簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 王宣賀
Wang, Hsuan-Ho
論文名稱: 愛氏震度與地震引致邊坡位移之關係研究
A Study on the Relationship between Arias Intensity and Earthquake-induced Slope Displacement
指導教授: 洪瀞
Hung, Ching
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 工學院 - 土木工程學系
Department of Civil Engineering
論文出版年: 2018
畢業學年度: 106
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 66
中文關鍵詞: 地震引致山崩愛式震度有限元素分析
外文關鍵詞: Earthquake-induced landslide, Arias Intensity, Finite element analysis
相關次數: 點閱:97下載:6
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 地震引致之山崩為災害性之危害。一個可以減輕山崩危害,使我們對地震引致之位移的方法是十分關鍵的。以能量為基礎的愛氏震度Arias Intensity被認為是地震引致之邊坡穩定分析中十分可靠的方法。有限元素分析被視為實用以及有效的工具來研究邊坡的動態過程。本研究使用一系列的地震加速度紀錄,並透過數值模擬來研究愛氏震度與地震引致之位移的關係。動態過程中的位移被檢驗,愛氏震度與邊坡位移的關係透過考慮不同角度的邊坡(20 o,30 o, 及 45o)呈現。草嶺山崩模型以及阿蘇橋山崩模型在本研究中被當作應用模型。
    本研究結果顯示,愛氏震度的範圍大小以及塑性流動法則對於愛氏震度以及地震引致之邊坡位移的關係有所影響,而邊坡的角度則沒有明顯影響。愛氏震度的範圍在使用任何已發表的經驗關係式時,是需要被考慮的。而在進行相關數值模擬時,塑性流動法則的影響也是需要注意的。
    本研究希望提供愛氏震度與地震引致之位移之關係式使用上更進一步的了解,也希望提供在未來使用這些經驗關係式時有更深入的見解。

    Earthquake-induced landslides are damaging hazards. A way to mitigate landslide damage, having a better understanding of slope movements induced by earthquakes is pivotal. The energy-based Arias Intensity has been recognized as a useful measure in earthquake-induced slope stability. Finite element analysis has been a practical and effective tool to analyze the dynamic process of landslides. The study utilized a series of seismic records and performed numerical simulations to study the relationship between Arias Intensity and earthquake-induced slope displacement. The displacements in the dynamic process were examined and the relationships between Arias Intensity and displacements of slopes, considering different angles of slopes (20 o, 30 o, and 45o), are presented. The Tsaoling model and Aso-bridge model were utilized as verification models. The results indicated that the range of the Arias Intensity and the plastic flow rule have influences on the relationships between Arias Intensity and normalized earthquake-induced slope displacement, while the angles of slopes show little effect. The range of the Arias Intensity should be considered in any usage of published empirical relationships. The plastic flow rule should be taken into account when conducting simulations. This study aims to provide better understanding in the relationships between Arias Intensity and earthquake-induced slope displacement and hopes to provide insight for any further usages of empirical relationships.

    摘要 I Abstract II 誌謝 III TABLE OF CONTENTS IV LIST OF TABLES VI LIST OF FIGURES VII Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1-1 Background and Motivation 1 1-2 Methods and Procedure 2 1-3 Research Framework 4 Chapter 2 Literature Review 5 2-1 Selection of Seismic Shaking Parameter 5 2-2 Studies of Earthquake-induced Landslides 9 2-3 Types of Landslides 14 2-4 Studies on Plastic Flow Rules 17 Chapter 3 Analysis Methodology 18 3-1 Introduction 18 3-2 Finite Element Analysis – Plaxis 18 3-2-1 Basic Operation 19 3-2-2 Model Properties 19 3-2-3 Landslide Models 20 3-2-4 Elements 22 3-2-5 Boundary Condition 23 3-2-6 Constitutive Model 24 3-2-7 Dynamic Analysis 28 3-2-8 Application Model 30 3-2-9 Seismic Records 32 Chapter 4 Result and Discussion 35 4-1 Introduction 35 4-2 The Effect of The Range of Arias Intensity 36 4-3 The Effect of The Angle of Slopes 45 4-4 The Effect of Plastic Flow Rule 49 Chapter 5 Conclusions 54 5-1 Overall Conclusions 54 5-2 Recommendations 55 Reference 56 Appendix A 61 Appendix B 63 Appendix C 65

    1. Abdrakhmatov, K., Havenith, H.B., Delvaux, D., Jongmans, D., and Trefois, P. (2003). “Probabilistic PGA and Arias Intensity maps of Kyrgyzstan (Central Asia),” Journal of Seismology, 7, p 203-220.
    2. Ambraseys, N.N. (1974) “Notes on engineering seismology,” Engineering Seismology and Earthquake Engineering, p 33-54.
    3. Arias, A. (1970). “A measure of earthquake intensity,” Hansen, R.J. (Ed.), Seismic Design for Nuclear Power Plants. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Cambridge, MA, p 438–483.
    4. Bozzano, F., Esposito, E., Lenti, L., Martion, S., Montagna, A., Paciello, A., and Porfido, S. (2010). “Numerical modelling of earthquake-induced rock landslides: The 1783 Scilla Case-history (Southern Italy),” Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics.
    5. Campbell, K.W., and Bozorgnia, Y. (2003). “Updated Near-Source Ground-Motion (Attenuation) Relations for the Horizontal and Vertical Components of Peak Ground Acceleration and Acceleration Response Spectra,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 93(1), p 314-331.
    6. Chousianitis, K., Gaudio, V.D., Kalogeras, I., and Ganas, A. (2014). “Predictive model of Arias intensity and Newmark displacement for regional scale evaluation of earthquake-induced landslide hazard in Greece,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 65, p11-29.
    7. Egan, J.A., and Rosidi, D. (1991). “Assessment of Earthquake-Induced Liquefaction Using Ground-Motion Energy Characteristics,” Pacific Conference on Earthquake Engineering, p 313-324.
    8. Everden, J.F. (1975) “Seismic intensities, "size" of earthquakes, and related phenomena,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 65, p 1287-1315.
    9. Goodman, R.E., and Seed, H.B. (1966). “Earthquake–induced displacements in sand embankments,” Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, 92(2), p 125–146.
    10. Harp, E.L., and Wilson, R.C. (1995). “Shaking Intensity Thresholds for Rock Falls and Slides: Evidence from 1987 Whittier Narrows and Superstition Hills Earthquake Strong-Motion Records,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 85(6), p 1739-1757.
    11. Housner, G.W. (1965) “Intensity of earthquake ground shaking near the causative fault,” Proceedings of the Third World Congress of Earthquake Engineering, 1, p 94-111.
    12. Hung, C., Lin, G.W., Syu, H.S., Chen, C.W., and Yen, H.Y. (2017). “Analysis of the Aso-bridge landslide during the 2016 Kumamoto earthquakes in Japan,” Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2017, p 1-11.
    13. Hung, C., Liu, C.H., Lin, G.W., and Leshchinsky, B. (2018). “The Aso-Bridge coseismic landslide: a numerical investigation using finite and discrete element methods,” Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment.
    14. Hsieh, S.Y., and Lee, C.T. (2011). “Empirical estimation of the Newmark displacement from the Arias intensity and critical acceleration,” Engineering Geology, 122, p 34-42.
    15. Hwang, G., Lin, C.K., Yeh, Y.T., Cheng, S.N., and Chen, K.C. (2004). “Attenuation relations of Arias intensity based on the Chi-Chi Taiwan earthquake data,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 24(2004), p 509-517.
    16. Jibson, R. (1993). “Predicting earthquake-induced landslide displacement using Newmark’s sliding block analysis,” Transportation Research Record, 1411, p 9-17.
    17. Joyner, W.B., and Boore, D.M. (1981). “ Peak horizontal acceleration and velocity from strong motion records including records from the 1979 Imperial Valley, California, earthquake,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 71(6), p 2011-2038.
    18. Kayen, R.E., and Mitchell, J.K. (1997). “Assessment of Liquefaction Potential During Earthquakes by Arias Intensity,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 123(12), p 1162-1174.
    19. Kramer, S.L., and Mitchell, R.A. (2006). “Ground measures for liquefaction hazard evaluation,” Earthquake Spectra, 22(2), p 413-438.
    20. Lin, G.W., Hung, C., and Syu, H.S. (2017). “Evaluation of an enhanced FS method for finding the initiation time of earthquake-induced landslides,” Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2017, p 1-9.
    21. Lo, C.M., Lin, M.L., Tang, C.L., Hu, J.C. (2011). “A kinematic model of the Hsiaolin landslide calibrated to the morphology of the landslide deposit,” Engineering Geology, 123, p 22-39.
    22. Melentijevic, S., Serrano, A., Ollalla, C., and Galindo, R.A. (2017) “Incorporation of non-associative flow rules into rock slope stability analysis,” International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 96, p47-57.
    23. Newmark, N.M. (1965). “Effects of earthquakes on dams and embankments,” Geotechnique, 15(1965), p 139-159.
    24. Pela´ez. J.A., Delgado, J., Casado, C.L. (2005). “A preliminary probabilistic seismic hazard assessment in terms of Arias intensity in southeastern Spain,” Engineering Geology, 77, p 139-151.
    25. PLAXIS. (2015). Reference and Material Models Manual. Plaxis bv, Netherlands.
    26. Rajabi, A.M., Khamehchiyan, M., Mahdavifar, M.R., and Gaudio, V.D. (2009). “Attenuation relation of Arias intensity for Zagros Mountains region (Iran),” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 30(3), p 110-118.
    27. Ravichandran, K., and Arulchelvan, S. (2017). “The Curve Fitting Model Analyzed the Survey of Crime News Awareness in India,” 2017 Second International Conference on Recent Trends and Challenges in Computational Models, p 191-195.
    28. Romeo, R. (2000). “Seismically induced landslide displacements: a predictive model,” Engineering Geology, 58(3), p 337-351.
    29. Schnabel, P.B., and Seed H.B. (1973). “Accelerations in Rock for Earthquakes in the Western United States,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 63(2), p 501-516.
    30. Seed, H.B., Tokimatsu, K., Harder, L.F., and Chung, R.M. (1985). “Influence of SPT procedures in soil liquefaction resistance evaluations,” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 111(12), p 1425-1445.
    31. Sluys, L.J. (1992). “Wave Propagation, Localisation and Dispersion in Softening Solids.”
    32. Stafford, P.J., and Berrill, J.B. (2009). “New predictive equations for Arias intensity from crustal earthquakes in New Zealand,” Journal of Seismology, p31-52.
    33. Syu, H.S. (2017). “Earthquake-Induced Landslide: Analysis of the Initiation-Time and Failure Surfaces,” Department of Civil Engineering, National Cheng Kung University.
    34. Travasarou, T., Bray, J.D., and Abrhamson, N.A. (2003). “Empirical attenuation relationship for Arias Intensity,” Earthquake engineering and structural dynamics, 32, p 1133-1155.
    35. Takizawa, H., and Jennings, P.C. (1980) “Collapse of a model for ductile reinforced concrete frames under extreme earthquake motions,” Earthquake engineering and structural dynamics, 8, p 117-144.
    36. Terzaghi, K. (1950). “Mechanisms of Landslides,” Geotechnical Society of America, 1950, p 83-125.
    37. USGS. (2004). “Landslide Types and Processes.”
    38. Wilson, R.C., and Keefer, D.K. (1983). “Dynamic Analysis of a Slope Failure from the 6 August 1979 Coyote Lake, California, Earthquake,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 73(3), p 863-877.
    39. Wilson, R.C., and Keefer, D.K. (1985). “Predicting areal limits of earthquake-induced landsliding,” Professional Paper 1360, U.S. Geological Survey, 1985, p 316-345.
    40. Wilson, R.C. (1993). “Relation of Arias Intensity to magnitude and distance in California,” U.S. Department of the interior U.S. geological survey.
    41. Yule, D.E., Matheu, E.E., and Beaty, M.H. (2004). “Duration parameters for the selection of ground motion time histories for non linear analysis of embankment dams,” 36th Joint Meeting U.S-Japan Panel Wind and Seismic Effects.
    42. Zhou, J. W., Cui, P., and Yang, X. G. (2013). “Dynamic Process Analysis for the Initiation and Movement of the Donghekou Landslide-Debris Flow Triggered by the Wenchuan Earthquake,” Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 76, p 70-84.

    下載圖示 校內:2021-06-30公開
    校外:2021-06-30公開
    QR CODE