures: from passive to active learning via imagery?. Active Learning in Higher Education, 20(1), 63-77.
    Sajjacholapunt, P., & Ball, L. J. (2014). The influence of banner advertisements on attention and memory: Human faces with averted gaze can enhance advertising effectiveness. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 166.
    Sarason, I. G. (1984). Stress, anxiety, and cognitive interference: reactions to tests. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(4), 929.
    Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2021). Partial least squares structural equationmodeling. In C. Homburg, Klarmann, M., Vomberg, A. (Ed.), Handbook of Market Research (pp. 587-632). Switzerland AG: Springer Nature.
    Scheiter, K., & Gerjets, P. (2007). Learner control in hypermedia environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 285-307.
    Skulmowski, A., & Xu, K. M. (2021). Understanding cognitive load in digital and online learning: A new perspective on extraneous cognitive load. Educational Psychology review, 34, 171–196.
    Stewart, J. A., Wood, L., Wiener, J., Kennedy, G. D., Chu, D. I., Lancaster, J. R., & Morris, M. S. (2021). Visual teaching aids improve patient understanding and reduce anxiety prior to a colectomy. The American Journal of Surgery, 222(4), 780-785.
    Suthers, D. D., & Hundhausen, C. D. (2003). An experimental study of the effects of representational guidance on collaborative learning processes. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(2), 183-218.
    Sewell, J. L., Boscardin, C. K., Young, J. Q., Ten Cate, O., & O'Sullivan, P. S. (2016). Measuring cognitive load during procedural skills training with colonoscopy as an exemplar. Medical Education, 50(6), 682-692.
    Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257-285.
    Sweller, J. (2010). Element interactivity and intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review, 22(2), 123-138.
    Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive Load Theory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 37-76.
    Sweller, J., & Levine, M. (1982). Effects of goal specificity on means–ends analysis and learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8(5), 463-474.
    Sweller, J., Van Merrienboer, J. J., & Paas, F. G. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251-296.
    Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 years later. Educational Psychology Review, 31, 261-292.
    Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273-1296.
    Tayie, S. (2005). Research Methods and Writing Research Proposals. Center for Advancement of Postgraduate Studies and Research in Engineering Sciences, Faculty of Engineering-Cario University(CAPSCU): Pathways to Higher Education
    Teece, D. J. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(2-3), 172-194.
    Timmers, P. (1998). Business models for electronic markets. Electronic markets, 8(2), 3-8.
    Türko, E. S. (2016). Business plan vs business model canvas in entrepreneurship trainings, a comparison of students' perceptions. Asian Social Science, 12(10), 55-62.
    Tzafilkou, K., Perifanou, M., & Economides, A. A. (2021). Negative emotions, cognitive load, acceptance, and self-perceived learning outcome in emergency remote education during COVID-19. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 7497-7521.
    Van Merrienboer, J. J., & Ayres, P. (2005). Research on cognitive load theory and its design implications for e-learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(3), 5-13.
    Warr, P., & Downing, J. (2000). Learning strategies, learning anxiety and knowledge acquisition. British Journal of Psychology, 91(3), 311-333.
    Zeng, H., Zhou, S. N., Hong, G. R., Li, Q. Y., & Xu, S. Q. (2020). Evaluation of Interactive Game-Based Learning in Physics Domain. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(3), 484-498.

    無法下載圖示 校內:2029-06-24公開
    校外:2029-06-24公開
    電子論文尚未授權公開,紙本請查館藏目錄
    QR CODE