隨著台灣地區經濟的迅速發展，人口不斷往都市集中，為爭取更多空間，高樓密度日趨上升。在高密度之都市建築群會塑造出如峽谷般之外部空間，不適之風場常直接衝擊都市街廓中的行人，因此每年有百件以上的開發案必須執行環境風場的評估。雖然我國環境保護署發佈「開發行為環境影響評估作業準則」及「開發行為應實施環境影響評估細目及範圍認定標準」，台北市及新北市亦頒布相關規範法令，但此類的法令僅就應執行風場環境評估的範圍及條件加以訂定，並無評估模式與標準規範，以致於執行評估分析時沒有一致的評估模式，審議時亦缺乏統一的審議標準，而失去立法的美意。
為彌補現行規定的不足，此次研究透過「行人風場評估模式技術規範(草案)」審議國內的風場試驗案例，將結果統整並進行分析與比較，以檢視規範(草案)之問題，並建議增修其內容以達到規範合理之可行性，使能在未來納入環境影響評估中，供國內評估單位或審議人員參考。

With the rapid development of Taiwan's economy, the population is constantly concentrated to the city.The group of city building in high density create an external space like a canyon, so the unsuitable level wind usually have impact on those pedestrian in the city street directly. Therefore, more than hundreds of development projects each year should be implemented of the wind environmental assessment. Environmental Protection Department of Taiwan has issued Environmental Impact Assessment Criteria for Development Behavior and Criteria for Determining the Scope and Scope of Environmental Impact Assessment for Development Activities. And the City of New Taipei has also formulated the Urban Review Rules for pedestrian wind environmental issues. However, the above-mentioned EPD, Taipei and New Taipei City have promulgated the relevant ordinance laws. The scope and conditions of the wind environmental assessment should be implemented. There is no assessment model and standards, so that there is no consistent assessment model for the implementation of the assessment analysis, and there is no uniform standard for deliberation.
In order to make up for the shortcomings of the existing regulations, the project plans to collect five domestic cases as an object of audit, use「Pedestrian Wind Farm Assessment Technical Specifications 」as a standard. According to compare the deliberation content and specification, and make appropriate amendments to the specifications problem, in order to reach the beauty of standard, bring this project into environmental impact assessment in the future, for domestic evaluation units or reviewers reference.

1.Davenport, A. G. “The relationship of wind structure to wind loading.” Proceedings of the Symposium on Wind Effects on Buildings and Structures, Vol.1, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, U. K., HMSO, London, 53-102.1965.
2.Davenport, A.G., “An Approach to Human Comfort Criteria for Environmental Wind Conditions.” Colloquium on Building Climatology, Stockholm.1972.
3.Davenport, A.G. and Isyumov, N., “The application of the boundary layer wind tunnel to the prediction of wind loading.” Proceedings of International Research Seminar, Wind Effects on Buildings and Structures , 210-230. 1967.
4.Hunt, J. C. R., Coulton, Poulton, E., and Mumford, J C.,“The effects of wind on people: New criteria based on ind tunnel experiments.” Building and Environment, 11, 15-28.1976.
5.Isyumov, N., “Studies of the Pedestrian Level Wind Environment at the Boundary Layer Wind Tunnel Laboratory of University of Western Ontario”, Journal of Industrial Aerodynamics, Vol. 3, 187-200.1978.
6.Isyumov, N., and Davenport, A.G., “The Ground Level Wind Environment in Build-Up Areas”, Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Wind Effects on Buildings and Structures, United Kingdom, 403-422.1976.
7.Lawson, T. V., & Penwarden, A. D., “The effects of wind on people in the vicinity of buildings.”Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference n Wind Effects on Buildings and Structures. Landon, UK: Cambridge University Press, 605-622.1975.
8.Melbourne, W. H. “Criteria for environment wind onditions” Journal of Wind Engineering and ndustrial Aerodynamics, 3, 241-249.1978.
9.Murakami, S., Iwasa, Y., & Morikawa, Y.,“Study on acceptable criteria for assessing wind environment at gorund level based on residents' diaries.” Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 24(1), 1-18. 1986.
10.Penwarden, A.D., “Acceptable wind speeds in towns.” Building Science, Vol.8, 259-267. 1973.
11.Penwarden, A.D., and Wise, A.F.E., “Wind Environment around Buildings.” Building research Establishment Report H.M.S.O. 1975.
12.Williams, C. J. and Soligo M. J., “A Discussion of the Components for a Comprehensive Pedestrian Level Comfort Criteria.” Eighth International Conference on Wind Engineering, London, 1991.
13.丁育群、朱佳仁，高層建築物風場環境評估準則研議，內政部建築研究所研究計劃報告，2000年。
14.郭建源，風洞試驗應用於行人風場環境影響評估之研究，內政部建築研究所自行研究報告，新北市，2009年。
15.郭建源，風洞試驗應用於行人風場環境影響評估之研究，內政部建築研究所自行研究報告，新北市，2009年。
16.郭建源，以風洞試驗方法建立行人風場環境影響評估準則之研究，內政部建築研究所自行研究報告，新北市，2010年。
17.郭建源，行人風場評估準則相關影響因子分析研究，內政部建築研究所自行研究報告，新北市，2011年。
18.郭建源，以基底設計改善高層建築行人風場之研究，內政部建築研究所自行研究報告，新北市，2012年。
19.郭建源，鄰棟建物對含基底高層建築行人風場影響之研究，內政部建築研究所自行研究報告，新北市，2013年。
20.郭建源，環境風場風洞實驗應用於都市設計審議規則研究，內政部建築研究所自行研究報告，新北市，2014年。
21.郭建源，都市區域風環境影響評估分析研究，內政部建築研究所自行研究報告，新北市，2015年。
22.郭建源，高層建築物行人環境風場特性研究，國立成功大學博士論文，台南，2016年。
23.郭建源，行人風場評估模式技術規範草案研擬，內政部建築研究所自行研究報告，2016年。
24.賴冠廷，應用高精度數值地形模型進行CFD風場模擬，內政部建築研究所自行研究報告，2016年。
25.黎益肇、蔡宜中、劉文欽、鐘文祥、許敬昀，都是地區風環境流通效應影響評估分析研究，2015年。
26.黎益肇、郭建源、曾俊達、何明錦，以受風感受試驗建立高層建築行人風場評估準則之研究，「建築學報」第95期，2016年。