每當面對新興科技的發展時，政府會制定相應的計畫，透過導入新興科技讓公共政策的制定能夠更加的流暢，提高民眾對政府的信任。最近幾年，環境劇烈的變動，如何將資訊科學運用在公共政策制定的流程當中，透過數據分析使政策制定更精確達到循證決策支持 (Evidence-based Decision Support)，是許多國家政府面對數位轉型浪潮所採取的策略，而政府如何校準資訊系統策略及業務策略，並透過演算法開發決策輔助工具，以提升決策者的政策效能?
因此本研究以觀察公部門組織在面對劇烈環境變動下，資訊系統策略校準的過程，並分析此校準過程中，演算法開發並動態更新決策輔助工具為目的。透過質化研究中的個案研究，以臺北大數據中心為例，根據其策略校準的過程分為資料共享時期、資料應用時期以及資料賦能時期三個階段，觀察其感知到環境的變動後，如何透過動態能力持續校準資訊系統策略，並以演算法更新每一階段的決策輔助工具，從建立共用的資料庫到決策輔助系統，最終建構出資料開放平台，運用這些決策輔助工具應對各階段的問題，並持續的尋找未來持續應用的場域，使臺北市政府在城市治理上更有韌性，並透過個案分析設計一套靈巧的循證決策支援機制，藉此提供欲採取以證據為基礎的治理方針之組織參考依據。

In Taiwan, whenever the government encounters the development of emerging technologies, it formulates corresponding plans, hoping to shape transformation strategies and goals through these plans. By introducing these emerging technologies, the government aims to make the formulation of public policies smoother and enhance public trust in the government. In recent years, with the dramatic changes in the environment, many governments worldwide have adopted strategies to incorporate data science into public policy-making processes. This approach leverages data analysis to achieve more precise, evidence-based decision-making amid the digital transformation wave. How can the government align information system strategies and develop algorithmic decision-support tools to enhance policymakers' effectiveness?
Therefore, this study strives to observe the process of aligning information system strategies in public sector organizations facing dramatic environmental changes and analyze the development and dynamic updating of algorithmic decision support tools during this alignment process. Through qualitative research using case studies, this study takes the Taipei Urban Intelligence Center as an example to observe how it continuously aligns its information system strategies through dynamic capabilities at each stage of implementing evidence-based governance. The study examines how the Taipei City Government enhances its resilience in urban governance by updating decision support tools through algorithms and designs an ambidextrous evidence-based decision support mechanism through case analysis, providing a reference for organizations intending to adopt evidence-based governance approaches.

英文部分
Adler, P. S., Goldoftas, B., & Levine, D. I. (1999). Flexibility Versus Efficiency? A Case Study Of Model Changeovers In The Toyota Production System. Organization Science, 10(1), 43-68.
Allio, M. K. (2012). Strategic Dashboards: Designing And Deploying Them To Improve Implementation. Strategy & Leadership, 40(5), 24-31.
Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. J. (1993). Strategic Assets And Organizational Rent. Strategic Management Journal, 14(1), 33-46.
Aoki, M. (1990). The Participatory Generation Of Information Rents And The Theory Of The Firm. The Firm As A Nexus Of Treaties, 26.
Benbya, H., Leidner, D. E., & Preston, D. (2019). MIS Quarterly Research Curation On Information Systems Alignment. MIS Q, 141-157.
Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (2004). Persistent Parochialism: Trust And Exclusion In Ethnic Networks. Journal Of Economic Behavior & Organization, 55(1), 1-23.
Chau, D. C., Ngai, E. W., Gerow, J. E., & Thatcher, J. B. (2020). The Effects Of Business–IT Strategic Alignment And IT Governance On Firm Performance: A Moderated Polynomial Regression Analysis. MIS Quarterly, 44(4).
Chen, L., Liu, H., Zhou, Z., Chen, M., & Chen, Y. (2022). IT-Business Alignment, Big Data Analytics Capability, And Strategic Decision-Making: Moderating Roles Of Event Criticality And Disruption Of COVID-19. Decision Support Systems, 161, 113745.
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective On Learning And Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152.
Dess, G. G., & Beard, D. W. (1984). Dimensions Of Organizational Task Environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52-73.
Duncan, R. B. (1976). The Ambidextrous Organization: Designing Dual Structures For Innovation. The Management Of Organization, 1(1), 167-188.
Gerow, J. E., Grover, V., Thatcher, J., & Roth, P. L. (2014). Looking Toward The Future Of IT–Business Strategic Alignment Through The Past. MIS Quarterly, 38(4), 1159-1186.
Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The Antecedents, Consequences, And Mediating Role Of Organizational Ambidexterity. Academy Of Management Journal, 47(2), 209-226.
Head, B. W. (2008). Three Lenses Of Evidence‐Based Policy. Australian Journal Of Public Administration, 67(1), 1-11.
Henderson, J. C., & Venkatraman, H. (1999). Strategic Alignment: Leveraging Information Technology For Transforming Organizations. IBM Systems Journal, 38(2.3), 472-484.
Hirschheim, R., & Sabherwal, R. (2001). Detours In The Path Toward Strategic Information Systems Alignment. California Management Review, 44(1), 87-108.
Horton, S. (2003). Participation And Involvement–The Democratisation Of New Public Management? International Journal Of Public Sector Management, 16(6), 403-411.
Howlett, M. (2009). Policy Analytical Capacity And Evidence‐Based Policy‐Making: Lessons From Canada. Canadian Public Administration, 52(2), 153-175.
Janssen, M., & Kuk, G. (2016). The Challenges And Limits Of Big Data Algorithms In Technocratic Governance. Government Information Quarterly, 33(3), 371-377.
Kaufman, H. (2001). Major Players: Bureaucracies In American Government. Public Administration Review, 61(1), 18-42.
Kowalczyk, M., & Buxmann, P. (2015). An Ambidextrous Perspective On Business Intelligence And Analytics Support In Decision Processes: Insights From A Multiple Case Study. Decision Support Systems, 80, 1-13.
Kroll, J. A. (2015). Accountable Algorithms Princeton University].
Langlois, R. N. (1997). Cognition And Capabilities: Opportunities Seized And Missed In The History Of The Computer Industry. Technological Innovation: Oversights And Foresights, 71-94.
Lavie, D., Stettner, U., & Tushman, M. L. (2010). Exploration And Exploitation Within And Across Organizations. Academy Of Management Annals, 4(1), 109-155.
Lawrence Neuman, W. (2014). Social Research Methods: Qualitative And Quantitative Approaches. In: Pearson.
Lee, G., Delone, W. H., & Espinosa, J. A. (2010). The Main And Interaction Effects Of Process Rigor, Process Standardization, And Process Agility On System Performance In Distributed IS Development: An Ambidexterity Perspective.
Leonard‐Barton, D. (1992). Core Capabilities And Core Rigidities: A Paradox In Managing New Product Development. Strategic Management Journal, 13(S1), 111-125.
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration And Exploitation In Organizational Learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87.
Matheus, R., Janssen, M., & Maheshwari, D. (2020). Data Science Empowering The Public: Data-Driven Dashboards For Transparent And Accountable Decision-Making In Smart Cities. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3), 101284.
Mikalef, P., Van De Wetering, R., & Krogstie, J. (2021). Building Dynamic Capabilities By Leveraging Big Data Analytics: The Role Of Organizational Inertia. Information & Management, 58(6), 103412.
Miles, R. E., Snow, C. C., Meyer, A. D., & Coleman Jr, H. J. (1978). Organizational Strategy,
Structure, And Process. Academy Of Management Review, 3(3), 546-562.
Pan, G., Pan, S.-L., & Lim, C.-Y. (2015). Examining How Firms Leverage IT To Achieve Firm Productivity: RBV And Dynamic Capabilities Perspectives. Information & Management, 52(4), 401-412.
Panagiotopoulos, P., Bowen, F., & Brooker, P. (2017). The Value Of Social Media Data: Integrating Crowd Capabilities In Evidence-Based Policy. Government Information Quarterly, 34(4), 601-612.
Parsons, W. (2002). From Muddling Through To Muddling Up-Evidence Based Policy Making And The Modernisation Of British Government. Public Policy And Administration, 17(3), 43-60.
Reich, B. H., & Benbasat, I. (1996). Measuring The Linkage Between Business And Information Technology Objectives. MIS Quarterly, 20(1), 55-81.
Riedling, A. M. (2002). Learning To Learn: A Guide To Becoming Information Literate. ERIC.
Saranto, K., & Hovenga, E. J. (2004). Information Literacy—What It Is About?: Literature Review Of The Concept And The Context. International Journal Of Medical Informatics, 73(6), 503-513.
Shamim, S., Zeng, J., Shariq, S. M., & Khan, Z. (2019). Role Of Big Data Management In Enhancing Big Data Decision-Making Capability And Quality Among Chinese Firms: A Dynamic Capabilities View. Information & Management, 56(6), 103135.
Shin, D., & Park, Y. J. (2019). Role Of Fairness, Accountability, And Transparency In Algorithmic Affordance. Computers In Human Behavior, 98, 277-284.
Sull, D. N. (1999). The Dynamics Of Standing Still: Firestone Tire & Rubber And The Radial Revolution. Business History Review, 73(3), 430-464.
Tallon, P. P., & Pinsonneault, A. (2011). Competing Perspectives On The Link Between
Strategic Information Technology Alignment And Organizational Agility: Insights From A Mediation Model. MIS Quarterly, 35(2), 463-486.
Tavakolian, H. (1989). Linking The Information Technology Structure With Organizational Competitive Strategy: A Survey. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 309-317.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities And Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, And Happiness. Penguin.
Tushman, M. L., & O'Reilly III, C. A. (1996). Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary And Revolutionary Change. California Management Review, 38(4), 8-29.
Wang, G., Guo, Y., Zhang, W., Xie, S., & Chen, Q. (2023). What Type Of Algorithm Is Perceived As Fairer And More Acceptable? A Comparative Analysis Of Rule-Driven Versus Data-Driven Algorithmic Decision-Making In Public Affairs. Government Information Quarterly, 40(2), 101803.
Wu, S. P.-J., Straub, D. W., & Liang, T.-P. (2015). How Information Technology Governance Mechanisms And Strategic Alignment Influence Organizational Performance. MIS Quarterly, 39(2), 497-518.
Xue, L., Ray, G., & Sambamurthy, V. (2012). Efficiency Or Innovation: How Do Industry Environments Moderate The Effects Of Firms' IT Asset Portfolios? MIS Quarterly, 36(2), 509-528.
Yin, R. K. (1989). Case Study Research: Design And Methods. In Case Study Research: Design And Methods (Pp. 166-166).
Zuboff, S. (2015). Big Other: Surveillance Capitalism And The Prospects Of An Information Civilization. Journal Of Information Technology, 30(1), 75-89.
中文部分
袁方 (2002)。社會研究方法。台北: 五南.
書目部分
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative Inquiry And Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Sage Publications.
Lawrence Neuman, W. (2014). Social Research Methods: Qualitative And Quantitative Approaches. In: Pearson.
Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory And Practice. Sage Publications.
Stone, H. S. (1971). Introduction To Computer Organization And Data Structures. Mcgraw-Hill, Inc.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design And Methods (Vol. 5). Sage Publications.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research And Applications (Vol. 6). Sage Thousand Oaks, CA.
網站部分
iThome，https://www.ithome.com.tw/
臺北大數據中心，(2024年6月瀏覽)，https://tuic.gov.taipei/zh
臺北市政府資訊局，(2024年5月瀏覽)，https://doit.gov.taipei/
國家發展委員會，(2024年5月瀏覽)，https://www.ndc.gov.tw/