簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表
研究生： 湯愛惠
Evelyna, Shierly
論文名稱： 設計師作為全球開放系統生產網絡的創新冠軍：以成功大學創意基地之台灣荷蘭設計聚落設計師為例
Designer as Innovation Champion in Global Open System Production Network: A Study of Designers in Taiwan Dutch Design Post at C-Hub, NCKU
指導教授： 高如妃
J., Kao, Faye
學位類別： 碩士
Master
系所名稱： 規劃與設計學院 - 創意產業設計研究所
Institute of Creative Industries Design
論文出版年： 2018
畢業學年度： 106
語文別： 英文
論文頁數： 100
中文關鍵詞： 設計者 、仲介者 、創意倡議者 、推廣者 、開放性共創網絡
外文關鍵詞： designer, agent, innovation champion, promotors, open production system
相關次數： 點閱：74  下載：2 
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

    • 本研究著眼於曾在台灣執行過創意設計計劃的荷蘭設計師們。 這群設計師透過台灣荷蘭設計聚落(Taiwan Dutch Design Post, TDDP)引介與國立成功大學C-Hub創意基地合作，嘗試進行跨國設計計畫。TDDP 是在C-Hub 的管理之下，而C-Hub 是在台南市成功大學的一個創意空間基地。本論文基於仲介者概念，探討跨荷蘭與台灣兩國的開放性共創網絡。研究者對五位與TDDP有合作關係的荷蘭籍設計師做了深度訪談。有三個主要的研究目的：1) 設計師如何將設計角色成為一種資源，以及他們在開放性共創網絡中的合作模式; 2) 設計師們的創意作品創作階段和評估; 3) 設計師的生涯階段及在台灣的計畫對此所產生的效益。
    首先，此研究發現在這個跨國創意合作中有五個新的推廣角色(promoter roles)，分別為：實驗推廣者、催化推廣者、推動回饋推廣者、住宿推廣者以及資產推廣者。其次，此研究發現跨國的開放性共創網絡以設計師為創意倡議主導，而兩國的政府、大學及產業在授權創新榜樣的過程中扮演著重要的推廣角色。基於本研究的發現，本研究也提出對創意仲介者，如TDDP，及大學的創意基地，如C-Hub等的經營建議。

    This research looks into a group of Dutch designers who had worked on their creative projects in Taiwan facillitated via Taiwan Dutch Design Post (TDDP). TDDP cooperated with C-Hub, a creative space building that is owned by National Cheng Kung University (NCKU) located in Tainan City, Taiwan. Based on the concepts of agent, this thesis investigated the open system production creative network across two countries, Netherland and Taiwan. The researcher conducted in-depth interview with 5 designers partnering with TDDP. There were three main research objectives: 1) The designers’ roles as resources, and their collaboration’s pattern in the open system production network; 2) their creative production phases and the evaluation; 3) their career stage and Taiwan’s project benefit to their career’s stage.
    First, this study finds five agent roles that were unique to these cross-national creative projects. They were the experimenting promotor, the catalyst promotor, the feedback – boost promotor, the accomodation promotor, and the property promotor. Second, This study finds that designers as innovation champions were in the center of the cross-national open production systme, and the governments, universities, and industries in both countries played critical promotor roles in enabling innovation champion’s work process. Additionally, managerial implications for social agent, such as TDDP, and university based role, such as C-Hub, are also discussed.

    摘要 I ABSTRACT II ACKNOWLEDGMENT III TABLE OF CONTENTS V LIST OF TABLES VIII LIST OF FIGURES IX 1 CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Research Background 1 1.2 Research Motivation 8 1.3 Research Objectives and Questions 9 2 CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW 11 2.1 Innovation Agent 11 2.1.1 Innovation Champions: Going Extraordinary 12 2.1.2 Promotor Theories 13 2.2 Roles Enactment 16 2.3 The Open System of Production 17 2.4 Creative Production Process 18 2.4.1 Phase 1: ‘Understand’ 19 2.4.2 Phase 2: ‘Create’ 19 2.4.3 Phase 3: ‘Expand’ 20 2.4.4 Phase 4: ‘Evaluate’ 20 2.5 Designer’s Career Stages 20 3 CHAPTER THREE RESEARCH METHODS 23 3.1 Research Process 23 3.2 Methodology 23 3.2.1 Guided in-depth Interview 23 3.2.2 Data Collection 27 3.3 Case Selection and Data Analysis Method 28 3.3.1 Criteria of Projects Selection 28 3.3.2 Data Analysis Method 30 4 CHAPTER FOUR FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS 32 4.1 Human and Institution Agents of Innovation 32 4.1.1 Identified Champion and Promotors in Taiwan Dutch Design Post Context 32 4.1.2 Global Open System Production Network 46 4.1.3 Discussion 60 4.2 Designer’s Creative Production Process 62 4.2.1 Phase 1: Understand 63 4.2.2 Phase 2: Create 65 4.2.3 Phase 3: Expand 66 4.2.4 Phase 4: Evaluate 67 4.2.5 Discussion 68 4.3 Designer’s Career Stage 69 4.3.1 Maturity 69 4.3.2 Decline 72 4.3.3 Discussion 73 4.4 Conclusion and General Discussion 73 5 CHAPTER FIVE CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION 77 5.1 Conclusion and Discussion 77 5.1.1 Innovation Champion and Promotors’ Role in Taiwan Dutch Design Post Context 77 5.1.2 Designer’s Creative Production Process and Evaluation Part 79 5.1.3 Designer’s Career Stage and Taiwan Project’s Benefit 80 5.2 Theoretical and Managerial Implication 81 5.2.1 Theoretical Implication 81 5.2.2 Managerial Implication 84 5.3 Limitations of the Study 86 REFERENCES 87

    Ashenfelter, O. (1989). How auctions work for wine and art. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3(3), 23-36.
    Baker, W. E., & Faulkner, R. R. (1991). Role as resource in the Hollywood film industry. American Journal of Sociology, 97(2), 279-309.
    Bankins, S., Denness, B., Kriz, A., & Molloy, C. (2017). Innovation agents in the public sector: Applying champion and promotor theory to explore innovation in the Australian Public Service. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 76(1), 122-137.
    Battani, M. (1999). Organizational fields, cultural fields and art worlds: The early effort to make photographs and make photographers in the 19th-century United States of America. Media, Culture & Society, 21(5), 601-626.
    Baycan Levent, T., Fusco Girard, L., & Nijkamp, P. (2011). Sustainable city and creativity: Ashgate Publishing, Surrey, UK.
    Boud, D. (2001). Making the move to peer learning. Peer learning in higher education: Learning from and with each other, 1-21.
    Budge, K., Beale, C., & Lynas, E. (2013). A chaotic intervention: Creativity and peer learning in design education. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 32(2), 146-156.
    Bueren, B. v. (2017). Portfolio Taiwan Dutch Design Post. from Taiwan Dutch Design Post
    Bueren, B. v., & Goh, Y.-S. (2016). Internationalizing SMEs in Creative Industries via Triple Helix Strategy. International Journal of Cultural and Creative Industries, 3(2), 44-53.
    Crane, D. (1992). The Production of Culture: Media and the Urban Arts (Foundations of Popular Culture): Sage Publications.
    Currid, E. (2008). The Warhol economy: How fashion, art, and music drive New York City: Princeton University Press.
    Davey, G. (2013). MA Forrester (Ed.), Doing Qualitative Research in Psychology: A Practical Guide: (2010). London, UK: Sage: Taylor & Francis.
    Dineen, R., & Collins, E. (2005). Killing the goose: Conflicts between pedagogy and politics in the delivery of a creative education. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 24(1), 43-52.
    Fine, G. A. (2003). Crafting authenticity: The validation of identity in self-taught art. Theory and Society, 32(2), 153-180.
    Florida, R. (2004). The rise of the creative class and how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life (Paperback Ed.): New York: Basic Books.
    Giddens, A. (1979). Agency, structure Central problems in social theory (pp. 49-95): Springer.
    Ginsburgh, V. A., & Throsby, D. (2006). Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture (Vol. 1): Elsevier.
    Hauge, A., & Hracs, B. J. (2010). See the sound, hear the style: collaborative linkages between indie musicians and fashion designers in local scenes. Industry and Innovation, 17(1), 113-129.
    Kang, L. (2016). Social design as a creative device in developing Countries: The case of a handcraft pottery community in Cambodia. International Journal of Design, 10(3), 65-74.
    Kourtit, K., Möhlmann, J., Nijkamp, P., & Rouwendal, J. (2012). The geography of creative industries and cultural heritage. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development.
    Kourtit, K., & Nijkamp, P. (2012). Creative firms as change agents in creative spaces. Quaestiones Geographicae, 31(4), 19-31.
    Lamont, M., & Fournier, M. (1992). Cultivating differences: Symbolic boundaries and the making of inequality: University of Chicago Press.
    Lena, J. C. (2004). Meaning and membership: samples in rap music, 1979–1995. Poetics, 32(3-4), 297-310.
    Lopes, P. D. (1992). Innovation and diversity in the popular music industry, 1969 to 1990. American sociological review, 56-71.
    Mack, N., Woodsong, C., MacQueen, K. M., Guest, G., & Namey, E. (2005). Qualitative research methods: a data collectors field guide.
    Markusen, A., & Gadwa, A. (2010). Arts and culture in urban or regional planning: A review and research agenda. Journal of planning education and research, 29(3), 379-391.
    Marx, K. (1978). The eighteenth brumaire of Louis Bonaparte (Vol. 11): Foreign Languages Press Peking.
    Massey, D. (1995). Spatial divisions of labour: social structures and the geography of production: Macmillan International Higher Education.
    Mc Glashan, A. (2011). Designer stories: A commentary on the community of design practice. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 21(2), 235-260.
    Mo, A. (2012). Why put ‘class’ in the creative class? Quaestiones Geographicae, 31(4), 9-17.
    Moss, L. (2002). Sheffield's cultural industries quarter 20 years on: What can be learned from a pioneering example? International Journal of Cultural Policy, 8(2), 211-219.
    Peck, J. (2011). Creative moments. Working Culture, through Municipal socialism and Neoliberal Urbanism Mobile Urbanism. Cities and Policymaking in the global age, 41-70.
    Peterson, R. A., & Anand, N. (2004). The production of culture perspective. Annu. Rev. Sociol., 30, 311-334.
    R⊘ yseng, S. (2010). Pierre Bourdieu, The field of cultural production: essays on art and literature. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 16(1), 68-69.
    Rost, K., Hölzle, K., & Gemünden, H.-G. (2007). Promotors or champions? Pros and cons of role specialisation for economic process. Schmalenbach Business Review, 59(4), 340-363.
    Ryan, F., Coughlan, M., & Cronin, P. (2009). Interviewing in qualitative research: The one-to-one interview. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 16(6), 309-314.
    Smith, J., & Osborn, M. (2007). Interpretative phenomenoligical analysis (pp. 53–80). Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to methods. London: Sage Publications.
    Urry, J. (1981). Localities, regions and social class. International journal of urban and regional research, 5(4), 455-473.
    Verboord, M., & Noord, S. v. (2016). The online place of popular music: Exploring the impact of geography and social media on pop artists’ mainstream media attention. Popular Communication, 14(2), 59-72.
    Vettese, A. (1998). Artisti si diventa (Vol. 34): Carocci.
    Xianwei, G., Samuel, M., & Asmawi, A. (2016). Qzone Weblog for Critical Peer Feedback to Improve Business English Writing: A Case of Chinese Undergraduates. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 15(3), 131-140.
    Zorloni, A. (2013). The economics of contemporary art (Vol. 60): Springer.
    Zou, Y. (2017). Exploring the The Lifestyle of Creative Class and Their Interaction with Public Spaces: A Perspective from Designers in Taipei. (Master), National Cheng Kung University, Tainan.

    下載圖示 校內：2023-08-06公開
    校外：2023-08-06公開
    QR CODE