本研究利用鉻鋼球與陶瓷球在不同粗糙度之高速鋼底材，於乾磨耗下之磨耗行為研究。以SRV往復式磨耗試驗機與Pin On Disc迴轉式磨耗試驗機進行磨耗試驗。
由實驗結果得知：上試件為鉻鋼球的時候，需要以去除黏附層之後的拋物線面積，才可作為磨耗量之比較基準。尤其是120號砂紙研磨時黏附層特別嚴重。由接觸式粗度儀量測結果，上試件採用鉻鋼球的時候，上下試件磨痕寬度都較大，但下試件磨痕深度較小；上試件採用陶瓷球的時候上下試件磨痕寬度都較小，但下試件磨痕深度較大。

In this study, a series dry abrasion wear test of chrome steel ball and ceramic ball pairing with high speed steel substrate with different roughness are carried out. SRV reciprocating wear test machine and Pin On Disc rotary wear test machine are used.
The results indicate that: when chrome steel ball is used as the upper specimen, we need to remove the adhesion layer to get the parabolic area which is a standard to compare the amount of wear. The adhesion is particularly serious in this experiment while use the NO.120 sandpaper grinding. Results from contact type roughness measurement show that the wear scar width of chrome steel ball and specimen are larger and the wear scar depth of specimen is smaller, but the wear scar width of ceramic ball and specimen are smaller and the wear scar depth of specimen is larger.

1.中華民國摩擦材料協會成立十週年紀念會刊

2.F.Svahn,A.Kassman-Rudolphi,E.Wallen,Wear, Vol.254(2003)P.1092-P.1098

3.J.Siu,L.Li,Wear,Vol.237(2000)P.283-P.287

4.J.Takadoum,H.H.Bennani,Surface and coatings technology,Vol.96(1997)P.272-P.282

5.F.Luo,X.Pang,K.Gao,C.Tao,Advanced materials research,Vol.97-101(2010)P.1261-P.1264

6.E.Arslan,Y.Totik,E.Demirci,A.Alsaran,Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance,Vol.19(2010)P.428-P.433

7.K.P.Shaha,Y.T.Pei,D.M.Martinez,J.Th.M.De Hosson,Surface and coatings technology,Vol.205 (2010) P.2624-P.2632

8.J.Jiang,R.D.Arnell,Wear,Vol.239 (2000) P.1-P.9

9.T.Ohana,M.Suzuki,T.Nakamura,A.Tanaka,Y.Koga,Diamond and related materials,Vol.13 (2004) P.2211-P.2215

10.M.Suzuki,T.Ohana,A.Tanaka,Diamond and related Materials,Vol.13 (2004) P.2216-P.2220

11.E.Liu,Y.F.Ding,L.Li,B.Blanpain,J.P.Celis,Tribology, Vol.40 (2007) P.216-P.219

12.J.Jiang,R.D.Arnell,G.Dixit,Wear,Vol.243 (2000) P.1-P.5