本研究之目的在於建構出我國未來航太產業供應鏈體系選廠指標之研究，期能提供給航太業界做為選廠的一個準則目標，不再只單純以價格競標的方式做為選擇依據。以有效的提昇外包供應鏈之工作效能。本研究首先透過文獻整理出國內外有關選廠指標之研究項目；並深入企業與實務資深工作者及管理者進行深度訪談及專家討論問卷，獲得7項主要評量指標，分別為「生產能力」、「品保能力」、「服務水準」、「成本競爭能力」、「公司政策」、「公司管理制度」、「公司聲譽」等7項，及24項次要評量指標，最後再分別針對「航太專家」及「國內航太供應商」為對象，進行層級分析(AHP)重要性相對權重問卷分析法，建構出雙方因角色不同，所獲得的各項評量指標相對權重。
在主要評量指標7項中，依「航太專家」層級權重問卷結果，以「生產能力」、「品保能力」所佔權重最高，其次是「成本競爭能力」、其餘依次為「服務水準」、「公司管理制度」、「公司政策」最後是「公司聲譽」，另依「國內航太供應商」為對象，所進行的層級權重問卷結果，以「公司政策」、「公司管理制度」所佔權重最高，其餘依次為「生產能力」、「成本競爭能力」、「品保能力」、「公司聲譽」、最後是「服務水準」，表示「買方」及「賣方」在不同的角色與立場，會產生兩者不同的指標權重比。
因此透過本研究的層級權重分析法，可做為航太業將來在進行外包選廠時多方面的考量。最後的目的是希望為國內航太產業的外包供應鏈體系作一個貢獻。

The purpose of this study is to provide the aviation industries with the supplier selection criterion needed to develop an effective supply chain for Tawian’s aerospace industry. In the past, the open bid is the sole way to farm out the parts manufacturing which is purely based on the lowest price competition. Through ths current study of modeling the supplier selection criteria, the price will never be the only plement for the supplier selection. In stead, the overall effectiveness of aviation industry supply chain can be much improved using the present model for outsourcing to the suppliers.
Based on the available reports about the supplier selection criterion, the Delphi Technique method is adopted to study and make questionnaire surveys with experienced experts and senior managers as many as possible throughout Taiwan’s aerospace industries. From the questionnaire results obtained, seven major criteria and twenty one secondary criteria were respectively proposed. The major criteria include reduction capability, quality assurance capability, service level, cost competition capability, company policies, company management guidelines and company reputation. Based on the obtained major criteria, a second questionnaire was prepared and filled out by the aerospace industry experts and in particular the domestic suppliers. Finally, the questionnaire data were analyzed using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. The relative weightings of each criterion are obtained. The results indicate that the perspective between the suppliers and the buyers are clearly different due to opposite role played in the demand-and-supply chain.
From the analyzed results, the aerospace industry experts have the strong preference on the “production capability” and the “quality assurance capability” being the higher weighting levels among the seven major criteria. While the “cost competition capability” was placed at the second, the rest are followed by “service level”, “company management system”, “company policies”, and the “company reputation”. However, from the supplier’s viewpoint, the “company policies” and the “company management system” have the higher weighting levels, which are then followed by “production capability”, “cost competition capability”, “quality assurance capability”, “company reputation”, and the “service level” placed at lowest. This indicates the striking different viewpoint between the buyer and the supplier causing the different weighting levels of criteria.
Based on the major criteria obtained, using the AHP method for present study has also provided multiple considerations for the supplier selection for setting up a supply chain of aviation industries in Taiwan

參考文獻
中文部份：
【1】王振榮(1977)，衛星工廠滿意度與其供應績效關係之研究，大同工學院事業經營研究所，碩士論文。
【2】王忠宗(1998) 9月，如何尋找供應商，採購雜誌，中國採購管理協會
pp. 66。
【3】王立志(1999)，系統化運籌與供應鏈管理(初版)，滄海書局。
【4】邱美玲﹙1994﹚，製造業供應商的選擇與評估，國立台灣大學工業技術學院工業管理學程碩士論文。
【5】李啟彰(1996)，供應鏈管理概念模式建構研究DRP/MRPII之整合資訊策略，國立台灣大學工業工程研究所碩士論文。
【6】李昭賢(1998)，供應鏈管理分析模式之研究，國立中興大學企業管理研究所，碩士論文。
【7】邱福星(2002)，供應鏈管理下電子產業銲錫供應商評選之研究，國立台北科技大學生產系統工程與管理研究所碩士論文。
【8】行政院公共工程委員會，政府採構法令彙編，pp.5.8民國91年10月。
【9】呂健萍﹙1998﹚9月，如何挑選合適的供應商，採購雜誌，中國採購管理協會 pp. 61.65。
【10】何智謀(2000)，食品飲料及清潔用品業中影響預測準確度因素之探討，銘傳大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
【11】林英峰(2000)，全球供應鏈管理之趨勢，台北，北區中小企業研訓中心講義。
【12】吳俊誼(2001)，採購部門參與、供應商選擇標準、供應商發展活動與新產品開發績效關係之研究，國立中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
【13】胡謹、李龍鑫，(2000)，「九一一恐怖攻擊事件對航空產業的影響」，台中：漢翔月刊。
【14】航太小組網站(2003)。航太工業發展年鑑
【15】唐印星﹙1998﹚，採購績效衡量關鍵技術之研究—以台灣電子、汽車、鋼鐵、機械等產業為例，國立雲林科技大學碩士論文。
【16】陳怡和(1998)，供應商管理標竿之建立與分析..以台灣筆記型電腦產業為例，元智大學工業工程研究所碩士論文。
【17】陳家祥(1998)，「從供給鏈觀點探討供應商-零售商之戶動模式」國科會結案報告」。
【18】許振邦(1998) 9 月，如何選擇合適的供應商，採購雜誌，中國採購管理協會 pp. 58.60。
【19】許世明(2001)，台灣製造業採購管理之研究，國立台灣科技大學碩士論文。
【20】黃子賢，(1997) ，供應商遴選模式之建立，國立雲林技術學院工業管理技術系，國科會大學生參與專題研究計劃成果報告。
【21】黃智偉(2000)，供應鏈管理下供應商選擇評估之研究—以台灣地區中衛體系之汽機車業與電腦資訊業為例，國立雲林科技大學工業工程與管理研究所碩士論文。
【22】黃銘章(2001)，影響代工供應商與顧客間夥伴關係因素之研究，國立政治大學企業管理學系博士班博士論文。
【23】葉牧青(1989)，AHP 層級結構設定問題之探討，國立交通大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
【24】漢翔行航空工業公司，(2006) 3月，如何建立供應鏈，供應商大會報告。
【25】鄧振源、曾國雄（1989）。層級分析法(AHP)的內涵特性與應用。
【26】蔡松齡，(2004)，陸軍直昇機委商修護廠商遴選辦法之研究，義守大學管理研究所，碩士論文。
【27】鐘興永(1996)，實施JIT 採購中心廠與衛星廠溝通指標績效研究，國立台灣科技大學管理技術研究所碩士論文。
【28】蘇雄義(1999)，「供應鏈整合-觀念性分析架構整合程序與個案」，國際物流研討會論文集，pp 97-106。

英文部分：
【29】Barbarosoglu, G., Yazgac, T.,1997, “An Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process to the supplier Selection Problem”, Production and Inventory Management Journal,pp. 14.21.
【30】Belton, V. and Gear T., (1983) , “On a Shortcoming of Saaty's Method of Analytic Hierarchies”, Omega 11, 228-230.
【31】Christopher, M. (1992) , “Logistics and Supply Chain Management” Strate for Reducing Costs and Improving Service, Pitman, London.
【32】Choi,T.Y, Hartley,J.L, 1996, “An explortation of supplier selection practices across the supply chain” Jouurnal of Operation Management Vo1.14,pp. 333.343.
【33】Dickson, G. W.(1966), “An Analysis of Vender Selection Systems and Decisions”, Journal of Purchasing,Vol.2, No.1, pp. 5.17a.
【34】Ellram,L.M.(1990), “The Supplier Selection Decision in Strategic Partnerships”, Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, Full pp .8-14.
【35】Golden, B.L., Wasil E.A. and Levy D.E.,.(1989), “Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process: A Categorized, Annotated Bibliography”, in: B.L. Golden, P.T. Harker and E.A. Wasil (eds.), Analytic Hierarchy Process, Springer-Verlag, New York, 37-58
【36】Houlihan, J. (1984), “Supply Chain Management”,Proceeding of the 19th International Technical Conference of the British Production and Inventory Control Society, pp. 101.110.
【37】Harland and Christine. (1997), “Supply Chain Operational Performance Roles,” Integrated Manufacturing system,Vo1.8, pp. 70-78.
【38】Krause D.R., Ellram,L.M (1997), “Critical Elements of Supplier Development – The Buying-firm Perspective” European Journal Of Purchasing & Supply Management Vo1.3, No.1, pp. 21-31.
【39】Kalakota (1997) R., and Whinston, A.B., “Electronic Commerce : A Manager Guide ” Addison Wesley.
【40】Linstone. H.A. and Turoff. M, (1975), “The Delphi Method:Techniques and Applications, MA: Addison-Wesley”
【41】Leavy, B. (1994), “Two Strategic Perspective on the Buyer-supplier Relationship ” Production and Inventory Management Journal, Vo1.35, No2, pp. 47-51
【42】Nydick, R. L. and Hill, R. P.（1992）, “Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process to Structure the Supplier Selection Procedrue” , Internation Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management，Vol.28 ，No.2，pp .31.36.
【43】Saaty, T. L. (1980), “The Analytic Hierarchy Process”, Mc Graw.Hill，New York.
【44】Saaty, R.W. (1987), “ The Analytic Hierarchy Process-What it is and how it is used ”, Mathl. Modeling, Vol. 9, No. 3-5, pp. 161-176
【45】Saaty, Thomas, (1971), “ Transport Planning with Multiple Criteria: The Analytic Hierarchy Process Applications and Progress Review”, Journal of Advanced Transportation, Vol. 29, No. 1, p. 81-126.
【46】Saaty, T. L (1990), “ How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process ”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 9-26
【47】Tracey,M.,Vondermbse, M.A. and Lim, J.S, (1999), “ Manufacturing Technology and Strategy Formulation : Keys to Enhancing Competitivenness and Improving Performance ”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 17, pp. 411-428
【48】Tan,K.C., and Kannan, V.R, and Handfield,R.B., (1998), “Supply Chain Management Supplier Performance and firm Performance ”, International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management,Tempe,
【49】Vondermbse M.A. Tracey,M., (1999), “ Impact of Supplier Selection Criteria and Supplier Involement on Manufacturing ”, The Journal of Supply Chain Management, Summer, pp. 33-39
【50】Watson, S.R. and Freeling A.N.S., (1982), “Assessing Attributes Weights by Ratios”, Omega 10/6, 582-585.
【51】Watson, S.R. and Freeling A.N.S., (1983), “Comment on Assessing Attributes Weights by Ratios”, Omega 11/1, 1-13.
【52】Zahedi, F (1986), “The Analytic Hierarchy Process--a Survey of the Method and its Applications”, Interfaces 16/4, 96-108.