The An-Shun Plant was located in southern Taiwan with the contamination area of many toxic residual during the Tai-Caustic period. As more media spot and related parties around the An-Shun district keep focus on the compensation plan as well as the recovery work. The determination of corporate social responsibility (CSR) with the strategic formation, planning, and implementation based on An-Shun Plant environmental pollution is the focus of this research. This paper introduces CSR and strategic formation, planning and implementation. The research method includes a semi-constructed interview to understand CPDC’s organization strategy on this typical environmental case. Township leaders as well as the scholars were interviewed. The purpose was to investigate if the organization strategies consist with the CSR. The research finding determined that CPDC has covered the legal and economic responsibility by following the court justices of remediation the areas as well as protecting its shareholders and employees benefits. The strategic formation and planning stages has determined both the legal and economic responsibility holding. However, no ethical and discretionary strategies were found because the passive attitude and only plan or perform after the regulator enforcement. In order to induce the public images, the study suggested CPDC to be more ethical and discretionary during the strategic implementation period.

Backman, J. (1975). Social responsibility and accountability, New York University Press. New York.
Burton, B., Farth, J., & Hegarty, H. (2000). A cross cultural comparions of corporate soical responsibility orientation: Hong Kong Vs. United States Students. Teaching Business Ethics, 4(2), 151-167.
Carroll, A. B. (1977). Managing corporate social responsibility. Boston: Brown.
Carroll, A. B. (1979). A Three-Dimensional conceptual Model of Corporate Performance. The Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497-505.
Carroll, A. B. (1991). Corporate social performance measurement: a comment on methods for evaluating an elusive construct, in L. E. Post (ed.). Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, 12, 385-401.
CED. (1971). Social Responsibilities of Business Corporations. New York: Committee for Economic Developemt.
de los Salmones, M., Crespo, A. H., & Bosque, I. R. (2005). Influence of corporate social responsibility on loyalty and valuation of services. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(4), 369-385.
Dror, Y. (1973). Design for Policy Sciences. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 7(1), 105-106.
Frederick, W. C. (1978). From CSR1 to CSR2: The maturing of business-and-society thought. : Graduates School of Business, Univeristy of Pittsburgh.
Freemand, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
Hay, R. D., Gray, E. R., and Gates, J. E. . (1976). Business and society. Cincinnati: Southwestern Publishing.
Henriques, I., & Sadorsku, P. (1999). The Relationship Between Environmental Commitment and Managerial Perceptions of Stakeholder Importance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 97-99.
Henriques, L., & Robinson, S. N. . (1992). Rethinking corporate environmental management. Columbia Journal of World Business, 27(3 & 4), 222-232.
Hunt, C. B., & Auster, E. R. . (1990). Proactive environmental management: Avoiding the toxic trap. Sloan Management Review, 31(2), 7-18.
Huang, H. (2002). Lost Memory – Pollution of Taiwan Alkali An-Shun Plant. Taiwan Watch Institute, 4(2), 80-88.
Jones, C. (1984). An Introduction to the Study of Public Policy. Monterey: Brooks/Cole Publishers.
Kingdon, J. (1984). Agendas, Alternatives, and public policy. Glenview, IL: Foresmand and Company.
Lofland, J., and Lofland, L.H. (1995). Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth
Maccoby, E., & Maccoby, N.,. (1954). The Interview: A Tool of Social Science. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.
Manakkalathil, J., & Rudolf, E. (1995). Corporate social responsibility in a globalizing market. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 47, 29-32.
McGuire, J. W. (1963). Business and society. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Mitroff, I., Pauchant, T.C, & Shrivastava, P. (1989). Crisis, disaster, catastrophe: Are you ready? Security Management, 33(2), 101-108.
OCED. (1992). The Polluter-Pays Principle: OECD Analyses and Recommendations.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Quazi, A. M., & D., O. B. (2000). An empirical test of a cross national model of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 25(1), 33-53.
Roome, N. (1992). Developing environmental management systems. Business Strategy and the Environment, 1, 11-24.
Savage, G. T., Nix, T. W., Whitehead, C. J., & Blair, J. D. (1991). Strategies for assessing and managing organizational stakeholders. Academy of Management Executive, 5(2), 61-75.
Segerson, K. (1992). Lender Liability for Hazardous Waste Cleanup. Hants, U.K: Edward Elgar Publushing.
Sharbrough, W. C., & Moody, J. W. (1995). Managing the media. Journal of Systems Management, 46(4), 4-11.
Shrivastava, P., & Siomkos, G. . (1989). Disaster containment strategies. Journal of Business Strategy, 10(5), 26-30.
Tobey, J. A., & Smets, H. . (1996). The Polluter-Pays Principle in the Context of Agriculture and the Environment. The World Economy, 19(1).
Turner, D. S., R. (1994). Managing media attention. Security Management, 38(12), 55-57.
Wartick, S. L., & Cochran, P. L. (1985). The evolution of the corporate social performance model. Academy of Management Review,(4), 758-769.
WBCSD. (2001). Corporate Social Responsibility.
WCOED. (1987). Our Common Future.
Wu. D. (2003). Strateic Management. Taipei Linkingbooks.
Yang, Y. (2008). The Remediation Policy and Citizen Participation - the
An-Shun Plant Case. Paper presented at the Taiwan Association for Schools of Public Administration and Affairs.
ISO. http://www.iso.org/iso/home.htm
OECD. http://www.oecd.org
United Nations Global Impact. http://www.unglobalcompact.org/